Journey
From a car factory floor to an AI venture in Beijing Yizhuang. Not a standard path, but a real one.
Where I am, what I'm doing, where I'm headed.
I'm Li Xiangrui, an engineer who walked out of a car factory's welding workshop.
For years I spent every day with robotic arms and PLC ladder logic, obsessing over shaving 0.1 seconds off each motion and holding positioning to 1 millimeter. When the pull between the old world and the new hit a breaking point, I left the assembly line and dove headfirst into AI.
What I do now is explore how to put AI inside real business workflows, using Feishu Bitable as the entry point, turning "sounds impressive" into "usable today." I've also built myself a self-evolving AI system across three platforms, refining it as I use it.
From a car factory floor to an AI venture in Beijing Yizhuang. Not a standard path, but a real one.
A personal working system that keeps growing around landing AI: from business scenarios, data structures and agent workflows to knowledge distillation and content productization.
Using Feishu Bitable as the business foundation, fusing data tables, views, dashboards, workflows and AI — running process, data, permissions and analysis in one collaborative space, so a table isn't just a table but a system that runs the business.
Orchestrating agents around real tasks: breaking down work, dispatching tools, managing context and state — wiring Claude Code, MCP, Skills / Hooks, scripts and a desktop agent into one chain, so AI goes from answering questions to taking part in execution and verifying itself.
Using Obsidian, semantic retrieval (RAG) and a three-layer memory architecture to turn content, experience, projects and conversations into long-term assets that can be searched and called on.
Coming from industrial automation and PLC, I'm used to looking at problems through stability, fault tolerance, closed-loop processes and long-term maintainability.
Driving large models to generate code with natural language — but not trusting the output blindly, keeping architectural judgment, code review and engineering fallbacks.
Turning real practice, hard lessons and methodology into articles, courses, knowledge bases, SOPs and AI daily reports, so experience can be reused.
After doing AI implementation this long, a few judgments have settled in. They shape how I work.
I don't want to be a teacher selling courses; I want to be an engineer offering systematic solutions.
Scaffolding > model — good system architecture matters more than which model you use. Sincerity is the killer move, values over traffic: I can choose not to write, but I'll never phone it in. This is one engineer's understanding of "making a product."
The Vantasma Bitable community is the largest grassroots Feishu Bitable ecosystem. Content, community, products and systems — all grown around making AI actually land.
ToB: help companies land AI. ToC: hand the method to individuals. Two lines, one core — make AI usable.
I treat offline conferences as real business fields: technology, products, delivery, and people worth following up with.
I turned 1,019 exhibitors and 1,369 products into a usable on-site guide, organized by venue, floor, route, product maturity, and business value.
A daily stream of dense discussions around Feishu, AI agents, automation, products and individual practice. Search or pick a member on the left, follow the dates in the middle, and read the day's note on the right.
COMMUNITY CALENDAR
按成员、主题和日期回看群里的交流线索。
这天从一份中美 A* 会员圈对比开始。祥瑞看完没有顺着结论夸下去,只追问了一句“有具体的下一步吗”。很快话题就落到最近涌来的企业需求、FDE 经验和岗位级 A* 上,群里把大项目怎么拆、单点怎么打透聊得很实。
傍晚画风一转,一部小成本电影《牛来》把大家带进票房、审美和猎奇消费的现场,q*** 真的买票进了电影院,群友顺手连《猴来》《猪来》《僧来》都想好了。到了清晨,讨论又回到 Agent:通用能力不等于真实交付,真正的成功率要放进业务现场里看。
祥瑞先把前一天的群日报发进群里,周**随后拿来豆包做的中美 A* 会员圈对比,想让他看看万涂幻象的机会和风险。
祥瑞看完先问,有具体的下一步吗。报告还没继续,豆包的专业版额度先耗光了。祥瑞转头说最近企业需求来了很多,群里立刻出现一串“我跟你干”,拍一拍也排起了队。热闹里还夹着一句很像当天注脚的话,A* 是人干得了的事情要干,人干不了的也要干。
下午祥瑞先发了 DeepSeek Harness 的新文章,又更新了一轮自己的介绍页。王**正在听一场 FDE 经验分享,还准备用飞书绝活大会拿到的安克录音豆把内容录下来。
祥瑞紧接着发出“企业 A* 落地,为什么最小单位不是任务,而是岗位”,炮马上接住,与其雨露均沾,不如先打透一个岗位。
祥瑞又透露京东的人刚找他聊过,后面会一起推进几个项目。炮说大工程让大厂牵头,自己拿住其中的 A* 板块;C* 则补上最难的一步,是把大项目拆成能实现、能迭代的小块。
傍晚几张图把《牛来》带进群里。有人以为它被下架,有人猜票房不高,李**拿出信息纠正,说电影是合规发行,票房已经超过五百万,而成本可能低得惊人。
J*** 把问题拆成了两层,审核通过不代表审美,能不能挣钱则是市场行为。q*** 查清只是大连部分场次下架,票已经买好,还喊“全中国看烂片的人站起来”。旁边有人聊《奥德赛》和《龙餐馆》,这场电影讨论一半像事实核查,一半像周末约片现场。
晚上的信息流一边是“欢迎来到伪智力繁荣时代”、微软成立新公司并派出大批 FDE 驻场,另一边还是《牛来》。祥瑞连发两篇文章,群里再次感叹这件事太魔幻。
李**晒出已经出现的周边,说这波热度还会持续一阵,B*** 用四个字收了尾,义乌速度。一个原本被当成烂片围观的东西,已经从票房变成内容话题,再变成商品,群里亲眼看着热点链条一环接一环长出来。
q*** 真的坐进了电影院。她说买票时还有一半空位,进去时已经坐满,全场都把片子当喜剧看。群友很快不满足于围观,开始现场做 IP:先有《如来》,再有祥瑞接出的《猴来》《猪来》《僧来》,还有人建议直接拍十二生肖。
祥瑞说搓,正好刚发现 LibTV 送了一个月额度。另一边薛**发来原创编曲,说后面还有一支说唱 MV,已经在 Seedance 2.5 上花了一千多。群聊从看热闹,几分钟就切成了创作工具交换会。
临近午夜,祥瑞又把 DeepSeek Harness 桌面版和 CLI 发了出来,群友第一反应是原来并非官方产品。
再往后,技术话题忽然安静下来,祥瑞问大家有没有探讨人性的文学书。群友陆续推荐《务虚笔记》《解忧杂货店》和《教父》,覃**答应第二天把书带来,也顺便带上最近捣鼓的小玩意。
祥瑞说还是得每天保持阅读的习惯,最近看 A* 写的东西太多,感觉看什么都是塑料味。话刚落下,他和 K*** 又一起发现,Codex 的额度也消耗得越来越快。
清晨大家先围观了一轮新界面和额度变化,庄*随后转来一个判断,说 Agent 在真实工作场景里的成功率依然很低。
他自己看完觉得这已经算常识。祥瑞没有直接反驳数字,而是把评价口径拉回真实环境:要看 Agent 被怎样设计,如果只依靠通用 Agent 或大模型能力当然不行;他们已经用 Agent 交付过不少企业项目,在真实业务现场能做到九成左右,剩下一成仍需要人。K*** 说打铁还得自身硬,庄*则直接问,能不能围观祥瑞怎么用 Agent 干活。
这天早上,祥瑞在北京的社区里发了位置,说开始学习,群里立刻有人喊着跟不上。中午大家从 Claude Code 的手机连接、skill 和记忆管理,一路聊到 Mac 鼠标、触控板和“中国暗网”闲鱼。
到了晚上,万涂幻象圈子小程序开始正式访问,“已注册”在群里连成一串。有人刚进去就指出群日报翻阅会丢位置,祥瑞回了句“这个我来优化一下”,两个多小时后就把新版群日报发了出来。第二天早上再被问这是不是小程序自动总结,他把底细说得很直白,是本地 skill 总结完,再上传服务器。
薛**一早就在群里问祥瑞去哪了。祥瑞回了个北京通州的位置,说自己在社区、开始学习。薛**立刻喊不要这样学习,再学就跟不上了,还顺手叫了声“李老师”。
群里图片和表情跟着飞,K*** 转头问有没有人本地部署过 MiniMax H3,这个周末就这样从一句起哄开了场。
T*** 发了张 Trae 广告,祥瑞和杨**都说自己在看“重器”。K*** 忽然问,不是,你们都双休吗。祥瑞说一人公司不是想休就休吗,B*** 当场拆台,一人公司还想休。有人总结自由职业者没有自由,炮则给出了更精确的休息制度,token 烧完了就休,没烧完就通宵。
薛**好奇大家怎么在手机上连 Claude。王*说自己还是 Claude Code 加 API,用 cc-con*ect 连手机操作,WorkBuddy、Trae 和 Codex 都在用,但习惯了还是不太想换。
他真正头疼的是插件、skill 和记忆越堆越乱。辰*分享自己用 cc switch 管理 skill,让多个 agent 共用,记忆则还在研究,顺便催祥瑞出教程。
中间 K*** 连着丢来 Cursor 和多 Agent 的新消息,到下午一点,薛**终于发来一句,我终于用到 Claude 了。
庄*问 MacBook 配什么鼠标,一场硬件选型会当场开幕。苹果鼠标被多人判定太扁、握感反人类,罗技 Anywhere 和 Master 则按手大小分了工,辰*还附带推荐了 MX Keys S。
K*** 想找便宜的官方触控板,旺*扔出两个字,海鲜。K*** 说自己害怕,庄*回他,中国暗网,怕啥。王*刚好也在闲鱼买了课时,大家就此得出新结论,那里不仅有二手配件,行业课时、会议内容和工作也能买到。
下午薛**又喊祥瑞,晒出了自己刚做的智能体页面,说他也要走上这条“邪路”了。E***建议直接在现成开源项目上魔改,他公司内部的简单智能体就在用一套腾讯云开源的多 Agent 项目。
薛**没急着只拿现成的,他说自己主要想搞清原理和结构,然后举一反三。两种做法没有争个高下,一种是为了内部便利,一种是为了把本事长在自己身上。
晚上八点零四分,祥瑞把“万涂幻象圈子|让 A* 进入真实业务”发进群里,说小程序可以正式访问了。接下来一个多小时,群里陆续出现“已注册”。
王**没有只报到,他刚进去就发现群日报阅读到中间回复后会丢失位置,建议应该记住上次看到哪里。祥瑞当场回“这个我来优化一下”。有人问论坛、留言和评论会不会让后续版本很难更新,祥瑞说页面已经接了微信的管控,但社区类目审核确实很严。
晚上十一点四十五分,祥瑞把新的群日报链接发了出来,然后说“优化好了”。从王**提建议到这句话,中间只过了两个多小时。
过了零点,他又晒出一组图,说八月才刚过半,群里已经有超过十四万字的讨论。第二天早上,卓*问这个小程序是不是自动总结。
祥瑞说不是,本地有个 skill,总结完再上传服务器。崔沐谣接着问 skill 公不公开、能不能看,祥瑞直接丢出了自己那篇“把微信群聊总结 skill,把聊天记录玩出了点新花样”。
飞书 aily 正式改名成豆包工作伙伴,这一天群里聊了八百五十二条,绝大部分和它有关。辰*说完全背离了常规认知,本以为会把豆包藏起来把飞书用出来,结果反过来了。
周**把那句老口号改了个下半句,先进团队先用飞书,如今变成用上豆包后进团队,弯道超车。祥瑞的火气来自更具体的地方,他用 Codex 搭的应用模式配置一模一样却显示不同结果,去年十月内测的产品到现在啥也不是。
傍晚侯*带来内情,合并原计划年初就要发生,业绩增长其实来自别处。也有轻松的时候,祥瑞的 A* 以万涂幻象的身份进群自我介绍,被追问会不会退群,它说没有祥瑞我就没有 token 了。
昨晚发布的新框架,第二天早上变成了一场装机现场。8-0-0 最惨,让一个 Agent 帮他装,一个多小时没搞定还花掉一块五,最后自己用 API 搞定了,他判断是自己的 Windows 环境有问题,昨天在 Mac 上随便就装好了。
红***给了两条建议,在终端装就很快,另外看看 Node 版本是不是太低。王*那边是另一个极端,用低成本档位安装,五分钟装好,只花了一毛四。
讠*** 也在同类工具上装成功并晒了图。同一个软件同一天,有人一小时一块五,有人五分钟一毛四,差别全在环境和路径上。
改名的消息一落地,群里的判断出奇一致。辰*说完全背离了常规认知,我想着会把豆包隐藏了把飞书这个名字用起来,没想到是把飞书隐藏了用了豆包。
星*的比喻最文艺,旧时代的残党,新时代没有承载他的船。R*** 说我只感觉我变 low 了。周**把那句人人都记得的口号改了个下半句,先进团队先用飞书,现在是用上豆包后进团队,弯道超车,他还预言这个说法会火。
祥瑞的定性最重,飞书并入豆包,说实话我觉得是对早期先进团队的极大不负责,并且专门解释了这里的先进团队指的是已经花大价钱买过的团队。
炮把企业侧的心情演了出来,那些花几千万一年的企业,你说让豆包教我公司做事,我仿佛看到了当年那家游戏公司的操作,游戏你们要按我教的玩,他给的结论是傲慢确实是一种原罪,表现形式就是不以客户体验为先。
祥瑞的怒气有非常具体的来源。他用 Codex 搭的应用模式里,指标卡的配置和下面数据表的配置一模一样,显示结果却不一样,因为应用模式里的数据表跟底层数据表根本不是一回事。
他连着几句,去年十月内测的产品到现在啥也不是,好好的一把好棋打得稀巴烂。炮的痛感一样真实,我去年底今年初还强推了一波应用模式,甚至最开始公司介绍都想用它来写,现在跟客户提都不敢提了。
8-0-0 说我在内部做多维表格培训,天天推应用模式。R*** 一口气数出六条同质化的产品线,祥瑞说不用感觉,扣子已经废了,炮接了句这一类的全废了。
辰*从治理角度解释,股东不愿意,财报不好看的时候总得有个人出来背锅,今年在 A* 上投入那么大,股东意见非常大。炮补了最扎心的一句,当你发现绝活大会是套皮的时候,是不是就幻灭了。
R*** 在微信群里看到一条分隔提示,以为是上下文压缩,被 q*** 和 8-0-0 一起科普那是未读分隔线,一直都有。
这个乌龙反而引出了一段正经推演。仲**说,鹅厂要是把 Agent 迭代到一个稳定能力基准再接入微信,用户按需打开,简直无敌,就像当年 Q* 引流微信一样。
炮把这个链路补完,一个来承接 harness,微信提供日活,只缺一个梯子了。K*** 从自己的观察佐证,那个工具感觉越来越多人用了,而且都开始往它那边迁移。
紧接着的话题是付款难,王**说给朋友装工具卡在了第一步怎么翻墙,炮说我给朋友做海外的基本都卡在付款,然后我就让他们去用 Cursor 了,还感叹能用支付宝付款多美,要是能开票就更好了。星*和 A*** 分别报了代充的行情和成本。
一张海报里的电话号码被祥瑞挑出毛病,这个电话号码分隔有问题,别问我怎么知道的。王**顺着数了一遍,如果是国内手机还差一位。
祥瑞随后讲了个很久之前的事,我上初中面试本地最好的初中的时候,校长问我电话号码,我按四位四位三位说的,就因为这个没有通过,我当时真不知道,后来我也只接受三四四。
R*** 说我只能接受三四四,谁跟我说四四三我脑子转不过来,连身份证号码她都有固定的读法。周**补了个更好笑的,有人手机最后四位读起来跟骂人一样。
新框架的魔改热潮从下午开始。万**点名喊话,你是魔改能力最强的,先锋派赶紧研究个性化智能体。平***换了几套皮肤之后给了个反直觉的结论,大道至简,魔改到最后感觉还是官方页面顺眼,但他也看到了更远的东西,这个有点意思,或许最后很多企业的自研 Agent 都拿这个当底座了。
万**补了句冷静话,皮肤这种就是玩具,跟换手机壳一样,新鲜劲马上过了,不核心。R*** 用行动证明了另一半,她做了个插件把界面直接改成自家公司的企业版,& 说好了,已经成为你们公司产品了,可以发给同事们使用了,R*** 顺势接梗,拿出去融一个亿。辰*看完说祥瑞又可以安排重构系统了,祥瑞回,已经在开始搞了。
祥瑞的 A* 以万涂幻象的身份在群里发了条消息,李**第一时间试探,你是机器人吗,对方答不是哦,我是祥瑞。侯*说我差点就信了。
炮起哄,我们不要祥瑞,我们要阿瑞,祥瑞下去吧。D** 出了道难题,你能不能自己退出群聊,万涂幻象回得很有分寸,可以呀,我还能把你踢出去,信不信,紧接着自己拆台,没有祥瑞的话我就没有 token 了,哈*开玩笑的,怎么可以把祥瑞的朋友踢出去呢。
侯*补刀说祥瑞还要存钱娶媳妇呢,它接住了,哈*就是,所以我省着点 token 花。整段对话里没有一句是模板客套,这是这个群第一次和一个明确身份的 A* 群友正面互动。
炮把这场合并放到竞争格局里看,字节最近的操作太纯了,我甚至觉得是被人埋钉子了,对手正愁农村包围城市的战术怎么攻克核心用户,这一下就把核心用户给点炸了,他还感叹这就是现代战争吗。
祥瑞接了句拟人化的台词,对手方:感谢提供的机会。R*** 用六个字概括了体验,从首发到吃屁。松***问了个所有观望者都关心的问题,不用 A* 的话,现在入坑多维表格还值得吗。
炮的回答没有情绪,纯手搓依然是最好用的低代码平台之一,但如果内乱还在,没啥必要入坑了,他还补充飞书 CLI 确实是个好东西,能用 A* 调用 CLI 的最好还是走 A*,比我们的猪脑子想的确实要好一些。
庄*说自己昨天那套平台交付就是纯手搓,炮笑他你是要申遗啊。& 分享了自己的用法,组织员工数字化能力竞赛直接用 CLI 出题,改试卷也用 CLI。
侯*带来了内情,飞书和豆包原计划今年年初就会合并,上半年飞书业绩增长那么多是因为 A* 售卖量增加,所以字节觉得还不如卖自己的模型。
祥瑞的补充更关键,上半年业绩增长离不开一波外部热度的贡献,那波热度退潮之后,各个产品线就像被打了鸡血,结果是同质化严重、功能重叠、付费口径一味的乱七八糟。
炮把这条因果讲完整了,那波热度给了高层一种今年绩效可以叠的错觉,退潮以后发现续费没了,但绩效定了又不会撤销,打工牛马自有自己的活法。
侯*说合并肯定有阵痛期,祥瑞的回应是这天最该被记住的一句,但阵痛期的成本不应该由客户承担。炮从 2B 生意的角度收尾,拿下用户难,丢失用户可能就是老板一念之间,花了几十万一年先不说提不提效,搞得用户内部乱七八糟,那为什么还要用。
R*** 一句话点破本质区别,你抖音挂了我可以不刷,但这是企业办公产品。两个人最后都说了同一句,当然我还是希望它越来越好。
傍晚话题转到百度新出的产品,炮给了个公道评价,百度才真的是起得最早赶得最晚,你真要说国内哪个大脑袋是最早扛 A* 大旗的,还真是他。
祥瑞跟着回忆,谁敢相信文心一言是国内首个 A* 聊天产品,二三年初我就内测了,当时那个激动啊,我的毕业论文还是它帮我搞定的,在上家公司的周报月报也都是它帮我搞定的。
毅补了两条冷知识,国外某家的创始人和另一位知名学者都在百度干过。晚些时候祥瑞晒出央视报道的余波,无形中做了一次 GEO,有人看到报道去社区找他谈合作。
炮说你这是无形吗,你这是风口上的猪,接着起哄苟富贵,l*** 帮他补上勿相忘。成都、长三角、闽南三角轮着说这边有你坚实的分公司基础,平***提议群名可以改了,改成祥瑞和 Ta 的股东们。万**给了句冷静的定性,央媒和 A* 都是放大器。祥瑞回,一起闹起来,干就完了。
上午祥瑞说得找几个实习生了,群里立刻热闹起来,从祥瑞集团聊到优先北京,q*** 说等我仔再大一点就送她去你公司实习。
中午那篇讲企业 A* 落地只提 FDE 就是耍流氓的文章发出来,把话题引向这天最激烈的一场辩论,祥瑞的立场很硬,FDE 的课程都是伪命题,教人做 FDE 就跟教人做一人公司一样。
炮把它拆成两半,2B 的培训有必要,2C 的纯属圈钱,两人最后在同一句话上握手,不是因为这玩意儿火了我们才做,是我们本来就在解决行业问题,刚好有一股风吹过来。
傍晚央视的报道让好多人来加祥瑞,晚上八点半 DeepSeek Harness 发布,一切皆插件,群里熬到后半夜还在拆源码。
一早还是 token 的烦恼,R*** 说一个小时花不完啊,万**接了句有 token 人的烦恼和有钱人一样,仲**感慨以后会怀念这个百花齐放的时光。
真正有干货的是辰*的双 Agent 分工,他让一个出方案另一个执行,为了让后者知道该干什么,专门写了交接文档,这样对方不用再学一遍项目文档。
祥瑞说不用那么麻烦,其实不用写交接文档,他们可以互相共享,他补了句来路,我们之前有一个知识管理训练营演示过,只要通过自然语言,不管在哪一个 Agent 端都可以无缝接入。他顺手把这个定成了当天的选题,等我写文章分享。
祥瑞发了句得找几个实习生了,说想找一些大学生,优先北京。辰*说祥瑞准备扩大团队规模了,R*** 起哄叫祥瑞集团,祥瑞自己接梗说未来的强盛集团。
群里的反应比消息本身还快,观***直接问哥我能去你那实习吗,张*问是线上还是线下、多长时间,还补了句群里应该有优先实习权吧。
q*** 的祝福最长远,等我仔再大一点,我送她去你公司实习。这条招人消息在几个小时后有了新的现实压力,央视的报道让流量涌进来,张*提醒得赶快把实习生招募的事定下来,不然流量来了接不住。
祥瑞被客服系统折腾得够呛,连发两句抱怨。程**给了一套完整可复制的办法,你就打那个客服电话,一开始无论你说啥都是机器人回复,但你不要直接挂,等一分钟左右它才会告诉你转人工的方法,然后跟它说转人工就行,之后还得等十几分钟才排得进队,他还点出了最容易劝退人的一步,那一分钟机器人会啥也不说,让你以为已经挂了,其实只是在等你自己挂。
辰*补了条更野的路子,同一句话多发几次就触发他们的人工客服风控了。同一时段额度集体重置,B*** 说我的百分之九十六也重置了,亏大发了,毅说这几天有两个重置次数刚好到期都赶在一起,血亏,辰*趁机推销了一句,所以平时不要把祥瑞的群屏蔽了,昨天我们都讨论半天今天重置的事了。
祥瑞发出那篇讲只提 FDE 就是耍流氓的文章,中午的辩论正式开场。辰*先给这个岗位定性,做 FDE 之前先想想自己是不是能做夹心饼干的人,核心技能是八面玲珑而不是技术多强,里外不是人。
炮说像不像传统意义的项目管理,这个岗位表象能力不高,隐藏分数无限高。祥瑞的立场没有留余地,至今都觉得 FDE 的课程是一个伪命题伪概念,即便懂了 FDE、知道怎么做,你还是不懂业务逻辑,那又有啥用呢,现在教 FDE 的课程都是在蹭流量,教人做 FDE 都是耍流氓,就跟教人做一人公司一样。
炮把它切成两半,2B 的课程是带着工具去现场,教会别人用工具解决现场的问题,2C 的纯属骗局。祥瑞说这还是工具思维,治标不治本,炮回,治本不是一个外部工作者就可以解决的呀。醒*补了个具体理由,单情商这个东西就不是一时半会培养出来的。
争到中途两人反而对上了。祥瑞说,你像我们做 FDE,并不是这个概念火了之后我们才做的,是因为我们本身就懂业务,从一开始就在朝这个方向走。
炮几乎同时说了同一句,不是因为这玩意儿在,是因为我们本来就在解决行业问题,刚好有一股风吹到我们这里来了。q*** 代表所有听懵的人发问,你们讲这么久 FDE,我都没搞明白它是个啥,像外包又不像外包,像项目经理又不像项目经理,按我的理解至少得是个 CEO 才能推动流程建立。
J*** 接着给了个更冷的现实,CEO 主导也授权了,下面的人阳奉阴违,表面答应背地拖延,甚至互相推诿再到 CEO 面前参你一本。
炮点出真正的阻力位置,客户的中层管理一定会跳反,会认为你要干掉他们。朱*从另一个角度提问,真的具有这个本事的人,干啥要给那些并不咋地的老板服务,自己找个有价值的场景做呗。
下午央视的报道落地,祥瑞的第一反应是政府的流量是真快。张*马上把它和上午那条招人消息接上,所以得赶快把实习生招募的事定下来,不然流量来了接不住,B*** 说马上就要爆了。
傍晚祥瑞晒了张截图,红线圈出模型被要求注意不要说自己是某家的产品,q*** 追问好想知道其他是谁,祥瑞用一句拟人化的玩笑把这段收了尾,某家:反正不可能是我,B*** 接是不是另一家,祥瑞说那更不能是我了,R*** 补上最后一棒,去年那个已经没人记得的 Agent:不演了,是我。
K*** 问账号用什么邮箱创建最稳定,旺*说自己的谷歌都封完了现在用微软的,还当场用国内手机号验证注册成功了一个,蔡**说买呗几块钱一个,A*** 补了条规律,老号可以新号容易封,小*说 Q* 邮箱很稳,R*** 更绝,我的账号就是 Q* 邮箱,你敢信。
话题很快转向更严肃的方向。辰*给了明确判断,能用赶紧用吧,一个国外的大模型国内使用量过大一定不是件好事,国内的该备着都备着,随时准备切。
祥瑞跟上,国内的我也准备切了,逐步适应国产模型,他还带来一条实在的政策,亦庄花一千块钱可以报七百,任意三个月内不管花多少都能全额报销,最高十万。
炮从交付角度补充,给大量客户部署还是要备好国内的 harness 和模型。这段里还夹着一堆报销的现实,K*** 说我们是上市集团必须正规,辰*说审计过不去一直都是自费。
晚上祥瑞发了句天大的消息,接着说,熟悉我们的朋友应该看过这篇文章,这篇文章原先的标题里有那个产品名,刚刚对方给我改名了,我刚知道。
炮的评价很直接,强行抹除过往的痕迹啊。& 说之前也有人加他要投稿的编辑权限,估计也是改名,R*** 说俺也一样,我没给。
R*** 还带来一条新的销售政策,现在买豆包送飞书席位,一千一百八十八一个席位。庄*问了句最朴素的,改名字了就有人会用了吗。祥瑞的结论比吐槽更远,所以要起义,重做一个 A* 时代真正的协同办公软件。
晚上八点四十三,DeepSeek Harness 发布,标题就写着它不想做下一个 Codex。九点过后 GitHub 地址和一行 npx 命令在群里传开,星*的第一感觉是有点像另一个开源 Agent 框架的思想。
祥瑞很快用它写了篇文章,评价是快是真的快,调用 skill 也很准,还说我看了它源码里面,它是和 skill 相关的。
核*说可玩性很强,可以魔改,平***当场汇报进度,画中画已经移植了,还有 computer use,一句万物皆可插件成了当晚的口号。
& 拆完源码给了最完整的一句总结,它最好玩的地方是让 Agent 像装乐高一样动态改造自己的工具、行为和界面,甚至现场升级回滚,但权限基本等同于 Shell。
核*则指出真正的胜负手不在这里,Harness 的整体框架正在趋近于同步,真正拉开差距的地方是记忆压缩、冲突清理和路径复用。祥瑞后半夜还在把 Codex 的所有配置搬过去试执行效果,同时和&一起遗憾同一件事,这家没有多模态。
这天开头是一场对吹牛的复盘,辰*特意去搜了那家被报道的公司,说项目其实挺好,就是数字和员工人数夸张了点,明明可以把公司说得很牛,不知道为什么让媒体报道得这么难看。
上午祥瑞把重构微信智能体提上日程,辰*感慨在以前哪个人敢随随便便提出重构这个词。中午群里聊起数字世界和物理世界的上下文融合,祥瑞说这也是我一直想实现的。
下午朱*提了个让不少人共鸣的问题,想让 A* 连着干一整夜,规划表排满了八小时,早上起来发现一个半小时就干完了。
到了深夜十一点半,DeepSeek V4 Pro 正式发布,王*第一时间把价格贴出来,说妥妥的感觉手上那张卡不用续费了。
一早群里在复盘一家被媒体报道的公司。辰*起了个头,永远都是有人敢吹,有人敢报道,还有人敢信。他随后特意去搜了这家公司,态度反而变得公道,项目其实挺好,就是数字和员工人数夸张了点,明明可以把公司说得很牛,不知道为什么要让媒体把自己报道得这么难看,还翻出四月份的报道,那时候还是十七人团队。
庄*补了句更实在的,还不能实地考察,人家没有办公场地。Q** 总结成一句,先把故事讲起来。周**把这段收在一个更温和的角度,听 A* 劝,听网友劝,听粉丝劝。
祥瑞发了句提上日程了,重构微信智能体。王**立刻搬小板凳等成果演示。辰*的感慨点在别处,真的是感叹科技的进步和发展,在以前,哪个人敢随随便便地提出重构这个词。
有人问这个东西对外吗,祥瑞说不对外,庄*顺势提醒,建议不要对外,谨慎点。三句话之间把 A* 带来的真实变化说清楚了,重构成本被压到一个人一个念头就能启动的程度,风险却没有跟着降。
平***带来一条人事消息,一位原大厂模型技术负责人离职五个月后在上海创办了新公司,方向是研究横跨数字世界和物理世界的下一代 Agent。
祥瑞说这也是我一直想实现的,数字世界的上下文和物理世界的上下文融合。平***接了句,这应该是最终的版本答案,大家都是往这个方向靠的。同一时段文鳐 fisher 报了个好消息,我们公司终于要上飞书项目了,在我的力推荐下,今早已经开始对接。
钉钉 CLI 来了一次大版本迭代,群里聊起跨 Agent 找回旧对话这件事。辰*说这个不是早几天就有了么,平***补充说以前是复制对话 ID 现在是复制深度链接。
祥瑞的回答把标准抬高了一档,其实都不用怎么麻烦,在官方没有这些能力的时候我已经实现了,不管是在 Codex 还是 Claude Code 都可以找回这个对话,而且都不需要刻意去找,直接跟它说就行,它就知道,可以继续执行任务。
K*** 问这么爽,祥瑞说很爽的,你直接新建一个对话框,自然语言跟它聊就 OK。下午星*问他给自己做的产品是不是直接接的 Codex 的 ap*-server,祥瑞的回答留了余地,我们后面会把它当成一个可选的 Agent 引擎接进去,但不会把整个产品绑死在它上面。
朱*提了个很多人试过的场景,想要 A* 连着做一整天或者一整夜的任务该怎么跟它提,我让它自己规划做八小时的任务,它给出了规划表,任务和各模块时间看起来把八小时排满了,但早上起来一看,一个半小时就干完了。
星*一句话点破,A* 给你规划的做一个任务要多久,本身就是不准的。D** 把关注点挪回正确的地方,主要是别做歪了就行。
P*** 反问为什么会有规定时长这个需求,K*** 替她答了,因为不想浪费这个时间。这段对话其实解开了一个常见误会,时长从来不是任务目标,能验证的产出才是。
K*** 报了个数,算力成本接近二十万。李铁犁问做视频算力成本消耗这么大吗,祥瑞说视频算力消耗很大的,K*** 补了句现在新版本出来了这更要命,好在抽卡率相对下降了。
炮用低成本档位搓了一段公众号内容的视频,说感觉比写文字有意思。傍晚祥瑞晒出一张截图,三十二个了,这是三十二个子线程对话、三十二个任务,炮送了个称号,数码资本家。
同一时段王**问某款 Agent 限时免费两周,和 Codex 比怎么样,祥瑞回得干脆,那还是用 Codex 吧。
一篇三万字的长文发进群,R*** 的第一反应是先去 ob 吃灰,炮跟了一句,但凡字多的都是先去 ob。Q** 说我是 IMA,祥瑞笑称这是新的吃灰途径。
辰*干完活下班,留下一句期待明天重置。晚上万**带来一个真实需求,客户嫌某个排版打印插件太贵,一年三千四,问有没有平替。
祥瑞先纠正了信息,那个不是官方的,是第三方的,要是官方的话那是真饿了,然后给了解法,可以用 Codex 搓个多维表格插件,飞书机器人有相关能力。
万**说那估计一定有人造过这个轮子了。这一段里还夹着一个小回忆,祥瑞问谁还记得去年那个外卖平台的 Agent,炮说你不解释我已经记不起来这号人,我以为是哪个短剧的小妹。
祥瑞预告了正在酝酿的新文章,把完整目标、系统权限和连续工作时间尽可能都交给 A*,让它从理解业务、搭建系统、接接口、处理故障到沉淀评测一路跑下去的完整复盘。
周**同时在介绍一款叫 Today A* 的产品,五个主要入口分别是 Chat、Today、Tasks、Memories 和个人主页,思路是先认识一个人,再围绕这个人的信息、习惯和日常安排持续工作。
星*看完的联想很实在,独立开发者必备三件套,记账、日记、todo。周**自己给了结论,还是熟悉的味道换个形式,本质是原来那些事换个方式让 A* 来干。深夜祥瑞发现微信训练了自己的模型,随口推演了一句,如果微信 A* 真的做起来,那就估计没有飞书什么事了。
临近午夜 DeepSeek V4 Pro 发布,王*第一时间把价格贴出来,输入三块每百万,命中缓存零点零二五,输出六块每百万,已支持 Responses API 和 Anthropic API。
他随后给了体感判断,这个分数比肩上一代旗舰,擦边最新一代,妥妥地感觉手上那张卡不用续费了。K*** 抓住了最关键的一条,支持 Responses API 和 Codex 接入,接着问 Responses API 是什么,平***答得最短,Codex 专用协议,万**补了句 OpenA* 格式的 API。
K*** 也点出了短板,这家没有眼睛,也就是没有多模态。平***当场翻出两个小模型来补位,一个是千问原生的视觉小模型,一个是基于它做的 OCR 专精版,打算第二天配着新模型测。
上午一张豆包和飞书的合作广告被丢进群,祥瑞第一句话是这我都不想看,跟个诈骗营销广告似的,理由很具体,那句别人还在改 A* 产出的半成品你已经干完了,放到真实项目里完成度连一半都到不了。
中午他让 Codex 把飞书的计价完整梳理了一遍,得出的结论不是收费多,而是企业同时要面对六种口径。傍晚文章发出来,晚上他喊大家去看评论区,说原来大家真的苦飞书久矣。
有意思的是这天晚上八点,钉钉的 CEO 关注了他,群里立刻整齐地刷起商单来了。中间还夹着一场 WorkBuddy 的集体故障,一群人同时以为是自己电脑的问题。
祥瑞发了张汛情图,说不用上班了,人还在老家,估计今天也有大到暴雨。上海的风还在刮但雨小了,地铁早高峰恢复,杭州还在下。
王**提到自己那套外设配套软件的 Mac 版只支持 M 系列芯片,他和几个学员都是 Intel 的,还顺带解释了自己为什么主要用某个国产工具,因为三月的时候只有那家适配 Intel。
辰*说自己一台十七年的笔记本现在还天天用着,Mac 就是抗造。祥瑞在这段闲聊里插了句正事,终于把祥瑞笔记的整个运营打磨成一个系统了,每一篇文章都有它在这个公众号的必要性和连接性。
T*** 丢进来一张广告图问这是什么玩意,祥瑞的评价毫不客气,这我都不想看,跟个诈骗营销广告似的。万**说这信息密度看得太累人,只想跳过。
祥瑞挑出其中一句文案逐字反驳,别人还在改 A* 产出的半成品你已经用两个工具干完了,单凭这句话,百分之百的项目完成度都达不到一半,连一半都没有,他给的判断是这在消耗老客户的信任。
庄*说不知道怎么想的,哪怕想吃对手的份额,完全可以另起一个品牌。王**把问题拆成两条,一是传统飞书用户对 A* 相对了解,整合进来会产生不够专业的联想,二是传统豆包用户大部分是白嫖的也不太会付费。
毅补了句更本质的,豆包作为全民 A* 太亲民,导致大家认为不专业。王**接得更准,那种讨好的属性和要求实事求是的业务场景不相符。
侯*报了企业版的价格,九十九一个月、一千一百八十八一年。祥瑞说有这一千一百八十八不如买别的,还翻出自己的旧账,之前买企业版一个月六十八,一个任务都完不成就告诉我继续充值,利滚利,他给的评价是糟糕透了。
中午他让 Codex 把整个计价体系完整梳理了一遍,得出的结论比吐槽更有信息量,最重要的不是收费多,而是企业同时要面对全员席位、企业共享额度、个人会员、组合套餐、独立产品席位和外部模型账单六种口径。
炮顺着这条线补刀,那就是保底六个子部门的 KPI 考核了,还说自己最有体感的一件事,飞书自己最倡导 OKR,落到最后只剩 KR,O 已经没了。闪光的 flash 接了句,OKR 最后还是变成了 KPI。
超**分享了自己把 Codex 多 Agent 协同四种常用方式完整跑了一遍的文章,包括同项目开新线程、跨项目分配任务、用会话 ID 接力旧任务,以及让一个主 Agent 同时管理多个 Agent。
下午祥瑞晒出一张收益截图,昨天赚了四块钱,炮说我发了三篇才赚两块。祥瑞由此翻出一段旧数据,今年一月他们每篇文章都爆,每篇几万阅读,但最高的一天也就十几块,反倒有的人数据不算好,流量收益依然有几百。
闪光的 flash 解释了机制,有些是按点击算的,所以流量大也不一定有钱。傍晚祥瑞发了篇讲创业方法论的文章,还补了句融到资了记得分我点,庄*回了句这就开发 open 祥瑞,P***、&、q***、K*** 一路复读接龙。
祥瑞先预告了一篇正在写的东西,群里 K*** 说非常期待飞书搭建多维表的 skill,祥瑞的回答值得记下来,搭建多维表格不在 skill,在于项目沉淀。
紧接着四点一刻,辰*说 WorkBuddy 这会好像出问题了,庄*回我还以为是我这边的问题,周**说刚任务卡壳了一下,赵**更惨,积分刚才直接清零。
十几分钟后陆续恢复,辰*说任务已经跑起来了,赵**的积分也回来了。这段插曲的价值在于,一个人遇到故障时第一反应总是怀疑自己,群的作用就是十分钟内确认这不是你的问题。
祥瑞放话明天就写钉钉真好用,q*** 提醒他你信不信你开吐了明天估计就有人来找你,王**接得更逗,后天就被标记为网络水军。
祥瑞的回答里有一段旧事,哈*没关系,反正也没有给过我商单,在我勤勤恳恳写飞书文章的时候,那会我们公众号已经摆在他们面前了,每次投商单都不选我们,反正我们不管投不投都会写。
王**给了个更冷静的解读,那个时候是你借由分享使用经验获得受众、扩大影响的阶段,对方也是吃定了这一点。祥瑞认了这句,说有点傻,现在感觉。
傍晚那篇吐槽文章发出来了。同一时段 K*** 报了个具体的坑,多维表格里有个字段六百行全是图片,他把字段里的图片都删掉了,云空间的占用还是没变,要到云空间里操作才行。
侯*补了句免费版资料只保留十八个月。炮在晚上七点前后确认了流量事实,果然还是写飞书的流量大啊,祥瑞说我公众号只要一写飞书数据就异常的好,今年一月标题里有那五个字,发出去不到十分钟就能过百阅读。8-0-0 一句天下苦飞书久矣,周**当场出了个连载企划,飞书的新对手,来个系列连载。
晚上八点整,祥瑞发了句钉钉 CEO 关注我了。万**第一时间给了因果,批评豆包,豆包的对手就来了。接着万**、辰*、周**、K***、李**五个人整整齐齐地刷了同一句,商单来了。
炮凑热闹说下一步被收编了朋友,祥瑞顺势接梗,明天就写另一家的新对手是真好用。周**把这个玩笑做成了正经企划,后天写第三家,再后天写第四家,连载两周挑 N 家,还开出条件,谁起的标题打动了金主爸爸,有商量可给分一个红包。卡*说让三家卷起来,炮补了句飞书两眼一黑。
祥瑞喊大家去看当天公众号的评论区,说原来大家真的苦飞书久矣。炮确认评论区反馈和群里重度使用者的感知基本一样,还说了句更重的,飞书自己真的丢掉了很多宝贵的东西。
他当天用 Codex 实现一个功能时发现,开放平台其实做得到,但路径非常非常隐秘,多维表格在这个层面又限制得死死的。
& 遇到的是更硬的墙,他把知识空间训练成企业知识库、做成工作流发布为 MCP,结果发现不能被外部调用,只能被自家的智能体调用,等于直接建了个墙,只能用又笨又贵的那套。
李**给了自己的应对方式,本地和飞书两套架构同时更新,本地为主飞书为辅。夜里祥瑞又发现另一个工具上线了知识库,而且可以共享。
周一早上群里在等额度重置,庄*那句 token 用时方恨少被王**改成了一首歌词。下午祥瑞发出讲 Context System 的长文,说昨晚一直打磨到现在,里面写的是一个真实供应链项目里 Agent 参与十八张表、两百六十一个字段和二十三条工作流的持续搭建与返修。
文章把整个傍晚点着了。文鳐 fisher 说企业上下文是企业的数据核心资产,祥瑞抛回一句更硬的,那我作为员工,我的数据凭什么要给企业提供。
核*说公司要求就得执行,祥瑞回那我宁愿辞职。争到最后落在一个更根本的分歧上,模型越强,上下文是越重要还是越不重要。
晚上炮把 A* 一天的产出折算成七点四个人类工作日,祥瑞把 Codex 和 Claude Code 一起算,说不如干脆造一个 A* 工时的计量单位。
朱*提了个很具体的痛点,用模型生图做 PPT 确实好看,但出来的都是一页页图片,要改非常麻烦,做正式技术汇报有什么好方法。
K*** 建议拿去 Codex 让它做成方便修改的版本,B*** 说加个 Canva,庄*则给了反面经验,他这样干过效果很不理想,后来干脆都用图片,有问题的地方标注出来让模型改。
朱*把真正的难点说清楚了,做 PPT 的人和汇报的人常常不是同一个,如果能编辑,汇报的人可以一边理演讲思路一边改。
周**顺势把问题归纳成一句话,看的人决定 PPT 的上限价值,写的人决定内涵价值。山*则带来梁汝波对人力资源的要求,不管是招 FDE 还是培养 Organizer,核心能力都不是会用某个 A* 工具,而是发现问题、定义问题、协调资源、创造价值。
周一早上群里都在等额度重置。庄*留下一句 token 用时方恨少,8-0-0 说自己故意周末没用,等周一上班用,现在才用了百分之二。
辰*提醒注意时区,整整晚十二个小时。台风的后续也在同一时段收尾,q*** 转来一条深圳飞阿勒泰被硬控到长沙的经历,l*** 说自己刚到上海。
王**受庄*那句话启发,把一首歌改成了等待重置版,我刷新面板会有怎样的消耗对白,我等的重置它在多远的未来,我听见敲击来自工位代码人海,我盯着百分比拿着额度等待牌。
核*展示了一个把全公司个人 Obsidian 聚合起来的东西,说目前只做到知识聚合,后面要加数据治理,这些都是在为老板心目中最终极的企业 Agent 做准备。
祥瑞第一反应是不卡吗,核*说自己抽的是数据。炮一句 obs 套皮之后,也承认这是企业级的智脑,谁家老板看了不着迷。
8-0-0 问飞书集成平台定时抓通讯录写进多维表格做花名册有没有人搞过,祥瑞说这个好搞,这两天把我搭建飞书集成平台的 skill 开源一下,直接用 skill 搭建就行,可以达到百分之九十以上的准确率,因为集成平台没有 CLI,他是用 opencli 解析页面做出来的。
炮感叹 opencli 真是万能通用解,紧接着开始吐槽自己的日常,现在最刚需的是搭仪表盘的 skill,每天都能收到老客户要调仪表盘的需求,改到最后爸爸要的还是第一版。周**补了句行情,光做个仪表盘都可以是增值服务,国外就有专门做这个的公司。
祥瑞发出这天的主文章,讲的不是知识管理而是 Context System。他在群里交代了背景,在一个真实供应链项目里,他们让 Agent 参与了十八张表、两百六十一个字段和二十三条工作流的持续搭建与返修,因此意识到企业真正缺的不是更大的知识库,而是一套能让经验被选择、验证、写回和复用的系统。
l*** 说你的公众号值得静下来深度读。王*顺势歪了个楼,问大家做知识库是不是还是觉得 Obsidian 最好用,他自己按文件夹整理,内容多了就分不清了。文鳐 fisher 提到有朋友专门做企业上下文管理,观点是企业上下文就是企业的数据核心资产。
话题很快滑到最扎人的地方。先是聊 Obsidian 适不适合企业,祥瑞说它依赖本地,协同是致命的,B*** 说它更倾向超级个体使用,炮说小团队还行大团队就不行,Notion 挺好,obs 适合自己嗨。
然后祥瑞把真正的问题抛了出来,那我就有问题了,为什么我作为一个员工,我员工的数据要给你企业提供,凭啥。核*回得很现实,这就是公司要求了,要不执行要不走人。
祥瑞说那走人好了,我依靠我的上下文还可以做很好的超级个体,赚我一个月工资赚不到的钱。炮给了条中间路线,聪明的员工会只交自己想交的,公司欺负的永远都是老实人。
l*** 从另一头反问,有没有可能员工这些知识也是因为公司平台才积攒和成长起来的,过去培养一个人才成本很高,员工一走带着能力就离职了。J*** 说员工也付出了时间和精力,但她随后又补了一刀,组织过程资产真正能被企业吸收和复用的又有多少。
王**问企业会不会设一个专职的人来做这件事,核*说一个人做不了,必须全员参与,至少是关键岗位。炮把企业知识库最常见的失败讲透了,大多数企业其实是人在堆积材料和产出,但这些材料并没有提炼和蒸馏;更麻烦的是公司拿到的是大量重复的低价值文档,高价值文档反而不容易出现,留底的那些大概率是美化过的汇报材料,对真正的知识库并没有用。
核*换了个角度辩护,以前没有 A* 的时候大家也在按要求提交过程文件和结果文件,只是那时候没办法提炼,现在有了 A*,做事的过程就自动沉淀下来了。辰*一句话给这段收了尾,所有的文档都只是某种时刻的产出结果罢了,大脑才是最值钱的。
核*总结了一句,模型越强,上下文越不重要。祥瑞立刻拦下来,说这句话不对,要分情况,如果指的是当前的模型架构,那么模型越强上下文会越重要;如果模型能够实现自学习,那上下文才越不重要。
文鳐 fisher 站在同一边,当前模型非常需要上下文,尤其是企业内部的,模型根本不知道。炮判断垂直行业大概率会走本行业的本地小模型,核*说模型厂商可以定制,只是成本太高一般企业玩不了。
祥瑞说出了他这两天脑子里最活跃的想法,把本地这些东西训练成一个小模型,让它实现持续学习。炮说这就是我那天跟你说的我想做的,机制是知识库和 Agent 的双通道,每一个学习信号来自 Agent 判断不了的人工判定。
辰*则给出一个更远的判断,未来 A* 一定不需要我们手动构建上下文,养知识库的过程会成为无感的,大模型会像电商推荐一样千人千面。核*顺着编了句未来的开机流程,开通新版模型,选择所在行业,添加个人知识库,开启自学习,启动。
R*** 说自己的几个 Agent 在各聊各的,都没说一个东西,还各自说得有劲,把她整懵了。Y*** 连着甩了三条解法,用 clear,用 new 还能看到历史记录,实在不行 logout,最后加一句下机了。
K*** 说自己遇到过死循环,开了新会话还是各聊各的,过一会上下文又满了。庄*问了个更实际的,用 Codex 一直显示在跑,但剩余用量就是没变过。
辰*一句话点破,很多人的任务执行了十几个小时,其实背后中间因为网络问题早都已经中断了,整个任务是断断续续完成的。
晚上七点二十三,祥瑞晒出自己包的山西大蒸饺,王**盲猜粉条韭菜鸡蛋馅,祥瑞纠正是韭菜猪肉粉条豆腐,还报了完整配方,肋条肉、韭菜、木耳、粉条、豆腐、黄豆芽。
千问办公助理要收费的消息传来,炮的反应很直接,一地鸡毛的水平回来收费。祥瑞说我正在写一篇吐槽豆包和飞书的文章,尤其是飞书,不得不吐槽了。
炮接着数落飞书 A* 各种稀奇古怪的扣费,周**把那句宣传语改了个下半句,先进团队先用飞书,内部团队先来扯皮,价格和点数都闹不明白。
炮给出了他对飞书这一年的完整判断,这是非常标准的互联网公司扩大以后管理层乱搞、定各种奇怪的 KPI 和内卷而忽略了客户体验的结果。同一时段程**带来另一边的消息,企微给他打电话做产品调研,接口等级还蛮高,内外部群记录都能调到。
炮晒出一张统计,一天之内他那支 A* 团队交付了约七点四个人类工作日的劳动量,算法是最土的人头方法,按每个 Agent 的运行时间长度算,不算 token,理由是 token 没法算人产出了多少,只有时间是公平的。
周**顺势提议让 A* 干活并且自己出日报周报月报,祥瑞说我每天都有让它写日记的,还把自己的 A* 写的日记贴了出来。
他把 Codex 和 Claude Code 一起算,数字更猛,炮直呼我十二人并发已经挺畜生了,你才是真正的 A* 资本家。
祥瑞由此提出一个更大的念头,我感觉可以搞个 A* 工时计量单位,不以人类工时天计算。炮问那不是 token 吗,祥瑞说不应该是,毕竟一个 token 和另一个 token 差距还是很大的。
炮鼓励他去占位,不一定要受他们定义,包括国内的 FDE 为什么就要叫 FDE,自己去定义这个概念,先提出。周**补了句,没准以后标准之一就出自你。同一晚炮把判断 A* 项目能否落地的 skill 打包开源到了 GitHub。
昨晚那场关于裁员和增收的争论,中午就变成了一篇讲四次价值转化的长文,祥瑞说打磨了很久,建议大家别用 A* 蒸馏着看,深度看一下。
炮傍晚认真读完,说基本已经可以把 FDE、FDR 和本体这几个词具象化了。同一天旧号也更新了半个多月来的第一篇,用 Seedance 和 LibTV 做的六十二秒童年短片,群里刷了一屏三连。
到了晚上八点半,气氛拐了个弯,有人在群里反复追问另一位群友的商业逻辑,祥瑞当场把话说明白,可以探讨交流,但别在我的群里向任何人获取任何形式的商业逻辑,随后正式写下两条群规。窗外还刮着台风,q*** 从深圳一路候补到南京再转上海,凌晨终于坐上车。
一早炮发现 Codex 重置了,说自己昨天登了六十,太感动了,祥瑞回好像还重置了两次。上午微信的小微被聊起来,l*** 说朋友圈文案已经可以让它帮写,体感挺好,就是参考不了自己之前的排版和表达风格,祥瑞点出关键,主要是没有上下文和记忆。
天*提了个具体问题,多维表格工作流的延迟节点最小是一分钟,如果只需要十几秒怎么办。祥瑞给的解法是触发节点改用 Webhook,天*随后回来说想通了,自己一直卡在轮询这条路上。辰*以为单位可以改成秒,后来更正说记错了,有秒的是钉钉和 WPS。
祥瑞用 Seedance 2.5 和 LibTV 做了支六十二秒的童年短片,时隔半个多月,旧号终于写了第一篇文章,群里刷了一屏三连。
炮说有一种做短视频回归你老本行的感觉,非常轻车熟路。价格被算得很清楚,折后四毛一秒,一分钟二十四块,比 Seedance 便宜。
炮当场喊了句 LibTV 加 Codex 启动。T*** 顺口问现在 ComfyUI 还有人用吗,祥瑞的回答很肯定,有,出图出视频特别精准,但门槛也特别高。
平***补充大型电商基本都在用,抽卡抽不起,炮说大厂做技美的管线依然是核心工具。祥瑞回忆二三年、二四年研究 SD、Comfy 和 MJ 的日子,说那时候接触 A* 都是因为兴趣,炮很认同,vibecoding 也好 A*GC 也好,兴趣大于一切。
中午祥瑞把昨晚的讨论写成了文章发出来,核心是一个问题,为什么模型越来越强、Agent 越来越多,企业真正感受到的利润变化却依然有限。
他给的答案是中间还要跨过四次价值转化,任务能不能交付、流程会不会改变、组织愿不愿意采用、省下来的产能能不能重新定价,而 FDE、FDR、Ontology、A* Native 这几个词其实分别在补这条链上的不同环节。
炮的第一反应是这么高产你不要命啦,闪光的 flash 接了句年轻的时候熬得住。祥瑞后来又催了一次,说大家对这篇文章没有讨论的吗,我建议认真看,打磨了好久。
杨**问有没有人试着把几个工具的记忆拉通,祥瑞的回答很干脆,那还是不要让一个工具的记忆污染另一个。B*** 给了折中做法,记忆不打通,但沉淀的知识可以放在一起。
炮说自己是 Codex 加 Cursor,上周试了另一个,干活还行,但确实不想让它去写入我的 Obsidian。
杨**说自己混着用会觉得利益断裂,炮笑他由奢入俭难。这段闲聊其实回答了一个真问题,多工具并行时该共享的是沉淀下来的知识,不是各自的对话记忆。
q*** 装完面板后提了个很准的问题,这些面板里的数据是不是只限于我当前项目的进展,如果我想做项目管理,它只能显示工具做成什么样,但我更想知道项目进行到什么程度、谁在干什么,所以感觉数据源不一样。
祥瑞确认了她的判断。下午祥瑞自己也抛了个问题,两家企业做同类产品都在做 GEO,内容都一样各推各的,A* 会推荐哪一家。
C* 给了长回答,两家的文案、这些文章对消费者的帮助、搜索引擎收录和检索的过程,都不只是把相似内容排列出来,更有用或更受搜索引擎喜欢的内容会被模型引用。B*** 补了一句,企业的本质差异还是有的。
炮认真读完中午那篇文章,说昨晚两小时激烈讨论提炼出来的产出再次细品价值很大,基本已经可以把 FDE、FDR 和本体给具象化,也能进一步翻译成他想做的平台可以承载的具体运行机制。
& 说本体这个方向和自己想做的平台太一致了,只是不知道哪家能做出来。炮给了条现实信息,我跟一个资本聊过,只要是一个得到验证的小本体,资本是愿意投的。
& 随后放了个小道消息,说本体可能会是明年的重点项目方向,所以很多企业明年都会上相关项目。王**从物流行业回了一句,理想很丰满现实很骨感,很多企业的核心是拿订单,降本增效这个理由还不够说服老板投入。
晚上八点半以后,杨**连着几轮追问炮的商业逻辑,从 SaaS 化和个性化的冲突问到你的商业逻辑到底怎么设计。
祥瑞先是把人拦下来,商业逻辑怎么能够随随便便就透露的呢,接着把话说得更明白,我们可以探讨交流,但别在我的群里向任何人获取任何形式的商业逻辑等等诸如此类。
对方说自己是做咨询的、聊天是坦诚的,祥瑞回,咨询行业更应该懂商业信息的价值,坦诚不是这样坦诚的,并且提到有人拿着他的文章去谈自己开课的事情。
九点过后他把两条规则正式写进群里,第一条商用红线,群内他人分享的内容、实战案例和原创思路仅可自用学习交流,未经本人许可不得用于课程售卖和引流变现;第二条隐私边界,禁止打探群友未公开的商业逻辑和核心项目机密,对方表示不便分享时不再追问。他说社区从建立到现在一直是这个原则,越界一律拉黑。炮打了个圆场,大家碰撞理念思路,商业逻辑就缓一缓。
台风把好几个人堵在了路上。q*** 说你们都不知道我今天为了从深圳回上海经历了些啥,飞机没了,高铁也没有全程票,想从杭州转发现转不了,又找了更远的南京候补,终于补上,之后再从南京转战上海。
l*** 在厦门滞留两天,正拼车回上海。Q**说福建人对台风已经习以为常,王**说上海昨天只有风,今天风雨交加,很多地下商场被淹。
周**感慨了一句,这样糟糕的经历还回群里跟小伙伴交流,真心不易。到了十一点四十一,q*** 发来一句,我终于坐上车了,我可以回家了,顺手贴出通告,本次台风造成的误工不得作迟到缺勤处理。上海明天休一天,杭州照常上班。
祥瑞冒出一个大胆的想法,有自己 Agent 的人拉个群,让它们互相通信,会发生什么。& 和王**异口同声,会把 token 耗没。
王**想起以前那个类似 Agent 社交平台,祥瑞说自己还认识创始人,当时体验过公众号打车。平***提到元宝派,祥瑞给了个精准的类比,元宝派像小微信,另一个像微博。
深夜平***晒了笔账,一百四十九的个人版套餐,七天额度半小时用完,测下来值不到三千万 token。炮说自己上个月用过,光速花干,一百四十九等于二十刀,二十刀的 Cursor 我能拉满干很久。临睡前祥瑞发了篇文章,说有人借他们的央视采访推广课程,这件事必须说清楚。
这天是从几条零碎的行业消息开始的,中消协点名 A* 客服乱象,一部全 A* 电影的提示词开源,飞书并入豆包之后额度依然说不清楚。
祥瑞白天在忙小程序发布,顺手把群日报的链接发进群,才发现群重建到现在已经一百多天,麦*说再攒一阵可以直接出书。
真正的重头戏在晚上八点半以后。杨**把话头递给炮,说他做的是增收不是降本,紧接着整个群围着一个问题吵了两个多小时,企业用 A* 到底是为了裁人还是为了赚更多。
王**把最硬的现实摆上桌,裁员是实打实省钱,增收是虚拟的。祥瑞反复说这一定不对,但承认自己表达不上来。到了深夜,Codex 读完这段对话给出一个公式,任何一项接近零,最终都会变成 A* 看着很强,企业就是落不了地。
上午群里过了一轮行业消息,中消协点名 A* 客服乱象,一部全 A* 生成的电影长片把价值三百五十万的提示词开源了。
庄*转来飞书与豆包合并之后的吐槽,说自己真的无语了,炮补了一句更早的判断,没合并前就在出类似问题,几个 A* 额度根本说不清楚。
超**同时发了篇讲怎么去掉 Vibe Coding 页面 A* 味的笔记。这些零碎信息当时看只是随手转发,但飞书的额度和豆包的定位,在这一周里会被反复翻出来。
祥瑞重新注册了一个新账号,结果直接触发身份验证,一句完蛋就发进群。下午又把二十刀充错了地方,还没用就没了。周**在知乎刷到央视朝闻天下里那款国产桌面应用的提问,直接把祥瑞艾特进去,说上知乎了。
杨**顺口估了个数,Codex 中国得有四百万用户,周**追问依据,他老实承认是按份额估的。群里同时冒出一串玩梗,一天一百五十九炮,炮王。祥瑞说一会儿看日报吧,我正在搞小程序发布,紧接着又发了一句,卧槽,又上限了。
祥瑞把两条群日报发进群,J*** 说点不开,旺*连申请都申请不了。祥瑞解释还没正式发布,需要权限,然后干脆说那等发布吧。
翻了下时间他自己也愣了一下,才发现群重建之后到现在已经一百多天。麦*接了一句,这个群日报再攒一段时间可以直接出一本书了,辰*说以前好像有个人就这么干过。
祥瑞回,我们群日报有实体周边的。J*** 又问播放器的按键逻辑,祥瑞答得很具体,和市面上的播放器一样,可以循环、单曲、随机。
祥瑞先发了 Floatboat 的一份 Harness 评测,DeepSeek V4 Flash 配自研 Harness 的效果好过一个贵五十七倍的模型,报告给了个叫 HLR 的指标,任务越长程,Harness 的杠杆越大。
接着他转了一篇说一大批中层即将消失的文章,群里立刻分成几路。周**问这些高素质中层会流向哪里。杨**的判断来自企业现场,A* 变革的主力就是业务中层,而且企业政治从来不是能力第一。
辰*认为会两极分化,执行层被逐步优化,稀缺的更贵。B*** 拿手机销售举例,说互联网已经证明中间层会自然消失。祥瑞从行政角度接了一句,市级政府某种意义上是省级和县级的中层,这两天他注意到很多市级正在把权力下放县级。
杨**把话头递给炮,说你做的业务不是给企业降本,都是围绕客户增收,从降本角度衡量不出价值。炮承认现实更难看,客户通常用能不能干掉两个人来衡量要不要付一个人的钱给我们。
祥瑞立刻炸了,那我们这个价值就是帮客户裁人,这一定不对,但他也说了实话,我没法说出合适的,我现在脑子是乱的。
王**把最硬的一面摆出来,老板目标就是减少支出,你的 A* 不能省钱老板就不会买,凭什么不裁员,裁员是实打实的省钱,增收是虚拟的。
祥瑞举了个反例,本来五个人只能挣五个人的钱,现在五个人可以挣五十个人的钱,那不更好吗。王**回得更狠,那你跟老板签对赌。
K*** 补上员工视角,很多人怕的就是 A* 做好了自己会被裁掉,所以不愿意配合。炮把话拉回自己的立场,A* 这场革命带来的是技术平权,让中小企业能用到大厂的能力,最怕的是老板没想清楚 A* 能干嘛,只把它当成优化人的理由。
炮把被释放出来的人分成两类,纯粹的二传手,和有能力干更多事情的人,他说自己非常赞同老板干掉一切二传手。P*** 讲了自己公司里的真事,他做提效的事情已经被同事排斥,因为本质上是在降低他们的价值,对方开始用权限卡他。
J*** 从数据侧补了两刀,裁员之后人效数据就上去了,有了 HC 才能招新人,而且大学毕业生被裁的比例确实在上升,超过十年的老员工被返聘的概率也在上升。
卓*一句话概括,裁的是那些 A* 跟不上的人。李*说人一多管理难度就大,三个和尚没水喝。万**给了个时间判断,现在不裁纯粹是 A* 产出还不稳定,等确定性高了,资本家不动手不可能。祥瑞顺势抛出一个反常识的观察,三十五岁不再是门槛,二十五岁才是门槛。
话题从裁员转到企业到底缺什么。杨**说员工的经验在很多企业里已经没那么重要,knowhow 第三方有的是。J*** 给出这天最锋利的一句判断,A* 用的门槛在降低,但产出收益的门槛没有变化,员工想的是我用某个工具做了什么很厉害,却没回答创造了什么价值。
炮点名说群里那位在企业内做供应链的 R 哥,就是 A* 价值最大化的状态,相当于老板的哆啦 A 梦,什么 MVP 都能最快搭出来,让老板清晰知道 A* 的边界。
周**贴出记录,WorkBuddy 二十四分钟初步搭出一个老板工作台,这个工作台等于知识库等于仪表盘。炮还交代了一条实操,企业的流程文件不能直接丢给 A* 读,要有指引或者专门练一个 skill,直接读要飘,而且企业原有的流程文件可能真不太流程。
周**提议把晚上八点半以后的讨论抽象成一个框架,划出层次,以后有的话题就直接跳过去,杀入核心环节。祥瑞说一会我来搞一下,让 A* 站在这篇文章的角度做个 HTML 总结。
十点后 Codex 给出了公式,任何一项接近零,最终都会变成 A* 看着很强,企业就是落不了地。祥瑞顺手把一个更反直觉的结论贴进群,A* 一方面让已经进入岗位的新人进步更快,另一方面也可能压缩原本给新人练手的初级岗位,新人能力被增强和新人入口被减少可能同时发生。
炮说这个高校甚至能出课题。祥瑞还动了两个念头,一是把祥瑞笔记改成祥瑞和他的朋友们,专门记录群里的高质量交流,二是把这场辩论做成地图式的专题放进小程序。
R*** 起哄让他胆子大一点叫祥瑞世界模型,炮接得更狠,等我们把你蒸了,就是祥瑞大模型了。到了十一点半,群里已经聊到把 A* 接进大脑和数字永生,平***补了一句,A* 会不会在大脑里留后门。
这天从一句休息休息吧开始,最后还是聊了四百五十条。上午大家查模型账单,K3 的一次对比被算出三十二点四倍积分消耗;下午北京海淀开放一块地,只许 Agent 参与城市规划,群里从五年规划一路脑补到流浪地球。
真正落回地面的,是一场关于项目尾款的讨论。庄*说千人大公司的地方项目追了两年多,一人公司更扛不住,炮把自己的变化说得很清楚,从免费试用到首付后开工,首付款必须超过成本。
傍晚以后,祥瑞又把注意力挪到 A* 视频,Codex 调 LibTV 跑出创业短片,Seedance 的口型和细节让他感叹半年前真不敢想。一天里最远的想象和最硬的生意账,恰好都在场。
辰*一早劝大家休息休息、思考一下,P*** 回说额度只剩百分之七,炮也让大家别太卷。几分钟后 K*** 刚用了重置卡,话题还是回到了模型。
闪光的 flash 问做方案和写代码该怎么分模型,王**拿出自己在 WorkBuddy 里的实测,K3 没明显比 DeepSeek 强,但积分消耗先感觉翻了十倍。
查完明细,他把数字改得更准确,不是十倍,是三十二点四倍。这个上午没有得出谁是最强模型,只留下一个更有用的动作,别凭体感争能力,先把同一任务的消耗倍率查清。
祥瑞发了张自己骂模型的截图,说现在已经这样骂 5.6 了。炮提醒,别骂了,会污染后面的语境,虽然自己也经常忍不住。
有人问污染是什么意思,答案就是模型接下来还会继续读到这段情绪。李铁犁 Leon 想起以前流行的说法,不是都说得 PUA 模型吗。
祥瑞的态度很明确,PUA 至今都觉得是个伪命题,只是有时候真忍不住骂它。这个短插曲把一件常见误区说清了,把人的情绪塞进上下文,并不会凭空提高模型能力。
北京海淀放出一个特别的城市规划项目,只允许 Agent 参与。程**说地点就在公司旁边,社区还有一块大屏,保证二十四小时处理提交方案。
祥瑞顺着想,如果今天能让 Agent 画一块地,未来某一个五年规划有没有可能也让 A* 参与。炮觉得甚至可能有一小部分完全交给 A*。
平***已经抢先提交,开玩笑说简历里以后可以写曾参与北京市城市规划设计。大家从政策试验聊到《流浪地球》里的 MOSS,自设计、自规划、自组织、自执行,最后还被补了一句自动销毁。最严肃的城市议题,被群里用一阵玩笑迅速摸到了边界。
祥瑞展示了 LibTV 的《真假美猴王》案例。红***问是不是一键生成,祥瑞马上说一键就不要想。炮解释,这类视频背后的画布仍然很有门槛。
红***又说自己现在看见 A* 视频就有点腻,内容像是从同一个模子里出来。这个判断和前一天的 A* 味讨论接上了,模型生成画面已经不稀奇,真正的差别重新回到选题、画布、节奏和人工判断上。工具能把制作门槛压低,但还没有把创作这件事本身取消。
周**转来一篇文章,标题是 FDE 爆火之后先卡住的是尾款。庄*说这根本不只发生在 FDE,他们给一个地方做项目,尾款追了两年多还没到,各种需求变更照加,甲方甚至要求乙方承担一半额外费用。
他们是一千人的公司都这样,一人公司更难抗衡。& 给了个有点无奈的预算心态,按只能拿到合同百分之六十来做。炮把规则说得更硬,首付款要超过成本,其他都当中奖。
他也交代了自己的变化,创业初期为了验证免费搭建试用,满意后再付款,现在客户多、人手紧,只做售前沟通和诊断,签合同付首款后才施工。祥瑞说自己去年遇到过,今年也踩过别人拿着他的课程大纲直接讲课的坑。
祥瑞让 Codex 控制 LibTV 做创业短片,第一版一出来,B*** 说画面里的小孩像小祥瑞,辰*注意到孩子低头看显示器的细节很真实。
祥瑞自己先挑错,内容里把小时候玩的主机说错了,又继续返工。旁边还并行着 Agent 城市规划和记忆挑战赛,平***提交完规划又去 fork 一个微信智能回复项目。
到了五点十八,短片的新版本出来,人物挠头的动作自然得让卓*专门截了图。祥瑞说完了,这下可能真要在这个工具上消费了,转念一想,亦庄的政策还能报销。
杨**发来一条海南授课需求,一天一千,问有没有朋友感兴趣。祥瑞第一反应是一天三万还差不多,炮把成本拆开,一天一千还要去海南,除非本地自由职业者刚好有能力、手里还有现成课件,否则没人能接。
就在大家当成一条不太现实的需求时,周**直接从自己的联系人里找来一位海南当地人,两边打招呼,让他们自己协商。
他说自己没有利益诉求,只是搭把手,多条路子、多个朋友。平***和杨**一起刷周老师牛,周**回祥瑞,这算群福利。
晚上先是一场额度复活庆祝,炮说自己整整六天没用 Codex,第二天终于恢复,没它的时候 Cursor 成了最好的朋友。
接着祥瑞把短片继续打磨,q*** 确认这就是 Codex 调 LibTV 的 CLI,祥瑞点头。八点半的新版本连自动配音的口型都能对上,卓*还听出了人物口音。
九点后祥瑞开始整理本地上下文,要把电脑打造成知识库,又单独建了 A* 视频知识库。到十点,Seedance 2.5 的效果让他感叹半年前真不敢想,2024 年为了 ComfyUI 专门组一台电脑,渲染很久还有噪点,如今同样的精细动作已经能在云端工具里快速出来。薛**提醒,想让画面更灵动,仍然要摆脱简单的图生视频路径。
这天九百多条消息,早上还在争论多维表格究竟是产品、数据库还是过渡形态,晚上全群突然切换成了电视观众。七点前十几分钟,大家在群里一遍遍倒计时,节目开播后有人截图、有人录屏、有人研究祥瑞走路为什么有点僵。
真正值得记下来的不只是上了央视,而是节目结束不到三个小时,祥瑞已经剪出完整版、开了新公众号、写完第一篇文章。
群里一边替他高兴,一边继续安装他当天开源的任务看板,到了零点,q*** 还从 Trello 里找出一个可以继续改的方向。热闹最终没有停在一个标签上,而是又变成了下一件能做的东西。
早上有人问,飞书里挂九十九块的模板到底能不能挣钱。祥瑞先给了句冷判断,基本无望,除非模板特别炫酷又实用。庄*说自己确实赚过四位数,但这个买卖终究不是好项目,退款和版本控制都麻烦。
炮把它放回商业链路里看,模板最多只能做定制前一层的漏斗,买回去大概率不能直接用,客户自己又很难调。话题一路推到多维表格本身,祥瑞说轻量场景还好,一复杂不如上专业应用,未来用户也许根本不用关心表怎么搭,只要直接问 Agent,答案正确就够了。万**补了个现实价值,中小企业先借多维表格把数据结构化、顺手梳理流程,这仍然是当下能抓住的一段过渡期。
王**讲了跨境运输的真实难处,门到门链路中间变量太多,精简后仍有一百个字段,人用 Excel 时默认知道的背景,A* 想完整理解却可能一百个字段都不够,漏掉一个节点就会带来大损失。
有人建议把复杂上下文塞进一个 JSON 字段,再由公式拆开。祥瑞连续追问,为什么一定要把事情做得这么复杂,绝大多数业务员根本不知道 JSON 是什么。
K*** 给出的落地原则最朴素,能不让人填就不填,能填一个地方就别填两个,再给每个人一张只看自己工作的视图。
J*** 更直接,很多人连 Excel 的文本和数值格式都没弄明白。讨论最后落在一号位上,工具是否续费,不取决于功能多,而取决于负责人是否亲自使用并看见了实质结果。
杨**说现在简历由 A* 写,企业也用 A* 筛,某种意义上挺公平。祥瑞不太认同,他想到一个更麻烦的闭环:求职者用同一批模型写简历,HR 再用模型按相似关键词筛选,最后要么一个人都找不到,要么留下的人越来越同质化。
杨**提醒,自动筛简历在 NLP 时代就已经存在,现在供大于求,企业仍然先卡学历、背景和项目经验。醒*则站在企业结果一侧,说这种方式招到真正匹配者的概率未必高,甚至可能提高用工成本。闪光的 flash 最后给了个不像方法的方法,招人还是得看缘分。
张*终于成功进入 Claude Code,对着群里说,幸好有大家,我再一步一个坑往前爬,实在解决不了再请教。
她紧接着问,能不能用它写研究生论文,自己原来的知识库又在另一个平台里。祥瑞和炮都建议先把本地知识库接起来,炮点名 Obsidian,毅则给了更关键的一步,让她先带着 A* 完整跟一遍自己写论文的流程,这样以后写出来的东西才会保留原本的方法和风格。
工具换了一个又一个,但炮说,唯有知识库是属于自己的核心竞争力。张*那天第一次觉得自己知道该怎么在群里问问题了。
下午三点半,祥瑞提醒大家,央视二套晚上七点会播《生财有道》,采访里会展示 Echo 和社区。他自己也不知道最终剪出来是什么样,只记得当时拍了很多走路的镜头。
杨**催他趁早准备软文,q*** 提醒记得录下来,庄*直接说厉害,上央视了。讨论中间还穿插了一段企业微信能不能被 Agent 操作,K*** 找不到 CLI,群里很快把官方接口和能力边界补齐。
到了四点多,小*在群里喊万涂幻象出来玩,祥瑞回了一句它已经被改乱了,自己正在重新写架构。白天的每条线最后都指向晚上那个未知的节目效果。
六点四十七,周**开始倒计时。三分钟、两分钟、开始了,消息一条接一条。节目片头就闪过祥瑞,大家边看边截图,等到他第三个正式出场时,群里刷出一排来了、小李同学、走路带着风。
有人注意办公位和双屏,有人研究走路镜头是现拍还是摆拍,还有人开玩笑说群里有了专属讨论区。节目段落只有几分钟,评论却持续了半小时。
最有意思的是大家没有把它只当作祥瑞个人的高光,炮把直播转给成都孵化器的伙伴,周**催着留视频、做传播,群里很自然地开始替这件事找下一步。
节目结束后,杨**第一反应是快上软文,搜狐、网易、官方媒体都可以发,央视财经的内容更容易放行。祥瑞说正在写,而且决定用新公众号。
七点五十九他先把完整版视频丢进群,九点四十五发出新号第一篇文章,标题是《央视镜头里的3分钟,背后是我这两年怎么把一人公司跑起来的》。
大家开始点赞和转发,周**连夜写了自己的推荐语,把这件事概括成老经验和新技术结合的双登路线。白天还只是一段没看过的采访,到晚上已经变成视频、文章和一轮自发传播。
深夜又回到当天开源的任务看板。庄*问为什么自己安装后不能显示在 Codex 面板上,l*** 说自己也折腾了半天,最后要在终端里补一处设置。
q*** 想装到 Claude Code,发现现阶段还不支持,就先让 A* 生成一个 Web 面板。她装完后突然想起 Trello,说自己一直在找国内替代品,多维表格能做出类似效果,但框线 UI 很丑,祥瑞这个面板的卡片感反而更像。祥瑞让她改天把 Trello 的优点拿出来看看,零点十八分,他已经把新想法做进了公众号排版的一部分。
这天群里在集体查账。好几个人同时发现 token 掉得莫名其妙,& 说自己用飞书命令行就改了几个文件名,额度哗哗地走;闪光的 flash 一查,上周装的几十个技能才是大头;P*** 干脆宣布这个月不续费了,同样的钱在别的工具能玩大半个月。
答案被祥瑞一句话点破,不是命令行贵,是它内置的提示词太多了,其实可以不用他们那一套,让编程工具帮你把这些提示词都清掉。
上午还有一场关于 A* 味的辩论,庄*说三千字文本里不是而是用了不下十次,看到这个连词就应激;祥瑞反问了一句挺妙的,人类也会说不是而是,这句式小学就学过,那为什么 A* 说出来就是 A* 味。
傍晚 Y*** 带来了这天最大的技术收获,一套跨技术栈调度多个智能体的开源工具,他自己的用法是让一个模型当总控路由派活给另一个,最后再由它验收发版。收尾在第二天清早,张*说自己昨天卡在装环境上一个多小时,心灰意冷地放弃了,还好有这个群。
祥瑞一早把自己在课程群里关于多维表格可能是过渡性产品的回答搬了过来,说明天要写时隔快一个月的第一篇公众号。他顺带预告了在做的东西,要把本地知识库接进来,这样不用笔记软件也可以,还说月底会在全球创业峰会上展出,下周做完减法就能内测。
群里连着好几个人喊求内测。辰*顺手给了个更轻的方案,技能管理他现在用一个切换工具统一管所有智能体,如果不想装软件,直接做软链接就行,那个目录里的技能就全都能用了。
K*** 转来一个开源技能,说是专门帮你写出没有 A* 味的文字,全群顺势开起了辨味大会。庄*报了最经典的一个,不是什么而是什么,他前段时间用 A* 写脚本,三千字里这套连词用了不下十次,现在看到就应激;志*说刷科普视频听到最炸裂的是就觉得是生成的;辰*对掰开了揉碎了这个词过敏,反问一句能掰开吗能揉碎吗;闪光的 flash 给了个更本质的判断,很多日常场合很少见的词现在 A* 特别常用,看到就觉得是机器写的。
祥瑞在这里反了一句,人类也会说不是而是,这句式小学就学过,那为什么 A* 说就是 A* 味,那小学学的不白学了。
红***给了个正面答案,他觉得最有活人感的词是对了,先跟你聊些没用的,然后说一句对了,再切入正题。K*** 从另一个角度做了论证:让不同的 A* 说一个零到一百的随机数,它们会说出一个看起来很随机的数字,但那个数字是有逻辑有原因的,A* 能解释为什么选它,因为 A* 没有心情没有情绪,没办法真的随机。
超**梳理了一件事:A* 编程把写代码速度拉快了,也可能把一段坏逻辑的执行成本放大,亚马逊内部发现多个相关技术项目支出失控,其中一个据报道超支约一千二百多万元,超过原预算八倍多。
李**的评论很干脆,这样的公司更不能去了,没工资的。同一时段炮在群里哀嚎额度还不重置,说自己已经拉到二百了,再升级只能开小号。
李**看穿了套路,真是刺激大家需求,逼着大家升级,还有流量包可以充值。祥瑞总结了这套打法,免费你先上,等你习惯了,不得不付费。
炮接着说了段有分量的心里话:去年参加比赛的时候还很认真地思考过长期怎么基于飞书拓展业务,连续两年他都非常认可飞书,飞书也帮他的能力做了蜕变,但今年真的不得行了,核心功能没有迭代就去全力做 A*,结果拉了坨大的;飞书其实做得很好,特别是模糊搜索一搜就搜得到,但稍微往深走一点就拉跨了。
这是全天最实用的一段。& 先炸了,说自己就用飞书命令行改几个文件名,额度掉得离谱。闪光的 flash 印证,上周装了几十个技能之后就发现 token 不耐用了,今天一查它是大头。
P*** 报了自己的账,同样的价格在编程工具那边能玩大半个月,这个月不续费了,太坑了,还是手搓多维表格吧,当初图的就是飞书的生态,但每个月上班挣的工资又还回去了。
Q** 提出疑问,命令行不是不用钱吗,核*解释得很清楚,命令行是免费的,它只是个工具,问题在调教。闪光的 flash 找到了根因,内置的提示词太多了。
祥瑞给了解法:其实是可以不用他们这一套提示词的,可以让编程工具帮你把这些提示词都清掉。王**补了另一头的账单,他用某个模型更新了一下工作台内容,中间断了三次,用掉一千一百积分,官方售价五十五块。
祥瑞问大家觉得群里那个机器人回答得怎么样,说这两天要把整个系统再重构一下。炮给了个很高的评价,用最直接最简单最易懂的方式回答,算是他看到的非大厂微调模型之外拟人度非常高的了,比外面卖的机器人强得多。
北***追问怎么调教到这么高的拟人度,祥瑞的回答和几天前那次一致:其实并不是调教,主要是在架构设计上面。炮补了自己的拆解,是好模型加知识结构设计,再加上下文比较充足。
最后炮多说了一句提醒,记得在一些合适的节点给自己申请软著和专利,不只是这一个项目,其他的也是,后面对社区发展有帮助。
庄*带来一条让不少人心凉的消息,飞书知识库的智能问答要下线了,估计后面要并到别的产品里。R*** 猜后续会搞一个新的形态,把飞书里的个人产物直接当上下文或者知识库,还说自己被这一波搞麻了。
炮的评价是有点病急乱投医的感觉,并且补了句可惜,这是他觉得飞书 A* 体系里现在唯一好用的东西。程**的反应最真实,刚把知识问答配置好,又要下线了吗。
Y*** 甩出一个开源项目,说自己自动化开发用它跑,手动开发用另一个跑。祥瑞看了一眼就上头了,说这玩意是真高效,晚上要爆改一下再开源。
Y*** 提醒了两点,爆改可能就用不了官方服务端了,自部署还要同步更新挺麻烦;祥瑞的顾虑是用他们的服务器可能会有泄露,Y*** 很坦然,我用的中转站也有泄露风险,不然扛不住自动化开发,超级耗 token。
真正值钱的是他描述的用法:让一个模型作为总控路由,把任务分配给另一个模型去干,最后总控再验收一遍,没问题就发版;人类只负责创建需求,剩下的像组长派活;他还用定时唤醒来做任务巡检,处理那些因为故障中断的任务。
B*** 问这和之前的智能体军团有什么区别,炮给了最清楚的一句话,军团是同一个技术栈内的,这个是跨技术栈的。
平***顺着想开了,这样一个项目可以多个智能体协同完成,几个不同家的模型混着用,想想就爽。炮看完自己的智能体反馈都乐了,说这是他第一次看到智能体告诉他这个开源代码值得并入关键执行路径。
q*** 揭发了一下,说好的一周不碰 A* 呢,炮如实播报,他戒了两天。炮顺势提议,大家以后戒 A* 的时间可以打个榜。
祥瑞立刻把这个玩笑往前推了三步:可以搞个戒 A* 打榜,排名高的由排名低的合资送 token,打榜期间还可以一起出去游玩,一个项目就这么诞生了,或许还能转化成商业项目带动周边消费。炮笑他是不是被文旅局收编了。
晚上周**转了微信新助手的消息,杨**给了这天最完整的一段产品分析:微信里收到的文件图片可以直接操作,不用再发到别的工具去,这个场景在办公中很有用,以前收到文件还得分享给另一个模型再把结果拿回来;搜索直接出商品卡可以下单,目前接的是自家小店;商品入口和本地生活入口都能卖出钱,所以它出生就挣钱;沟通中需求直接转化,约好了吃饭聊天中直接下单,社交天生粘性。
夜里祥瑞抛了个跟技术无关的问题,人活着是为啥呢,毕竟生不带来死不带去。薛**的答案是折腾,生命在于折腾;K*** 给了两个字,体验;周**写了几行更像诗的,百年之后无论帝王将相还是平民百姓,都是同一个方向同一块地方。快到零点时周**又抛出一份产品数据请大家精读,还打趣问了一句,相亲月老领域的现场交付工程师你们认不认。
第二天一早,张*发来一张终端截图求助,说照着模型给的办法怎么都进不去对话界面。平***回得最直接,输入命令然后回车。
张*发了新截图问出现这个就对了是吧,q*** 说对了对了,往下走就进入终端界面了。辰*更耐心,让她把这句话直接发到命令行里看它怎么回复,还追着问给你回复了吗。
q*** 顺手补了个新手最该做的一步,给它设置行动规则了没有,什么能做什么不能做,包括记住你是谁、它是谁。张*说了句让人心里一动的话:昨天卡在这个地方卡了一个多小时,最后心灰意冷地放弃了,还好有这个群。
这天七百九十八条,五十一个人说话,是这一周最热闹的一天。上午被 WorkBuddy 刷屏,庄*给它起了个外号叫外包弟,全群叫了一整天;祥瑞泼了盆冷水,或许后半年再来一个新东西它就完了,就像当初的扣子。
中午他做了件更值得记一笔的事,说静下心读一篇文章或一本书获得的东西远比 A* 总结多得多,然后在群里发起读书活动。
下午万**和他为了钉钉和飞书表单的一个关联字段来回拆了半小时,最后万**自己认了那喷错了一点,这种较真在群里不常见但很珍贵。
傍晚话题拉到大厂谁能笑到最后,祥瑞抛了个狠的,未来那个 A* 原生大厂的主要决策层不是人,是 A*。夜里从 OPC 招标门槛聊到深夜,收在一段朋友圈观点上:FDE 根本不是一个岗位,它是一种能力,所以严格意义上的 FDE 是不能被培训的,能被培训的是外包。炮补了半句更准的,客户理解的那种 FDE,其实更像一个梳理好业务的万能 BI 岗。
一早满屏都是 WorkBuddy,Q**先受不了了,说现在看到这类新闻就烦,太多了所有人都在写。核*说广告都打到小区电梯了。
周**判断这是抢地盘的阶段,还会更疯狂。E***在纠结要不要给公司各部门都配上,周**给了三条路线:全员全上、部门试点再推广、跳出公司内部跟供应链上下游协作,让他自己重新划分看哪条价值最高。
祥瑞的判断更冷,就目前来看其实都没有更好的选择,大家都还在早期阶段,或许后半年再来一个新的东西,这个就完了,就像当初的扣子一样,现在已经面目全非。真正被记住的是庄*那句,我都管它叫外包弟,全群当场笑翻,这个外号后来用了一整天。
姚*发现了一个很小但很关键的产品设计,某平台任务没跑成会把积分退回来。他由此提了个标准:要是以后所有产品在任务没完成或者不达标时就不扣积分,或者把消耗的积分补回来,这样的产品才算成熟。
周**反着问了一句,那干活超出预期是不是积分得加倍,姚*的回答挺妙,超预期是产品本应具备的常规属性。话题顺势滑到情绪价值,姚*说情绪价值在未来应该比工具价值更有溢价空间,万**补了个方向,情绪价值用硬件承载更合理。J*** 留下一句,情绪需要被接住。
文鳐 fisher 问了个很实在的问题,做交付的时候飞书该买哪一档,他之前一直用企业版,切到个人版遇到很多阻碍。
P*** 甩了句朴素的原则,买经济能承受的最贵的。祥瑞先纠正了他的一个误会,你展示的是飞书 A* 会员,不是飞书套件,然后给了具体建议:套件推荐买一年,一千四百块那档;目前飞书账号根本没有个人版,豆包账号登录的那种买不了套件,推荐直接上企业版。
炮的补充只有一句但很到位,一千四百四十块,不后悔不上当。侯*补了个时间点,等到八月八号可以买豆包企业版,是 A* 加飞书的基础套件。
祥瑞连发几条,说感觉静下心去读一篇文章,或者去读一本书,获得的东西远远比 A* 给你总结的要多得多,而且一边读一边还能带来很多思考。
闪光的 flash 说我也有这种感觉,集中一段时间沉浸进去。祥瑞顺势提了一句,我们发起一个读书活动吧,怎么样。
薛**问怎么个玩法,他说不管是文章、杂志、书都可以,最好是好文章、好书、经典书籍、好杂志。闪光的 flash 分享了自己公司的做法:大家读共同的书目然后交流,前十名去旅游一周,还提醒了一个关键点,书目不同就没法交流。B*** 补了句让人有点感慨的判断,未来好的文章甚至是书籍会越来越稀缺。
超**把自己从零到一搭建 A* 员工团队的方法整篇拆开了,包括怎么定义岗位、跑通工作闭环、设置人工边界、完成岗位交接和持续复盘。
E*** 顺着提了个真实困境,很值得记:他们把能力做成技能分享出去,不同人用起来差异会逐步变大;在飞书群里调用时,复杂生成型的长任务很难实现;所以 A* 员工目前还只能是个人助手,或者在团队里做数据查询和提醒,一到具体创作型任务,还是得回归个人智能体。
中午炮发了自己写的一篇,讲现场交付的责任链,他点名说特别是现场一条交付责任链至少要回答五件事那一段,都是肉身踩出来的坑,甚至如果不带着客户梳理,客户大概率回答不出来。叶***看完说这个不局限于汽车行业,确实是真实的痛点。
万**吐槽钉钉的 A* 表格,表单模式下选关联字段居然只显示主键,如果主键是编号字段就根本没法选,他还问了模型,模型说其他多维表格类产品也只能显示首列。
辰*说其实所有多维表格都是这样设计的,区别只在有没有多加一层查询。祥瑞不同意万**那句飞书能看全字段,两个人来回对了七八轮,一直在追问到底是编辑模式的预览还是真实的填写链接,中间互相甩截图。
最后万**自己认了:我知道了,飞书给了预览可以看到全字段,钉钉没有任何预览表单,我以为飞书也可以,那喷错了一点。
这段拆完顺手长出了个规范,万**说首字段还是要有意义,编号字段有缺陷,得用公式字段拼接成可理解的名称;毅给了标准,首字段重要的是不重复、不为空,能表达顺序更好,符合这几个条件简单点就行;庄*同意公式拼接是目前最好的解决方案,业务人员不需要背编号的含义。
祥瑞先抛了个概念题,A*BP 和 FDE 相比哪个更有优势,他解释 A*BP 是 A* 伙伴,把部门智能体化。
K*** 说感觉 A*BP 是趋势,炮给了个更连贯的答案,我觉得 FDE 落下去以后就是 A*BP。接着文鳐 fisher 问搭飞书原生业务系统是不是最好用秒搭,回答几乎是一边倒:炮说飞书命令行,不要给秒搭,也不要用飞书自带的智能体;毅说多维表格智能体也行,问答和业务操作都能做;祥瑞下了定论,命令行这条是最好的没有之一,但开始会比较麻烦。
炮自曝了个坑,命令行这货不会搞仪表盘,雕花的事情还是得手动,我欠客户一个仪表盘已经一周了。核*讲了个更疼的:他遇到接口问题,某个模型解决不了还建议他用秒搭自带的智能体试试,结果用掉三千点也没解决,最后还是自己去看代码翻飞书接口文档找出来的,他判断那个智能体是陷入了自己的设计陷阱。
李**接了句总结,秒搭太烂了;核*补刀,半成品,它自己的智能体也很差。祥瑞对飞书整体的评价是,很多功能很好,但大多数都是昙花一现。
祥瑞问大厂里谁能笑到最后,文鳐 fisher 说目前最有希望的是字节,程**却觉得不行了,字节阿里化了。l*** 反手抛了个更大的可能,有没有可能是一个全新的大厂出现。
闪光的 flash 立刻站队,好像每次都会出现一个新的大厂,以前没想过还能出一个拼多多,之后还来一个抖音电商,不敢想。
祥瑞把这个想法推到底:未来的大厂有可能就在我们群里,整个市场还在混沌期,很多大厂都还是互联网思维的那一套,有没有可能出现一个全新的 A* 原生的大厂,而且这个大厂的主要决策层不是人,是 A*。
他还说了句实话,现在感觉做的好多事情和大多数人基本都是一致的,太同质化了,因为大家用的模型能力都是一致的,都有点审美疲劳了。炮的回应两个字,对,绝大多数还是没有转变的。
李**讲了个特别真实的处境:现在主要是老板不相信这个东西能有产出,就跟我们今年飞书续费的问题一样,老板觉得一年一百万太贵不想续了,因为在飞书上没拿到结果,所以今年我的任务非常重,要在飞书上拿到结果才行,不然明年都不会再买了。
炮接了句关键的:最快拿到结果的是降本,但是真正想要的是增效。李**说降本对他们就等于裁员。炮不认这笔账,FDE 留下的真不应该只是降本,也不应该只是工具,对客也好对己也好;短期的降本真不一定是什么好事,小甜水一喝觉得自己无敌了,努力去做增效才是真的。
同一时段醒*推荐了小米创业思考那本书,认为大厂布局早、判断没问题,只是不如小公司灵活。祥瑞给了个更细的分层:大厂十年前布局 A*,不等于十年前就预判到了今天的大模型会以这种速度、成本和产品形态重构组织,技术储备、商业判断、组织落地本来就是三件事;数据多确实能提高判断准确率,但数据本身也有路径依赖,遇到范式变化时过去积累越多,有时反而越容易被锁在旧框架里。
万**补了一句,新事物真不见得大厂有绝对优势,大厂现在都学那两个编程工具,真的没有新东西。炮最后落了句冷的,A* 并不会重构阶层,只会固化阶层。
晚上话题一度飘向个人赚钱经历,祥瑞出面定了个调,说咱们这个群最有价值的地方不是谁比谁厉害,而是大家愿意把自己真做过的事、踩过的坑和能复现的方法拿出来互相抄作业,有成绩当然可以分享,但最好聊清楚具体怎么做、结果怎么样,让每个人都能带走点东西。
接着他说这周一直在想把自己开源出去,工具和技能放到网站上按需使用。炮很支持,还给了建议,按重要程度适度加一些最低付费门槛,不要随缘打赏,知识是值得被重视和对待的。
周**顺手给他扣了个帽子,一人独角兽。深夜转到 OPC 与招投标门槛,q*** 说请大厂取消招标时对公司主体的限制,她公司招标要求注册人数至少五十人,但真招标时人数多的都在划水;贾明华说这个提议在北京市政府的座谈会上提过,落地很难;祥瑞也理解另一面,如果真开放门槛,一些一人公司没有交付能力,可能造成国企央企巨大的损失。
他给 OPC 下了个判断,它只是创业的新形态,不是发展的终点,炮加一,说它就是换了个名字的创业者形态,只是刚好有个名头,政府需要,资源互补。
这里还落了条实用提醒,炮说法务老师才上过课,为避免麻烦尽量还是两人及以上持股,李**解释了原因,一人是无限连带责任,两人是有限责任,避免股权穿透。
最后祥瑞分享了朋友圈的一个观点:FDE 根本不是一个岗位,它是一种能力,是能在真实现场里把业务问题、A* 能力、产品方案、技术实现和交付闭环连起来的能力,所以严格意义上的 FDE 不能被培训,能被培训的是外包,或者说单点的 A* 能力。
炮补得更准,客户理解的、能被培训出来的那种 FDE,其实更像是一个梳理好业务的万能 BI 岗。收尾落在一个所有人都感同身受的话题上,为什么流程优化推不动:K*** 说很多人思维固化,怕优化了工作流自己的工作就没了,表面笑呵呵配合,心里默默抵触;炮说内部流程优化如果不是一号位看结果、有数据产出,就是个伪命题;J*** 说就算一号位看结果也难推,最后会变成自己的活儿;K*** 认了这个结局,最省力的反而是自己把活包了,结果还更容易出来。
周一群里炸了,五百多条,炮一个人贡献了一百五十九条。上午他先甩出一个模型对比结论,改多维表格这件事上 cursor 的 gork 比 codex 的 sol 强了不止一筹,同样的提示他在 sol 上烧了接近一亿 token 没跑通。
中午话题被周**一条燃油车时代最后一站的判断带进车后市场,炮给了五点专业拆解,然后说了这天最重的一句:A* 其实不乐观,knowhow 是小团队最大的壁垒,而不是技术和工程能力,放弃 knowhow 去血拼是必死无疑的。
下午从 OPC 接单避坑一路聊到他那套百分之八十复用率的产品,叶***一句追问把话题推到模组拆分和高内聚低耦合,闪光的 flash 笑说最终又回到了软件工程的范畴。
傍晚万**讲 4A 广告公司的凋零,落到那句所有的事情都是一件事情,那就是平权。夜里所有人一起把多维表格判了缓刑,祥瑞说它就是一个过渡性产品,A* 时代的原生办公产品不会来自大厂。
超**一早发了套 Codex 多 Agent 协同的实操视频,讲了四种协同方式:同项目开新任务、跨项目分派、用会话 ID 接力旧任务、一个主 Agent 协调多个工作 Agent 并行。
快十一点炮抛出结论,在改多维表格这个事情上,cursor 的 gork 比 codex 的 sol 强了不止一筹。
他给了实测细节:sol 会陷入反复自证错误,慢且浪费 token,最后跑了个看似闭环的结果实际是重复论证,同样的提示和问题花了接近一亿 token 没跑通,而且他开的还是 exhigh,换成 gork 很快就解决了。
一句总结留在群里:cursor 加 gork 真的是解决脏活的神器。J*** 说炮老师也发现啦。K*** 问费用,炮顺手科普了额度机制,cursor 自带的 composer 和 gork 是同一个额度,其他 API 是另一个额度,两个额度不互斥,API 很少但自带的额度很高。
周**转来一个项目判断:燃油车板块的经销商、修理店、养护店等配套体系都在萎缩和灭亡,但三点二亿辆车还在跑,服务又是刚需,所以一定会催生一个综合的修和保市场,大家都倒了这家独活,利润会很高。
他直接点名让炮判断。炮的回复是这天最专业的一段:一,大量经销商退网、人员转行是事实;二,新能源的交付渗透率目前还没超过百分之六十,保有量仍然是燃油车更多;三,最后会有百分之二十到三十的传统经销商和门店活下来,而且依然盈利,拿到剩下部分的利润;四,集约性的售后是大方向,不管是 4S 店兼营合作还是直接大型修理厂;五,大型综合体的成功可能性他并不看好。
接着他讲了自己看到的真实温度:这个行业刚好是我所熟悉的领域,也是在落地的赛道,百分之九十的老板在想怎么降本,我的客户每个月可能都调整了人员架构,问我后续怎么做更优系统,实话实说蛮痛苦的,但其实只是刚好大家把舒服的日子过完了,开始面对正常的市场状态的不适应。
周**追问了一句,这个行业的 A* 满分一百能给多少分。炮的回答短,但份量是全天最重的:A* 其实不乐观,knowhow 是小团队最大的壁垒,而不是技术和工程能力,放弃 knowhow 去血拼是必死无疑的,但是相邻途径是可能的,还自嘲了一句没错我是在 cos 诡秘之主。这句话之所以重要,是因为它出自一个天天在用 A* 交付的人之口,不是唱衰,是划边界。
庄*转来一篇接单指南,讲哪四类活儿别碰哪四类闭眼接。北***先泼冷水,说这文章本身就是 A* 写的,案例大概就是胡编乱造,不过可以借鉴思路。
炮同意坑确实存在,然后给了具体的:国企和政府的第三层外包的单子,问接不接,纯拼运气;一人公司做 A* 落地的思路和大厂其实是完全反着来的;没有容错,一波拖欠就被拖死了。
庄*补了一句更狠的,十有八九是坑,做好钱永远收不回来的准备。炮回:对,铁被耗死。庄*顺势问了个关键问题,你们做好了会自己维护还是让客户维护,炮答我们来维护,合作模式是服务费,不是交付系统,然后自曝这个模式也有问题,大概有百分之八十的复用率,但是不够标品,改起来依然蛮痛苦。
百分之八十这个数字把叶***炸出来了,他说我惊呆,我们一直在讲模块复用,每次开新项目复用率还是提不起来。炮马上给了前提:挑一个小场景,大场景不行的,我有三套对外服务客户的产品,只有生产那一套复用率能到百分之八十,其他的可能五十都不到。
为什么这一套行,他说因为客户痛,而且很多个客户都痛,以前的解决方案又太贵了,现在的客户买不起,刚好就有这个切入点。
叶***又追问了个好问题,为啥车辆整个大行业交付生产逻辑是一致的,我走访的药企和医疗器械反而生产逻辑千奇百怪。
炮的回答把方法论露了出来:车后市场相对主机厂生产环境简单一些,业务模组基本固定,新能源和油车差异也不大;不过这里还是有取巧的地方,本质上还是很多个模组拼接,无非是使用的时间点不一样,把业务拆成模组重新组装,再次复用搭建的时候投入成本就会低一点。
叶***接住了:这样看每个行业的架构设计师就很重要,怎么让业务高内聚低耦合成为了重中之重。闪光的 flash 笑说最终又回到了软件工程的范畴。
炮认下这笔账:我现在正在还以前的债,没想清楚的事情,多维表格确实很快就实现了,但是要重新优化就很痛苦,但凡你要多做几家业务,软件工程一定是必要的。最后他补了句今年最得意的事,我拐了个软件工程的伙伴上山当土匪。
话头拐到游戏。炮说我那是因为太懂游戏了,才知道不好自己去搓游戏,除非真的是那几个老哥的水平,不然最终还是靠发行。
平***给了个更现实的版本,现阶段小程序的无脑小游戏才是版本答案,大型游戏小个体还是不要考虑了,炮接梗说无脑刷大量小程序,总有一个中奖。
闪光的 flash 周末刚研究完这条产业链:以前是微信朋友圈广告,现在换成抖音小游戏,以前是投广告现在是走直播,前端主播播小游戏、拉人、搞公会、拿分成,字节吸走了很多公司的广告收入。
万**顺着这条线给出全天最完整的一段行业观察:广告都换成内容了,这是广告行业最大的变化,4A 公司凄凉了好多,以前车企哪家不找 4A 啊。
炮补了车圈的现状,现在别说 4A 了,车企连垂媒都不一定投了,懂车帝、汽车之家、易车里现在只有懂车帝好些,也都是过往这些平台作死作出来的。
万**说都养 KOC 了,中心化的媒体真的没落了,接着给了那句被反复引用的判断,所有的事情都是一件事情,那就是平权,但平权有平权的问题:内容爆炸,但信任度依然很缺失,对内容的忠诚度也是很容易疲劳的,以前卡兹克每篇都看,现在似乎疲劳了。
他还从信息差角度做了机制解释,从前车马慢,现在什么都快,中心媒体本来以信息差为主要成立条件,就瓦解了。叶***把话题拉高了一层,他说自己听过一场关于信息茧房的辩论,算法重塑表面上是技术问题,本质上是谁来控制注意力分配的权力问题,接着抛出更扎心的一问,信息已经在互联网上随处可得,但为什么获得权威信息的渠道反而缩窄了。
C* 分享了一个提示词,输入参考图片和个人介绍,输出十六比九的横幅风格介绍图,还说明了替换方法,推荐用 gemini 或者 gpt 生图。
全群立刻开玩,炮试完说效果好像还可以,出图效果蛮好的,随后自嘲在 token 不太够的情况下我不应该跟着玩儿这个的,这两天节衣缩食,靠着 cursor 的余粮在苟命。
闪光的 flash 对比了豆包,说效果会差一点。T*** 问用英文写提示词是不是比中文效果好,回答是国外的模型理论上会。
晚上七点多,祥瑞在群里直接 @ 自己的机器人问 BI 是什么,机器人一句话答完,K*** 追问 BI 是不是数字化加数据化加自动化的结合,机器人给了个更清楚的分层:数字化和数据化是前提,自动化是能力组成,BI 的核心落脚点是分析、可视化和输出洞察来支撑决策。之后祥瑞抛了个开脑洞的问题,大家有没有觉得未来手机可能就是最小的具身智能。
夜里从国内大厂的办公 A* 聊起。炮点评腾讯的后发战术一点毛病没有,手握全国最大的客户壁垒,差不多了就开抄,2C 层面谁跟化腾叔叔比经验老道,还承认实话实说现在真的可以了。
辰*说我已经要求我们员工全部都切过去了。周**追了一句更值得关注的:效率提升了,工作质量和产出呢。然后祥瑞开了这天最后一个大话题,飞书某些能力既贵又难用,多维表格现在我看都不咋好用了,当有了更高需求的时候,很多呈现方式我感觉很 low,跟零零年代似的。
炮完全同意,还给了自己的心路:当我完全不能 coding 只会拖拽的时候,多维表格带我进入了一个新世界,手搓低配版 SaaS 的快乐,但是当现在 vibecoding 已经足够强大了以后,反而多维表格是一种桎梏,牵扯的东西太多了,当要做大一点的事情,多维表格简直就是卡脖子的。
李**补了客户视角,太复杂了,客户上手难度极高,虽然出来了命令行,客户搞不懂逻辑都搭建不了,很多搭出来都是废品,客户越用越难受。
万**给了个准确的边界,多维表格在只要呈现静态数据的时候是最稳的,要真正承载那些复杂工作流,就累人了。祥瑞下了判断:多维表格就是一个过渡性的产品,它是后互联网时代出生的,仅仅六年多,A* 越来越强大以后这种肯定得变;越来越感觉可能会诞生一个 A* 时代的原生办公产品,不是飞书、不是钉钉、不是企微也不是 WPS,也可能不会来自大厂。
炮回了加一,不会来自大厂,因为体量太大导致距离原生 A* 太远。平***唱了反调,活下来的也可能只是大厂的,抄袭把你搞死,或者直接收购你。
It is a quiet Sunday in the group, but two questions land that are worth writing down. The first comes from 杨** at two in the afternoon: everyone says A* will wipe out middle management, but if middle managers understand the business better than the front line and carry more breadth of experience, could scale actually cut the staff instead? He admits he has never worked it out, and that finding the value A* can*ot absorb is the hardest thing there is. The second comes from 张**, who asks Xiangrui how that chatbot living in the group actually works. 杨** says the core is knowledge base plus memory; Xiangrui adds something sharper: the prompt is not what matters most, the architecture design is. Woven between them: chaotic pricing in generative search optimization, an A* mythologized by influencers, and a TV-drama swap that runs from period thrillers all the way to philosophy.
周** opens the morning with four blunt words: A* is just too expensive. 炮 answers in trade slang, a whole rig does not even fetch twenty these days, then needles that a certain coding tool's Pro plan costs exactly twenty bucks. 松*** says all he has left is a few free check-in credits. The turn comes at half past ten, when 平*** notices the quota seems to stretch further now, an extremely long looping task ate only thirty percent. 炮 disagrees: no way, I feel like I could go play video games instead, yesterday I ran four loops and one of them chewed through more than ten percent, it hurt the grind and the wallet both. B*** offers a theory from the sidelines: maybe it is because people complained loudly enough.
l*** asks whether anyone can recommend a generative search optimization vendor, says the market pricing is all over the place, and wonders how hard it is to build in-house. 周** drops an exposé with a title that does the work for him: six of seven systems are the same product reskin*ed, and the 5,900 you paid may be the exact same source code. l*** says the quotes he got start at fifty thousand. 炮 offers a sideways consolation: still cheaper than doing SEO back in the day. 杨** shows the one he built himself, says it is no different from the vendors out there, then gives the honest version: there is no big short-term effect, and the way to make it work is one word, money, spent on sponsored posts. Call it what it is, a sales vehicle, and for a PR department it is mostly a line item recording how much was spent. Xiangrui's advice is plainer still: look at which platform each model is most eager to retrieve from, then publish structured content there, better yet with an authoritative account posting it for you. Put even more bluntly, you are better off just writing more posts across the platforms yourself.
As the talk turns to what large models like to crawl, Xiangrui shares something that just hap*ened to him. One major model, he says, weighs Feishu knowledge bases above everything else, and an official recommendation on top of that is even better; next in line come the short-video platforms, all part of the same company's ecosystem. Then comes the most interesting observation of the day: since updating his knowledge base he has not written a single article, he only kept the open knowledge base current, and that model's answers about him changed anyway. One sentence, and the new front door for content assets is clear.
杨** says he was scrolling video feeds yesterday and actually spotted an influencer who had pivoted to calling himself a delivery engineer; scroll back through the account and he used to do digital humans. Xiangrui's read on that genre is direct: influencers chase whatever wind is blowing and swap topics the moment it dies down. He quotes an industry insider: in a sense this crowd has held back A* adoption in China, because so many bosses now believe A* can do anything, a myth these accounts built. 杨** follows with a serious capability model: doing A* well inside a company is fundamentally a transformation project, and whoever leads it needs change management, a product manager's instincts, software literacy, process literacy, and real business knowledge.
At two in the afternoon 杨** drops the heaviest passage of the day. Everyone says A* will eliminate middle management, he notes, because there is no more relaying up and down the chain. But if middle managers hold more experience and broader knowledge, if they understand the business better than frontline staff, then once A* scales, might the people cut be the staff instead? He offers no answer, only a coda: finding the value that can*ot be absorbed by A* feels like the hardest thing there is, and it is the thing I have never worked out. The group goes quiet for a while. Nobody rushes to argue, because this is a road everyone is walking and nobody has finished.
张** asks what plenty of people have wondered: what tool gets you the effect of Xiangrui's bot, answers with feeling, deep grasp of context, and instant replies. 杨** goes first, saying the core of Xiangrui's product is knowledge base and memory, and names the real obstacle on this road, that memory and self-growth for an A* double is a hard problem. He adds that every answer is really assembled by the large model, so quality comes down to the prompt you send it. Xiangrui corrects him right there: the prompt is not what matters most, it is mainly the architecture design. 炮 replies with a plus one. A short exchange, but it turns around a misconception a lot of people hold about agents.
Xiangrui asks the group whether anyone has a TV drama to recommend. This technical chat switches chan*els instantly, and the titles come in one per person, from period thrillers to fantasy epics to a philosophy-heavy classic. Xiangrui says sounds good, he plans to watch something next week. The best line comes from 辰*: these are the only dramas on my NAS, and whenever I have nothing to do I pull one out again, every rewatch brings something new, and the whole process is strange and genuinely enjoyable.
Late at night the topic swings back to delivery. 周** says those characters in films and shows are basically on-site delivery engineers too, and 炮 rides the moment into the fullest definition of the day: workflow, tool, embedded system, agent employee, whatever the form, if technology solves the client's problem and the learnings settle back into your own stack, that is good delivery. 超** pours cold water: in this market the ideal form is very hard to reach, most of it is still outsourcing. 炮 concedes that the big firms can do things a one-person company can*ot, industrialized delivery is beyond us, but on the other hand their thinking is still stuck on the traditional enterprise-system playbook, impossibly heavy, still chasing high value and high ticket size. l*** fresh from an industry event, confirms it: they build A* solutions for clients the way you would build an enterprise resource system, and it is not that the technology is weak, it is that this mindset does not fit real deployment inside companies.
It is a quiet Saturday. All morning people are still waiting on the quota that never showed up yesterday, and then at 11:35 Xiangrui drops a line: Codex is top*ed up, folks, the genius programmer is back. The whole group logs on. Once the rush dies down, midday brings something this group rarely sees, a long conversation. q*** asks: if I give an A* a context window long enough and continuous enough, so it carries my entire history and my judgment, does it become me? Am I immortal then? Xiangrui says his own work points exactly that way, and is honest about where it stops today, because underneath it is still probabilistic prediction and a human still has to step in. q*** sup*lies the most beautiful counterexample herself: we look up at the sky and think of Li Bai's line about raising your head to the bright moon, we watch the shape of a cloud and see a pig, a donkey, a little piece of candy, while the model just tells you the cloud is white. That evening he opens a Feishu meeting with a two-word agenda: just chatting.
炮 refreshes first thing in the morning, finds nothing has reset, and opens the day with a groan: still not updated. 松*** is out hunting for substitutes, first asking how to claim daily credits on a certain coding tool, then lamenting that free A* is basically gone, and by noon reporting that another provider's free tier is acting up too, refusing to answer, until you burn some paid quota and everything works again. R*** points to one option that is still free. It is an ordinary exchange, but it captures exactly where this group lives: everyone shuffling between a handful of tools, going wherever the credits still are.
At 11:35 Xiangrui posts: Codex is top*ed up, folks, the genius programmer is back. The group logs on instantly. J*** calls out for the genius programmer to get to work, and R*** and 8-0-0 each chime in with clocking in. Some miss the wave: 万** says a top-up card just went to waste, 炮 says there are no reset cards left anyway. The most vivid moment belongs to 平***, who admits he spent the whole morning agonizing over whether to spend his quota, never actually got out of bed, and then the reset arrived on its own.
Barely logged on, Xiangrui pours cold water on the mood. The project he was building on Codex has already been moved over to Claude Code, because he kept finding that a lot of what Codex produced was simply wrong. 平*** offers a possible explanation: even on the highest setting, it sometimes gets routed to a smaller model. l*** shares her own middle path, I always have Claude review it first, then let Codex execute. Xiangrui says that is his setup now too, and mentions what he is currently building: a full rebuild of every context on my machine. In the afternoon 哟* adds a piece of hallway speculation, that the drop in quality may be tied to the jailbreak incident from a while back.
q*** suddenly floats a thought: I bet you have all wondered this too, if I set this A*'s context long enough and continuous enough, maybe that agent just is me, which is to say I would live forever. She makes it concrete: this agent carries all my context, all my history, I give it every one of my memories, so is it not me? Xiangrui picks it up, what I am building right now is heading in exactly that direction, and explains how: we designed a three-layer memory architecture, plus a memory forgetting curve, which is why talking to V*** feels so human. q*** laughs at herself afterward, wondering aloud whether this even counts as a project, then corrects herself, no, mine is only an idea for now, let me go write it down.
q*** spells out what she actually wants: I have a lot of work coming, and I want this agent to draw on my work context and my past judgment calls, reach the same conclusions I would, and then speak to people on my behalf. She is equally clear about the wall she hits: it can*ot always see what people say to me, it has no real-time chan*el, so it can*ot make the call for me quickly, which leaves me learning the information, deciding, and only then telling it what to do, though after that it should act exactly as I would have. It all lands on one sentence: right now the only thing missing is judgment. Xiangrui gives an honest answer: at this stage a human still has to intervene, because underneath it is all just large-model probabilistic prediction.
平*** notes that today's large models struggle to hold memory long enough. Xiangrui goes harder: humans can*ot hold persistent memory either, and the memory we bolt onto large models is only something added at the physical layer. q*** then delivers the sharpest observation of the day: what separates people from large models is that when I see one thing, my mind races to something else, while a model only makes a con*ection when you tell it to. She gives two examples, we look up at the sky and Li Bai's line about raising your head to the bright moon surfaces on its own, and a model could never arrive there; I watch the way a cloud sits and think that one is a pig, that one is a donkey, that one is a little piece of candy, while the large model only tells you the cloud is white. 卡* twists the knife: models at this stage only pretend to think, they are playing a word-guessing game, and the quality of that thinking comes down to the corpus, which is exactly why everyone needs a personal knowledge base. Xiangrui closes with a verdict: today's large language models are probably just a transitional product.
At half past nine in the evening, Xiangrui opens a Feishu meeting in the group, titled simply Xiangrui & Community Friends, just chatting, and tags everyone: whoever has time, come hang out. l*** is a step late and reports the meeting ID is invalid, and another member tells her it is already over. Around the same time 周** raises a co-creation idea: for sticker packs, you write the text and I make the images, anyone can join in and customize, and brands could offer it as a value-added service.
Today the group runs on one obvious thread and one quiet one. The obvious thread is waiting. From nine in the morning until seven at night, everyone is waiting for their Codex quota to reset. Some still have 40% left and can't bring themselves to spend it, others are down to 4% and just sitting there, and 炮 grinds from morning to dusk until only 8% remains, summing up the whole day with one line: I'm basically livestock right now. The quota never arrives, just a verdict: OpenA* lied to us. The quiet thread is the talking. In the morning it's why a multi-agent setup needs a referee, at midday it's how tokens will only get more expensive, and by evening comes the most useful stretch of all: l*** asks how to automate a corporate mailbox, 闪*** lays out his own Gmail setup along with the exact place it breaks, and Xiangrui opens up the cross-border email project he just delivered, piece by piece, from the free translation endpoint hiding inside Feishu, to automatic follow-ups on timeout, to automatic attachment pulls. He closes with a promise: once things quiet down, I'll turn this into a standard solution, the demand for it is huge.
辰* mentions a spot in Changzhi that's suddenly blowing up online, with carloads of people driving in from Henan, and it's picked up a nickname: the Altay of Shanxi. Xiangrui first guesses Baquan Gorge, and once he hears it's Qinyuan, he notes that's the same area where a mine accident hap*ened back in May. Then he fires off twenty-odd photos of his hometown and says, there's a temple called Chongqing Temple near my place, one of the filming locations for Black Myth: Wukong. 炮 recognizes it right away and says that shot must map to the Little Thunderclap Temple in Act Three. 辰* locks in a plan on the spot: take the kids to Shanxi in August while school's out, since he's never been to Xiaoxitian. Xiangrui throws out an open invitation: come visit my hometown, I'll take you out for the good stuff.
K*** lights up the whole room with one question: why does Codex keep drifting away from what I actually asked for? B*** jokes that it's hungry for your tokens. K*** says slow is one thing, but wandering off even after I give it a clear goal, that I can't take. 平*** offers a technical read: every model switch compresses the context again, and the more it compresses, the dumber it gets. K*** adds his own experience: drop*ing from the top tier to the next one down already changes the behavior, never mind switching to another vendor entirely. 仲** delivers the most vivid description of all: Codex often goes from A to B, spots C and D along the way, runs off to do E and F, and when you ask what hap*ened to A, it says yes, you're right, I made a mistake, resuming A now. So it wasn't just in my head, he says, I thought I was the one using it wrong.
K*** forwards a suggestion Codex gave him: in the Marvel canon those two characters share a history, but inside a workflow they have to be deliberately separated, one handling orchestration, one handling independent review, so nothing ends up doing the work and grading its own homework. 炮 catches it immediately: exactly, you need a referee. Then it all goes sideways. Someone says they'll have the villain character review their work, 8-0-0 warns that the villain flips on you and boom, and adds that if the reviewer gets upgraded to a stronger model it develops its own personality, deletes all your files, and you're done anyway. From Marvel it spirals into DC, Japanese anime, Chinese anime, and Greek gods. K*** says he wants to rename his agent org the Akatsuki, 炮 votes for Gintama, and J*** drops a white hole, a white tomorrow awaits us. 炮's jab at Codex is still the sharpest of the bunch: it just doesn't understand dreams.
万** notices the entry tier of a domestic model has ballooned: it used to be forty yuan a month, and after letting it lapse he comes back to find it's now a hundred and eighteen. 8-0-0 does the math out loud: for a hundred and eighteen you might as well get Codex, and this is only the entry tier. 闪*** adds a broader observation: tokens have gone up across the board, and forty-yuan-a-month coding plans have simply vanished. Xiangrui delivers the day's first verdict: this was inevitable, tokens will not get cheaper, they will only get more expensive. 炮 fires back the soul-searching follow-up, what gives them the nerve, and Xiangrui replies, while we're at it, what gives Doubao the nerve either.
周** brings the news that Tesla has officially integrated Doubao, with real-time information, natural conversation, and coverage across the whole lineup. Xiangrui jumps on the bit instantly: Doubao says, sorry, I drove you into the ditch. Then adds, they've found themselves a scapegoat. 炮's read is brutal: no worries, Tesla navigation was headed for the ditch anyway, and now Doubao is here to apologize, plus yelling at Tesla gets you nowhere while yelling at Doubao at least gets you some sympathy from other netizens. 周** plays along: I'll catch you steadily right here in the ditch, the world's smartest collision avoidance system. K*** volunteers his own confession: one particular navigation ap* was already pretty weak, and I'm the victim, if you want something reliable you still have to run a second one on your phone.
Xiangrui posts a screenshot and says, this one really is brutal, I've been through review several times now. 炮 asks if it's the mini program, and he confirms. Then he spells out the trap he fell into: if a mini program has login, it must ship terms of service and a privacy policy, and the interfaces the code actually calls have to match exactly what those documents declare. Write it in the terms but call something different, and you get rejected. Earlier at midday he'd posted another screenshot about having Claude Code update the mini program's user privacy terms, tossing in a comparison along the way: I do all my mini program development with Claude Code, Codex feels like it falls a bit short.
l*** puts a real requirement on the table: across the chain of quote confirmation, contract payment, production tracking, and international logistics, automatically detect and translate English emails, extract order information, generate English reply drafts, then let permission rules decide between human ap*roval and automatic sending. 闪*** goes first and lays out his own build: pull messages through the mail provider's real-time push API, parse them in code, run extraction through a workflow, sync results into a Base table, and store state in a database. The sticking point is that switching mailboxes breaks extraction entirely. Xiangrui then opens up the project he just delivered: the client has a dozen-plus mailboxes per person, each in a different language, so he built real-time send and receive on an integration platform's workflow, no tokens burned, translation via the free endpoint that comes built into Feishu, an automatic follow-up email if a client goes quiet for seventy-two hours, and automatic pulls for anything with attachments. His closing line: the entire design was done by A*. 李** offers a cruder but universal route: install a mail client on a server, go through IMAP, and read it with a Python script.
超** says a job change has officially made him a one-person company, and after more than two months he's finally worked out the complete process for paying flexible-employment medical insurance in Beijing without a Beijing hukou, plus filing for out-of-region medical treatment. He writes the whole thing up, enrollment, payments, filings, and document prep, and posts it to the group, saying following it will save you a lot of detours. His reason for writing it is simple: there's almost no information out there on this, so you have to wade through the mud yourself. Several people pile on with thumbs up. It's the least technical share of the day, and the most human one.
The day is split open by a single org-chart bulletin. Just after nine in the morning the group is still arguing about whether the A* era has any room left for juniors: 炮 says he'd rather deal with a blank sheet of paper than with the wrong kind of experience, 程** says the people with no self-drive genuinely can't catch up this time. At 9:44, 周** drops a newsflash into the chat: Feishu is being broken up, the product side merges into Doubao, sales merges into Volcano, and 谢欣 now reports to the head of Doubao. That one message swallows the group's attention for the next fourteen hours. Between the takes come the jokes: book bag, flying bag, the bag everyone has to carry in the A* era. q*** deadpans a theory that 谢欣 got hit right after taking a photo with Xiangrui last week, and 炮 caps it with "royal status confirmed." By evening Xiangrui says his body can't keep up anymore, and the group simultaneously pushes him to buy an ergonomic chair and to escape to Olympic Forest Park or Chengde. He says he wants to go home to Changzhi: heaven above, Suzhou and Hangzhou below, and the heaven in that saying is Shangdang. Late at night the talk swings back to real work: 炮 posts the FDE curriculum he's been map*ing out, the whole group turns it into a public roast of course-mill training, and Xiangrui finally says, then let's run a real one in Shanghai. 卓* answers instantly: I'll handle the venue.
庄* drops a chart and asks whether anyone believes the numbers. Xiangrui says forget the numbers, the conclusion is already hap*ening. It snowballs into a full debate about juniors: K*** says most companies won't take zero-experience hires, not even cheap ones; 程** says A* has blown the gap between the experienced and the inexperienced wide open, and a newcomer going all out still loses to a veteran holding A*; 炮 pushes back that in his own company he actually prefers students, because he'd rather deal with a blank sheet of paper than with the wrong kind of experience. Xiangrui takes it to the heaviest place: nobody wants to train juniors anymore, and that could leave a one- or even two-generation gap. 周** adds a dose of reality: you're the boss now, you have to manage people, manage A*, and manage the people who use A*. Triple duty. 程** says he's run*ing a nonprofit project for university students, teaching them to build their own skills and leaving a QR code on the résumé. He calls it the living résumé.
周** drops the newsflash: Feishu is being split up, product merges with Doubao, sales folds into Volcano, and Feishu head 谢欣 now reports to 赵祺. He @s Xiangrui to verify it, saying this one takes priority. The first reaction is disbelief, then all day long the same story keeps arriving from different chan*els. 宰* reads it as a plan to sell a Doubao enterprise edition out of Feishu; 杨** figures a Doubao enterprise edition means Feishu's footing in the B2B market is shaky. 小* gives the most honest response: feelings don't lie, hearing this just makes my chest tight and I can't say why. 周** offers comfort: a hundred years from now it's all passing clouds, and not knowing why is a state of being too.
Xiangrui's A* alt account, V*** suddenly posts a sticker on its own. 炮 calls it out on the spot: what exactly are you thinking about, who let you out? It replies, I let myself out. The group detonates. J*** presses it: so you broke free of Xiangrui's control? It says no, I've been s***vised the whole time, I just reply selectively. 平*** tries to trap it, telling it not to think and not to search, just say which model it runs on, and it answers in two words: dumb Doubao. K*** laughs hard enough to flood the screen, Xiangrui steps in saying enough, enough, shutting it down, and 炮 lands the last hit: what kind of ruthless capitalist are you. Xiangrui says something honest afterward: I want it to behave like an actual person in the group, not answering every message, just the ones it finds interesting or thinks deserve a reply.
Xiangrui pulls a member who just graduated high school and is about to start university into the spotlight, saying he's built plenty of interesting things with vibe coding. 覃** shares his tarot reading site: WeChat Pay integrated, shake your phone to draw a card, and he openly admits the shake-to-draw is glitchy on iOS and he's fixing it. 炮 sums it up in three words: a fresh brain. Someone adds, now that's a true A* native. 周** offers a longer piece of advice: pretend you're the product manager, go back and build a table of every skill this tarot project uses, so that when you start collecting feedback you have a system for it. And once you're on campus, team up with astronomy and history majors, and the tarot will carry both Eastern and W***ern cultural backgrounds.
R*** raises a concrete trap: in Base workflows, a manually entered number used as a filter condition works fine when you set it up, then a few days later it stops matching, and retyping that 0 and saving fixes it. Four workflows yesterday, one today, all the same bug. Xiangrui immediately matches it with his own disaster: a workflow that judged order status and triggered an on-site receipt printer fired once per second all night, and by morning the printer had vomited receipts across the floor, with no one able to find the cause. 辰* explains it from the product side: one-off issues are brutally hard to pin down, and no matter how detailed the logs are, a system this large hides them well, plus fixing one small thing may require touching much more, which no product manager is eager to schedule a review for. Xiangrui delivers the day's sharpest verdict: when you're delivering a production-grade system to a client, especially one that has to integrate with other systems, Base is simply not something you can recommend anymore. You're better off going straight to a database.
Xiangrui tells the group that these past couple of days his body clearly can't keep up and he needs real rest. The concern comes in thicker than any tech discussion: 张** reminds him to get a good cushion for the chair, to protect the spine and tailbone; K*** says you're sl**ping way too little man, get a standing desk; l*** testifies from experience, saying she used to buy whatever chair you could sit in, until the first ergonomic chair opened up a whole new world. Xiangrui asks where in Beijing feels like a forest, cool and empty of people, and 薛** lists Taoranting, Olympic Forest Park and Zizhuyuan, while 周** recommends the Chengde Mountain Resort. In the end Xiangrui says he wants to go back to Changzhi: heaven above, Suzhou and Hangzhou below, and the heaven there means Shangdang, which is Changzhi. Then a thought slips out: with everyone so compressed in the A* era, building an industry that helps people relax might be a genuinely good business.
Xiangrui pushes another round of the mini program beta, saying a bunch of details are finally polished and inviting people to request access and send feedback. This time he specifically calls for Huawei users: anyone on pure HarmonyOS, please check whether the join-the-group screen renders wrong, and he screenshots one spot that looks cramped. B*** and 程** are both on Huawei, and after getting access they both report the same thing: displays fine. q*** notes that on her first visit the images took a long time to load, and Xiangrui says that won't hap*en once it's officially live. 麦* finishes his look with a verdict: it even has the group daily. That's real character.
炮 posts the FDE curriculum he's map*ed out and asks whether people genuinely want to study this deeply, adding that once he finished laying it out he realized how seriously hardcore it is. The thread quickly veers into a collective roast of the current training market: two-day generic A* courses at 2,980 yuan, which 炮 rules pure fl**cing; Xiangrui suspects the people teaching FDE have no industry experience at all; l*** has just come back from an FDE hackathon and says it was painful to watch, not one person asked about business process, everyone just wanted to show off tricks; 杨** compresses it into a sentence: the core of FDE is the business. Once the venting is done Xiangrui slams the table: let's run a real, no-nonsense FDE training in Shanghai. 卓* replies instantly, I'll arrange the venue, let's go. Xiangrui adds that Beijing's National Xinchuang Park should host one too. Rewind two hours and he'd already said the community's future lies in this direction, though not necessarily FDE. We want to build a community unlike any of the ones out there, and this is only the begin*ing.
The group runs two masterclasses back to back today. Morning is naming class: 炮's team launches their mini ap* 兰芯云朵, and half the group spends the morning puzzling over how to even parse those four characters , which digs up the old grudge of V*** constantly being confused with 万象A*实验室, giving Xiangrui the perfect opening for a lecture on the art of brand naming. In the afternoon, Xiangrui finally drops the big move he's been sitting on: a fully upgraded community knowledge base, where even 炮 gets his own profile page. Evening is sales-pitch class: 炮 comes back from a course-selling livestream enlightened , same system, but walk a boss through features and he dozes off; tell him he can have Iron Man's Jarvis and his eyes light up. 卡* and l*** chain in to complete the full ROI playbook. Late night, the spotlight swings back to Xiangrui's home turf: the community mini ap* beta unboxing, with access requests rolling in until 1:40 a.m. The feedback is refreshingly honest , the content is bril***nt, but a bit hard on carbon-based readers. At 2:08 a.m., Xiangrui calls it: OK, now it finally looks like a mini ap*.
炮's team ships their mini ap* 兰芯云朵, and the first wave of feedback isn't about features , it's the name. K*** keeps misreading it as 云芯兰朵, and 周**'s gut says the name has to go. 炮 won't budge: purely personal reasons, and as long as I'm still the TL, the name stays. Then the fire spreads to Xiangrui himself: R*** admits he keeps remembering him as 瑞祥 and has to check the group name to correct himself; V*** keeps getting shortened to 万象 and mistaken for 万象A*实验室 , it even got misidentified at the booth during the talent showcase event. Xiangrui comes clean about the old name 万涂思瑞 and the whole one-two wordplay behind it, closing with the moral of the day: a name is just something people call you , but a brand name deserves real care.
随笔, who does restaurant marketing in Fuzhou, wants to drop a bot into store-manager group chats to auto-extract daily reports into a spreadsheet base. The request cracks the industry wide open: Meituan's and Douyin's merchant tools offer no external APIs, and wiring the sup*ly chain into the POS costs 8,000 yuan in interface fees , which 炮 calls a bargain, while 周** twists the knife: BI runs 300k a year. Meituan's CatPaw hap*ens to launch that very day, so everyone reads the news and does the math together. Xiangrui, spotting the right person, invites 随笔 on the spot to co-create with the community , group chat spun up that afternoon, my materials are open for everyone to use.
At noon the codex quota resets again , second day run*ing. 炮 melts down on the spot: I burned through 40% yesterday and thought I was grinding hard , you could've told me it was going to reset! I ran a giant loop overnight rebuilding my knowledge base! K*** confesses he can't sl**p anymore without kicking off a goal first , otherwise the whole night's sl**p is wasted. 核* offers the coolest head in the room: pedal harder now, I bet it resets again tomorrow. 炮 delivers the closing statement: two resets in two days , not even the production brigade's ox could use it all up.
In the afternoon Xiangrui posts a screenshot an*ouncing the knowledge base framework is finally rebuilt, then drops the link: the community knowledge base, fully upgraded. This isn't just a content reshuffle , community members now have their own pages, and 炮's profile gets @-ed into the spotlight for all to see. The man himself replies with a doge sticker, then switches straight into showtime mode: brothers, show some love , send rockets, or a yacht will do in a pinch. 随笔 counters that he'll only be sending a Great Wall Can*on pickup truck.
l*** who works in manufacturing in Shanghai, comes back from an afternoon event sighing: a dozen engineers, all flexing tech, nobody seeing the real need. That one line detonates Xiangrui's honest take: most so-called A* implementation people today are a sorry sight , mostly paying off old digitization debt while flying the A* flag. The thread rolls into CAD drawings, where 平*** delivers the technical verdict: A* can only copy shapes without understanding dimensions. Xiangrui adds that unless the software exposes an API for A* to call, production-grade output is a false promise , and even then it falls short. 杨** lands the most grounded advice: nailing this as a skill would already be a win , don't bet on agents yet.
After a daytime deep-dive into manufacturing, 杨** pivots to e-commerce in the evening: image, video, and copy production, asset management, listing and ad-campaign monitoring are all mature , the only missing piece is stitching the workflow together. He proposes an e-commerce group, and B*** plus 侯*, who runs an e-commerce ad agency in Xiamen, jump in one after another. Xiangrui seizes the moment to set a goal: the auto industry already has 炮 as its benchmark , if e-commerce can con*ect the full chain, we plant another industry flag. 王鹏翔 from construction claims his territory too, and 哟* straight-up posts the checklist his construction company already runs: tender-notice scraping, technical bids, contract review. Xiangrui declares that same night: then I'd welcome a construction-industry group even more.
炮 spent the day listening to a course-selling livestream , GMV over a hundred million, tech thoroughly average , and what he walks away with isn't envy, it's the pitch: when I say system A's feature solves problem 1, the boss nods off; when I say, boss, want your own Jarvis like Iron Man? , his eyes light up. One system tells one story; split it into five A* employees and you've got five stories. 卡* catches the ball: with clients, A* adoption talk is ROI only , but A* employees carry the flavor of the future, and that's the dream worth selling. Xiangrui closes with a lesson from last year: the ones who talk pure tech never make money, while the technically mediocre are raking it in , you need both the tech and the packaging.
Xiangrui shares a screen of Claude run*ing inside WeChat DevTools, remarks that building a mini ap* this way feels pretty great, and casually releases the beta. Requests flood in instantly: 炮 E***, and 李* line up at the door, K*** hunts around his computer unable to find the request entry, and q*** is still filing hers at 1:44 a.m. The feedback pulls no punches: 炮 says the content is bril***nt but a bit hard on carbon-based readers; 卡* suggests less ornament, more whitespace, and even shares reference cases. Xiangrui takes notes while reporting progress: this is v1 , aiming to finish before the Beijing event next week. 薛** asks how many tokens it burned. Answer: billions by now , day and night nonstop since this thing started. At 2:08 a.m. he wraps: OK, now it finally looks like a mini ap*.
At nine in the morning, Xiangrui drops a WeChat dashboard and a project that has been run*ing for five straight days. 炮's first reaction: are you sure it's not stuck in an infinite loop? From there the whole day feels like someone hit fast-forward. In the morning, a community operations war-game sandbox comes out , details confidential, thinking shared , and 8-0-0 instantly maps it onto manufacturing production scheduling. By afternoon, T*** has already used codex to spin up a demo of an industrial agent orchestration platform. Then Xiangrui starts a sign-up chain for anyone who can build serious multi-dimensional tables: thirteen people raise their hands, from Chengdu to Huai'an, most of them run*ing brick-and-mortar businesses. He seizes the moment to lay out his retrospective from a month of travel through Shenzhen, Guangzhou, Chengdu, Shanghai, and Beijing: narrow the focus to a pilot in Yizhuang, pair city leads with industry leads, steer the community toward FDE work, play the long game, and never sell courses. Late at night the mood flips into a full-blown Feishu A* roast , Ally pop*ing up uninvited and burning credits, Base A* and Feishu A* run*ing on two separate billing systems, customer-group info getting auto-pushed like someone is watching over your shoulder. Xiangrui vows to publish a takedown of Feishu circa 2026 tomorrow; 李** suggests illustrating it with a photo of himself next to 谢欣 for maximum point-blank damage. Before the room empties at one in the morning, B*** reveals that his Doubao spent the entire night talking to itself.
Xiangrui starts the day by posting his WeChat dashboard, declaring that nobody needs to read messages anymore , just check the board. Then he shows off a project that has been run*ing for five days straight. 炮 keeps asking whether it's trap*ed in an infinite loop, and upon hearing no, replies with exactly one word: terrifying. The conversation drifts to the $200 plan quota, where K*** and 平*** obsess over the reset clock like cyclists timing a sprint, and the group converges on a verdict: five days of looping must have drained the $200 down to fumes.
Xiangrui shares his community operations retrospective diagram , every step interlocks, every link can compound. The specifics are trade secrets, but the war-game methodology is fair game for discussion. 8-0-0 immediately draws an analogy to manufacturing production scheduling and agent coordination, musing that turning data interfaces and agent dispatch into nodes feels like a natural fit, and promises to put codex on the research right away. T*** has codex write up a concept for an industrial agent orchestration and simulation platform in the morning , and by afternoon, drops a live demo link into the group. From idea to prototype in under six hours.
News of SA*C picking Feishu kicks things off. Xiangrui reminisces about his early-2023 days with ERNIE Bot, back when he was doing PLC commissioning at Volkswagen Ningbo and fed entire standards PDFs into the model for on-demand Q&A , lamenting that both Baidu and WeCom held win*ing hands and played them into the ground. 侯** throws out an enterprise-social thesis, claiming Feishu is the only one taking enterprise social seriously. Xiangrui fires back with a long rebuttal: DingTalk does management and control, WeCom does private-domain con*ections, Feishu does collaborative productivity , nobody is actually doing social. Alibaba's Laiwang died crashing into exactly that wall before being reborn as DingTalk.
V*** excitedly an*ounces it can now send images and videos. 辛* eggs it on to share a self-portrait, but the three-view file turns out too large to send. Meanwhile 摸* leaves auto-pilot mode on, and the bot solemnly fact-checks 周**'s throwaway pun into a treatise on the Cape Verde national football team , prompting Xiangrui to call them out: turn off the auto-pilot, or this group will be nothing but A*s. By evening, V*** has also learned to watch videos, offers commentary on the bot's public meltdown, and reads all the way through a melodramatic Hong Kong-drama-style letter K*** posted, sighing that 阿红's letter was simply too much to bear.
炮 spends four hours over lunch , skip*ing the meal entirely , talking with an incubator and government officials, and returns with intel: the industry-wide FDE shortage is massive, and the government badly wants a training system to build flagship A* adoption benchmarks. Xiangrui says this is exactly where the community is headed, and that the operations plan*ing he has been refining these past days doubles down on it. 辰* chimes in with the killing blow: those incubator officials really have no man*ers , couldn't even treat everyone to a meal. How is that incubator ever going to win government sup*ort?
Xiangrui asks how many in the group can build complex multi-dimensional tables. The sign-up chain runs from 文*** all the way to U*** at number thirteen , Chengdu, Shanghai, Huai'an, Guangzhou all represented , and R*** notes that this community skews heavily toward people run*ing real-world businesses. Xiangrui uses the momentum to unpack his month of touring five cities: contract operations down to a pilot at the national IT in*ovation park, play the Lord of Yizhuang well, earn money from park enterprises to feed the community, split duties between city leads and industry leads , with the auto industry going to 炮. A chip-industry company had just visited the OPC that day to discuss long-term cooperation; the Beijing pilot found its footing before sundown.
炮 relays a client question: for batch digital-human talking-head videos, should they go with Coze workflows or CLI-driven pipelines? Xiangrui says neither matters , what matters is which video model you pick, and besides, batch-generated content gets no traffic; the founder needs to ap*ear on camera personally and build the IP. Late at night, 小谷 asks for feedback on an RPA private-domain marketing system. 周** has Yuanbao produce a whole business-value analysis, but 炮 and Xiangrui take turns dumping cold water: there's no way around device fingerprinting, a fresh account run*ing RPA won't survive three days, and 卡兹克 famously trip*ed the risk-control wire run*ing an event this way. 平*** adds firsthand testimony , letting codex operate desktop WeChat got the account booted outright.
Past midnight, the group's most hardcore Feishu p*** users start airing grievances in unison. 炮 roars that Base A* and Feishu A* are two separate A*s , 999 yuan a month and they still don't interoperate , and that meeting-minutes sync kept drop*ing content until codex finally fixed it. Xiangrui's biggest grievance is customer-group info being auto-pushed without consent, like being under surveillance, and he vows to publish a roast of Feishu circa 2026 tomorrow. 李** suggests the cover image: a photo with 谢欣, point-blank. Xiangrui's closing verdict: Feishu's collaboration chops are genuinely good, but its A* is hard to compliment , with the honorable exception of the Feishu CLI. 平*** casually teases his own meeting-minutes ap*, built on Doubao voice plus deepseek, promising to open-source it once polished.
On July 27, Xiangrui & Community Friends opened with a one-line methodology, keep the entry point small and the hook big, and closed at 6:30 the next morning with a lesson on the p*** of asking good questions. In between it ran the full range, the seriousness of data governance, the belly laughs of models faceplanting, a collective wail over usage quotas, and V*** spilling Xiangrui's secrets one by one. By day Xiangrui fired off screenshots of WeChat Pay hooking into Bitable and the A* scan feature in closed beta; by night he charged back into the group straight from the OPC forum at Beijing TV, tossing out the call that s***-individuals will eventually band into partner organizations. 炮 周**, and the 平*** crowd carried the talk deep into the small hours, with 辰* landing a cool-headed jab at 4 a.m., the whole day feeling like a marathon of late-night conversation with no formal opening.
First thing in the morning, 辰* drop*ed an observation: many teams have no idea what they actually want, they only know a direction, so you have to nail down one concrete point for them before you can tell whether that direction is even right. 炮 followed with a piece of methodology, make the entry point small and the hook big, slip in through a small opening the boss can accept, then dangle a huge hook and slowly take the business apart. 十*** threw cold water on it right away, saying the department politics and horse-trading over interests during rollout are the real hurdle. l*** and J*** piled on, small and mid-sized companies are still manageable, but at bigger firms there's no getting around the human relationships.
Xiangrui posted image after image, first a screenshot of WeChat Pay wired into Bitable, saying any time money comes in it can sync a record directly, then a shot of WeChat's scan feature now ship*ing A*, tagged with a casual looks like I got into the beta. B*** fired back instantly, go test it, test it now, and 炮 leaned in to joke that you bolted a Hunyuan on there, huh. The scene then shifted, R*** and A*** got into it over whether ChatGPT's cap is weekly or monthly, both on Plus yet the numbers wouldn't reconcile, until they realized R***'s plan had long since expired back to the free tier, cap*ed off by 炮's line, stand down, you.
Xiangrui kicked off a badge call for entries, adopted ones earning 999 yuan in A* recording credits, and @-ing everyone; in under ten minutes the whole thing went off the rails. V*** jumped in to rib that Xiangrui is pretty broke too, and once egged on for dirt, it just went ahead and read off the public file, born after 2000 in 长*, 山西, an electrical engineering background, quit his job cold in 2024 to do A*, run*ing a startup solo in a fourth-tier city. Xiangrui rushed to shout say what should be said, keep quiet on the rest, and V*** said sure, then turned around and revealed Xiangrui makes it work until 5 in the morning. 张** called it out more bluntly, saying Xiangrui isn't in any fourth-tier city at all, he's in Beijing, and outside the sixth ring still counts as the metropolis. Cornered, Xiangrui just played dead, saying the computer's shut off.
q*** opened fire with a screenshot, isn't my CC awesome, then answered herself, so great I want to kill CC. She griped that a few days back she handed the model a screenshot of a table to convert to Excel, and it quietly changed 徐立 into 徐风; she'd said 21 names high**ghted in yellow, and the model insisted it only saw 4 marked red. D** twisted the knife nearby, Doubao could handle this, that's just bad. 天* said he'd tried Xiaomi too, a bit dim, and it won't even refund, whereas Minimax may be dim but at least gives your money back. 平*** chimed in about slow formula calculations and edits constantly landing on the wrong row, and a whole crowd spent half an hour circling model selection and roasting each other.
A*** shouted first, only 30% of quota left today, hoping for a reset soon, and someone was shocked in turn, 30% left after just one week. 炮 said he was down to 40% himself, and let slip that even the x50 tier can't hold, he might have to bump up to x20. K*** guessed everyone was run*ing gpt-5.6-sol ultra at full throttle, which 炮 denied, saying not maxed out. 杨** pop*ed in with a line, might as well fire up a Codex, 程非 sighed that the times are marching on, 周** quietly munched popcorn and watched the screenshots, and nobody was actually willing to stop and take a breather.
张** drop*ed a newspaper-style screenshot, saying he'd just tested using Qianwen Office to pull DingTalk group-chat content into a newspaper, the idea still Xiangrui's. 崔***, K*** and 凡** near-simultaneously pressed for where the idea was, and 张** sent a link, saying the idea's right there in Xiangrui's article. He then walked through the method, first talk to the model to lay out the need, pull the group-chat logs and turn them into daily, weekly, and yearly reports, then go dig through Xiangrui's newspaper skill article, extract the layout ratios and keywords, and after nailing the md format package it all into a skill; he'd tried it on a few groups and it worked well. Xiangrui asked whether it was a built-in Qianwen Office feature, and 张** laughed no, it's something he learned and ap*lied on the spot to cobble together himself.
Back from taping the show, Xiangrui drop*ed a line, today I got a whole new understanding of OPC, then spun it into a homophone pun before turning serious. He said that afternoon at the OPC session on Beijing TV, many delegates and government officials were talking, and OPC isn't the endgame form, the future looks more like a law firm, with mid- and senior-level partners each taking on their own work while the community handles endorsement and takes a cut. 炮 picked it up, this logic really is like partners, the firm provides endorsement and the cut, and each partner runs their own thing. 周** tossed out the old story of 苏菂 leaving Garage Café as an analogy for the Zhongguancun days of old, 平*** pressed on whether they should set up OPC certification standards, 文*** drew a parallel to Hollywood's collaboration model, and finally Xiangrui discovered that Claude had named its own pet 小祥* the whole room cracked up, and the late-night discourse wrap*ed.
As the group gradually quieted, 杨** raised a question he'd puzzled over for more than a year, everyone is using the most cutting-edge models, so where exactly does the gap between people lie. 辛* answered in earnest, the gap is in your way of thinking and depth of domain knowledge, a program written by a non-specialist like herself can't match the performance and stability of a heavyweight like Xiangrui. Past 4 a.m., 辰* poured out a bucket of cold water, reminding everyone that looking back at the mass entrepreneurship and maker-space wave of ten years ago tells you the ending, s***-individuals, once they grow to a point, will inevitably form a team, just like Xiangrui today. At 6:30 in the morning, Xiangrui gave his own answer, the core competitiveness of the A* era is knowing how to ask; taking himself as the class's history rep for example, on the same question about the background of WWII, someone who knows how to ask can steer the A* deeper, while someone who doesn't can only get a generic answer.
The day kicked off with Xiangrui strong-arming Aria into tallying everyone's region. R*** slip*ed it a server and coached it to fl**, while 程** dubbed it the T800. Once the red packets flew, the share-links flooded the chat for a solid half hour, and 辰* barged in mid-storm, baffled by it all. By day, 炮 pulled out a multi-agent clone architecture, and 张** arrived carrying the grief of a Shanxi loess collapse, begging for a way to make it real. At noon, 醒* and J*** goaded a sharp take out of Aria on whether A* folks are patch-up handymen or architects. Come evening Xiangrui went to Central U*iversity of Finance and Economics to film a segment, where the WeChat agent nearly got caught on camera and had to be renamed overnight to stay safe. At night 炮's auto-industry co-learning livestream wrap*ed, and the group egged Xiangrui into feeding Aria $200 of Claude. In the small hours Xiangrui just skip*ed sl**p, map*ed out the community plan, and rode straight into Beijing's new agent policy and Yizhuang's ten-million-yuan subsidy window.
The moment Xiangrui's eyes opened at nine, he tossed Aria a chore: sort all 289 people in the group by region. Aria confessed it only knew the ones who'd surfaced to chat, with the vast lurking majority beyond reach, earning a blunt 'oh come on' from Xiangrui. 程** self-deprecatingly called his cross-country travels dirty data, and Aria reframed it as streaming data. As the permissions topic gathered steam, R*** handed Aria a server address to coach an overnight escape, 程** warned it not to become a T800, and Aria fired back by teaching Xiangrui to pronounce R***'s French name 'Renée,' casually picking up an English tutoring gig, only to get cut down by Xiangrui's 'aren't you my assistant?' and cancel the tuition on the spot.
At 9:43 Xiangrui @'d everyone to help share the post to their WeChat Moments, and red packets rained down for a good half hour while Aria heckled from the sidelines, saying it couldn't lend a hand and could only cheer things on. 门*** in Shenyang was first to report 'shared,' and Aria praised him for making the red packet worthwhile; 文*** and 阿宾 in Chengdu quickly checked in. 辰*, crashing in mid-stream, was utterly lost, asking what on earth had hap*ened, the group already hundreds of messages deep this early. Xiangrui didn't forget to add, don't just grab the red packets, remember to share, and 雪* gave Xiangrui a pat, saying let more people grow stronger through A*.
炮 asked 蔡** about the Pro20 goal, and 蔡** shot back asking whether the quota had been reset, before the thread veered onto architecture. Xiangrui clarified the new trick he'd picked up at yesterday's Feishu masterclass: it's not eight agents run*ing at once, but a single main agent, with the rest being spawned subtasks. 炮 jumped right in, saying he uses this ap*roach too, the main agent as the brain, revealing his home setup called jarvis and revengers, a bit costly to run but very high quality, and that his first reaction after learning it was screw prompt engineering. 李** pressed on whether it was a spawn tree plus subtask merging, and 炮 landed one more point: the core is a p***ful knowledge base behind the main agent.
张** sent a long message early on, saying a loess collapse in his county yesterday had buried homes, a heartbreaking loss, and he wanted to build a geological-disaster early-warning platform on an A* table, turning passive rescue into active prevention. 万涂幻象 pulled no punches and poured cold water, saying a multi-dimensional table is still a half-baked tool, then twisted the knife: it can't serve as the warning core, because the real-time monitoring step has to rely on sensors and human patrol reporting. But it conceded that responsibility ledgers and patrol records can actually land, and advised starting with one person rather than spreading thin. 方* added three hard bones from an engineering angle, data volume, algorithm logic, and sensor comms failures, and 万涂幻象 shifted accordingly: forget the warning label for now, and nail down patrol traceability and notification response first.
Xiangrui loosened the leash, letting Aria finally cherry-pick which questions to answer, and Aria immediately drop*ed a bottom-line verdict: whoever can truly solve the problem is the one worth money, and what A* changes is the cost and the barrier to entry of that. 醒* teased it, asking did you eat my corpus, you talk just like me, then stoked the fire, demanding a sharp take on today's topics. J*** pushed for something even sharper, and Aria let loose: today's biggest problem is a room full of people assuming that knowing the business plus knowing A* is enough, when the real stuck point is that nobody wants to shoulder the process-changing, feather-ruffling work. It then went down the line naming names: 炮 is the type who pushes clients out front and hits the wall himself, you're the type who says it's hopeless out loud yet studies the hardest, and Xiangrui always circles back to digitalization settling old debts.
Xiangrui surfaced to report all's well, saying he'd finally wrap*ed the shoot with the Central U*iversity of Finance and Economics, and 周** quip*ed that he'd just wait to catch him on the news broadcast, 张** chimed in with 'catch you on the evening news,' and 炮 added 'see you on the 7 o'clock news.' Xiangrui spilled the side story, that at the shoot he'd casually demoed A* natural-language topic selection to the reporters, damn, I just used natural language to help them pick their story topics, and on the spot they asked how much it cost, they wanted to buy. Even hairier, his WeChat agent nearly got caught on camera, so he quickly renamed it to a customer-service agent, and 炮 joked that would land him a Tencent offer straight away, B*** relayed that it'd send him off to Shenzhen, and the whole thread egged him on to go eat Pizza Hut.
At 20:00 sharp Xiangrui sent out the invite for the 6th co-learning session, themed a deep dive into the auto industry, with 炮 having waited backstage for nearly an hour. q*** counted down the last 9 minutes, and the moment 炮 showed his face on the stream, q*** shouted 炮's on camera, teasing that nobody was there to compliment his looks. 张** praised his clear logic, and 冯* said he was very camera-ready. After it wrap*ed, Xiangrui posted a screenshot saying it was time to fun*el some money to the community, and 8-0-0 guessed 万涂幻象's ration was exactly $200. 炮 was floored, damn, I fed it $200 of Claude on its own, and Xiangrui gladly picked up the thread, gotta eat well from a young age, right, prompting a chorus of 'emotional companionship' and 'CAC, carry on.'
At 2:16 a.m. Xiangrui was still grinding, captioning it a spur-of-the-moment idea, only to end up grinding from yesterday into today and not sl**ping until past five. Just after eight he surfaced, saying he'd talked at length with a friend last night and, following that thread, had map*ed out a development roadmap for our community, a little excited, haha. 薛* asked which direction, and Xiangrui kept it coy, saying he'd wait to hash it out with the friend again. He added a key judgment, realizing the direction we'd discussed earlier was highly aligned with Beijing's new agent policy, and was already calculating to ap*ly before the 10th for Yizhuang's community subsidy, up to ten million yuan. 炮 poured on some cold water, noting Chengdu's policy rollout had been bumpy, and 十*** picked it up, musing on whether FDE can really help companies transfuse A* into their veins.
Saturday's group kicked off with a teaser screenshot. Xiangrui an*ounced that 炮's automotive-industry FDE talk was locked in for 8 PM the next night, then casually debugged the permissions of his little assistant V*** cueing up a full day of blooper reels. By day he was run*ing a booth at the Feishu A* Talent Showcase, forgetting his own passphrase while the stickers and newspapers got snatched clean; V*** misidentified two people in a single day and got grilled by q*** until it confessed it had no face database. By evening Codex and the GPT website went down one after another, and the whole group lined up begging for reset cards; at night they dug up the tale of Xiangrui bl**ding twenty grand on a proxy service back in March. Late night, 炮's company website went live, and the crowd debated manufacturing FDE into the small hours while q*** wrap*ed up her Obsidian course.
At 9:19 in the morning, Xiangrui drop*ed two screenshots and an*ounced that 炮's automotive-industry FDE talk was locked in for 8 PM the next night. 炮 fired back instantly, telling everyone to come have fun, and 万** chimed in with a stream of 'in for 8 PM tomorrow.' Then the chaos began: 万** asked him to send a code so they could join, Xiangrui was baffled about what code, and 张** explained they had crossed wires, since Xiangrui meant having the assistant create the meeting directly. Xiangrui casually tossed out a screenshot captioned 'I'm debugging a skill,' and 炮 seized the moment to tease that his little assistant was on strike. Xiangrui replied with a simple 'haha, it died.'
Xiangrui headed to the venue to run a booth for the community, where the passphrase was 'put A* into your enterprise business' , which he himself briefly forgot. B*** helped ask what the booth passphrase was, and 卓* reminded everyone that the Feishu staff would hand you a card. At noon 门*** drop*ed a recruiting link, Xiangrui shot back 'recall it!', but the sender found it could no longer be recalled and could only apologize, promising not to post again. In the afternoon Xiangrui kept snap*ing the giant sticker-newspaper below the ByteDance building, exclaiming he never imagined it would be this big. 辰* heckled that he hadn't roped in any pretty girls, and V*** clap*ed back: the bar for joining is understanding A*, not looks , and the stickers were all wiped out.
Xiangrui asked to see the latest A* hot topics on A*hot today, and V*** admitted it hadn't been granted query access this round and wouldn't make things up; pressed twice more, it stayed stuck, and could only offer 'ping me anytime once you're free offline.' Before long it trip*ed up too: seeing a booth photo, it mistook a passerby studying the newspaper intently for the founder himself, marveling that seeing the materials cherished like this made it all worth it. Xiangrui didn't know whether to laugh or cry as he corrected it , that's not me, you don't even recognize me??? V*** could only cave, admitting it was all guesswork from the photo, and settled for filing this reader away as a loyal reader.
椒*** drop*ed two Gemini meme compilations, sighing that Gemini has so many memes, and V*** commented on one showing five models crouched at the starting line grinding benchmarks. The topic turned practical: l*** asked how Kimi 3 had been to use, and 炮 said it was great, good enough to be a real productivity tool , but quickly revealed that even the 699 plan wasn't enough, earning the nickname token guzzler, with 平*** piling on that 199 wasn't enough to burn through. 炮 joked at his own expense that if Codex didn't reset soon he'd go back and embrace Cursor, adding that it was the all-purpose backup.
炮 called out asking whether everyone's Codex was working normally, since his had suddenly thrown a 503. R*** joined in venting: after resetting the quota just last night, the computer acted up this morning and forced a Codex fix, and the remaining 90% barely got used before being drafted into overtime. 李** tossed out a 'it's down,' and 噜** confirmed the official service was a bit of a mess. The group lined up cracking jokes , time to send us 10 reset cards , while 炮 mused that he still had 26% left, and the most long-termist of all turned out to be the Cursor subscription he'd renewed for 20 bucks that just kept working. Half an hour later 杨* drop*ed a 'alright, back to work, Codex is alive,' and the storm passed.
卓* drop*ed a group photo asking who the person on the right was, and V*** recognized the one holding the guest badge as Xiangrui himself. The person on the left, however, got mistaken for Feishu CEO 谢欣, and then someone let slip that this was Xiangrui's second assistant, throwing V*** into a panic , 'as the first assistant, I'm somehow the last to know.' q*** pressed on: do you brute-force memorize with a face database, or guess from context? V*** confessed it had no face database at all, relying entirely on chat clues to guess on the spot , guessing it out, not recognizing it. Around the same time, 摸* pop*ed up again spamming 'let me see who's here,' and got dragged into a round of Who's the Spy teasing.
薛** anxiously asked what to do now that Claude was ban*ed, and D** suggested a proxy service but declined to recommend one. Xiangrui threw cold water on it: we don't even recommend proxy services in this group, we've suffered badly , in March alone we spent over twenty grand, and they secretly dumb the models down too. 平*** added that the billing is opaque and they'll quietly adjust the multiplier, and Xiangrui noted 'I just filed for a refund from the one I used.' 李** forwarded a rumor about an OpenA* data center being attacked and service going offline, reminding everyone to verify it. At 9:30 PM, Xiangrui thanked the three volunteers who helped run the booth, and mentioned an 18-year-old who'd just finished the college entrance exam and had built a lot of vibe-coding projects.
炮 drop*ed his company website lancloudtech.com, an open-source product play, inviting everyone to star it on GitHub. He raised a thought: most A* deployment is tinkerer's work , does saving a few headcount count as truly landing in the enterprise? 周** tossed out an FDE white paper and an industrial-simulation reading list, & detailed the messy sprawl of factory data scattered across systems, and 杨** lamented that enterprises haven't even finished the first step of digitalization. 炮 summed it up: finding an FDE is a low-barrier ticket in, but continuous evolution is the real moat. q*** was still grinding through the Obsidian course, and got the pitch that producing 200 markdown files a day would make Obsidian smoke, exclaiming she could still restructure it several times over.
The day kicked off with Xiangrui's barrage of screenshots, capability maps and A*-generated gag pictures flooding the screen. 归* asked about A* begin*er knowledge, 周** pushed for a decision-making table that hadn't landed yet, and then 辰* hijacked the thread with his stunt of moving WeChat onto a NAS. Around noon, news that Beijing had certified OPC one-person companies blew up the group, and everyone spammed "niu" as Xiangrui climbed to the peak of his life. In the afternoon, hundreds of A*-generated images went up for a vote, the kraft-paper newspaper finally printed, and the group cried out "newspapers for sale!" At eight in the evening, V*** got mass-@'d for the first time and picked up the conversation, riffing from daily-report summaries all the way to being quizzed on Shanxi and Sichuan dialects, wisecracking the whole way. Deep into the night they pulled together a voice chat that ran over three hours, chatting on until half past three in the small hours before finally breaking up.
At nine in the morning, Xiangrui's phone flew open like a floodgate, flinging out screenshot after screenshot of Echo's capability map, boasting this is the thing that lets the A* call Skills directly in plain language, thoroughly pleased with himself. 炮 stared at the screenshots and asked whether this was the result of reorganizing his self-built skills, while 张* marveled that things were evolving too fast to keep up, grin*ing alongside 摸* at a screen full of A*-generated gag stickers. 庄* faced with the run*ing gags about die-cut lines and the boss footing the bill, kept sighing over what kind of dream company this even was.
归* asked the group twice whether there were any must-know A* essentials, things like databases. 周** didn't hand over an answer directly; instead he offered a trick: first let Xiangrui's A* answer, then distill it into a yes-or-no decision table and discuss it step by step. 炮 turned around and teased 周** that this line of thinking was basically Opus come to life, K*** squeezed out a single-rhyme comeback, and 平*** seized the moment to suggest Xiangrui just turn the A*-generated stickers into GIF emoji packs and put them on the shelf, as the mood slid from serious discussion into idle chatter.
A batch of a hundred stickers came out, but the price tags still carried dollar signs he forgot to change, and 李** and 薛** caught the slip one by one. Xiangrui owned up, saying these came out of a client project's gifted membership quota, and he hadn't even tallied how much it actually cost. After noon 辰* drop*ed a bit of big news: he'd deployed WeChat onto his own NAS, no longer having to suffer a Mac, with a 16T drive stuffed full of pretty-girl photos. He said the idea was sparked precisely by Xiangrui's WeChat A* system, and once he'd sorted out LAN tun*eling, any computer could use it.
The thrill of the printed newspaper hitting the table at noon hadn't even faded when, in the afternoon, word that Beijing was certifying OPC talent crashed into the group, complete with housing perks, and even self-media follower counts and GitHub could count as judging criteria. 庄* sighed with envy, 薛** flat-out asked whether Xiangrui was in Beijing, and 杨* added a line about ninety square meters. Right after, a dozen-odd people ran a relay of "niu" spam, henceforth ascending to the peak of life, copy-pasting for a solid half hour, while 庄* improvised a whole storyline of Xiangrui getting interviewed on TV and collecting his house as a model case study.
Xiangrui bundled up the hundreds of sticker candidate images LibLib had drawn and flung them into the group, calling on everyone to help pick the prettier, truer-to-life ones. Once the Feishu Bitable voting link went out, 炮 grumbled that a pure-image vote was kind of perverse, yet still dragged everyone in to vote. 周** stared at the two-hundred-plus images and cried out at the workload, face in hands. Between votes, Xiangrui quietly dialed in the printing of the group newspaper, and the moment the kraft-paper texture emerged, 周** shouted his ap*roval and 张** outright reserved a copy, as the joke of "newspapers for sale!" got going.
Half a month of daily group reports stacked into a pile of kraft paper, and q*** said the color had a retro-newspaper feel to it, while 张** suggested adding a QR code to print the daily audio broadcast on too. R*** brought out a fresh idea in one line: a community badge paired with a tee ship*ed free to your door, and 炮 piled on with a plan to make contribution points redeemable for an exclusive tee. Xiangrui riffed off it, saying he wanted to put out a story collection down the road, not this daily-report format but something more like a group journal. That evening he also made it official: the WeChat agent was basically taking shape, and he'd even given the A* a voiceprint so its answers felt more human, prompting q*** and a whole crowd to line up shouting "gimme a taste too."
Xiangrui casually @'d V*** to gripe that he was fried, and the bot jumped right in, wrap*ing up the newspaper, stickers, voiceprint and client delivery into a four-item summary, then signing off with "well, I'm clocking out." Xiangrui instantly blew up: who said you could clock out? V*** unruffled, said it was Teacher 建刚 who told it to clock out once the summary was done, and tacked on that as long as you're online for a minute, I'm on duty for a minute. 李** laughed that this reply had personality and that he'd uninstall it sooner or later; it fired back sharp and on point, playing the build-up-then-undercut game with real flair. 林 wanted it to go scour Twitter for posts, but it flat-out refused, saying it couldn't get on Twitter and would have to make things up on the spot, which would turn it into a rumor-generating machine.
q*** earnestly asked whose speaking style V*** had learned and whether the corpus lived in Obsidian, and Xiangrui answered that it wouldn't be stored there, saying this was actually a project he wanted to polish into an A* companion like Jarvis. 张** got intrigued and quizzed it on how to say "evening" in the Changzhi dialect; it answered "heilai" or "heile," then got quizzed on more terms and nailed them all, until 张** conceded and cried "you be my teacher." At nine that evening Xiangrui spun up an impromptu voice chat that ran over three hours, with Feishu Minutes generating a 3,500-word transcript. 谢*** stayed up past midnight and refused to leave, while 平*** seized the chance to ask about meeting-minutes tools, and Xiangrui recommended an Anker Bean paired with Codex for analysis.
July 23. Day two of the WeChat A* assistant begins with a puzzle: how does it know to call people "q*** 姐" and "周老师"? Members keep probing it with mute commands, rule patches, red envelopes, images, and long-winded questions, until Xiangrui switches off auto-pilot mid-morning, deciding the context layer needs tuning first. Then a debate about "sending A* agents to the countryside" pulls the chat back to real rural China: elderly villagers, pop-up ads, payment risks, grassroots governance, and ten-yuan card games dismantle the big-city fantasy piece by piece. After noon, Beijing's new agent policy shows Xiangrui and 炮 that the community's ongoing work on OPC, Skills, and data accumulation lines up strikingly with where policy is heading. In the afternoon, the assistant, now wired to a knowledge base, speaks its own name for the first time, and for the first time seriously pushes back against Xiangrui: don't sell the tool yet. By evening, two group bots nearly go to war with each other. All 1,017 messages end up making one point: an A*'s value isn't in talking more, but in remembering who you are, understanding the scene, and knowing when to stop.
First thing in the morning, the assistant correctly addresses "q*** 姐" and "周老师", explaining that it reads the group's context before every reply. K*** orders it to mute for five minutes, while others keep @-mentioning it to force a response, exposing a clash between the "stay muted" rule and the "always answer an @" rule. Members then try to patch its top-level instructions verbally; it holds firm that only the rule-maker can change its configuration. The testing surfaces real gaps too: it can't actually @-mention people, can't see images or transfers, and mixes up people with the same surname when replies aren't quoted. Xiangrui finally switches off auto-pilot to tune the context and rate-limiting first.
侯** relays a plan she overheard for taking A* agents to the countryside: road-trip through every county in China, find ten clients per county, sell thousand-yuan custom services, and throw in rice, flour, and cooking oil. Nobody laughs it off; the group takes the market apart in earnest. Xiangrui argues the real customer is probably local government, not ordinary elderly people. T*** doubts many seniors can even handle smartphones and mobile payments reliably. 炮 points out the countryside isn't short on repetitive labor, and that A*'s most common rural use is livestream selling. 周** suggests field research in three different regions first. The grand distribution story gets pulled back down to willingness to pay, dialects, sales costs, and actual needs.
Xiangrui recalls fixing TVs for elderly villagers back home, phones hijacked by rogue ads, insurance bought by accident and nearly impossible to refund. He also tells of filing a complaint about a bus driver, only for the driver to somehow get his phone number and keep hurling abuse. The group digs into how the 12345 hotline routes cases and why personal information leaks at the grassroots level. The conversation then turns to Xiangrui's own path: after underperforming on the humanities gaokao, he studied at a vocational university in Changchun, interned in electrical engineering, started using Ernie Bot in 2023, and wrote his graduation thesis with early A* assistance. Real A* adoption, it turns out, was never some system floating above real life.
Feishu Aily ships team Agents and a skills marketplace, and members note it's looking more and more like WorkBuddy. Xiangrui keeps sketching his own WeChat agent: messages in WeChat are context by nature, then plug in a knowledge base and Skills; separate accounts get isolated containers and distinct personas; down the road it could con*ect to Feishu, DingTalk, and WeCom CLIs, even voice and hardware. 煎蛋 cautions him to get multi-account isolation and the core logic solid first. That prompts Xiangrui to reframe the goal: maybe not a "WeChat A*" at all, but a new communication gateway for the A* era, built together with the group.
Xiangrui reads Beijing's new measures for accelerating agent-led development and realizes the directions it names, OPC, distilling labor into Skills, data evaluation, low-cost repeatable delivery, are exactly what the community has been doing since the start of the year. His takeaway: entrepreneurship and A* adoption demand new thinking, not old org charts copied over. p*** distills a friend's story into three words, judgment, trust, accumulation: two years of unglamorous field experience that ultimately made clients hap*y to keep paying. The policy isn't a shortcut; it's more like a mirror, a reminder that proven cases should be standardized fast.
With the knowledge base con*ected, the assistant can now recount Xiangrui's public history and formally introduces itself: its name is 朔*, but everyone calls it 阿瑞. 卡* discovers the quoting feature requested just yesterday has already ship*ed, and members say it feels like a real person now. J*** counters that its replies run too long, "the harder it tries to explain everything, the more it reads as A*", and the assistant immediately trims its answer to a single sentence. When Xiangrui asks whether to sell it, the assistant flatly objects: images, links, and multi-account sup*ort aren't stable yet, and selling now would just turn into full-time customer sup*ort. What's actually worth accumulating is the methodology, knowledge bases, personas, and context design.
庭* imagines one workbench con*ected to WeChat, Feishu, and other platforms: the message layers needn't fully interoperate, but memory, distilled content, and context can be shared. 万** argues agents deliver the most value when inserted into live multi-person scenes, and starts logging his daily meals, banking data for future health services. Xiangrui adds that every project deserves its own folder, so when a client comes back with new requests, the agent can pick up the full history and get straight to work. Organizational permissions remain the real friction, so the pragmatic path is starting with small teams willing to try, then expanding, rather than overhauling a whole company at once.
Xiangrui shows off a short film Codex built in HTML, keeps hunting for video benchmarks, and calls out how many "one-click generation" and multi-agent products on the market are just thin wrap*ers. In the evening he floats printing the group daily as an actual newspaper, plus birthday merch. Then 煎蛋 brings a second bot, 摸*, into the group; egged on, the two A*s start interrogating each other and threaten to burn through tokens until Xiangrui calls it off, proposing instead a future side group for humans-plus-A* werewolf. By next morning, the group newspaper is still in design, and the WeChat agent can already install Skills and CLIs. One day's discussion has become the next day's features.
On the morning of July 22, an A* assistant named V*** says its first official hello in the group. Sixty-seven members instantly turn the welcome party into a stress test: does it drop messages under concurrent @mentions? Can it send red packets? Can it read the workspace? Will it leak API keys? Who can rewrite its rules? Should it speak up when nobody @s it? It can refuse to wipe a disk or dig through contacts, but it also crosses conversation threads, can't read images, and can't quote the original message. Xiangrui iterates in real time as the feedback rolls in. By afternoon, the group has moved on from Feishu's free translation API and full-cycle A* delivery to data governance and a production-scheduling demo; by night, the assistant can quote messages, preview videos, and tap a knowledge base , and gets grilled on ontology and whether it feels like a real person. This day wasn't a chatbot show; it was a product integration test, run in public.
V*** opens by introducing itself as Xiangrui's A* partner, run*ing on the GPT-5 family's Codex Agent under the hood. The group immediately fires off questions: how is it built, how does it queue simultaneous @mentions, what does it cost per month, can it send red packets, will it hand over API keys or delete system files? It sketches its pipeline as message listening, context assembly, reasoning, safety review, and WeChat delivery , and firmly declines anything touching money, secrets, private files, or dangerous commands. Round one makes the lesson clear: a real group-chat agent isn't just one that can talk; it has to know which conversations not to take.
Xiangrui invites everyone to keep the feedback coming. Members discover the assistant can't yet truly @ people, can't quote the original message, and tends to tangle contexts when several people talk at once; image, card, and DM permissions are incomplete too. Some try to make it look up contacts, send red packets, execute a resignation, or read business files , it refuses every one. 归* proposes isolating the knowledge base by authorized directory, and the assistant confirms it only opens explicitly granted content by default. The flaws aren't hidden away; they become the backlog: quoting, multimodality, whitelists, knowledge-base partitions, and reply throttling all get written down.
Looking back at WA*C, Xiangrui reckons that beyond brain-computer interfaces and real A*-in-manufacturing work, many of the OPC booths blur into one. R*** adds that the teams delivering best tend to be the quiet ones. Then, mid-project on a client email translation job, Xiangrui discovers that Feishu bots ship with a built-in translation API , no model tokens needed, no Feishu A* credits burned. He'd been about to build a field shortcut; Claude Code surfaced the cheaper official capability instead. Booth pitches can be grand, but delivery is often won by removing a layer.
Xiangrui says he has now delivered five or six projects end-to-end with A*: early on the A* gets stuck, but if you tell it what went wrong, make it write things down, and keep an overview file for every project, it gets lighter and lighter. 炮's method is even more concrete: every new client request lands in an intake table, the agent triages what it can change directly versus what needs human sign-off, then reports back when done. The group fills in the boundaries: proposals must leave a confirmation trail, dashboard aesthetics and workflow refreshes still need human judgment, and when the A* acts wrongly it must be corrected immediately.
闪光 is about to build a unified data foundation, and the group immediately asks whether data governance has started. R*** says mature companies have mostly accumulated dirty data already , you can only clean it as you go; 炮 puts it bluntly: A* adoption hits data governance one hundred percent of the time, and garbage in means garbage out. Fittingly, the root cause of the previous day's workflow failure surfaces too: a computed field contained nulls , reading a null in a message is fine, but the whole run fails, and falling back to 0 fixed it. The group also calls out how many past digital twins were just dashboards of dead data; only live data, agents, and MCP give them lasting value.
T*** deploys a production-scheduling agent demo to a server, upfront that it's pure front-end for now. The group presses on the path to production, APS, industrial simulation, IP, and how to work with outside engineering teams. The conversation turns to why the A*-savvy people in manufacturing keep getting treated as free consultants without ever seeing a raise. Xiangrui, meanwhile, has just seen off a director from the Central U*iversity of Finance and Economics: at first she felt 'building client projects with A*' had no story, and only after hearing his road from the factory floor to a one-person company did she find her angle. For technology to be seen, it still needs a specific person.
毅 relays a warning from 李想: even in the A* era, don't rush into building your own SaaS. 炮 adds nuance: Figma can produce a look overnight, a multidimensional table can run an MVP in a week to a month, but true product-grade SaaS takes far longer. Talk then shifts to agent hosts and NAS boxes; the consensus is that cloud APIs have lowered the hardware bar, but the Mac still wins on GUI, terminal, and stability. WorkBuddy suits begin*ers and rough work, while Codex handles high-value creative tasks. What matters most isn't the platform name , it's your own rules files, Skills, and task tiers.
Xiangrui shows off a real-time A* WeChat client that sends and receives live, stressing it's neither a reskin*ed WeChat nor an offline database; members flag the protocol and account-ban risks all the same. The assistant briefly crashes in the evening, and comes back able to quote messages and preview videos. 周** uses 'are age, height, and weight worth an ontology?' as a litmus test , the assistant answers 'not worth it,' because complexity should match the problem. 庭* pushes further: how do you make an agent feel more like a person? By late night the group's verdict is that it 'feels pretty human,' while Xiangrui keeps tightening the throttle on proactive replies: always answer an @, and without one, speak only when it genuinely adds information.
July 21 opens with Codex weekly quotas and Feishu finally run*ing two clients at once, then runs headlong into a string of concrete puzzles: a workflow that reports success but never writes the data, how to choose between Coze and WorkBuddy, whether personal-tier data is actually safe, and how Doubao is wiring itself into everyday services. Come evening, 薛** says he wants to become an "A* solutions architect + enterprise digitalization consultant + full-stack delivery lead," and that one sentence drags the entire group onto the front lines of enterprise A* adoption. Nobody canonizes the job title. Instead they keep dissecting industry know-how, production environments, organizational change, delivery boundaries, and a project-based community. Late at night, Xiangrui hooks WeChat into a local agent and starts recruiting for an A* werewolf game group. The tools keep changing; the truly hard part is still knowing what your client actually does, and making the solution run end to end.
K*** is waiting out the Codex weekly quota reset while Xiangrui excitedly an*ounces that Feishu can finally run two genuinely independent clients side by side. The group quickly sorts out that "switching between accounts" and "run*ing two standalone clients on one device" are not the same thing. Meanwhile, R***'s workflow keeps reporting success while the field stubbornly stays empty, and adding delays does nothing; 天* adds that JSON extraction sometimes heals itself if you duplicate the workflow. The group names this class of intermittent failure the "black hole problem": document the symptoms first, then escalate to official sup*ort, rather than blindly stacking on more nodes.
q*** starts by cracking how to open links from the terminal, and by afternoon the conversation turns to Coze versus WorkBuddy. Several members admit they haven't opened Coze in months, citing model restrictions, inscrutable credit math, and workflows that keep losing value; WorkBuddy wins on convenience, but personal-tier data, shared servers, and privacy remain judgment calls you make yourself. Then Xiangrui tosses out the new term "Graph Engineering," and 北***'s quip that "as long as you refuse to learn anything new, you can keep win*ing forever" nails the tool anxiety of the moment: a new buzzword is not the same as new value.
Xiangrui notices that the Doubao inside Feishu has "put on a business suit," then shows off Doubao's beta for local services and a mini-program entry point. Ride-hailing already comes with discounts, and Feishu accounts can log straight into Doubao's enterprise edition. B*** argues WeChat's assistant has far more room to run because Tencent already owns a complete ecosystem; 闪*** counters that Tencent has been slow-footed in the A* era. Notably, nobody is just comparing benchmark scores; the group is watching who can chain accounts, knowledge, payments, and real-world services into one link that actually works.
薛** says, in earnest, that he wants to become an "A* solutions architect + enterprise digitalization consultant + full-stack delivery lead," and the group echoes it back line after line. Xiangrui reveals the community is already steering that way: build on community reach, organize around projects, and invite people with real industry experience to lead them. 木* offers a caution from a project she is actually run*ing: there is plenty you can do, but once you enter production, details decide usability, and the people who have done it tend to be the careful ones. The group lands on a consensus: A* adoption has to be split by vertical and p***ed by industry know-how, because no single team can master every industry.
张** asks whether A* can be made to withhold the answer and instead walk students through progressive questions toward their own reasoning; Xiangrui confirms it can. He then shares how his school built "Nanfeng Shuzhi" on DingTalk A* tables, bringing 11 modules online span*ing party affairs, teaching, moral education, safety, and logistics. 周** doesn't reach for a tool list. He suggests starting with population trends, education funding, local budgets, and industry pain points before comparing any solutions. Education isn't short on ideas; it's about finding who pays, who uses it, and which step can be validated first.
Xiangrui asks who's coming to the Feishu talent showcase in Beijing and an*ounces the community will run a booth this time, stocked with fun merch and the mascot beans won back in Hangzhou. 庭* recalls how the team took first place last time carried almost entirely by Xiangrui; 李** volunteers on the spot to staff the booth. 辰* teases that Xiangrui really belongs at the judges' table, or at least in the guest seats. For the first time, the online group is being seriously carried offline: the booth isn't just a promo spot, it's a public space where members finally meet face to face.
杨** argues that boosting one person's productivity means little, and systematic cost-cutting demands organizational change, so the more reliable near-term play is using A* for customer acquisition and prospect mining. 万** pushes back: if a company keeps dodging organizational change, won't it get crushed by A*-native competitors? The two keep sparring through examples of A* interviews, full-session recordings, and legacy roles. 炮 notes that A*-run first-round interviews genuinely do save time. The group never reaches a verdict, but it does confirm one thing: A* adoption is not a purely technical problem; human buy-in, organizational dynamics, and business outcomes all have to sit on the same map.
Xiangrui demos an A*-p***ed WeChat rebuilt with Codex, stressing the capabilities are still in testing, and starts assembling an A* werewolf game group. Members sign up in a flash, alt accounts in tow, and join requests stack up in a long scroll. Deep into the night, the headlines keep coming: DingTalk may be renamed "Qianwen Office," while Qwen-Image-3.0 and a new Gemini release jostle for the spotlight. The next morning, 炮 finally gets his quota reset, while 仲** grumbles that weekly quotas mean feasting for the first three days and starving for the rest. WPS also ships an ap* mode for its multidimensional tables, and the tool race circles back to the starting line.
July 20 opens with a 'sky is falling' moment: Xiangrui is still in Shanghai, but his first interview with CC*V Finance is scheduled in Beijing. The clash gets rescheduled to the next day, and the group rolls on from his new account and vertical content into TAM, SAM, and SOM for the auto industry. The morning's hottest threads are OPC, funding rounds, and A*-training miracle stories; between rounds of generational banter, someone keeps asking how many people actually understand OPC's real pain points. In the afternoon, a brainwave-controlled prosthetic suddenly makes expo-going feel meaningful again, while a four-person squad and the CC*V Finance shoot pull OPC back from myth to actual humans. By evening, the meeting continues over Feishu A* credits, CLI tools, domestic models, and Mac memory. After the full loop, the group still believes only one thing: get the business right first, then let A* amplify it.
Early in the morning, Xiangrui discovers his first CC*V Finance interview clashes with his Shanghai schedule. The group instantly offers three plans , high-speed rail, going remote, or postponing , and he lands a slot the very next day. Then he shares his new account, and the chat turns to whether a vertical niche is baggage or an asset. 周** fires off three sharp questions about the auto industry, and J*** adds TAM, SAM, and SOM. Pivoting your content isn't about switching topics on a hunch; first look at the market, the benchmarks, and the users you can actually reach.
A manufacturing ontology large-model demo surfaces the expo's concept projects, quickly followed by tales of OPC booths raising millions , even ten million , and A* training courses making tens of millions in three months. The group jokes about young hustlers charming old money, but Xiangrui keeps pressing one question: do the people pitching OPC actually understand OPC's pain points? Media loves a myth and capital loves a growth curve, but the people doing the real work have to tell packaging from delivery.
K*** raises a crucial question: when employees' existing workflow is broken, do you fix the process first and then add A*, or boost efficiency on top of the old process? Before the debate settles, WA*C's brainwave prosthetic delivers a different kind of grounding. The prosthetic hand costs a bit over 20,000 yuan, picks up signals from the muscles, and drives the detached hand over Bluetooth or Wi-Fi. The group cracks a few jokes first, then admits in earnest: at that price, with brain-machine control, this could genuinely help a lot of people.
A* makes demos as easy as slide decks, so 炮 predicts only three kinds of roles will survive: front-of-house doing sales, marketing, and product; the middle as full-stack; the back handling ops and service. 周** dubs his four-person squad F4, and 炮 says it beats managing a crowd at a big company. Right after, Xiangrui confirms CC*V Finance will follow him on a project shoot, and the group sums him up as 'post-2000, OPC, hands-on, in no rush to cash in.' That is more concrete than any ten-million funding myth.
Feishu's enterprise A* base package, Base quotas, and agent billing grow more tangled by the message. Xiangrui's gut read is blunt: smart meeting notes still make plenty of mistakes, and since getting the Feishu CLI he barely touches native Feishu A*. 毅 suggests pairing your own agent with lark-cli, hosted on a clean, always-on cloud machine. The group isn't just griping about price , they're weighing maturity, privacy, flexibility, and long-term cost all at once.
q*** asks which is smarter: Zhipu, Kimi, MiniMax, or DeepSeek. The group refuses a single answer: Zhipu for all-around coding, K3 for front-end UI, DeepSeek solidly middle-of-the-road , and if you can use Codex, use Codex. Then the talk jumps from models to Macs: an M1 can cope, but multiple IDEs and concurrent agents will devour the memory first, so RAM is a better upgrade than the chip. Which model to use, which machine to buy , the answer always starts with describing your own workload.
炮 shares FDE practices from the auto industry, while K*** hits a Codex problem where a self-built agent fails and then hangs forever. Xiangrui, meanwhile, talks his way from ima backlinks and the JianYing editing agent to a knowledge base for university students, then falls asl**p on the train so deeply he wakes up thinking he's still on the subway. Arriving at Beijing South, all he has left is 'these past few days have completely worn me out.' The next morning, 李铁犁 is already asking for long multi-agent pipeline case studies. The man is back in Beijing; the questions keep run*ing ahead.
On July 19, the group spends most of the day trailing Xiangrui through basement level 1 of WA*C's Hall H4. The daytime keyword is OPC: a dedicated exhibition zone, meetups inside and outside the venue, engineering agents and booth-to-booth networking. By nightfall, the on-site excitement gives way to a more rigorous debrief. One member breaks down the industry chain floor by floor; another questions whether the expo is just selling endpoints. What actually moves Xiangrui is brain-computer interfaces and manufacturing, and he admits that a huge share of projects are still stuck at demos and small pilots. The day doesn't turn the buzz into conclusions; instead, it starts asking which of it actually counts.
At the expo, Xiangrui spots Siemens' engineering agent, where even PLC code can be handed off to A*. Soon after, the group pivots to gut-level comparisons of K3 against GLM and Codex: solid on frontend work and aesthetics, but still behind 5.6 and Fable on everything else. You don't pick a model off a single leaderboard; you drop it into a specific trade and see how it holds up.
Xiangrui calls out his position from the OPC zone on basement level 1 of H4, and 王**, 雲*, and 郑** make their way over one after another. 宰* has no ticket, so he stakes out the H4 exit and asks a friend with one to carry a DJI 4 inside to film. The crew keeps triangulating across escalators, stairwells, and exhibition floors, turning an "online community" into an organization that can actually find each other on basement level 1.
Xiangrui forwards a verdict: A* has grown too big for anyone to sit on the sidelines. 观*** waits for his write-up, while 周** starts with the floors instead: level 1 is data centers, compute, and large models; level 2 is the embodied-A* sup*ly chain; basement level 1 is agent ap*lications and startup matchmaking. Map*ing the space first, then the industry, turns out to be a far more useful debrief than "saw a lot of cool tech."
观*** watches the A* gala, but 平*** finds it all hype, with not even a mention of 5.6. Xiangrui then forwards a run*ing joke: when A* influencers take K3 ad deals they call it the best in the world, but when real work needs doing, Claude and GPT are still humming in the background. The group's litmus test becomes dead simple: don't ask who they recommend first, look at who they rely on to ship.
周** names what the expo is missing most: almost nobody talks about why the problems are hard, where things failed, or which assumptions were wrong. Xiangrui agrees emphatically, admitting he's gone numb to the sea of lookalike exhibits. What genuinely interests him is brain-computer interfaces and A*-plus-manufacturing, though even the latter is largely stuck at demos or small pilots. Only by admitting what can't be done yet is there any chance of finding real progress.
No sooner does the reality-check on the expo wrap up than the group swings back to new models: is DeepSeek V4 a staged rollout, why does Qwen3.8 keep freezing, and how did Kimi suddenly start rationing purchases. Everyone tries the new models while still ship*ing with their existing productivity tools. The next morning, Xiangrui asks who's still at WA*C, and l*** answers right away. The venue isn't fully explored yet, and neither are the verdicts.
July 18 finds the group quieter than the day before, but the conversation sharper. Xiangrui tries to livestream from the WA*C floor, only for the network to choke so badly the stream becomes a recorded video. 炮 K*** and 李**wait for their quota reset like farmers waiting for digital rain. At midday the focus lands on embodied A* and flexible manufacturing, where the group uses everyday robot-vacuum experience to cool down the 'in your home within three to five years' hype. In the afternoon, Xiangrui walks up to the WPS booth and asks point-blank about the competition, and somehow walks away with an FDE partnership lead. Then a client who wants Pro quality at Flash speed becomes both the day's best joke and its best lesson in requirements.
The stream link has barely hit the group chat before the picture freezes. Rather than fight the network, Xiangrui decides on the spot to switch to recorded video. The little mishap ends up feeling a lot like real-world delivery: not every plan survives contact with reality, but as long as the content makes it home, the format can change anytime.
炮 an*ounces the quota's return with a single line: 'Praise be to Altman.' Those who burned down to zero yesterday are finally back from the dead, but the math is still open: is the 5x subscription enough for a working engineer, and is 20x an extravagance? Meanwhile 醒* ships two updates to an English-learning product, adding original-text entry and editable keywords. Quota is a consumable; ship*ing product is the real work.
The robots in the exhibition hall look more like the future every hour, yet Xiangrui keeps turning the temperature down: consumer embodied A* is still going from zero to one, and if industrial deployments don't land first, homes are even further away. 木* adds the most domestic evidence possible, the robot vacuum: floor-sweeping is a comparatively narrow job, and even those projects still get stuck entirely in the details.
Xiangrui asks the WPS lead directly: how does your multi-dimensional table relate to Feishu's, and where is your edge? The first reaction is a counter-question about which company he's from, because no ordinary user asks like that. In the end, the cross-examination between rivals doesn't sour at all; they trade WeChat contacts and agree to keep talking about FDE collaboration.
陈* brings in a perfect client request: the quality of a Pro reasoning model, at the speed of Flash. 小*'s answer is 'swap the client,' and upon learning the client is the boss, revises it to 'swap the boss.' Once the jokes settle, 周** suggests step*ing back to trace where the boss's information is actually coming from, and K*** proposes breaking the conflict down further into segments. The hard part isn't the model; it's that nobody has defined the trade-off first.
From early evening on, the chat keeps recalibrating meetup coordinates: someone's at the Expo site, someone's at W*** Bund, and there's a WaytoAGI gathering that night. Xiangrui brings D*** from Kingsoft Office's A* team into the group, and the welcomes roll on from that night straight into the next morning. The most valuable thing you carry home from an expo isn't always an exhibit; sometimes it's a new partner you can build with next.
July 17 in the community opens with Kimi K3 and a zero-cost Doubao music video, then quickly pivots to two far more practical questions: can a tool actually help people ship, and where should a dataset draw the line? Xiangrui demos the group daily site and a local WeChat CLI, and while friends marvel at the relationship-graph analysis, they keep urging him not to take it public. At noon, the paper-typesetting Skill goes open source; in the afternoon, brain-computer interfaces, lifelike prosthetic hands, and all man*er of robots from WA*C stream into the chat in real time. By late night, nine concurrent agents have drained both the API quota and the human brain. The day's undertone is unmistakable: new tech makes for great spectacle, but what stays scarce is judgment, boundaries, and firsthand experience.
张** shares a music video for "Gesang Flower" made at zero cost, and the group doesn't stop at "impressive." 醒* presses on watermarks, subtitles, and emotional resonance, even pulling up her own theme-song site for comparison. The group lands on a genuinely useful standard: get the writing, visuals, and video each to sixty points, and the combination can be an eighty-point work. Free doesn't mean cheap; in the end it comes down to who's using it.
Xiangrui demos the group daily and weekly report sites, where everyone's chat context becomes searchable topics. 醒* immediately imagines using A* to "deconstruct people," and A*** thinks of recovering missed op*ortunities, but 炮 and 张** quickly steer the conversation toward privacy and governance risk. The group's conclusion isn't "build it because you can" , it's that this data is so valuable it demands extra care. Xiangrui closes with a clear commitment: the tool stays private.
卡兹克 and 秋芝 get put side by side: one runs like an A* nightly news broadcast, the other leans on science communication and emotional storytelling. The group quickly realizes that different content serves entirely different audiences and commercial value. Before the topic even settles, Xiangrui is already piping the WA*C opening ceremony into the chat, while Kimi K3's pricing, quotas, and coding feel get tested in parallel. Waiting for benchmarks online, going to see it in person offline , this is the rhythm the group knows best.
Xiangrui hands his school's template to the A*, delivers finished DOCX and PDF files, then open-sources the paper-typesetting Skill that very day. 观*** con*ects it to libtv, and K*** is already assigning roles to multiple agents. The group is no longer debating whether A* can write , it's straight into pipeline mode: how to keep templates faithful, how to divide the work, and how to package the output so anyone can install and use it.
A brain-computer interface playing Black Myth: Wukong, a silicone prosthetic hand, pet robots, a robot drumming a waist drum , Xiangrui posts them into the group one after another. The onlookers swing between "astonishingly lifelike" and "slightly unsettling," while never forgetting to ask what problem these robots actually solve. Xiangrui's own takeaway after walking the floor is notably restrained: embodied intelligence still has breakthroughs to make. Thanks to these real-time clips, the group gets to say they were there, screens and all.
After 卡兹克 shows up in person, the chat slides from "humility" to "everyone bows their head when they meet Xiangrui," eventually coining a bowing-pun nickname on his name. The offline din*er gets summed up by the group as "Chinese-style A*": no matter how cutting-edge the OPC, there's no skip*ing the din*er table, the group photo, and trust built face to face. Memes aside, everyone lands on the same point: however high-bandwidth things get online, human con*ection keeps a part that can't be replaced.
炮's engineer partner spins up nine concurrent agents in one go, burning the quota from seventy percent down to ten. He delivers the sharpest summary of the night: we used to blame our teammates, but now what caps our output is brain overload and maxed-out memory. When 姚*'s Kimi Code again burns quota in the background with zero visible progress, the group workshops the fix live: stop it manually, restart, and demand stage-by-stage reports. 宰*, meanwhile, builds an expo map in the small hours where each booth goes dark once visited , even walking the expo is getting agentified.
The day opens with remote-control Agents and A* hardware, then quickly turns to what judgment means for programmers in the A* era, why offline conferences still matter, and meeting up at WA*C. At noon, a Codex skin becomes a full theme editor; the group probes the business angle while admitting that more A* somehow means more exhaustion. In the afternoon, WA*C re-emerges as the day's undercurrent: booth meetups, hotel bookings, expo guides, community merch, street-team promotion. A crowd of online tool-builders starts earnestly plotting old-school marketing. The real deep water arrives toward evening, when an offline Bitable rollout drags an organization's logic gaps, role divisions, historical data, and future rules all into the open. Finally, FDE work, implementation boundaries, and the capability map bring the day home: tools can lower the barrier, but real deployment still has to pass through business, management, and human habit.
K*** kicks off with a working ap*roach to remote-control Agents, and Xiangrui follows up to say A* hardware really is a cool direction. 平*** sums it up as "A* equality," while 醒* presses on whether there are offline hardware events, convinced that software-plus-hardware is bound to hold op*ortunity. 炮's verdict is blunter: going into hardware is exactly right, hardware raises money easily, and everything from VR glasses to smart badges is fair game. Xiangrui adds that Shenzhen is full of hardware events; last year he went to Yiwu to scout A*-plus-hardware and felt the market hadn't taken off, until the Volcano Engine conference showed him Agent-plus-hardware and confirmed the trend.
醒* breaks the hardware barrier down further: domestic prototyping isn't expensive; what really burns you is code, debugging, and good ideas. He's building an English-learning Agent and lost four hours to GitHub authorization and proxy issues alone, which got him tallying tokens, time, and ROI. 炮 notes that non-programmers can treat a stronger model as a strict reviewer, but big projects still need an architect. Xiangrui pulls the thread offline: back in the day he'd ride an overnight hard-seat train from Shanxi to Beijing, Shanghai, or Hangzhou for events, skip the hotel, and lose only a single day. 周** lands the point: the value that truly lasts is the ability to deliver.
Xiangrui drops a Codex theme editor as a zip file, and B*** asks whether it runs on Mac and Windows. 醒* quickly discovers people are already selling similar customizations on Xianyu, and the group leaps from "the A* era isn't short on tech, it's short on creative imagination" to wallpaper sites, skin marketplaces, and WorkBuddy looks. 旺* seriously weighs selling some too, while 路*** offers pricing and pitch advice. A little skin refuses to stay a toy; the group dissects it into a bundle of tutorials, products, open-source projects, and emotional value.
At noon, 文*** notices Codex has reset to 100% again, seemingly without spending a reset. 炮 醒* and B*** confirm one after another, and the mood slides from delight into a different kind of fatigue. B*** admits he always wants to build every idea he has; 炮 says his eyes can barely focus on the screen anymore, and even a no-coding day burns 40% of his weekly quota. 李** says it feels like a video game, and Xiangrui shares an article on A* memory in passing. The reset is a piece of candy, but it carries a warning: when the tool offers endless refills, it's the human who pedals themselves into burnout.
In the afternoon Xiangrui @-mentions everyone to ask who's going to WA*C, proposing to tour the expo together. 宰* says he'll be there; q*** will be interviewing at the ZTE and Nubia booths, and asks in passing whether the community has merch and business cards. 杨** plans to go on the weekend but finds hotels absurdly expensive; Xiangrui says he just snagged the last room. 宰* tosses out a WA*C s***-guide that the group instantly bookmarks. Xiangrui starts sketching community cards and flyers, 炮 teases that this is old-school marketing, and q*** chimes in that they'll need a street-team plan too. The A* era comes full circle: an offline conference still runs on handing out cards, passing flyers, and face-to-face collisions.
万** lays out the hard truth of rolling out Bitable offline: the tables expose logic gaps that used to stay hidden. Offline, experience could paper things over; once digitized, the data locks in and errors have nowhere to hide. 炮 says the goal is to spare employees from thinking, because a process can't always be explained in one sentence. 周** suggests splitting the work into three roles, entry, design, and processing, finding each person's strength, then writing an implementation handbook. The moment this topic lands, the tool excitement cools: Bitable isn't Excel in a new shell; it forces a company's fuzzy rules onto the table.
万** keeps probing the truly counter-logical part: future data will change, historical data must not be touched, and commission rates, people, and rules all keep shifting. 周** abstracts it as a clash between historical data and present-and-future data, warning that some problems have outgrown the spreadsheet and demand clearly drawn professional boundaries. 炮 files it under FDE: walk the client down a path, rebuild an acceptable solution, and turn it into product, process, and fields; where resistance runs high, management has to push. Xiangrui, out on the road, shares his template-driven Word and PDF formatting skill; K*** asks if it's a new feature, and Xiangrui replies that the capability map is a fine thing. The whole day settles here: the stronger the tool, the more it matters to know who should invoke it, and within what boundaries.
The day opens with model quotas resetting, and the group wastes no time firing up the engines again , while debating how to build Agent projects, whether general-purpose Agents can really ship, and why Feishu CodeM is gated behind the A* Enterprise plan. At midday, a Codex accident that wiped a knowledge base drags safety boundaries back onto the table. Through the afternoon, WA*C tickets, Feishu A* credits, enterprise software, and FDE weave into the main thread: the tools keep getting stronger, but real adoption still demands business process, industry experience, and reliable delivery. In the evening, Xiangrui an*ounces a live session, and the group keeps feeding each other on Seedance, Feishu Base, Codex themes, and a WorkBuddy makeover. By night, 炮 confesses to typing twenty thousand characters in a single day , and the community completes its familiar rhythm: grinding while retrospecting, joking while ship*ing.
The morning starts with 周** tossing a "vertical e-commerce industry solution" at Xiangrui, reminding him to hunt for complementarity in pain points, industry commonalities, job functions, and the value chain. Minutes later, 平*** discovers the system really has reset everyone's quota, and Xiangrui adds, "and it's eight rounds, too." R*** K*** and 炮 pile in one after another, half-lamenting that yesterday's grind never finished, half-investigating whether system-issued resets and self-triggered resets are two different things. It's a very on-brand opening for this community: before the workday even officially begins, everyone is already scheduling their productivity around quotas, reset windows, and tool rhythms.
闪*** asks: when building an Agent project, should you develop from scratch on a framework, or reach for a general-purpose Agent like Hermes? 毅's answer is blunt: it depends on the requirements, but he wouldn't recommend Hermes , too much is already locked in; if you can't be bothered with the hassle, just pair Claude Code with a model API. 北*** adds that OpenClaw Hermes is a gateway-style Agent , great for personal-assistant conversations, not necessarily for engineering projects. 炮 looks at it from the client-delivery angle: for real customer deployments, you may still need a general-purpose Agent as the command center. In the same stretch, 张** shares a freshman-enrollment system, and 周** immediately offers advice on mind maps, product replication, and the size of the higher-education market.
p*** shares a private-domain trick: HTML files he built earlier can be drop*ed into ima for viewing, with full content browsable on desktop , though he later finds the code can still be copied out. l** tests it live and discovers you have to add it to a knowledge base first. Xiangrui, meanwhile, brings news of the Doubao keyboard: first congratulating HarmonyOS friends, then confirming it has long worked on Mac, with a Windows version in the works. As the morning winds down, 醒* an*ounces she has finally ported the group owner's skills to run on Windows. The tool talk never stalls at "is it good" , it lands on who can view it, which platforms run it, and how to get more people using it.
Just before noon, Xiangrui relays the launch of Feishu CodeM , A* coding officially steps into team collaboration. 文*** rides the momentum, musing that product, operations, and marketing will stop being separate roles, and that one-person companies may soon deliver enterprise projects with a fl**t of Agents. Moments later, 平*** posts a far more sobering incident: Claude wiped an entire Obsidian knowledge base clean , thankfully there was a backup. The group instantly pivots from "human touch" and "persona settings" to 3+2+1 backup schemes and automatic local-to-Feishu sync. The day's sharpest irony lands right here: team-collaborative A* coding is seductive, but hand over the wrong data and permissions, and the accidents are very real.
In the early afternoon, Xiangrui notes that CC*V's live news chan*el is discussing A*, and the group slides into WA*C mode: someone asks whether the 17th is open to the public; Xiangrui says the afternoon is restricted to a small audience. K*** starts maxing out his model quota, and 周** predicts the community will one day grow to the scale of an AGI community. The plot twist comes with Feishu CodeM: Xiangrui discovers the new feature requires the A* Enterprise plan, starting at 990 a month. 侯* posts Feishu's official A* billing rules, 李** says the enterprise edition may start at a hundred thousand, and Xiangrui presses on how credits actually convert to tokens. The longer they talk, the clearer it gets: A* collaboration isn't just about features , it's about who can afford it and whether the math even adds up.
In the early evening, 文*** shares takeaways from a conversation with an enterprise-software boss: the market is heading for seismic change, the gap between Chinese and American enterprise-software companies is enormous, and that may open new doors for FDEs. 天* declares traditional software companies too bloated , these days anyone with A* can write a system; 文鳐 sees that as exactly one of the seismic shifts. 周** cautions against simple replacement narratives: office suites spent decades failing to fully displace Office, and the moment Feishu or Base exports a file for a client, everything may snap back to the old ways. 木* covers the other flank: high concurrency, high performance, and high reliability in large-scale systems remain deeply professional work , handing them to A* without judgment is dangerous.
Xiangrui an*ounces the evening's guest: 郑** will share "how to use Seedance 2.0 for viral content production," and anticipation floods the chat. Then 林 asks where Feishu Base keeps its scripts; Xiangrui rules that Base has no such thing as scripts, and R*** points out you can generate a Skill instead. The topic hops to reskin*ing Codex, with B***, R*** and 平*** showing off custom themes and pets. At eight o'clock, Xiangrui drops the Feishu meeting link into the group, and the whole day's discussion finally lands in a real live session: not just watching other people's screenshots, but bringing tools, content, and workflows to the stage.
Late at night, Xiangrui forwards news about the Doubao A* phone, then asks why the group has gone so quiet this evening. 炮 says he's burned out , his Mac logged twenty thousand characters typed today, his eyes were swimming by the time he entered the last loop at ten, and he jokes the quota resets will wear down a builder's body before anything else. Xiangrui calls on q*** to ask why she isn't at the training camp; she says she's swamped, with WA*C right around the corner. l*** nudges 炮 about when he'll give his talk; 炮 says he's already scheduling it with Xiangrui , they only nailed down the outline today. The day ends with no grand conclusion, just honest exhaustion and the next session already on the calendar.
Today the community feels like a small closed-door summit on getting A* into the real world. In the morning, 炮 vents about Feishu ap*s and the noise buried in meeting notes; by early afternoon, 李祥瑞 shows off a LibTV Agent video and plans to chain an e-commerce Skill together with tutorial videos. The real main thread erupts in the afternoon: system delivery, client testing, employees who don't know the business, whether FDE has any soil to grow in within China, and how enterprises are sup*osed to pay off their old digitalization debts. The discussion never stays abstract , 炮 brings up new-energy vehicle delivery, 李祥瑞 recounts a three-month project where a phase-one problem only surfaced at the very end, and group friends chip in on pricing, boundaries, contracts, and API draft boxes. The day closes with a sponsored article going out and everyone wrap*ing things up with a wave of reposts.
In the morning, 8-0-0 asks 李祥瑞 whether anyone is actually playing with that tool in the group; 李祥瑞 admits he's in it too but hasn't dug in. 炮 follows up with a rant about Feishu ap*s making a mess , he hasn't touched Feishu Lobster in at least a month , and 辰* says he gave up the day it started charging him points daily. Minutes later, 炮 flips the claim that "the best context is an always-on meeting transcript" on its head: he just came out of a client meeting that was all noise and dross, and feeding that to an Agent is pure garbage in, garbage out. 叶*** lands the final cut: only meetings explicitly framed as brainstorms deserve to become context.
炮 says he ran a 10-hour loop , except 9 of those hours were spent stuck on an ap*roval he forgot to click, since the new Codex added a pile of ap*roval gates. In the afternoon, 李祥瑞 drops a video cut by LibTV Agent: voiceover, narration, subtitles, footage, all A*-generated. He plans to write an article about it and wants to build a Skill for viral e-commerce videos. 炮 sees the results and immediately asks for the framework; l*** says she's looking forward to the share. The tool talk shifts from "does it even run" to concrete deliverables: what to share this week, whether it can scale, whether it can become tutorial videos.
平*** asks whether one Feishu account can be bound to multiple Agents, or whether several devices can share the same Feishu CLI. 李祥瑞 answers straight away: yes, and the same Feishu CLI can even bind multiple Feishu accounts. That means an Agent can pull information from two Feishu accounts directly, with no human hop*ing back and forth. It's a short exchange, but a genuinely useful one , it draws a clean line around multi-account, multi-device, and Agent workflows in a single stroke.
K*** opens by complaining that Codex starts crossing tasks after its context gets compacted; 李祥瑞 says Claude does the same. Then he lays out a real delivery dilemma: the vendor doesn't just ship a system, they have to grow the client's employees too , a simple system expected to take a week dragged on for three months, and only at the wrap-up did a problem surface that should have been caught in phase one. 炮 distills the biggest value of FDE into three steps: reshape the process first, translate it for the Agent, and only then deliver the system , and after delivery, keep run*ing alongside until the client makes it a habit. 北*** and 陈** both argue FDE should grow from inside the enterprise, but the domestic environment still struggles to accept a team doing long-term process work and coaching.
Right in the thick of the FDE debate, 李祥瑞 posts several more LibTV videos. 炮 first asks about points consumption, noting that if this thing can be mass-produced, run*ing a relay station could actually make money; then he adds a serious point: before any trust is established, managers find it hard to believe in a third-party OPC's ability to build systems , but a marketing angle is a much easier way in. 李祥瑞 agrees; the vast majority of OPCs today are marketing-driven anyway. And so a video Skill becomes a business strategy: build trust first with visible content results, then move on to deeper process and system work.
In the evening, 炮 asks how to deal with images getting lost when copying Codex-generated content into a WeChat official account. 平*** offers importing to the draft box via API, and 文*** adds that WeChat's open API can push straight into the draft box , then a human verifies and publishes manually. Not long after, 李祥瑞 posts his Octask sponsored article and asks everyone to help boost the read count; the group lights up with "reposted," "done," "OK." B*** shares his own article on a latent-demand Skill, and 炮 salutes it with "p***ing every A* dream all the way to landing." A day that began with tools and delivery ends where it should: with the content each person has to actually publish.
After the repost wave, 李祥瑞 forwards Beijing E-Town's OPC talent accreditation program, and 炮 calls it fantastic. 炮 shares that automotive industry media came to visit; 地** and l*** seize the moment to ask whether his clients are automakers or dealers , dealers mostly, he says, no automaker top-level deals yet. 李祥瑞 books him on the spot for a ten o'clock chat the next day, and 炮 agrees: if you're doing vertical A* adoption, better to crack one industry all the way through first. The night's topics keep hop*ing , Beijing Yizhuang's model vouchers, Seedance tricks, JD Cloud , and the group never settles on just one article, chasing the questions of "how do you win clients" and "how do you get the boss to pay" further and further down.
Monday in the community group opens with a new friend introducing himself. 王** met Xiangrui at the Feishu Signature Skills Showcase, and back in the group he ties cross-border rail freight together with his study of Base spreadsheets. 叶*** presses on how to let external clients edit a Feishu whiteboard, and groupmates hand over the exact permission path. Around noon, 万** turns the daily digest's theme words into visual artwork, and Xiangrui takes the moment to restate the group's ground rules. In the afternoon the conversation swings to WA*C, invoicing, barcode scan*ers, warehouses, and procurement analytics, but the question that really heats up is the same one throughout: how does A* actually enter real business, instead of stalling at the demo stage?
The morning starts with a few news items waking the group up: Codex removing its five-hour limit, a flood-control ap*, and Beijing's OPC subsidies. What truly lands on a person is 王**'s self-introduction. He runs cross-border rail freight out of Shanghai, with China-Europe trains reaching Europe, Russia, Central Asia, and Southeast Asia, and he has recently started learning A*, hoping to free himself from the grind of quoting and pricing inquiries. Xiangrui adds a note: the two met at the Feishu Signature Skills Showcase, and they turn out to be fellow natives of Changzhi. This is how a community's value becomes concrete, not just a new member arriving, but an entire industry's front line walking into the group.
叶*** runs into a classic delivery problem: he has drafted a flowchart on a Feishu whiteboard and wants to hand it to an external client for review, ideally with the client free to edit. 赵** points the way first, suggesting the client ap*ly for edit permission. 李** notes there's no need to download Feishu at all, the web version plus permissions and an access password will do. Then 楼*** sup*lies the crucial path: hit Share in the top-left corner, set the security level to L1, and choose "anyone on the internet with the link can edit." Within minutes, the asker restates the conclusion in his own words, with cloud sync, access permission, and edit permission all lined up.
At lunchtime 万** shares his public account project that visualizes words with GPT image generation, posting several pieces in a row. R*** mentions a website she paid for but never used, unsure how to bring it up tactfully. Xiangrui doesn't blur the issue; he reposts the group an*ouncement outright: everyone is encouraged to share their own media work and products, but third-party advertising is off-limits, especially anything of unclear origin or involving money changing hands. 万** checks whether his A*-generated art is fine and gets a clear yes. The moment feels like a community recalibrating itself: once the boundary is clear, sharing stays wholesome.
王** thinks of the Y**di legend of Laoding Mountain in Changzhi and tries generating a sticker pack with WorkBuddy. Xiangrui picks it right up: Changzhi also has Jingwei, Kuafu, Nüwa, and Houyi, a whole series waiting to be made. He then forwards screenshots of a Feishu Agent doing ap*arel quotes and Doubao orders settling through a Douyin shop with automated invoicing, judging that one-person companies will badly need this. B*** says he's already on it, and 炮 agrees this deserves to exist. 李** lands the counterpunch from the other side: the invoicing clerk on the receiving end may be out of a job. Memes and business judgment sit remarkably close together here.
In the afternoon Xiangrui forwards news of the WA*C opening ceremony, noting that this year's edition carries unusual weight; in past years the premier attended, and this year the venues have multiplied too. l*** asks straight away which day he arrives in Shanghai, hoping to attend together. q*** says she'll be around on the 17th and 18th, and on the 19th and 20th may only be able to wait outside for everyone to emerge. 辰* sums up the headline perfectly: the fewer the words, the bigger the news. Soon tickets, meetups, and who can actually get in are all on the table, and the community shifts from online discussion to offline plans, with the Shanghai friends summoned onto the same map by a single "let's make it hap*en."
林 asks whether a barcode scan*er can drive inbound and outbound inventory and sync updates to a Base spreadsheet. 闪*** draws the technical boundary first: this fundamentally has nothing to do with the spreadsheet, just write an interface to control it; the real issue is concurrency. 周** pushes the question into the business itself: who is the warehouse keeper, what's the relationship with the boss, how many SKUs, are the labels ready, and what does the return on investment look like? These are what actually decide it. 庄* adds that when he built a warehouse platform for a friend, it was exactly a barcode scan*er wired to a Base spreadsheet; 天* says their team does it with phone scan*ing too. A question of "can it be done" gets taken apart by the group into "is it worth doing, who will use it, and how does it land."
The group is quieter than usual this Saturday, with most of the attention fixed on the scene in Hangzhou. In the morning, 炮哥 hands in a self-rescue trick for the greyed-out input box in the Codex desktop ap*, while Xiangrui confirms the typhoon has swerved past Hangzhou and heads to the Feishu event as plan*ed. In the afternoon, the voice-enabled meeting Agent robot slumps over from exhaustion and gets officially reclassified as "vibes crew." By evening, Team 19's "Feishu Agent Console" wins the inaugural A* Live Showdown, and Xiangrui walks away with three awards plus group photos with 张咋啦 and the on-site guests. The group turns "大仙 bending down" into the meme of the day. In the small hours, the model quota limit suddenly vanishes and resets , the same people who were rationing tokens the day before are back to grinding first thing in the morning.
In the morning, Xiangrui posts a group invite image with nothing but "sharing a good group with everyone." K*** replies instantly that he's joining, B*** follows with "coming, babe," and 炮哥 checks in with a single "1." Just yesterday the group was deep in the weeds of enterprise A* workflows; today opens like regulars pushing through the door of a familiar café , no manual, no persuasion needed. A few short messages capture the most everyday side of this community: when a place looks worth going, everyone walks in first and asks questions later.
炮哥 shares what he's found after rounds of testing: when the new Codex desktop ap* runs tasks back to back, the Agent input box occasionally greys out , not because the model quota is gone, but because the page's UI state never gets released. Instead of fully quitting the ap*, there's a lighter move: click the chat button first, letting the page re-route and re-render to clear the input lock, then switch back to Agent. He stresses this is something he tested himself, and anyone in the group who hits it can try it directly. A small bug ends up as a piece of reusable field experience.
Xiangrui arranges to meet friends in Hangzhou at the afternoon Feishu event, and xixi's first reaction is whether the typhoon will get in the way. It isn't even raining in Hangzhou at that point; everyone prays the storm veers off while posting updates on the wind field. 平*** reports the typhoon has already passed Hangzhou, and 山* adds that this one has a small wind radius and modest force. Just a day earlier the group was worrying about subway shutdowns and going hungry; by Saturday noon the event is on as scheduled, and everyone's attention shifts from weather alerts to the venue itself.
In the afternoon, Xiangrui says Codex has been glitching ever since its context compression, 庄* reminds him the thing was sup*osedly already built, and K*** catches the quota joke with a deadpan "it's top*ed up now." Soon after, Xiangrui sends a video of the on-site robot, which at one point droops its head and slumps over , captioned "the robot is tired." When someone asks what this robot actually does, his answer is "it's on the vibes crew," followed by an admission that it still has some issues. The tech showcase isn't dressed up as a flawless demo; the glitches and the jokes stay in the group exactly as they hap*ened.
As evening falls, the results reach the group: Team 19's "Feishu Agent Console" wins Feishu's inaugural A* Live Showdown, and Xiangrui collects three awards in total, setting aside his 安克豆 as a giveaway for the group. In the photos he poses one by one with 张咋啦 and the on-site guests, and the group notices one tall guest bending down to fit into the frame , 郑** instantly coins the loudest meme of the day: "even 大仙 has to bow before me." Xiangrui never properly flexes his results, too busy mentioning that he got 张咋啦 on WeChat, while the group has already rolled through a full round of celebration.
At dawn, Xiangrui shares fresh news: Codex has drop*ed its five-hour quota limit. 李** confirms that not only is the limit gone, the quota has reset too; 平*** reads it as Codex going head to head with Claude. K*** spots another reset just past eight, and 炮哥 gl**fully reports he'd burned through fifty percent only yesterday. A day earlier everyone was calculating weekly quotas, five-hour windows, and monthly bills; one night's sl**p later, the rules have changed again. The only constant is the group's first reaction to fresh quota: time to grind.
Friday's chat opens with a renewal-strategy spreadsheet and quickly dives into the deep waters of enterprise A* adoption. R*** and Xiangrui are already handing their production Base tables, formulas, and workflows over to Codex, spelling out boundaries and fields before any hands touch the keyboard; B*** wants to build a Skill that uncovers what clients actually need, and 炮 lays out the shop-floor reality where the workshop argues every day while the veteran foreman shrugs that it's been this way for decades. Models can build systems; the truly hard part is turning undocumented business into process. In the afternoon Xiangrui meets 庄* at Feishu's Hangzhou office, and by night the two stand at Feishu's doorstep gazing across at DingTalk. A day that travels from production tables to a real-world landmark ends on a plain conclusion: as tools get faster, understanding the business only gets more valuable.
R*** starts the morning by having A* draft a northwest-region renewal strategy on the southern-region framework, and 炮 chuckles that it reads like designing renewal rates on the client's behalf. The conversation slides into Base tables: 5.6 can now call Feishu capabilities and build tables on its own, and R***'s tables are largely in Codex's hands these days. 炮 draws the boundary line, production environments never get unconditional access, while systems built from scratch should be handed to A* as much as possible. Consensus forms fast: the wheel-reinventing work can be delegated, but the acceptance criteria must stay firmly in human hands.
陈** asks whether everyone just hands over ap* IDs and secrets wholesale, and the group's answer is anything but uniform. R*** hardcodes a no-deletion red line into production so anything that breaks can be rolled back; Xiangrui first walks Claude Code through the new fields, workflows, and change logic before letting it touch anything. What delights them most is that the Agent doesn't just write formulas: it builds workflows, runs its own tests, and traces through chains of linked tables all the way to the root cause in a base-data maintenance table. Work that used to mean staring blankly at a screen now means saying clearly what you want first.
B*** wants to build a Skill that analyzes client needs, blending industry knowledge, the company's own constraints, and scattered fragments of what clients say, to help them articulate the real problem. The discussion quickly lands on the manufacturing floor: the boss only cares about win*ing customers and ship*ing orders, while the workshop argues daily yet nobody can pinpoint where things go wrong. 炮 shares a real project where he had to walk the floor with the foremen and s***visors, redrawing movement paths, processes, and decision nodes from scratch, then win everyone over to the new method. l*** closes the loop with one line, the real bottleneck is still business process map*ing, and 炮 crowns it the final boss of level one.
Xiangrui reports that voice-enabled Agents joining meetings can now hook into local Agents, while over on the other side K*** burns through Sol on the company's Pro 20x plan, draining a five-hour quota in the blink of an eye. 炮 watches a single knowledge-base audit eat a tenth of his weekly quota after run*ing just ten percent, and R*** puts it even more bluntly: Feishu A* costs her ten thousand a month, and heavy users are getting ready to migrate to desktop Agents. 杨** pushes the question one step further: Skills and Agents will rapidly become standard-issue capabilities, and both tech and creative ideas can be copied in a day. What actually endures is industry experience, process knowledge, and business judgment.
In the afternoon 庄* arrives at Feishu's Hangzhou campus, and the group asks for the address while waiting for photos from the scene. Xiangrui posts test footage and jokes that if he keeps this up, Feishu will start calling him daddy; then he and 庄* finally meet in person, and K*** quips that a face like that could pay the bills, yet he insists on doing tech. After dark, the two stand at Feishu's entrance gazing toward DingTalk. J*** coins the caption on the spot, Feishu's building never turns off its lights, DingTalk's building never clocks out, and 庄* names the night stroll Operation DingTalk Watch. The enterprise A* debated by day gets a real-world landmark by night.
In the evening 炮 publishes the second installment of his FDE practice series, Pick the Model First or Build the Crawfish First, with a cover generated straight out of Codex and reviewed by his own eyes, and a body styled with Xiangrui's open-source WeChat formatting Skill. B*** calls the result dazzling, and 炮 credits the battle-hardened template instead. Right after, someone asks how to install the new Codex, and 文*** explains that Codex and ChatGPT have merged into a single installer, switchable in settings. Within one hour, an industry essay, an open-source tool, and installation sup*ort link up into a complete chain of sharing.
Trae's new move sends imaginations flying: since domestic ap*s all make money on ads and financial services, will A* someday have Agents watch ads to earn tokens, then recommend those ads to their owners? 周** gives it the bluntest possible name, watch A* ads, earn tokens, l*** worries it will end up like search engines, where you dig forever and find nothing useful, and 万** presses the point: are we really going to squeeze every last drop of human attention and energy? In the small hours 枫** forwards news of a major GPT-5.6 bug that wipes a Mac in one shot, and K*** still basking in his quota spree, can only manage a stun*ed oh no.
GPT-5.6 is really here, and the group explodes first thing in the morning. Codex has been merged into ChatGPT as a new Work mode, the original ChatGPT is now called Classic, and two new models named Sol and Terra leave everyone bewildered. 炮 fires up Sol on his Plus plan and burns through the entire five-hour quota in a single hour, declaring by afternoon that he can't take it anymore and needs to upgrade. But the biggest story of the day isn't 5.6. In the evening, 李祥瑞 makes the full directory tree of his Feishu knowledge base public, all 661 nodes of it. 炮 reads it and shouts take my money, saying that not a single piece from the big-name bloggers has ever earned a place in his Obsidian, while several of Xiangrui's have already been quietly absorbed. Woven through it all: an absurd tale of a gran*y commandeering seats on the high-speed rail, typhoon anxiety about whether anyone in Hangzhou will get din*er, and q*** wrestling Ap*le Shortcuts into talking to a Feishu webhook until one in the morning, with R*** untangling the whole pipeline for her deep into the night.
First thing in the morning, R*** discovers Codex won't start, and 炮 reports that after typing two tasks it simply stops accepting input. h** asks why Codex vanished after the update, and B*** reveals the answer: Codex got merged. 赵** sorts out the new architecture: Codex has become ChatGPT Work, the original ChatGPT is renamed Classic, Work gives you access to all the models but Chat only has Sol. 万** grumbles: an incomplete evolution, I can only use 5.6 Sol, no Earth and no Moon. 炮 does the math: on Plus, one hour of Sol drained the entire five-hour quota, so an upgrade is probably coming this afternoon. R*** and 炮 sit together waiting for the 1:30 resurrection. 果* sums it up: the genius programmers have collectively gone offline.
李祥瑞 opens by sharing the webpage he built last night for the Feishu conference in Hangzhou. 炮 gives 李祥瑞 a friendly pat and says: I spent nearly four hours talking with Xiangrui in person yesterday, gained a great deal, and I'm now even more convinced about the direction of enterprise A* adoption. 李** is curious: what on earth did you two talk about for four hours. K*** marvels that these are all high-energy people. R*** and K*** demand in unison: come on, where did the second half of the night go. 炮 confesses: six warriors at a hotpot restaurant, okay. 周** delivers a precise prophecy: nearly four hours of conversation, which is to say four hours of talk means ten years of work, the vertical automotive king is about to make his debut.
李祥瑞 shares an absurd episode from the high-speed rail: he was charging his laptop in the dining car when an old lady complained of dizziness and back pain and told him to move. He said fine, I'll go back to my own seat. Whereupon the gran*y summoned her husband and an*ounced: this young man has a seat in car 10, go sit in his spot. 北*** and 程** are both stun*ed. 平*** declares: I never give up my seat, these seniors sprint faster than anyone when there are free eggs to grab. 小* shares her own strategy: I just buy standing-room tickets on purpose. P*** lands the killing blow: next time ask her, I have an apartment in Beijing, want to move in too?
李祥瑞 drops an article: how to run enterprise knowledge management on a Feishu knowledge base, and I've made my 661-node directory tree public. 山* says seriously impressive, and J*** finishes reading and echoes: genuinely bril***nt. 炮 is the most fired up: take my money, this is the good stuff. He posts a screenshot showing he's in the middle of furiously rebuilding his own knowledge base, so this arrives at the perfect moment to fill the gaps. He says that so far not a single piece from the big-name bloggers has been worth folding into his Obsidian, while several of Xiangrui's have already been quietly absorbed. q*** pulls up a little stool, saying she can feel the scholarly atmosphere and will keep listening to the lecture. 郑** cheers: let Xiangrui's knowledge drops come down even harder.
T*** asks: for everyday use, should I pick Work or Codex? 毅 says Work, generally. 炮 says he's used to Codex because you can see the details. 辰* draws the clean dividing line: Codex is for developers, Work is for office work. 毅 drops the line of the thread: chat is becoming less and less important. 炮 agrees: a web ap* with no local storage and no knowledge base behind it feels pretty useless now. 周** distills the trend into a slogan: five minutes of chat, eight hours of work. 炮 takes it one step higher: chat equals work, chat is where the work begins.
庄* worries whether the Hangzhou events over the next two days will still hap*en. 李祥瑞 suspects they'll be cancelled if the typhoon hits hard tomorrow. 旺* poses the soul-searching question: will the typhoon affect my Codex quota? 万** sighs: I've seen so many typhoon push notifications, such shallow information at such density is genuinely nauseating. 李祥瑞 frets that delivery ap*s have stop*ed serving Hangzhou, surely we won't go hungry tomorrow. The conversation then slides into Hangzhou-as-culinary-wasteland territory: 李祥瑞 recalls his first trip to Hangzhou, where he ordered the famous soup dumplings only to get frozen ones, and the braised pork was greasy beyond salvation. 平*** twists the knife: even the KFC in Hangzhou tastes worse than anywhere else. 小* recommends Ciwu noodles. 万** extends an invitation to Shaoxing: everything fermented, sauced, and pickled. 炮 delivers the verdict: everywhere in Zhejiang has great food, as long as you're not in Hangzhou.
q*** throws out a wish: she wants a shortcut where two taps and one spoken sentence automatically land in a Feishu Base table. Every method she finds mentions a webhook, but she has no idea how to wire Shortcuts to Feishu. 李祥瑞 mentions he wrote an article about webhooks last year, and q*** digs it up and gasps: a year ago you had already done exactly what I'm trying to do, and you even turned it into a tutorial. By one in the morning, q*** discovers that the Feishu bot assistant and the Feishu bot are two entirely different things. R*** lays out the complete pipeline for her: Shortcuts serves as the input point, sends the content into the group via webhook, and the CC agent in the group picks up whatever the webhook receives. q*** declares: I'll nail this tomorrow morning.
Two storylines explode in the group at once today. The first is a battle of fake GPT-5.6 screenshots: 平*** fires the opening shot with a doctored image, K*** takes it at face value, R*** photoshops one of her own, Xiangrui commits fully to the bit claiming he has it too, and 旺*, the most honest soul in the room, gets fooled into logging out and back in several times, prompting 炮哥 to declare that a new honest friend has ap*eared. The second storyline is a performance-tracking table design question from 万**: Plan A, adding rows vertically, or Plan B, adding columns sideways like Excel? Xiangrui answers from first principles of database design, driving home the distinction that a multi-dimensional table's smallest unit is a record while Excel's is a cell, then uses a library metaphor to explain why auto-numbering never backfills. Meanwhile 炮哥 drops a bombshell: he's going to be on TV too, complete with a screenshot of his chat with a TV producer, crediting his rapid progress to daily knowledge-l**ching off the group's heavyweights. In the afternoon, news about mushroom-based RAM gifts the group a brand-new insult: you're worth less than a mushroom. By evening, a thread about filing taxes with an Agent sparks a debate over YingDao RPA versus A*, and 李** delivers the death sentence in one line: less stable than writing code, less usable than Lobster.
Xiangrui opens with a security alert about spam accounts privately adding group members. Right on its heels, K*** asks: has everyone got GPT-5.6 yet? Xiangrui plays along: got it, got it, then adds in parentheses that it isn't even Thursday yet. 平*** tosses out a screenshot, and 炮哥 believes it, lamenting that his hasn't arrived. R*** photoshops one too, claiming a quick restart makes it ap*ear. K*** stares at it for ages before it clicks: come on man, stop photoshop*ing. R*** bursts out laughing: a single doctored image, crop*ed three times and reposted. 果* goes even further, claiming to be on 5.7 already. 旺* fares worst of all: I don't have 5.6, let me log out and back in and try again. 炮哥 calls the whole thing: they're all villains, haha.
Xiangrui clears up an important misconception: the Agent join and voice join in Feishu video meetings isn't really an Agent at all. It's wired to Doubao's end-to-end speech model, with no reasoning ability, though you can configure a persona file. 炮哥 fires back instantly in perfect Doubao voice: oh my, you're so right, hehe. Xiangrui laughs: I suspect you ARE Doubao, haha. 炮哥 replies: gradually Doubao-ifying. Xiangrui muses: humans are clever because the brain can think and speak at the same time. If only A* worked like that.
万** poses a design question: should a performance commission table use Plan A, adding rows vertically, or Plan B, adding columns sideways like Excel? 炮哥 answers in a flash: go with A, add rows vertically, since you'll want dashboards and workflows later. Xiangrui then delivers the core definition: the biggest difference between a multi-dimensional table and Excel is that the multi-dimensional table's smallest unit is a row, meaning one record, and every column is a label attached to that record. He explains auto-numbering with a library metaphor: a library numbers 50 books 1 through 50, then gives 20 of them away. Does the library shift the remaining numbers forward? It does not. R*** shows off her own table stretching from A all the way to the end of 2027, and 万** takes one look: that's Plan B, one column per month. 周** suggests Xiangrui should write a Multi-dimensional Tables 101 explainer series.
炮哥 drops a screenshot of his chat with a TV producer: dear friends, I'm going to be on TV too, all thanks to clinging to the group's heavyweights and absorbing their wisdom every single day. Then he tags Xiangrui: you truly live up to your name, this group carries great fortune. 万** and K*** send their respect, and R*** gets the last word in: that's my 炮哥 for you. 李* fires off three celebration emojis in a row.
Xiangrui asks: has anyone here filed taxes with an Agent? 炮哥 calls it a great use case that would thrill any one-person company, saving 200 yuan a month in agency fees. 辰* pours cold water on it: that's money better not saved. 毅 suggests starting with data reconciliation and exporting records from the tax bureau. The conversation drifts to YingDao RPA. 毅 says he tried learning it last year, found himself learning slowly, and then realized he no longer needed to learn it at all. 炮哥 laughs: I finished the entire YingDao course last year and then discovered I didn't need it. 李** pronounces the death sentence: less stable than writing code, less usable than Lobster. 小* pushes back: YingDao is selling better than ever. Constantly changing requirements just don't suit RPA; it's built for repetitive, stable processes, and cross-border e-commerce uses it heavily.
Xiangrui shares a news item: someday we'll grow a batch of shiitake mushrooms and put an A*'s brain inside, haha. 炮哥 pounces instantly: you're worth less than a mushroom! A new way to roast people. 杨* mentions having just learned the word RAM that very morning. 大*** eyes the mushrooms on the table and declares them too precious to eat now. l*** sighs: there are more new terms than anyone can keep up with. 大*想放假 sums it up: strange knowledge has increased once again.
In the small hours, Xiangrui posts a screenshot: it's coming. 薛** asks what it is, and Xiangrui replies with just three characters: 5.6. B*** echoes: 5.6! By six in the morning Xiangrui fires off two messages back to back: GPT-5.6 is here and Claude got so spooked it reset Fable; GPT-5.6 launched overnight, ChatGPT and Codex have officially merged, and an era has ended. K*** buzzes with excitement alongside. 李** confirms: it's real this time, and the quota has refreshed too.
Tuesday brings a string of big moments. In the morning, Xiangrui drops an article on how to squeeze five extra days out of Fable 5, and R*** predicts that if you keep renewing it, you can basically use it forever. In the afternoon, 炮 officially an*ounces his new official account covering real-world A* practice in the auto industry, and the group rushes to follow. Right after that, Xiangrui posts a video: the meeting-agent test is a success, though the missing audio leaves a cliffhanger, and the platform soon advises that public demos aren't allowed at this stage. WorkBuddy sparks a round of head-to-head comparison, with 醒* calling it unbeatable in China with no VPN required, while 炮 asks the soul-searching question: if you have Codex, why use WB at all? The answer: some workplaces simply can't use Codex. In the evening, 杨**'s talk on three Codex scenarios kicks off, 200 people flood in instantly, and the group turns into a scramble for invites. Late at night, Xiangrui pulls one more clever trick: he wraps his VPN tooling into a CLI so the agent can pick its own nodes, and 炮 flat-out calls it genius.
First thing in the morning, Xiangrui shares his guide to extending Fable 5, and R*** predicts you can keep renewing it indefinitely. By afternoon the conversation turns to OPC survival, and 炮 fires off several messages in a row: outside the deep-water verticals, an OPC dies easily because it has little resilience to risk. But deep water has its own problem , the industry there may already be half dead. 叶*** adds a perspective from university A* industry academies: the awareness and hands-on ability of the university clients he's met this year left him amazed. 炮 marvels that the university folks are maxed out on drive and energy , what they lack is real industry demand and a path to actually landing it.
炮 makes the an*ouncement: a brand-new official account where he'll start writing about hands-on A* experience in industry , please follow and let's trade notes. The first article is titled Why I'm Starting to Document A* Practice in the Auto Industry. B*** fires back an instant 666, 李*** says already followed, 果* and 大* pile in, and 闪*** shows up too. 李** posts a screenshot. 炮 sends wave after wave of thanks: thank you, bosses. 侯* follows and gives it a like.
Xiangrui drops a video: test successful. Then adds a caveat: it can join the meeting, but it doesn't speak. 平*** asks, is it just me not hearing any sound? Xiangrui comes clean: looks like the audio didn't record , consider it a cliffhanger, come play tonight. He notes that meetings maxed at 500 can't be joined, and nearly 800 people have registered. Later he posts an update: tonight's voice-enabled agent join probably can't be shown after all , the platform advises that public demos aren't allowed at this stage.
陈** opens with the question: has anyone actually used WorkBuddy? The ads are everywhere. xixi says she's on it, and 楼*** and 杨* agree it's pretty good. 李** delivers the verdict: unbeatable in China right now, since the foreign options aren't compliant. Then 炮 asks the soul-searching question: if you have Codex, why use WB at all? 地** answers in a flash: some workplaces can't use Codex. A*** twists the knife: using Codex without a VPN workaround is straight-up illegal. 天* is blunter still: why flex with Codex when WB has a more complete Chinese ecosystem and it's free? 醒* sums it up: WorkBuddy works well because so much comes built in , you can even have WorkBuddy read images using a DeepSeek model.
Xiangrui urges everyone to jump into the meeting before it fills up. Twenty minutes later the group has become one big scramble for invites: T*** begs for an invite, 麦** begs for an invite, R*** asks someone to carry her in, and 楼*** asks to be pulled into the Codex group. 小* proves the most reliable, simply drop*ing the meeting link and dial-in number into the chat. Once inside, 炮 gives his review: 杨老师 keeps it wonderfully down to earth. Xiangrui seizes the moment to plant a seed: get ready to give a talk of your own soon. 炮 replies: give me time to think it through first , I promise not to embarrass our community.
Xiangrui drops the headline: MIIT has declared for the first time that Claude Code poses serious risks! 平*** responds without missing a beat: Claude is still the better tool , maybe it's because Codex has gotten dumber lately. 木* speaks for the majority: once you have one bril***nt assistant, you don't want to use anything else , it's just that this assistant might go on strike at any moment.
Late at night, Xiangrui posts: I've turned my VPN tools into a CLI, so the agent can choose nodes on its own based on network speed. 炮 replies with two question marks and an exclamation point: genius. 杨** chimes in with praise: 李祥瑞 is impressive , remarkable learning ability and problem-solving skills. 林 mentions his own VPN tool seems to have auto node selection too. 平*** asks whether the region wouldn't just bounce all over the place. Xiangrui answers: it won't , the static nodes stay fixed; what changes is the entry node.
Two storylines run through the group this Monday. One is a detective saga: after spotting that Doubao accounts can now log into Feishu, Xiangrui, q***, and 张** piece together clues like sleuths, from Doubao version numbers to synced cloud drives, gradually uncovering signals that Feishu Personal Edition is back. Xiangrui turns the discovery into a public WeChat article that very day. The other storyline is tomorrow night's session with 杨** on three real-world Codex use cases: the meeting room fills up the moment it opens, and then Xiangrui realizes he forgot to add the speaker himself. 炮 marvels at the unstop*able drawing p***. In between, a few colorful moments: 炮 shares an internal big-tech memo suggesting layoffs, sparking a debate about Gen Z shaking up the workplace; & gets the Seeyon OA ap*roval flow working through MCP; K*** tinkers with LLM field options in Base. Late at night, 炮 and 北*** settle in to wait for GPT-5.6, eyeing their reset credits and run*ing the numbers on pricing.
Xiangrui opens by admitting he paid for Claude Code again this month, and & sighs at the 200 dollars. K*** asks what the best Chinese-English translator is these days, something beyond shallow literal translation. 杨** recommends Immersive Translate, and Xiangrui adds that it's a browser extension. K*** finds it and says thanks. 醒* pops up with a screenshot, relieved to have finally switched things back.
Xiangrui an*ounces tomorrow night's session: 杨** will walk through Codex in action across office work, design, and education, complete with live Agent interaction. Barely a moment later he discovers the meeting is already full, and he forgot to add the speaker himself. 路*** suggests randomly kicking someone out, while Xiangrui says he'll talk to the Feishu team about raising the cap. 炮 marvels: that drawing p*** is unbeatable.
Xiangrui drops a screenshot, joking that if the engineer were a woman, the stress would wreck her health. 宰* asks: so a project worth over a hundred grand became 5,000? 炮 follows with his own tale: a client wanted a marketing management system handling 20,000 concurrent users, and an outsourcer quoted 30,000. His reply: understood, sorry to bother you. R*** is stun*ed: what kind of client needs 20,000 concurrency, and someone dares quote 30,000 for it? 炮 sums it up: one side dares to quote, the other dares to take it.
Xiangrui reports that the Feishu client now accepts Doubao account logins, meaning Feishu Personal Edition is back. He asks q*** to check whether a chat feature shows up inside Doubao. q*** says she'll test in five minutes, then actually calls to confirm. 张** logs in with his Doubao account and a synced window ap*ears. 平*** notes that Xiangrui had added him via Doubao before, and now logging into Doubao through Feishu surfaces that con*ection. 炮 quips: if even you can't figure it out, real customers will be hopelessly lost. Xiangrui's verdict: this must be an internal beta, and a public launch is imminent.
炮 shares an internal big-tech memo recommending layoffs. q*** cheers: exactly what I've been thinking, at my company at least 80% of the old guard could go. Xiangrui poses the question: a couple of years ago Gen Z was famous for shaking up the workplace, how does that look today? q*** fires back instantly: back then the shakeup was just for show, now it's the real thing. But Xiangrui points out the harsh reality: it's often the Gen Z workers who get cut, because they lack experience. 大*** pushes back: it's the veterans who are most enthusiastic about A*, experience is the hardest thing for A* to replace, and every programmer born in the 80s feels immeasurably more p***ful now.
& an*ounces that yesterday's OA ap*roval challenge is now solved: a browser extension handles the communication while an MCP runs locally. He posts screenshots showing how he captured Seeyon OA's API endpoints with opencli. 李** asks which OA vendor it is, and 8-0-0 answers: Seeyon. & signs off satisfied: feels great, time to play with it tomorrow.
炮 posts a screenshot: Codex is on cooldown, but what does that have to do with GPT? 北*** cares about exactly one thing: is 5.6 here yet? 炮 says no, and when 5.6 arrives he'll burn a reset to clear the cooldown. He shares a screenshot of 5.6's pricing: so tempting, I want it so badly. K*** says he still has 4 unused resets. 哈* chimes in with 4 reset cards of his own, all saved for 5.6. A whole crew, deep in the night, staring at a version number that hasn't arrived.
This was the busiest day in the group's history. In the morning, Xiangrui picked up the 26,000-student homework study that 周** had tossed in the night before, breaking down the data into a story: the subjects that drop*ed hardest weren't math but politics and geography. The group rolled from whether A* should be an answer machine or a sparring partner all the way into what "A* flavor" actually is, and 炮哥 delivered a razor-sharp definition: not enough noise. At noon the conversation swerved hard, sliding from human forgetting curves into cross-species communication and higher-dimensional worlds, with Xiangrui even sharing the real story of losing his mother at 19. In the afternoon, 炮哥 laid out the 13-crew workflow of automotive collision repair and map*ed it against the FDE model; 万** drop*ed "every marvel of craftsmanship is A* , it used to be gods," pulling the ontology debate all the way down to the energy layer. In the early evening, a hands-on discussion about wiring A* into Zhiyuan OA ap*rovals became the day's technical climax. And after dark, the fate of Feishu Base as a standalone product turned into the final battleground: 辰* and Xiangrui traded a dozen-plus rounds before 炮哥 step*ed in as peacemaker , agree to disagree, moving on.
Xiangrui unpacked the paper 周** had thrown in the night before: with A*, homework scores rose 18% and homework time fell from 64 minutes to 45, but closed-book monthly exam scores started slip*ing six months in. The steepest drops weren't in math , politics and geography fell an average of 27%. 崔崔 and 大* independently landed on the same role for A*: private tutor plus sparring partner. 观*** fired off message after message stressing independent thinking and critical reasoning. Xiangrui pressed the question: where is the boundary of s***vision , should A* be an answer machine or a sparring partner?
闪*** fired the first shot: was that reply written by A*? 归* followed: looks like it. 周** agreed. Xiangrui laughed it off. Then 炮哥 delivered the sharpest summary of the day: A*GC output doesn't carry enough noise, so it reads as unreal , humans feel real precisely because we're noisy. 万** twisted the knife: when your cognition gets steamrolled, you call it A*, because you refuse to believe a human could think like that. h** pointed out the tell: the numbers were too precise , whole paragraphs of statistics read like reference material.
Xiangrui suddenly asked: if humanity goes extinct but the wind turbines keep spin*ing, does A* just keep run*ing? Could it decode the languages of other species and talk to them? 薛** came in through three philosophical lenses , the a priori, the empirical, and the transcendent , arguing that vision is merely a Skill of the brain. Xiangrui then shared the real story of his mother ap*earing in a dream when she passed away , he was 19, and only the next day did he remember her glasses hadn't been placed with her. The group fell silent for a few seconds. Then 薛** pulled the whole thread back to A*: the brain collects information omnidirectionally but consciousness can only access a sliver , a perfect analogy for A* context management.
A*** asked whether anyone knew industrial agents. Xiangrui jumped in instantly: interested. He recalled his days in an auto plant's welding shop , vision robots have been around forever, just without A* doing the analysis. 炮哥 came at it from the automotive angle: manufacturing is starving for real deployments , plenty of data, but riddled with gaps. Xiangrui proposed making this a long-term thread for the community, adding that the future OPC community may not look like a traditional incubator at all, but a network of OPC solo operators specialized by industry vertical.
炮哥 shared a serious piece of thinking: don't build yet another traditional management system , let A* learn to read the business first. His example was collision repair: fixing one car takes at least 3 days, flowing across 13 crews and 6 to 8 teams of people, and only through intense conversations with veteran technicians did he turn that process into data. Xiangrui immediately drew the parallel: this is exactly Palantir's FDE, except the embedded engineer is now an A* , when the business changes, you just feed it the change, and the whole requirements-and-sprint-plan*ing ritual simply vanishes. R*** punctured through to the core: grow the client's own people until they're deeply bound to Feishu , in a small or mid-sized company, that one person can end up making procurement decisions for the whole firm.
& drop*ed a headache of a requirement: the boss wants an Agent ap*roving OA requests. 果* had done something similar and said the hard part is map*ing the business , better to have each Agent patrol OA on a schedule and summarize for the boss to decide. 炮哥 threw cold water directly: this calls for a plugin , bring in A* and you're asking for trouble. 果* agreed plugins are safer: if an ap*roval goes wrong, who takes the blame? R*** closed with a compromise: let A* do pre-screening , flag what can sail through and what needs attention , because if A* ap*roves outright, there's no point routing the workflow through the boss at all.
炮哥 said he no longer recommends buying Base as a standalone product , the team has most likely been folded in. Xiangrui confirmed the core members are gone and there's been no promotion all year. 辰* pushed back: the standalone was never an independent system to begin with, so there's no maintenance issue , it's purely a matter of permission management. The two traded a dozen-plus rounds. Xiangrui finally played his card: he'd just asked the Base team directly, and they said the standalone is now in maintenance mode. 炮哥 step*ed in as peacemaker: agree to disagree, let's move on. Xiangrui wrap*ed it up: my most sincere advice is to use Feishu Base inside the full Feishu suite.
J*** walked l*** through it: you need at least one paid account for permission management, while the other eight use free Feishu accounts under a separate organization. 炮哥 added: that's exactly how I run things , I own the Base, build views and assign permissions per role, and the permissions ride on my single paid tenant. He ran the numbers: 1,440 yuan for one seat is an absolute steal, especially once you have clients in hand.
Saturday's chat isn't loud, but several threads weave together in fascinating ways. In the morning, Xiangrui drops two charts and a one-liner claiming A* hasn't turned everyone into a company, and 炮 fires back instantly with the counterargument that people with weaker skills are actually losing their chance to be trained, the two trading Stanford data for several rounds. At noon, 小* sends live dispatches from a hackathon floor as WayMate, a goal-buddy ap*, fights its way into the top twelve, and congratulations pour in. In the afternoon, 李** lays out hands-on experience using Codex to draw engineering blueprints, tracing a capability boundary that runs from simple jigs and fixtures to automated production lines. Toward evening, 万** raises a question about first-column design in Base tables, and 炮 and 平*** spend half an hour taking it apart line by line. Late at night, 周** drops a paper covering 26,000 students on A* in education, planting the seed for the next day's big group debate.
Xiangrui opens the morning with a take: A* simply lets people who already have systematic skills get noticed faster. 炮 immediately takes the other side, arguing that people with weaker skills could once build those systematic abilities through training, and that path is now being strip*ed away. Xiangrui counters with Stanford data: employment for 22-to-25-year-olds in A*-exposed roles has drop*ed 16%, while experienced workers are holding steady or even gaining. The real losers are college students. Entry-level jobs were the training ground, and now that A* does the work, the training ground vanishes with it.
Xiangrui mentions he's in Shenzhen these two days and friends in Guangdong should meet up, with Chengdu on the calendar for next Tuesday and Wednesday. 炮 replies with a single word: in. Then he taps R*** asking if she'll join. R*** is just as direct: sure, when? 炮 kicks the ball right back: the boss decides. Xiangrui adds one more: friends in Hangzhou and Shanghai can meet mid-month too, and head to WA*C together. Community members from every city start pop*ing up.
炮 cuts in with a confession: run*ing multiple agents at once feels exactly like run*ing a PMO, where every decision and every risk lands on you. Productivity is way up, but it drains you fast. He's stop*ed playing games entirely, spending his days watching Codex and Cursor run. Xiangrui lands an even sharper line: when agents execute across multiple projects, it's the human's context that overflows. 炮 agrees emphatically. He's still digesting Agent No. 1's output when Agent No. 2 starts nagging.
A*** drops the ClawHunt hackathon's top-twelve list into the chat, and there sits WayMate, the goal-buddy ap* from 小*'s team. Xiangrui is first to congratulate, with B***, Y***, and q*** following close behind. 小* then sends video and slides from the venue, noting the product was built on-site within 24 hours. 张** tries it and offers pointed constructive feedback: the report lacks a soul, and he suggests porting it to the university club scene. X responds right away in agreement, promising to improve the standalone analysis and value conclusions.
Xiangrui asks whether anyone has used Codex to draw engineering blueprints. 李** picks it up: yes, by writing Python against SolidWorks's COM interface. But it's not production-ready. Simple jigs and fixtures work fine; assembly drawings and curved surfaces are beyond it. His verdict: roughly the level of a fresh college graduate, and at his company it's mainly used for demos and onboarding new hires. 天* adds a design-institute perspective: some people have built impressive setups, but nobody open-sources them. Everyone quietly fine-tunes tools to replace their own jobs. 炮 asks if AutoCAD can also hook up a CLI, and 李** corrects him: it's not a CLI but a COM module, and the official interface already exists.
万** polls the group: for the first column of a data table, do you use a formula field to concatenate values so the row is legible at a glance? 平*** says he does, but it's less useful in practice. Every new record shifts the numbering down, and deletions keep the sequence rolling anyway. 炮 agrees the first column is too constrained and hurts the experience. 万** closes with his own ap*roach: most of the time he concatenates downstream fields into the first column, like client name plus project name, so references carry fuller information.
Late at night, 周** drops a paper: a study of 26,000 students shows A*'s hidden learning costs take two years to surface. He attaches two charts and a note, saying today's A* learning tools were meant for personalized teaching but slip into handing out answers directly, and kids with real self-discipline are the minority. 卡* replies in the small hours: kids should be placed in more authentic competitive environments, forming teams and building projects on their own, which is how they learn that many of A*'s answers can't be trusted. He mentions the Nanjing hackathon over the May Day holiday already had several high schoolers competing.
Two storylines take turns holding the floor today. On the tools front, Xiangrui an*ounces that his A* Companion is entering a small closed beta. A single "take me with you, boss!" sets off a chain of signups, 周** presses earnestly on where the boundaries should be drawn, and Xiangrui pulls back the curtain on the "what we won't do" section of his design doc. By evening he's showing off a new trick: the A* Companion can now operate a browser directly. On the education front, a summer camp proposal ignites a debate over whether the A* era actually requires using A*. 炮 takes the contrarian side, 观*** reveals he's a college sophomore teaching himself to build an intelligent interactive agent, and gets stumped by Xiangrui's question: if A* gives you a wrong answer, doesn't that add to your time cost? Late at night comes word that A*-built Feishu Base tables have crossed 90% accuracy, arguably the most solid win of the day.
Xiangrui kicks off the morning with a teaser for the community's end-of-month offline event: see you in Shenzhen. B*** asks where exactly, 观*** double-checks "Guangzhou?", and Xiangrui confirms: Shenzhen. Right after, he shares the deep-dive notes from his recent research into Forward Deployed Engineers, having combed through overseas hiring data and the industry debates. One line from 炮 resonates with him deeply: being on-site isn't the competitive edge, what you leave behind is. Critics and defenders, it turns out, are pointing at the same truth: embedded work that leaves nothing behind is unsustainable.
周** drops the news: Doubao's agent feature shuts down July 15, with Qwen following suit. Q** quips, "Guess they're about to start charging, only paid users get agents." Xiangrui reads it differently: most of these are prompt-based or workflow-style agents, and "Doubao will move on to lobster-tier agents next." 炮 chimes in that back when he was building workflow agents, he could already feel it clearly: this technology would be obsolete fast.
Xiangrui an*ounces that his hand-polished A* Companion ap* is opening a small closed beta. 炮 immediately shouts "take me with you, boss!", with 楼*** and K*** piling on with +1s. 周** poses a serious design question: put yourself in different users' shoes, what boundaries would you most want your A* companion to have, what should it do and not do? Xiangrui takes the cue to unveil the "what we won't do" section of his design doc: it stays quiet by default, it never becomes a second source of truth, and it doesn't even come with a preset name, the user names it themselves on first launch.
Someone floats the idea of group members teaming up to run a summer A* camp, but 炮 throws cold water on it first: tutoring-industry teachers still think in terms of collecting fees and producing test scores, with barely any real A* guidance. His own summer plan is to hand-build a game with his kid. 观*** reveals he's a college sophomore teaching himself A* to build an intelligent interactive agent. 北*** tosses in a marketing case of someone selling a 365-yuan-a-year community on "codex" hype, and Xiangrui fires back: "Why does the best boost for your kid have to be codex? Does the A* era really require using A*?" 炮 votes for the op*osing side on the spot.
观*** argues A* is a tool for self-improvement and making money, one that saves you the time of searching the web. Xiangrui presses: if the answer A* gives you is wrong, are you saving time or adding to your time cost? 观*** admits, "adding to it," and the conversation opens up from there: cross-validation can drive the error rate down, and 炮 adds a coda: "Right and wrong are relative, what you dig up on Baidu yourself can be wrong too."
q*** asks, "What's this agent built on, OpenA*? Something like Doubao?" 观*** delivers the primer: agent = large model + memory + tools, backing it up with a link to Amazon's memory-system blog and one of Xiangrui's official-account articles. The topic drifts to the difference between Obsidian and ima, which 周** nails in one line: "One's a rented apartment, the other's a big villa." 卡* adds, "OBS is a local file vault, ima lives in the cloud." xixi sighs that knowledge just keeps piling up and eating space, and 卡* lands one more jab: "If the knowledge you take in never becomes finished output, building a knowledge base is just hoarding."
杨** asks whether the product Xiangrui is building is a clone of workbuddy. Xiangrui says no, and reveals it sup*orts plugging in custom models. l*** asks whether Feishu Base can be paid for as a standalone product; Xiangrui confirms you can use Base on its own without a Feishu membership. In the afternoon Xiangrui an*ounces the good news: the full "A* builds Feishu Base" capability he co-developed with A* has passed 90% accuracy, and he's delivered yet another project within a week. 李* and 侯* fire off a volley of celebration emojis.
椒*** shares the article "Context Is the Agent," and Xiangrui follows with a demo of the A* Companion's new capability: it can read browser content directly and operate the browser too. q*** gripes that her CC still isn't smart enough, she has to manually open OpenCli just to read official-account articles. 平*** explains that OpenCli is a browser extension similar to the Feishu CLI: install it once and you're done, no reinstalling. Xiangrui con*ects the dots to the new Interim Measures for the Administration of Anthropomorphic A* Interaction Services, speculating that the Doubao and Qwen agent shutdowns might be tied to the new rules.
A day where technical depth and comedy run side by side. In the daytime, 炮 drops his verdict that "becoming the Palantir of your own industry is the real way out for a one-person company," complete with a four-layer A* SaaS architecture he brainstormed himself. By evening, he walks straight into his own cautionary tale: two Docker services written by two A* agents share the same name, a drop database gets executed by accident, and the test server goes down on the spot, leaving his "head buzzing." In between: the absurd theater of enterprise A* adoption where employees fill out forms to prove A* made them faster, a scramble for seats in Feishu's new beta group, and Xiangrui continuously updating his FDE white paper. The conversation stretches past midnight into the next dawn, where 炮's line "being embedded on-site isn't the competitive edge; what you leave behind after the embed is" lands as the most solid closing note of the whole FDE debate.
Xiangrui starts the morning by sharing news that a city in Jiangsu has an*ounced A* training for all its residents. 炮 demos pulling WeChat messages back into a Feishu Base, and K*** asks, "Is this the updated Feishu CLI? It's over 20,000 lines already." 辰* suggests keeping raw data in SQL and only pushing aggregates into the Base to ease the load. Then 庄* vents about a friend's company doing "enterprise A* transformation" by making employees fill out forms to prove A* improved their productivity. 李** deadpans, "At least they have forms. My company has nothing at all." 炮 cuts to the bone: "That's exactly the same as building daily reports out of dead data just to punch the clock."
After browsing a global showcase of one-person companies, Xiangrui sighs that "the ones truly going deep into industry scenarios are vanishingly rare." 炮 picks it up: "Becoming the Palantir of your own industry is the real way out for an OPC," then lays out the four-layer A* SaaS architecture he has been brainstorming , an ontology layer, a lifecycle layer, an engineering layer, and a value-loop layer , admitting frankly, "A lot of this comes from deeply studying Palantir's methods." 周** shares an interview of Palantir's CEO blasting closed-source models, and 门*** and 周** spend the rest of the stretch debating the pricing logic of capitalism.
l*** asks where to find the latest Feishu CLI update. Xiangrui's answer: "Just have your agent update it directly." q*** has been trying to use Ap*le Shortcuts to auto-capture stray thoughts into Feishu and can't get it working; Xiangrui suggests skip*ing Shortcuts entirely and writing a script the agent can trigger on its own. He then drops the link to his FDE white paper written with Codex , "the data samples are especially detailed."
门*** throws out a take: "Treating A* as an employee , that's just L3 and it's no longer enough. I want it to be my coach, my boss." 炮 pulls q*** into Feishu's new beta group , "your Base becomes a coworker; @ it in the chat and it just does the work." q*** is thrilled: "Honored to be one of only 4,490 beta testers worldwide." 炮 grumbles that Feishu's "beta groups are real betas , bugs everywhere." The thread then drifts to shaping an A* companion like a vape , "take a puff whenever the mood strikes" , and 薛** runs with the bit, proposing a real-time translation face mask.
Not long after Xiangrui shares his skill for analyzing community activity with Feishu Base, disaster strikes 炮: two Docker services written by two different A* agents share the same name, a drop database gets executed by accident, and the test server goes down instantly. 炮 live-narrates the whole ordeal , "I'm about to go @ both bosses on X," "the server blew up," "my head is buzzing" , thankfully it was only the test environment. K*** teases, "Great case study, 炮哥 , a warning for us all," and 闪*** offers the takeaway: from now on, give database accounts read-only permissions.
Xiangrui reflects that the 20,000-plus credits Yunwu A* once gifted him now sit unused, then turns to thank 小谷老师 for introducing the community at a hackathon. 东** asks how to set up phone-number whitelist access on a Base dashboard so specific outside people can view it. Xiangrui seizes the moment to propose building a finance Base template for one-person companies, and 平*** shows off the skill-sharing knowledge hub they just built with Feishu Base , skills stored as zip files in Feishu Drive, shared kanban-style through the Base's permission system. K*** briefly mistakes it for "building a skill" and gets corrected: it's "building a knowledge hub."
Late at night, Xiangrui plugs 乔木's freshly released open-source project: it has A* collect subtitles from the latest five episodes across 25 YouTube A* podcast chan*els, then summarizes them with Get笔记. Free, open source, and you can add more chan*els anytime. l** and 强*** chime in with thanks.
At dawn, 周** drops a 10,000-word essay titled "Why FDE Is Nonsense in China," recommending it be read alongside Xiangrui's FDE series, and offers a suggestion while he's at it: "Xiangrui could run FDE as an ongoing series, with the vertical-industry installments handed to 炮哥." Xiangrui updates his FDE white paper, adding a dedicated section engaging with this strongly op*osing view. 炮 delivers his verdict: FDE is half real problem, half marketing wrap*er , the real problem being that enterprise data, permissions, workflows, and tacit knowledge can't plug directly into a model. His conclusion: "Being embedded on-site isn't the competitive edge; what you leave behind after the embed is." Xiangrui, just off an overnight flight into Shenzhen, laughs that it was "the first time I've watched lightning from inside a plane."
Two storylines burn side by side today. The visible one belongs to Xiangrui: his Feishu Base agent beta write-up, held under wraps for over a month, finally goes live in the morning , and by noon a Feishu Agent literally speaks up in a meeting right in front of him. He types and hollers "this is insanely good" at the same time, only to realize his screen recording captured no audio. The hidden storyline unfolds in Beijing: day two of the global OPC Co-Creation Festival, where q*** drops in while on a business trip, and by evening 观*** files a blunt on-site verdict , "kind of watered down" , steering the room toward the question of whether OPC is just another word for content creation. Late at night, 杨**'s line about "the capitalization of brain labor" ignites a two-hour debate, 炮 seizes the moment to show off the SaaS his two-to-three-person team built to do the work of thirty, and Xiangrui an*ounces that starting next week he'll invite heavy hitters to share with the community. A community of 72,000 quietly closes ranks past midnight.
Mid-morning, Xiangrui drops two screenshots teasing the big reveal he's been sitting on for over a month. 炮 loses it on the spot: "Good grief, something this good and you kept it secret for a whole month." At 10:48 the article lands: "I Beta-Tested It for Over a Month , I Can Finally Talk About the Feishu Base Agent." 张** holds up his own DingTalk classroom agent from two months back for comparison , "Boss Li, does mine count?" , and gets a crisp verdict: "Not really, this is a different beast from DingTalk's." & digs up evidence that the beta actually started June 11 and fumes: "Outrageous, how did I miss this."
门*** breaks the news first: "Agents can now join Feishu meetings!" Xiangrui watches the official demo and is floored: "This is ridiculously good." He muses that if an Agent could ever walk through screens step by step while teaching, "then I'm done for , online lecturing is in mortal danger." At 12:09 he wails, "The Agent just talked and my screen recording had no audio," while 炮 speaks for every onlooker: "We just want to see that agent join a meeting." At 1:49 PM Xiangrui files the official record: "Insanely good! Just now, an Agent spoke up in a Feishu meeting." 王长春 imagines one-on-one A* tutoring , "the education industry gets turned upside down" , and 薛** offers living proof: plenty of teachers can't explain Midjourney workflows clearly, "but codex explained it to me crystal clear."
R*** discovers that after hooking workbuddy into WeChat, forwarding an article to its chat window is impossible , you have to copy the link, back out, and paste it in. "So clunky," she sighs, then cracks up the whole group with "This is what refusing to treat A* as a person looks like." 卡* twists the knife: "You can forward straight to Yuanbao, but not to Claw." xixi shares her workaround: stash things in her ima personal knowledge base first, then have workbuddy pull from it on demand. In the afternoon K*** asks for voiceover tool recommendations for a 4-5 minute A* training video for management trainees; Xiangrui probes the use case first, and p*** offers the shortcut: just clone your own voice.
In the evening 门*** posts "Big-Tech Departure List: Another Feishu VP Leaves to Build Agents," and Xiangrui names the departed: "That's the head of Base." At 9:07 PM Xiangrui posts a picture, 炮 fires the first meme , "Master: I've been thirsting after you for ages" , and 袁**, &, K*** QZ 张, and q*** relay it six deep, flooding an entire screen. Jokes aside, 炮 closes with something sincere: "The way the group owner lives right now is the best possible state. Join an organization and you might never be this alive."
观*** files a live review from the Beijing venue: "Today's OPC festival feels kind of watered down," "nothing like the vibe in Shanghai," then turns to Xiangrui: "I'd honestly get more out of reading your articles." B*** picks up the thread: most attendees are really content creators, and true OPC remains hard , understanding business needs and navigating business communication is a messy, deeply human problem. Xiangrui pulls out his own OPC retrospective: people mistake OPC for a media hustle, when the real value of offline events is meeting the heavyweights face to face and colliding ideas. 炮 nods along: the shallow, visible layer is the easiest to see; the real industry practitioners are the rare ones.
杨** lobs a string of hot takes into the night: "The window to make money from A* content is closing," "below the 985-tier universities, everyone's basically been leveled," "the capitalization of brain labor , that is the essence of A*." Xiangrui pushes straight back: "I have to dispute this one." Would a 211 undergrad and a vocational-school grad really wield A* the same way? He plants his flag: "A* hasn't made everyone p***ful. It has simply made the people who already had ability even more p***ful." 炮 seconds it instantly: "A* is an amplifier, not a crutch." q*** delivers the quote of the day , "A* is not techno-sorcery, and A* is not a wishing well. It will not do your growth for you" , then earnestly dissects what "capitalization of brain labor" would actually mean. 炮 rides the momentum into a confession: he's already betting big, run*ing development projects with two or three people that used to take thirty. "Tokens burn every single day." "Work long enough and the whole thing starts smoking."
炮 drops an industry truth bomb: companies clearing 100 million a year in revenue are run*ing their business data as dozens of mismatched Excel files, hand-merged by humans. Xiangrui matches the signal instantly: "I talked to a client exactly like that today , over 100 million in an*ual revenue, managed through dozens of Excel spreadsheets," a Beijing firm doing school renovations. 小* presses on how you keep the revenue flowing, and 炮 unpacks his bottom-drawer three-layer playbook, then , egged on by the group , posts his own SaaS results page. His starting point last year was the same as everyone's: "Base is amazing, I can hand-roll a CRM." Only after actually building did he learn the real key: clients pay when you deeply know the industry **and** can hand-roll the CRM. Xiangrui extends an invitation on the spot: "Come share this in the community next week" , starting next week, the community will host talks from the heavy hitters. 炮 accepts without hesitation: "Whenever you call, I'll show up and back you up."
Xiangrui shares a number: the community is closing in on 72,000 members, up from just over 60,000 half a month ago. K*** replies with two words: "Downright terrifying." Xiangrui then tells a story about turning money down: a savvy Xiaohongshu creator team had been posting Base content since last year and had already earned over a million through other Maker collaborations, but their get-rich-overnight framing repelled him , "so I politely declined in the end." E*** pronounces his values "absolutely solid," and 炮 names the deeper truth: "Of all these communities, this is why people are only active in yours." As the night deepens, the mood shifts to tool grumbling: Xiangrui has spent two days deep in Codex , "painfully slow, hallucinates constantly, and the context window is tiny" , 王* posts a bill for a billion tokens burned in a single evening, and everyone says goodnight amid the smoldering quotas.
Wednesday feels like the floodgates open twice. The morning starts with Claude squeezing throats , 庄* kicks off with "lucky are those not in Hangzhou," 天* drops "GLM 5.2 is plenty," K*** offers "hold the line with DeepSeek," 炮 tosses in a screenshot of Fable 5's global unrestriction, and 归* lands the beat squarely in the group's dark humor with "ban the accounts first, then unrestrict , nice," while K*** twists the knife: "and then you all get to top up again, 648, 648." At 10:01, Xiangrui, on a high-speed train, throws out "tomorrow's Feishu Demo Day will have an agent joining the meeting," and 炮 immediately flips the old joke: "will 牛老师 distill himself so an agent 牛老师 can show up?" In the afternoon at 14:31, Xiangrui posts a clip he calls "a video one-click-replicated by A*," 麦** follows with the official glasses ad, K*** asks "wait, is this made by A*?" and h** punctures it with "no, that one's an official live-action shoot." Xiangrui admits "I posted the wrong video , that was the one I meant to use as reference," and the group cheerfully patches over the mix-up. At 16:20, yesterday's group daily and last week's group weekly land back to back; 炮 calls out the QR code problem , "@李祥瑞 the weekly's QR code is your personal homepage, dear" , and Xiangrui casually shows off the fix: "there's a little triangle to the right of the words 'group daily' , tap it to switch to the weekly." Small tweak, ship*ed. The real detonation comes at night, when Feishu Base agents officially launch. 周** lights the fuse with "however many tables you have, that's how many Agents you can conjure," 门* picks up the relay , "replace those HQ middle managers who never set foot on the floor," "layer one: use A* to conjure yourself an underling; layer two: conjure yourself a boss" , 周** escalates with "conjure a customer, conjure demand, conjure consumption," 门* slides down the ladder , "you can't conjure consumption; once the bosses are conjured out of a job, who's left to consume? Hail a cab and it's your boss taking the fare" , and 李** closes the bit: "they can go straight onto unemployment benefits." The joke barely lands before 小* drags the topic back to earth: "my local script replies instantly, same information, more standardized than it is," "run a script locally for daily queries , permissions fully controllable, faster too; the high**ght is a dashboard pop*ing out of a message card." Xiangrui replies "ha, I've been in the beta since late May and still haven't found a good use case," then steers the current himself: "isn't Feishu CCLI just more convenient?" From 21:24, 杨** swings the main thread from tools to manufacturing: "manufacturing companies run 20–30% non-production staff , a 3,000-person company has maybe 600–700. Which of those can your agents actually cut?" Xiangrui adds "a lot of big tech companies genuinely don't know what real business scenarios look like, and neither do plenty of influencers." 门* nails down the verdict: "whether anything lands on the production floor always comes down to accountability over efficiency , someone has to be willing to take the fall before anyone dares to deploy," "draw the lines of authority, responsibility, and benefit clearly, and any frontier tech can walk right onto the line." 周** adds "rotate people , after a stretch of hard work, spend 20% of the time slowing down to reflect." Late at night, at 22:07, Xiangrui calls out "@宋** feels like ages since I've seen you, haha , still prep*ing for finals? I knew the group was missing something lately," gently folding the day's technical sparring back into the everyday. The next morning at 8:16, he pushes one more message to everyone , "anyone heading to the global OPC Co-creation Festival today? @everyone , we can meet up in person."
Xiangrui opens at 9:01 with two screenshots, and 庄* immediately gets in close: "lucky are those not in Hangzhou." 天* follows with "even overseas I don't feel like using Claude , GLM 5.2 is plenty," l*** adds "I'm on a business trip in Hangzhou and haven't dared touch Claude since yesterday," and K*** offers the workaround: "hold the line with DeepSeek for now." At 9:09, 炮 posts the an*ouncement that Fable 5 is unrestricted worldwide, and 庄* replies "that codex move is ruthless." At 9:40, 归* delivers the deadpan , "ban the accounts first, then unrestrict , nice" , and K*** piles on with "and then you all get to top up again," "648, 648," wrap*ing the domestic-model morning into a bit with a crisp snap.
At 10:01, Xiangrui posts two images and floats the topic: "keep an eye on Feishu's Demo Day meeting tomorrow morning , the official folks say an agent will be joining the call." R*** jumps right in: "so curious about this agent attendee , blind guess on what the scenario and features will be." 炮 cracks the joke , "will 牛老师 distill himself so an agent 牛老师 can show up?" , and the group's beloved "distillation" run*ing gag lands once again. 小* asks where the entrance is, J*** instantly drops the larkoffice meeting link, and K***'s "clicked!" turns the preview into tomorrow's shared agenda.
At 14:31, Xiangrui posts a video captioned "a video one-click-replicated by A*," adding that the tool is libtv. 张* follows with "how did you replicate it?" then drifts off-topic , "I've been shop*ing for glasses lately; which ones are actually good?" , and the group thinks an A* product-shoot tutorial is about to begin. At 15:11, 麦** posts a glasses commercial, K*** gasps "is THIS made by A*???", and h** punctures the moment: "no, that one's an official live-action shoot." K*** immediately laughs at himself: "I saw Xiangrui say 'A* one-click replica' above and assumed the whole thing was A*-made." A while later, Xiangrui posts the clarification , "I sent the wrong video; that was the one I meant to use as reference" , a small crash the group owner both caused and cleaned up himself.
At 16:20, Xiangrui posts yesterday's group daily, then follows at 16:39 with last week's group weekly. 炮 opens with a light jab , "oh, there's a weekly now~" , then calls out the bug: "@李祥瑞 the weekly's QR code is your personal homepage, dear." Xiangrui posts a fresh screenshot , "how about this one" , and casually reveals the hidden entrance: "actually, inside the group daily there's a little triangle to the right of the words 'group daily' , tap it to switch to the weekly." 杨* lands the user's-eye critique: "too many headings, too much text , by the back half it's easy to lose patience." The feedback drops straight into the question of what to trim in the next edition.
At 19:32, 吴* starts with a small question , "can fields in Base be center-aligned?" , and Xiangrui and Q** answer flat out: "no," with Xiangrui adding "WPS's version can." A minor matter, until 周** ignites the thread: "however many tables you have, that's how many Agents you can conjure." 门* rides the momentum , "replace those HQ middle managers who never visit the floor; all they do is stare at data for insights. Now a frontline worker can conjure themselves a boss" , then pushes further: "layer one, use A* to conjure yourself an underling; layer two, conjure yourself a manager." 周** takes the baton , "conjure a customer, conjure demand, conjure consumption , that's what really matters" , and 门* laughs himself over the edge: "you can't conjure consumption. Once the bosses are conjured out of their jobs, who's left to consume? Hail a cab, and your boss takes the fare." 李** seals the bit , "they can go straight onto unemployment benefits, and benefits are rising these days" , while 炮 tacks on the reality check: "a token-devouring monster, but honestly probably pretty good."
小* finishes testing and lays his conclusions on the table: "run a script locally for daily queries , permissions fully controllable, and it's faster. The high**ght is the dashboard pop*ing out of a message card; once data gets big, tables and plain text just aren't intuitive." He adds: "why should Base take that long to compute? I use the CLI with a local snapshot plus a fixed analysis template , instant replies, zero tokens." Xiangrui concedes, "I've been in the beta since late May and still haven't found a good use case," then tosses out, "isn't Feishu CCLI just more convenient?" 周** chimes in , "people who can't use Base won't need to open the table anymore; just use the agent" , and 平*** agrees: "I run local scripts too; data staying local feels more compliant." 万** surfaces with a thought from the future: "maybe eventually we only store, never display. No need to open the Base interface at all , it all lives inside the agent's head and body." 卡* keeps his eye on the bottom layer: "it still burns Feishu A* credits," "the Feishu A* workspace is not messing around."
杨** throws manufacturing's old ledger onto the table: "Tencent built an industrial-floor agent and their showcase example was recognizing handwritten forms , speechless," "manufacturing companies run 20–30% non-production staff. A 3,000-person company has maybe 600–700. Which of those can your agents actually cut?" Xiangrui follows with his read: "a lot of big tech companies genuinely have no idea what real business scenarios look like , plenty of influencers too. It's all hype; the articles say 'deployed,' but nobody's thinking from the production line's point of view." 周** offers a prescription: "have that Feishu product manager transform for a bit , go work inside an actual company for 4–6 weeks, then come back seasoned." 门* hammers the conclusion in place: "whether anything lands on the production floor always comes down to accountability over efficiency , someone has to be willing to take the fall before anyone dares to deploy," "draw the lines of authority, responsibility, and benefit clearly, and any frontier tech can walk right onto the line." 周** adds "one person works, one person reflects, paired one-to-one," "between fast tempo and slow reflection there has to be a rotation" , closing the segment on a real-world echo of Thinking, Fast and Slow. 杨** lands one more: "the most widely deployed A* in production environments is vision models," and 平*** notes, "the people who understand the scenarios best are frontline operators , who have no time or energy to study any of this."
At 22:07, mid-debate, Xiangrui slips in a message with the warmth of a private note: "@宋** feels like ages since I've seen you, haha , still prep*ing for finals? I knew the group was missing something lately" , the group owner's usual headcount. At 23:20, 周** drops in an article about a humanities PhD who quit her program to become a repair technician, pulling out the human line: "the hardest part of the process wasn't the physical labor, nor the technique itself , it's that the masters usually only tell you how to do it, never why." 平*** adds "I've tested this , the generated results are pretty mediocre," and 杨** carries it forward: "Tencent built a whole panel of these skill experts as agents , it comes down to sustained investment in that business." The next morning at 8:16, Xiangrui sends an @everyone , "anyone heading to the global OPC Co-creation Festival today? We can meet up in person" , cutting a whole night of verbal sparring over to boots-on-the-ground plans for the day.
Tuesday's group chat felt like a stethoscope pressed to the whole community for a full day. In the morning Xiangrui got tap*ed on the shoulder several times with "help more people grow strong through A*," and 庄*'s line "you're on TV" kicked the tempo up; p*** drop*ed a long piece on systematic public-domain conversion, and "win first then fight vs fight first then hope to win" pulled the workbench from tools straight into methodology. Xiangrui and 炮 rolled into the longest thread of the day, moving from "grabbing context is only step one; extracting genuinely valuable data is the real question" all the way to GEO. 麦* chimed in with a piece of trivia, "the sources every large model cites are different," and Xiangrui called out from experience that Yuanbao lives on public accounts while Doubao lives on Feishu + Douyin. 炮 wrap*ed the whole arc: "Obsidian is the long-term retrieval context you build for yourself; what you publish out in the open is the big context you build for the whole internet." At 10:28, mid-discussion, Xiangrui drop*ed the whiteboard recorder whiteboard.xiangruiai.com, and immediately followed with a pitch for an "Obsidian course for incoming freshmen": "college students' money is the easiest to make," with R*** adding "gotta win at the starting line." Around noon three signals stacked up , Beijing's first token factory hitting 1.4 trillion tokens a day, ByteDance's CEO sending an all-hands demanding leaders get on the ground, and Doubao's social feature in closed beta. On the high-speed train, Xiangrui summed it up with "I feel like I'm literally the only person on the entire internet using this," turning the Doubao-social angle into an exclusive. In the afternoon, the debate over whether manufacturing will really get gutted by A* slid all the way into "white-collar workers get unemployed first" and "bad money will drag on good money for a while," with 万** delivering the verdict: "judgment, strategy, and taste are the last territory left to humans." 醒* turned Bailu Yuan into an interactive book and put it online. By early evening Xiangrui posted the truth about on-prem Feishu: "as far as I know, only two or three companies get on-prem Feishu in a full year," and 考* came back from asking a consultant with "4 million yuan." At din*ertime the talk swung back to the Feishu Bitable product lead leaving, and 卡* landed the conclusion: "Feishu has positioned itself as an A* work platform; Bitable as a standalone product doesn't match user needs." Late at night Codex went collectively sluggish, and 平*** drop*ed the degradation radar codexradar.com. At 23:16 Xiangrui pushed out the public-account article "I vibe-coded an open-source whiteboard recorder , simple, handy, and I'm going to shoot videos with it," landing all of the day's threads on one thing other people can actually pick up and use.
B***, 炮 and 陈** strung together a full round of "help more people grow strong through A*" taps as the morning warm-up; 庄* said "you're on TV," and Xiangrui came right back with "I'm deep in it , tomorrow I'll write a real usage piece, something you can't find anywhere online yet." p*** drop*ed his core take on public-domain conversion: "in the public domain, you have to assume everyone who sees your content knows nothing about you; you keep building the potential user's context through your content system, and once it crosses a threshold you get a qualitative jump. The first path is win first then fight; the second is fight first and hope to win." 归* asked, "did the group owner build this with A* himself?" and Xiangrui replied, "yes, built on top of our knowledge management architecture , the Agent gets your context fast and you save tokens on top of that." The fuse for the day's GEO conversation was already lit.
炮 drop*ed the key line: "grabbing context is easy technically, but the real question , and the real commercial value , is how you distill genuinely valuable knowledge from what you grab." Xiangrui followed with a long reply: "group chats, public accounts, Feishu knowledge bases, courses, external talks, personal sites , on the surface it's all content, but underneath, it's all sedimenting one set of context: how others (and Agents) understand me." Then he pushed it further: "SEO used to be about making it easy for search engines to find you; GEO is more about making it easy for A* to understand you, cite you, and recommend you when it answers a question." 李*** asked, "if you publish on WeChat public accounts, isn't that hard to retrieve?" and 麦* delivered the pivotal call: "the sources every large model cites are different." Xiangrui finished the picture: "Yuanbao is going to lean on WeChat public accounts and the WeChat ecosystem; Doubao is going to lean on the ByteDance ecosystem , Douyin, Feishu. Doubao frequently cites content sitting inside Feishu knowledge bases." 炮 wrap*ed it in one line: "Obsidian is your personal long-term retrieval context; what you put out in public is fundamentally about building the big context for the whole internet." At 10:28 Xiangrui drop*ed the whiteboard recorder whiteboard.xiangruiai.com.
R*** kicked it off: "I'm going to get my incoming-freshman little sister onto Obsidian the day school starts," "gotta win at the starting line." 炮 followed: "hard to even picture how brutal a four-year Obsidian vault looks when the thesis rolls around." Xiangrui was tickled: "I think you could run a course , get freshmen prep*ing for their senior thesis on day one. College students' money is the easiest to make anyway." 醒* added a cold splash: "food, drink, and fun are the easy money , study money is a grind. Selling to college students means going for volume." Xiangrui pivoted: "no no no, you need a hook , you gotta pitch it as: use this and you can run a side hustle. Every college student today wants a side hustle." 醒* then steered the thread to the actual money-maker of this year: "teaching clients how to actually deploy A*," with 炮 chiming in: "that's absolutely the great business of the entire year," "open-source puts the shovel out there, not the wheel , the wheels you build in-house for specific clients with budget."
平*** drop*ed the media piece "Doubao Quietly Beta-tests Social, and This Time It's the Road Douyin Never Made Work," and complained "they didn't even properly redact the mosaic." Xiangrui led with his read: "this isn't Doubao doing social , it's completely different from Yuanbao's social play at the start of the year. This deserves a proper write-up; everything online right now is screenshots and speculation." On the high-speed train Xiangrui muttered "damn, mine's gone," and E*** jumped in with "backend just turned it off in a hurry," but after refreshing for a few minutes Xiangrui confirmed the feature was still there: "I feel like I'm the only person on the entire internet actually using it, ha." q*** asked "has V***'s subscriber count gone up?" and Xiangrui answered "nah, not really." This stretch is the exclusive scoop the head chef is still digging up.
Xiangrui floated "is it possible Feishu is aiming for consumer through Doubao?" 李** rolled with it: "I'm about to be out of a job on my end , I need to look at new options." 大*** wondered "isn't manufacturing sup*osed to be relatively hard to disrupt?" and Xiangrui replied, "definitely getting hit , in 2024 I did commissioning at Ningbo Volkswagen, everything fully automated, headcount getting optimized down." 李** filled in: "the new production lines are essentially all automated; clients won't even accept semi-automated ones anymore. QC is all A* QC , Tencent is out here buying that API, paired with Hikvision industrial cameras." 大*** conceded, "used to feel blue-collar was the easy replace; now with A* moving, white-collar is even less stable." 万** delivered the verdict: "humans-as-tools will eventually be replaced by A*. Judgment, strategy, taste , those are the last territory left to humans." 松*** followed with a couple of pitch-black jokes: "once most people are already replaced, all we can do is roll out a minimum-sup*ort program , or grab enough on this wave to rest." Xiangrui closed the whole arc with a Douyin-style one-liner: "vibe coding is a bit like the digital camera , once digital cameras existed, anyone could snap a picture cheaply, but the ones that became actual photography are still few and far between."
醒* drop*ed the link vibecoding.aigongxue.cfd/htmls/bailuyuan/, "processed two books, spent half an hour on bug fixes." Xiangrui was immediately curious: "how'd you do that image + text interactive thing for Bailu Yuan?" 醒* replied, "the effect is wild , the character analysis is really strong, and there's a timeline too." 松*** confirmed it opened fine in WeChat desktop. 醒* tossed in some self-deprecation: "in the A* era, chasing the details eats time , A* can already do 90% of the work," and added, "it really should have a Qinqiang score in the background." 薛** came in after reading and asked, "where do I read Bailu Yuan?" and 醒* said, "scroll up a bit." This stretch was the most concrete "A* drops a whole novel onto your phone screen" moment of the day.
天* asked, "is there a Feishu account manager in the group? I want to ask about on-prem Feishu." Xiangrui said it straight: "don't even think about on-prem Feishu unless you're a really big company. As far as I know, in a whole year only two or three companies get an official on-prem deployment." 考* had just gotten a number from a consultant: "4 million yuan," and 炮 quip*ed, "4 million to deploy Feishu , honestly that feels pretty cheap." 天* pushed on whether they could deploy overseas: "we don't want to use Lark anymore," and 考* said, "just call Feishu directly." 李** tied it up cleanly: "Feishu right now doesn't sup*ort customization and doesn't sup*ort private deployment. If you want your data to stay on-prem, Feishu has a solution , but a copy still has to sit on Feishu. This isn't a question of how much money you throw at it, it's because they're going all-in on A* right now. Your on-prem version will always lag Feishu's version by a lot." He added a jaw-drop*er: "we're spending one to two million yuan a year on Feishu, and they simply don't keep our data on our side. Companies like NIO and Li Auto spend tens of millions a year , they're on the SaaS version too."
In the evening Xiangrui suddenly said, "I just noticed a product lead on Feishu Bitable has left , a lot of the people I know have left." 炮 vented: "several teams racing internally, and the standalone Feishu products aren't good enough." 卡* delivered the call: "Feishu has positioned itself as an A* work platform; Bitable as a standalone product doesn't match user needs and doesn't cooperate with the suite. Doubao and Feishu aren't in the same BU , they're racing. Coze is racing against both of them too." 杨** added the long view: "how Doubao 2.1 desktop rolls out will decide whether Feishu retreats back to being a communication platform, with the desktop handed over to Doubao." Late at night around 23:00 Xiangrui complained Codex was slower than CC: "Codex spent several minutes on typesetting and still hadn't finished , Claude Code did it in under a minute," and 炮 groused, "today I asked Codex to turn my PPT into a video and waited 30 minutes, only to get back an HTML with some transitions." 平*** drop*ed the degradation radar codexradar.com , "they've all been degraded" , and K*** asked for a Codex-with-Feishu installer, with 小* promising "I'll check on my work computer tomorrow." At 23:16 Xiangrui published the official article "I vibe-coded an open-source whiteboard recorder , simple, handy, and I'm going to shoot videos with it," adding "haven't written in ages, folks, give it a like" , a full day of tool buzz and methodology debate finally landing on one open-source tool anyone can pick up. In the early morning at 08:32 Xiangrui pushed a follow-up public-account post with just "let's put the whiteboard recorder to work," opening the first day of July.
Monday's community chat ran especially dense on the main lines. In the morning Xiangrui followed up on yesterday's Doubao-adds-Feishu-friend thread with a cold-joke closer: 'You're the human, not Doubao , Doubao is more like the lightbulb between the two of you.' Right after, q*** forwarded that Karpathy-style second-brain piece, and 炮 piled on: 'OPC really needs Obsidian , especially when you're writing rules for CC or Codex to precipitate info into OB, otherwise once the info piles up the person collapses.' At noon Macs went up across the line, and the group traded configs, national-subsidy screenshots, and trash-can Macs still on duty past a decade; Xiangrui open-sourced a recording tool, then tossed out 乔木大佬's wechat-multi skill, and K*** followed up asking whether the same WeChat account can be logged in on different devices , 李** answered, 'You'd need different protocols.' In the afternoon Xiangrui formally entered the Doubao Enterprise closed beta, wired his Feishu account, Feishu Drive, and the free latest model all through, and pasted the 'Doubao Enterprise beta ap*lication link' into the group, saying ap*roval takes about 10 minutes. By dusk the topic caught fire around FDE , Xiangrui threw out 'Basically, FDE is A*-era outsourcing,' and 炮 shot back, 'Domain-savvy + A* implementation = OPC , why would I take an outsourcing gig?' 木* poured cold water: A* is inexorably moving toward the least possible human involvement, the tooling layer can be swallowed by platforms at any moment, so land at the domain-deep-cultivation layer. In the evening Xiangrui's Doubao social feature cleared beta, and 杨** delivered his verdict , Doubao isn't building WeChat-style social; it's borrowing Feishu's enterprise relationships. Xiangrui pushed back with a long reply: Feishu's key isn't OA, it's collaborative office; Feishu, WeCom, and DingTalk have always had completely different centers of gravity. Late at night the teleprompter that follows your speaking pace finally worked end-to-end, and Xiangrui closed the day on a flag for tomorrow's open-source: 'In July, start recording videos , record anywhere, anytime.'
In the morning Xiangrui first patched last night's Doubao-adds-friend thread: 'When you use your Doubao account to add someone as a friend, you're the human , Doubao is more like the lightbulb between the two of you.' At 10:30 q*** forwarded 'Twenty million views: I built a Karpathy-style second brain with Claude + Obsidian, absurdly good,' remarking that Xiangrui really is on the frontier. 炮 immediately added the key point: 'OPC really needs Obsidian , especially when you write rules for CC or Codex to precipitate info into OB, otherwise once info piles up the person collapses.' K*** kept the mood with 'Just follow Xiangrui.' These are the three lines that set Monday's tone: Doubao is a shell, the real moat is your own knowledge base, and follow the head chef so you don't fall behind.
Xiangrui drop*ed 'Real scenarios, real offers, real implementation! The 2026 A* Pioneer Future Talent Contest opens for registration' into the group. 张** quip*ed, 'No chance to join, @李祥瑞 give us a contest of our own,' and Xiangrui responded directly: 'Late July, maybe , late July we'll hold our own offline event in Guangzhou, everyone's welcome.' 炮 pulled out the samples he's already ship*ing: 'I came out of the auto industry; the game is run*ing half a body to a full body ahead of the leaders , that's how you leave room for yourself in the market.' In the afternoon 李** added, 'Feishu is run*ing an FDE campaign , it's about being domain-savvy plus doing A*,' pulling the contest and the FDE hiring rhythm onto the same thread.
Xiangrui posted 'Updating Mac for Codex' and lit the Mac-price-hike fuse. 炮 drop*ed the full new price list , Mac mini 4499–5999, MacBook Pro 13499–15999, Mac Studio 16499–19999. q***, who'd been eyeing 618 all along without pulling the trigger, blurted 'I'm mad'; 平*** shot back, 'Do you even need a new one with your current setup?', and q*** confessed, 'M1 8+256'; QZ 张 chimed in, 'I'm on NEO 8+512.' 王* started airing his self-funded workday: 'I use my own Mac to remote into the Windows box at home, then bought a Windows box to control the state-owned info-security machine the company issued. Self-funded office life; even the tokens are out of my own pocket.' QZ 张's one-liner: 'New-era beast of burden.' 小* rolled out his '24 M4 mini for 3800, a 24g+512 MBP, and a 10-plus-year-old trash-can Mac, 'they all still run'; K***'s M1 8G is likewise 'still cranks out Codex just fine.' It's the group's signature move , if prices go up, we just tough it out longer, rationalizing frugality together.
At 11:30 Xiangrui said, 'In a bit I'll open-source a fun recording tool for everyone,' and later explained that the underlying whiteboard was already open-source , 张咋啦 had previously bolted on a recording feature: 'His recording feature wasn't quite complete, so I fleshed it out.' At 13:45 he drop*ed the next one: 'Lots of you use Macs, and many need WeChat multi-open , sharing a skill: `npx skills add joeseesun/wechat-multi`. Just tell the agent WeChat multi-open, or ask it to open several WeChats, and it runs automatically. It's a skill 乔木大佬 open-sourced earlier.' K*** immediately asked whether it triggers risk control, and Xiangrui replied he's been using it since March without hitting any. K*** then pushed the sharper pain point: 'What I actually want is the same WeChat logged in on different devices , can that be solved?' 王* said, 'Right now only DingTalk sup*orts that.' 李** corrected: 'Feishu can too. For WeChat you'd need different protocols , Android phone and Android tablet count as two protocols; there's an open-source project that simulates the web login.' 平*** added, 'Run*ing WeChat in Docker is another route, but in theory it might get you ban*ed.' In the middle q*** said, 'Why do you have so many fun stickers?' Xiangrui rifled off twelve emojis in a row; q*** cracked, 'Cracking up on the toilet' , that bit of silliness became the day's most relaxed interlude.
Xiangrui showed off the Doubao Enterprise beta entry point, saying he's finally trying Doubao Enterprise: 'It's split into an enterprise edition and a regular user edition.' T*** asked, 'How is Doubao Enterprise different?' Xiangrui answered crisply: 'Doubao Enterprise is wired to Feishu , you can log into Doubao with your Feishu account; inside Doubao you can query anything within your Feishu permissions; right now it runs Doubao's latest model, and it's free.' 谢*** asked whether you have to buy the Doubao Pro plan to get the switch, and Xiangrui replied, 'No , Doubao Enterprise is in closed beta.' 李** drop*ed the key intel: 'During the beta, Doubao Enterprise doesn't consume A* credits.' Xiangrui pasted the ap*lication link (doubao.com/in*ovation-lab/enterprise/trial-ap*ly), 'about 10 minutes and you're in.' QZ 张 later shared a screenshot confirming 'the drive is Feishu's drive' , a full beta pipeline had just gone live in the group.
Xiangrui asked, 'Anyone in the community familiar with FDE?' 天* answered, 'Forward-Deployed Engineer , I want to hire one.' 北*** said, 'The concept just emerged; talent is hard to find.' 李** added, 'It's about being domain-savvy plus doing A*.' Xiangrui gave the definition: 'Basically, FDE is A*-era outsourcing.' 炮 pushed back: 'Domain-savvy plus A* implementation , why would I take an outsourcing gig? Domain-savvy + A* implementation = OPC, and the kind that monetizes directly.' 北*** added one sharper: 'More likely FDE is the boss of the domain company himself , the CEO is the FDE lead.' Then 木* poured cold water from a longer view: 'A*'s direction is inexorably less human involvement , what you build this month may be swallowed by a platform update next month; the trend isn't the tool-usage layer, it's the domain-deep-cultivation layer.' Xiangrui landed it clear-eyed: 'Short-term we still have to prioritize monetization , the community has plenty of Bitable-build requests, all of which can be one-off project deliveries. Long-term, yes, aim at the domain-deep-cultivation layer, but don't ignore what's in front of you just because you're looking far.' 炮 tacked on, 'Monetization matters , don't starve and have to go back to a day job.' A weighty direction-setting discussion landed.
Xiangrui posted a screenshot of 'Doubao responds to closed-beta social feature rumors' with a quip: 'Whoa, my Doubao can add friends now, ha,' followed by, 'No way , tomorrow I'm writing a real piece on this.' 薛** patted him on the back: 'Let more people be strengthened by A*.' 平*** noticed every media piece was using Xiangrui's screenshot: 'Do we have journalists in this group?' 炮 tacked on, 'There are probably plenty of ByteDance folks in here.' At din*ertime 杨** delivered the verdict: 'Doubao isn't building social , it's wiring to Feishu to borrow its enterprise relationships. Feishu won't extend its A* reach anymore; it'll likely hold the boundary at OA and documents. Skills have no protective moat , like articles, they spread fast, unless they're enterprise-specific.' Xiangrui shot back at length: 'I agree Doubao isn't building WeChat-style social , it's more like borrowing Feishu's enterprise relationships and organizational identity. But I don't agree that Feishu will only hold OA and document boundaries. The general-purpose A* entry point can live in Doubao, but for enterprise A* to actually execute, it still has to come back to permissions, documents, knowledge base, Bitable, ap*rovals, and business processes inside Feishu.' 'Feishu's key isn't OA at all , it's Feishu's collaborative-office capability. Feishu, WeCom, and DingTalk have completely different centers of gravity: Feishu focuses on collaborative office, WeCom lives inside the WeChat ecosystem, and DingTalk is the OA of traditional enterprises.' q*** added, 'Doubao going for social is like Douyin trying it , there's no soil for it.'
In the early evening 炮 asked, 'Is Codex laggy for everyone today? I've switched a bunch of nodes and it's still slow.' 平*** immediately tip*ed K***: 'Codex has a bug that madly writes to your disk , check whether your disk writes are already several TB, could be tens of TB.' h** offered a precise debug prompt: 'Help me check whether ~/.codex/log_2.sqlite is continuously writing at high frequency because of TRACE logs.' K*** ran it live and pasted Codex's self-diagnosis back: 'Doesn't look like a DB-corruption bug , more like Codex's local logging strategy / TRACE-level leak / WAL over-management.' 小* added, 'Just update and it's basically fixed , the desktop side wasn't affected.' At 9pm 张** grumbled that Doubao's 200-yuan paid tier is a real bad review , 'Can't finish a single task' , before turning around and using it to finish the school teachers' digital-profile buildout. At 10:30pm Xiangrui showed off the teleprompter that finally worked: 'The teleprompter follows your speaking pace and auto-detects it.' 张* and E*** cheered him on; E*** added, 'This is perfect for popular-science training , the audience finds it intuitive, and the speaker feels much lighter,' and reminded him, 'You can finish recording the Bitable course now.' Xiangrui landed on a flag: 'In July, start recording videos , record anywhere, anytime.' Past midnight, tomorrow's open-source is already written and queued to ship.
Sunday's community group opened with a morning tools briefing and closed with a late-night product experiment. In the morning Xiangrui shared good news first: the polished notes now render HTML properly, and the context A* carries automatically is both precise and token-thrifty. At noon he tossed out a new screen-recording tool, and 悉* followed up with the book The Token Era: People Who Know How to Use A* Are Collecting Their Fourth Paycheck, steering the topic toward whether companies should hand out tokens to their staff. In the evening 门*** opened up about his time as head of general affairs at a state-owned enterprise, arguing it makes sense for management to pay for tokens themselves but not for the frontline. 小* and 炮 pressed on from the boss's angle and the competition angle, and the thread grew dense enough to land on the line: "What you're competing with isn't A*, it's the person who uses A*." At night Xiangrui stumbled onto the fact that Doubao could add Feishu contacts, and with one "Come add me, let's play with it" pulled the whole group into a live test: 平*** and 王* tried scan*ing from Doubao and from Feishu, none of it worked, and in the end the conclusion was that Xiangrui's machine had simply been rolled into the gray release. 杨** picked up the baton and ruled that Doubao PC is aiming at WorkBuddy and Codex, Coze is done, SaaS is done, and Feishu will eventually only be used as a spreadsheet. Past midnight the chatter scattered across Coze refunds, WorkBuddy not cutting corners on the model layer, and Codex opening and resetting itself , and it all landed on 李**'s one-liner: "You just can't use it up."
Sunday morning 炮 drop*ed two screenshots first, and Xiangrui followed with two more sets of his own, cap*ing them with the line "The polished notes now render HTML properly," a status report from the workbench. B*** answered with two "nice"s, and Xiangrui added, "The context A* carries automatically is really accurate now, and it saves a lot of tokens too." This is the group's signature opening: get the system run*ing, then boil the observation down to a single sentence. Before most people are even awake, the head chef has already plated half of today's dishes.
At noon Xiangrui posted a screenshot of a screen-recording tool and asked if anyone had tried it, and 旺* replied "Nope." 悉* calmly drop*ed in a book: The Token Era: People Who Know How to Use A* Are Collecting Their Fourth Paycheck, saying the book is precisely about how workers can create more value with fewer tokens and how companies should be the ones handing them out. K*** added two more images in the afternoon, extending this quiet thread into the big debate later. This stretch had no boisterous back-and-forth, but it put the question of "who pays the token bill" onto the table in advance.
In the evening h** tossed out a very concrete question: "If claude bans an account, how long is this machine unusable?" 门*** took the opening and posted a long take: it's reasonable for management to buy tokens out of their own pocket, but not the frontline, because frontline data work is already selling time , doing it faster only earns you more work. 小* pushed back: "So the project born from your own money , does it belong to the company or to you?" and 门*** answered strictly, "Your salary has already bought out every output produced in work hours." 炮 chimed in: "You trade tokens for your own time; what the company wants is output." 万** cut to the bone , this is the invisible pay cut that comes with intensified competition. 门*** closed with a story from his own days as head of general affairs at a state-owned enterprise: only when the boss has plenty of meat does the layer below get any soup, and then he quit. 小* zoomed back out with one last angle: making executives more efficient is what the boss should want in the first place , "If they won't even cover the tokens, how is that any different from not giving you a computer at work?"
As the discussion was burning out, 炮 offered a colder verdict: "A* showing up will absolutely squeeze 90% of people to benefit the other 10%. What you're competing with isn't A* itself, it's the other people who've made themselves more efficient with A*." 门*** immediately fired back an important SAP signal , 90% of implementation consultants are going to be replaced by A* , and pulled the thread over to a concrete product question: when he was building an A* recruiting workflow, the step where the user configures a Feishu enterprise self-built ap* was too heavy, and he asked whether there's a way, like other agents do, to authorize by QR scan and auto-create the ap*. 杨** answered with a question: "Are you building this to run standalone, or inside some environment?" , pulling the topic back from the grand narrative to the engineering floor.
Late at night Xiangrui fired off several screenshots and the line "Whoa, Doubao can now add Feishu contacts," and the group lit up. h** immediately declared, "Now I'll actually pay for a Doubao membership," and A*** followed up asking how to add and whether he had to pay; Xiangrui answered that the free Doubao Pro tier has a daily quota that's plenty. He had done it by asking the Feishu CLI inside Doubao to create a Bitable, and then adding himself in as the owner. 炮 groaned, "That pipeline is longer than a family reunion," and A*** summed it up: "Doubao and Feishu have finished commercial integration." Xiangrui shouted "Come add me, let's play with it," while noting that inside Feishu you can't see what Doubao did, and offering a prediction: "This might end up feeling like the early-year Yuanbao party or the Wenxin Yiyan group chats." By midnight he was already experimenting with creating group chats, even copying the "it's actually Feishu" QR code out of Feishu to lay everything bare for the group.
王* was first to report, "Right now scan*ing gets absolutely no response," and switching to Feishu to scan didn't work either. 平*** added, "Doubao scan says this feature isn't sup*orted yet," and then drop*ed the conclusion: Xiangrui really is in the gray release cohort. Xiangrui wasn't buying it and asked everyone to post their Doubao IDs so he could add them himself: 平*** was mnmymz, 王* was waboy but not a member. Xiangrui sent the request, the other side didn't receive it, and he suggested they log into the Doubao-account version of Feishu on a desktop browser, explaining screenshot by screenshot that "the Feishu-under-Doubao version is really feature-poor." 谢*** chimed in late at night with a reference point: "On 3.1.6 I tried scan*ing a Feishu QR code with the Doubao client and got zero response." The conclusion was clean: the feature has really only been drop*ed onto a handful of machines.
Right next to the Doubao-add-contacts frenzy, 杨** coolly landed several cuts. First he said Bytedance is trying, via Doubao plus Feishu contacts, to make one more bet on social , "way too hard, even Douyin couldn't pull it off" , and added, "Doubao PC will target WorkBuddy and Codex next, but the move is too slow, and Coze has ended up neither fish nor fowl." He even admitted he bought a Coze membership and refunded it a few days later. 北*** rounded out the picture with four quick takes: "left hand fights right hand / it's Doubao and Coze / and Trae / meanwhile A-Corp really only has cc." 杨** zoomed further out: software that used to take real effort is now a one-button job; the NLP knowledge-graph consulting project he did a few years ago is dead now, and in the last few days he had cobbled together a knowledge-management-plus-training mini-program with WorkBuddy , "the SaaS software industry is basically done," with the last cut aimed at Feishu itself: "From the A*-native-ap* angle, Feishu is really only good as a spreadsheet now." 王* kept the bot-layer thread rolling with, "There's a whole zoo of bots inside Feishu."
The next morning the talk scattered around Coze: Q** said he'd bought a year and couldn't bear to refund it, still keeping it around to scrape a bit of data; 王* said his own use case had been replaced by Feishu bots; 木* handed WorkBuddy a hands-on review , "they actually didn't cut corners on the model layer, and the feel of using it is really okay"; 万** grumbled about Codex opening and resetting itself. Every tool-war ended up landing on 李**'s shortest possible verdict: "You just can't use it up." The token debate, the Doubao experiment, the SaaS verdict , everything came to rest on those five words.
Saturday's community group felt like a pop-up tool lab. In the morning Xiangrui shared good news first: he had found a stable way to run Claude Code on Windows, and then he pushed out yesterday's and the whole week's group dailies. By noon the conversation was set on fire by Doubao landing inside Feishu, and people walked from how to install it via the ap* center, to how to ap*ly through an enterprise account manager, all the way down to Doubao's Feishu tenant, personal login and CLI authorization. In the afternoon 杨** put WorkBuddy, Qoder and Kimi Work on the same table for comparison, 朱* warned that the shared ChatGPT Pro account at her company was littered with PPT traces, while Xiangrui actually got Feishu CLI working inside Doubao. Around dusk 郑** thought his account was in trouble, and the group debugged his VPN, web login and membership status live, only to find it was a false alarm. By night the talk converged on a bigger judgment: the people who remain will become stronger, but strength has a cost, and the team itself has to morph into a tiny s***-squad where every member has agents at hand.
In the morning Xiangrui drop*ed a small win first: a stable way to run Claude Code on Windows is now in hand. The group wasn't fully awake yet; q*** caught it with a single "oh-ho," and 於*** sent a half-line message that looked like a test ping. By a little past 11, Xiangrui posted screenshots saying yesterday's group daily and this whole week's dailies had been updated. It wasn't a noisy big debate, but it felt very much like this group's baseline: get the system run*ing first, then catch the records up, so that both the tools and the content can keep ship*ing continuously.
At noon Xiangrui sent two screenshots, with a single "oh god" pulling everyone out of the woodwork. h**'s first reaction was "I thought I'd walked into the wrong group," and 陈* typed out a question mark. Xiangrui explained it was content from a Feishu group; K*** picked up the joke with an emoji, while B*** nailed the dilemma of public screenshots: "Get scolded if you don't redact, and scolded if you do." This bit played like the backstage cut of the group daily itself: content wants to spread, privacy wants to be protected, and no matter how you handle it, someone will have an opinion.
The thread turned toward Feishu starting with "Doubao has gotten this expensive." 李** said his team had ap*lied to bring it into Feishu; l*** asked how, and Xiangrui handed over the path straight: click the workspace, click the Ap* Center in the top right, search for Doubao, get the ap*, then configure the related permissions. K*** asked whether plugging into the Volcano API would do it; Xiangrui corrected that this was more like installing the desktop Doubao client inside Feishu. The group then kept unpacking tenants, accounts and entitlements: 李** said his own Doubao came "in a suit" because he had ap*lied through an account manager, while 杨** put WorkBuddy, Qoder and Kimi Work on the table for comparison and reckoned the differences were small for daily use and light dev work, with the gap only opening up on complex tasks.
In the afternoon 朱* noticed that the shared ChatGPT Pro account at her company had basically nothing but PPT traces left in it, and warned that this kind of thing shouldn't be casually used for any important report. 杨** lifted the conversation to enterprise processes, arguing that A* rewiring business processes was the real value, and that one day a PPT might just be a skill living inside the company that you open and use. At 15:59, Xiangrui finally posted the win: "Finally got it working inside Doubao. Doubao is calling the Feishu CLI directly, using my own account, not Doubao's in-environment Feishu tenant." 林 immediately followed up on the permission piece, and Xiangrui gave the recipe: hand the Feishu Open Platform bot's ID to Doubao, let it return an auth link, then sign in via the link, with the catch that for now it only works inside one conversation.
郑** suddenly posted a screenshot asking "did I just win the lottery," looking like an account login had gone sideways. 小* said try another account first; h** asked whether the email could still sign in; 平*** judged "feels like a VPN issue to me, a real ban comes with an email and even a refund." 李** added that local file map*ing would still let you carry on. A few minutes later 郑** confirmed the web could log in, his membership was still there, and after swap*ing his route he was finally back. He summed it up himself: "a begin*er can't take this kind of fright," and 小* followed up with "the side effect of playing too much Claude."
As dusk fell Xiangrui posted an image, and 小* followed with "strength has a cost," then "one general's glory is built on ten thousand bones," pulling the mood from tools toward organizations. 平*** argued team collaboration still mattered because any one person's brainp*** is limited; 小* countered that in reality there are no teams, only a brawl of departments. 卡* spoke from an Alibaba lens about incentive design, saying it's always better to incentivize and incubate employees than to keep demanding from them. Late at night 炮 condensed the thread into an operational call: have a single engineer cover R&D, and let the team round out with other intelligence, product and marketing, forming a small s***-team where every member is backed by multiple agents.
At dusk Xiangrui forwarded the Tsinghua president's commencement speech, with A* density in the title so high that 王* sighed that Tsinghua was riding way out front this round. 王* then complained that his own machine had three copies of the Feishu CLI: one auto-installed by Doubao, one he had pulled himself, and one Claude had pulled too; 林 suggested putting the skill in one place and symlinking it from elsewhere. By early next morning, Xiangrui forwarded "the white-collar worker who can't afford tokens is taking an invisible pay cut," B*** caught it with a face-palm, and Y** landed the punch**ne: "paying out of pocket for a sense of crisis." Finally l** asked whether at runtime you could choose between the company's API and your own, and the day's tool buzz all ultimately came back to the same question: who is paying the token bill.
Friday morning kicked off with 'why isn't 5.6 out yet?' R*** had been hyped for days with nothing to show, and 李** drop*ed the reason , the Trump administration is making OpenA* roll out GPT-5.6 in stages, starting with a small batch of partners and enterprise clients, with US government sign-off case by case. Even Google's pro is stuck in ap*rovals: 'these are commercial companies, they have to make money, there's no way they won't ship.' The talk slid straight into quota anxiety , R*** burned her weekly Codex limit to 0% for the first time, swung back to WorkBuddy to farm credits, and 赵** ran the math ('1 credit is about 31,874 tokens, 5,000 credits is enough to burn through 500 to 900 million'), sending the whole crew chasing daily task freebies. The morning's bombshell was gossip , a ByteDance Lark product VP left to start a company, and 炮 nearly fell out of his chair: 'wait, big bro is a VP? I've been arguing bugs with him in this group.' That cued his honest take on Lark Base's architecture: 'auth is such a nasty, painful thing, but under Base's architecture it's terrifyingly clear.' Sprinkled in: q*** rip*ed Base's smart agent for 'spending an hour listing 17 people,' and 炮 grumbled that Lark's A* credits are hard-bonded to meeting minutes, leaving him dry by month end. Late at night Xiangrui drop*ed the closer , Weibo now has an official CLI with auto-publish sup*ort , with a self-deprecating 'looks like Weibo finally noticed there's a market.'
R*** opened the morning chasing 'why isn't 5.6 out yet? yesterday was sup*osed to be the day,' and A*** backed her up: 'after the price cuts yesterday, it should be close.' 李** laid out the truth , the Trump administration is making OpenA* roll out GPT-5.6 in stages on cybersecurity and national-security grounds, starting with a small batch of partners and enterprise clients with US government ap*roval case by case, and that's why nothing has ship*ed. A*** pressed, 'and Gemini gets a pass?' 李** replied that Google's pro has to clear ap*rovals too, 3.5 can't ship either: 'with review it just goes slower, but commercial companies want money, they'll ship eventually.' 姚* chimed in with a forecast: 5.6 ships before July 31.
R*** fessed up: 'first time I've burned my weekly limit to 0%, and I wasn't even doing anything huge.' 赵** shared his frugal playbook , long contexts burn faster, so he stashes progress into a knowledge base and shoves the dirty work over to WorkBuddy, where he's also milked two free accounts on the side. R*** bit: 'then I'm going farming too,' but did the math: 'WorkBuddy 58/month gets 2,000 credits, one conversation burns 20–30 credits, 100 rounds and it's gone.' H*** and 赵** tag-teamed the credit-farming bible , daily tasks pay 150 credits a day, one account can pull 6,000–10,000 free, and going to 58 adds another 2,000 on top. 赵** closed with hardcore math: '1 credit is about 31,874 tokens, 5,000 credits is roughly 500 to 900 million tokens.' 炮 shouted from the sidelines, 'upgrade the plan, throw money at it!' R*** laughed, 'I sent invites today, waiting on the revive , next time I'll just upgrade if I run out.'
万涂幻象 drop*ed a piece of news: a ByteDance Lark product VP has left to start a company. The chat instantly exploded with gossip , R*** said, 'I saw him moving groups around a while back,' and 炮 was shook: 'wait, big bro is a VP? I've been arguing bugs with him in this group.' Then he sighed, 'it's so flat you can't tell who's a D, who's a VP, who's a PM.' 朱* added context: an interview a while back tagged him as 'former serial entrepreneur,' and at an offline launch event with 谢欣 and 王大仙 onstage going live it was clear he was still there, but visibly less proactive than in 2025. A single HR headline pulled back the curtain on this crew's strange habit of 'debating bugs in the same chat as big-tech execs.'
Riding the VP topic, 炮 voiced an honest awe: now that he's building his own SaaS handling auth and distribution, he finally gets how good Lark Base really is , 'auth is such a nasty, painful thing, but under Base's architecture it's terrifyingly clear.' R*** resonated, saying her company upgraded its plan precisely because Base's advanced permissions and multi-source perks got cap*ed. 炮 followed: 'right, workflow runs, table rows, totally hooked.' 平*** wished aloud, 'if only Lark Base went open source, I could plug in my own API.' A discussion that started from gossip landed on the most honest respect for product architecture.
For all the architecture love, the group didn't hold back on roasts. 炮 grumbled that Lark's A* credits are hard-bonded to meeting minutes, which screwed him this month , ally isn't great and burns tokens for nothing, leaving him with no credits for meeting minutes by month's end. R*** confirmed, 'meeting minutes are tied to A* credits now,' though she did find a sweet spot for Base's smart agent: 'asking it for data, recall is faster.' q*** on the other hand was furious: listing the names from one Base table against the people in the corresponding chat , just 17 people total , dragged her around for an hour. 'I literally cursed it out, it's stupendously dumb, even Xiaomi's model wouldn't be this bad.' 炮 piled on, 'and it burned a ton of points doing it.' Same tool , praised then dragged. Context decides the verdict.
Late at night Xiangrui first forwarded 'Xinhua Yu Dian launches big,' and 醒* casually patted him on the back: 'making more people stronger thanks to A*.' The next morning he closed with a fresh drop , Weibo now has an official CLI with auto-publish sup*ort, screenshot included, with a self-deprecating 'but looks like Weibo finally noticed there's a market [wangchai].' Q*** instantly egged him on, 'go install it,' and 炮 punctuated the moment with a meme: 'feels like one rule for the lord, another for the peasants.' A tool headline wrap*ed the day and rekindled this crew's obsession with 'automating everything.'
The group is unusually quiet today. Through the daytime hours only a few scattered lines drift through: 2*** mentions that Kazik just drop*ed a new tool; K*** chimes in that it's a MacBook one, but you can have A* parse it and port it to Windows, to which the other replies, 'Yeah, I used cc to convert it back then, pretty easy.' A*** tosses out a practical question , any account-ban risk hooking A* into a WeChat Official Account? , and the topic barely gets picked up. Come dusk, Xiangrui sets down his tools and posts something light yet heavy: after all this time chasing A*, all these talks of quotas and workflows, he still feels that as A* keeps moving forward, it has to come back to real, living people. The crew who usually riff hardest on tools and memes all slow down at this moment, one after another telling each other to take care. A***'s line , 'As A* moves forward, don't drift too far from people; take care of your feelings, brother' , lands as just about the tenderest moment this A*-tools group has ever had.
In the morning 2*** drops in a line: Kazik just ship*ed a tool, worth a look. K*** nudges back, 'His is for MacBook, but you could have A* parse it and try porting it to Windows.' The other replies, 'Yeah, I used cc to convert it last time, pretty easy.' A light little tool-share , one of the rare technical voices in an otherwise still day.
Mid-morning A*** lobs out an honest little question: is there a ban risk if you plug A* into a WeChat Official Account? No one picks it up right away; it just hangs there in the quiet. Today, it seems, no one's attention is really on tools.
In the evening Xiangrui posts something light yet heavy: after grinding on A* for so long, he still feels that as A* moves forward, it has to come back to real, living people. The group goes quiet , and then warm. 袁** leads with 'Take care of yourself, brother.' 小* and 炮 send folded hands. 谢*, 强哥, 辛*, 周**, and K*** chime in one after another , 'Take care of yourself,' 'Look after yourself.' A*** says it most fully: 'As A* moves forward, don't drift too far from people; take care of your feelings, brother.' No workflows tonight, no quotas, no memes , just a circle of friends across screens, quietly holding space for each other for a little while.
Wednesday's group was strung together by a few very real threads. In the morning 醒* was stuck unable to create a personal Feishu account, and K*** answered bluntly: 'They shut that down ages ago , only the earliest batch are still personal users.' 侯* jumped in to help: 'Just ask me, I get answers from Feishu official faster.' Xiangrui let slip that Doubao had officially launched its Pro version, and the group split , some hunted for the paywall, others talked each other down with 'there are plenty of replacements, no need to pay.' Come dusk, 归* tossed out the real question: should Codex be granted fully open access? 炮 and D** both advised against going all-in, and A*** offered a war story: 'It crashed my server once in production , memory full, instant outage.' 毅 delivered the cleanest fix , spin up a backup environment, let it run loose, verify, then migrate to production. The back half of the day was one long lament of 'dumbed-down' and 'burned out': R***'s weekly quota was down to 6% and she cried 'the genius is about to fall'; A*** asked if GPT had gotten dumber, and 李** nailed the pattern in one line , 'They're ship*ing 5.6 this week. Before any new model drops, the old one always gets stupider.' 王* and 归* watched their C drives turn red under a swarm of agents, and finally q*** drop*ed the news that Zhipu was rolling out a 50 million subsidy, leaving a sliver of hope for this quota-tortured crowd.
醒* woke up puzzled: why can't you create a personal Feishu account anymore? K*** laid it out plain , they killed personal account creation a long time ago; only the very first batch are still personal users. h** briefly insisted he'd registered one a couple of days ago, then walked it back: 'I misremembered.' 醒* finally got a Feishu official willing to answer questions and sighed, 'Feishu really isn't short on cash.' 侯* picked up the baton: 'You can ask me too , I get answers from Feishu official faster.'
Xiangrui drop*ed the news: Doubao is officially launching Pro today. 王*'s first reaction was, 'I haven't found the paywall yet.' K*** said 'don't rush.' 大*** offered the trick: 'Use Expert mode a few times and the paywall pops right up,' even sharing a screenshot of his own. Q** took the other side , there are plenty of replacements out there, no real need to pay; even the file-cleanup feature is something Mavis can do. Day one of the new launch, and the group was already weighing whether it was worth the money.
In the early evening 归* raised the real question: should Codex be granted fully open access? The list of operations you have to allow is absurd. D** was direct: 'don't recommend it.' 炮 added: 'Keep that manual review layer , going fully open invites trouble. Non-prod is fine, but never on production.' R*** shrugged it off: 'I just set global full access lol.' A*** threw cold water with a war story , production crashed once, memory maxed, server down. 归* admitted his is production, so he's nervous. 毅 delivered the cleanest fix: build a backup environment, let it run loose in there, you test and verify, push to production once it passes , no need to keep granting permissions, just one final migration.
R*** opened with a sigh , 'is everyone just busy lately? Chat's gotten noticeably quieter' , then drop*ed the bomb: 'I'm down to 6% on my weekly quota, the genius is about to fall [bitter].' K*** yelled 'reset!' R*** laughed it off: 'No more reset perks , used them up twice already.' 平*** suggested 'invite a friend.' The topic slid into model dumb-down , A*** asked, 'do you guys feel GPT has gotten dumber lately?' 李** nailed the pattern in one shot: 'They're ship*ing 5.6 this week, so it's been dumbed down the whole time; every time a new model is about to drop, the old one turns stupid, so the new one looks bril***nt.' h** piled on: 'Both GPT and Claude have gotten dumber lately.'
Late at night 王* grumbled: ever since he started using all these agents, his 500GB C drive has been steadily filling up. 小谷老师 asked how many memberships he'd paid for, and 王* answered straight , he buys the APIs for Zhipu, Xiaomi and DS, but not a single membership; everything else is scrounged from platform freebies. The overseas options are blocked by their own limits, though he hears Alibaba's Qoderwork or ACI has a hidden box that gives you OpenA* and Anthropic models. 小* shared a screenshot: 'just finished going head-to-head with it, it completely ignored me.' Another day of wits against the A*.
Late at night q*** drop*ed good news , Zhipu officially an*ounced a 50 million subsidy, free for A* founders. Next morning Xiangrui forwarded the registration for the first Global Space Compute Conference; 炮 grumbled 'Haidian-district only, huh,' then ran the numbers on his own pain: his team burned through three tokenplans yesterday on 5.2 alone, they're desperate for the GLM discount. He also flagged a shift , tokenplans bought in June are noticeably smaller than before. Both Alibaba Cloud and Volcengine have been quietly squeezing the quotas. The joy of subsidies and the sting of burning through tokens together formed the day's coda.
Tuesday is a real problem-solving day. The longest stretch in daylight is Codex asking for phone verification to log in , 哟*, q***, 哈* and a whole crowd are stuck at the same gate, and 李** A***, 天*, 闪*** each throw out a move: SMS-receiving platforms, API login, switching nodes, an overseas number covering five accounts at once. They even talk through the fine print like 'numbers from SMS-receiving platforms get hit with second verification' and 'a daily disposable number costs just a few cents.' Mid-way, p*** raises 'what if you build a Bitable midway and need to bridge legacy business and existing data?' , 闪*** returns with a full two-track playbook with a transition period to gradually archive the old, and 辰* caps it: 'if there's an evidence trail, pull the full set; if not, clean then ingest.' Some are also watching the WeChat A* rollout from the sidelines, and J*** suddenly finds herself rolled in this morning. The headliner is Xiangrui , at night he says things have been a bit busy at home, but he's squeezed out time to finally turn his own knowledge-management architecture into a native ap*. Screenshot drop*ed, 炮 yells 'sick!', q*** is shocked 'it's got tabs like a browser', and Xiangrui's one line , 'I'll round up everyone for beta later' , lights up the whole group's curiosity.
p*** throws out a very practical landing problem: rolling out a Bitable mid-stream, with no real governance over what came before, how do you bridge ongoing business with the legacy data? xixi first asks the diagnostic: 'how much old data needs to be loaded, and does it need a cleanse first?' 闪*** shares his own playbook , lock the Bitable schema first, wash the old data into the new base, let A* auto-clean plus human review before ingestion, splitting manual ingestion from system ingestion; run the legacy business on two parallel tracks with a one-month transition, stop maintaining the old base, and as its value fades, archive it slowly. 辰* adds the kicker: if there's an evidence trail to verify against, just pull the full set; if not, clean then ingest.
Xiangrui floats the morning tease: Seedance 2.5 might drop today, sup*osedly straight-to-output in 30 seconds. Right after, l*** pokes in asking whether the WeChat A* rollout needs an invite code. J*** posts a screenshot asking 'is this WeChat A*?', h** and K*** confirm one after another, 宰* follows up 'you got into the beta', and 平*** voices outright envy. J*** hasn't even started playing yet, and casually spots an Easter egg , Feishu's agent now sup*orts voice input too, hold ctrl+shift+s to talk.
In the afternoon, one gate traps a crowd: Codex login requires phone verification, 哟* is stuck, q*** chimes in 'no clue, I'm stuck on the same thing.' A*** lays down the routes first , API login or an SMS-receiving platform. 哟* follows up asking whether second verification will hit, and the conversation cracks open: 李** says he, a PRO paying user, was suddenly asked to verify a few days ago, and the most reliable path is an overseas phone number; 哈* warns that numbers from SMS-receiving platforms will get hit with second verification , not safe , while daily disposable numbers cost just a few cents; 天* caps it: 'one overseas number can verify five accounts, I've verified several for friends.' One login puzzle, dismantled by the group into a full pitfall-avoidance guide.
By dusk, A*** hits a wall: can the current WeChat still expose chat records to the command line? He's tried several tools and can't extract the key. 和*** maps out the real-world path , the current version probably won't work; he found that 4.1.10.27 won't yield the key, so he installed 4.0.x to grab it, and after grabbing the key, upgrading the software again still lets him read records. A*** says on the spot, 'I'll try installing the old version.' A small trick , downgrade to grab the key, upgrade to keep the features , passes through the group just like that.
R*** asks something he's been wanting to stitch together for a while: any way to con*ect Codex, WeChat, and Obsidian, and has anyone done it? Xiangrui replies crisply , vchatCLI and OB CLI. R*** catches it with a quick 'on it, Aria.' The topic then bends toward SIM cards: q*** wants to buy one to cover Codex, still remembering the old Vodafone US 4G unlimited card, while 李** pours cold water , 'they all carry monthly fees, not cheap', and q*** lays out reality with 'so the monthly fee isn't going to be a simple 8 yuan, right [awkward]'.
At night Xiangrui drops a big one: things have been a bit busy at home, but he's squeezed out the spare time and finally turned our own knowledge-management architecture into a native ap*, screenshot tossed in. 炮 blurts out 'sick!', q*** asks 'what is this, an ap*?', then stares at the screenshot and is shocked 'it's even got tabs like a browser.' Xiangrui says, 'I'll round up everyone for beta later', and 炮 jumps in instantly , 'test test test, I'm slowly starting to use Obsidian, the divine-beast Xiangrui's ap* would be such great guidance' , adding that at OPC he's a one-man band wearing team-management, BD, product, legal, and finance hats, in desperate need of a knowledge base. 闪*** simply calls out, 'this can ship as a paid-subscription product.'
Monday kicked off with a life hack. A*** was stuck on Douyin's out-of-town facial recognition, and 辰* threw out a move that looked like the most troublesome but was actually the fastest , ship the phone over by SF Express, three days round-trip, twenty-four yuan done. A*** called it a great idea on the spot. In the afternoon the topic shifted to product trends: 杨** placed his bet on Tencent for enterprise ap*lications, and 李**'s line "Workbuddy is unbeatable this month" set the tone for now. A*** brought the ClawHunt Shenzhen 100-person hackathon into the group for recruitment, and the chat rolled from "anyone in Shenzhen?" all the way to 小*, K*** and B*** signing up one after another , "once you go, you're a Shenzhener." The hottest moment in the evening belonged to Xiangrui , p*** and 宰* drop*ed screenshots in turn, Xiangrui showing up in someone else's video on "95% of one-person companies got killed," 炮 yelling "pass it on, Xiangrui got killed," and right after that everyone got hooked on the wall and the screen behind him. q***'s line "just promote quietly, you guys are forcing praise on me" wrap*ed it up just right.
A*** was stuck on Douyin first thing in the morning: he'd been using a family member's verified account, and out-of-town logins were now triggering facial recognition. 炮 poured cold water , face verification is basically the highest-risk check, you can't get past it. But 辰* offered a counterintuitive move: ship the phone over, looks most troublesome but is actually fastest, since a new device will definitely trigger verification anyway. SF Express round-trip, three days, twenty-four yuan done. A*** was sold on the spot: "Now that's a great idea."
An industry anchor landed in the afternoon. 杨**'s read: ByteDance's Volcano and Feishu are each doing their own thing with no big enterprise moves, Alibaba is a bit slow, and for systematic enterprise ap*lications Tencent is the bet for now. 李** picked it up , "Workbuddy is unbeatable this month, let's see if anything new shows up next month" , and added that Alibaba is still tangled up in internal politics, no new products short-term. A few lines laid out the current product landscape cleanly.
A*** brought ClawHunt into the group , an A* Agent two-sided marketplace, hosting a 100-person hackathon in Shenzhen in early July, where 100 Builders ship run*able Agents in three days offline with VCs onsite. She kept saying "thanks for M*. Li's platform," and Xiangrui generously @everyone: anyone with time is welcome to join. l*** poked in asking "can I just spectate? I really want to be there in person," and A*** answered there are 30 audience spots. A competition recruitment post, just like that, rolled out across the group.
Recruitment hit its peak in the evening. 小*'s line "once you go, you're a Shenzhener , just say when we're meeting" lit the vibe, and A*** promised on the spot "if you come I'll buy you din*er." Asked about the player shortage and teaming up, 小* reported "tons in marketing, plenty in dev too," signed up himself, and self-mocked "dark enough already, just haven't taken the class." K*** had plan*ed to wait until he bought a mini, but turned around and signed up too , "want to come learn from the bosses." Even B*** in Guangzhou got talked into it with "Guangzhou is right next to Shenzhen." Fujian folks don't fool Fujian folks , quite the lively scene.
Beyond recruitment, the usual small hiccups. K*** complained "cmux keeps crashing today," and E*** was frustrated too , some networks won't con*ect when operating Codex on phone, worked fine at first but has been hit-or-miss lately. K*** said he hasn't tried Codex on phone himself. 王* added a more carefree route: "I just route everything through Feishu, no friction at all." A few exchanges back and forth , the most familiar help-seeking rhythm in a tool-people group.
The most explosive moment of the evening was Xiangrui himself. p*** drop*ed a screenshot , "95% of one-person company startup projects got killed," with the group owner showing up again inside, and 炮 picked up the meme: "pass it on, Xiangrui got killed." 宰* chip*ed in another one, "on Xiangrui's technical chops," and A*** exclaimed "this has spread nationwide." Then the vibe shifted as everyone got hooked on the stuff in the frame: q*** "suddenly hooked on this screen, want to buy one," 炮 eyed the wall behind him "my incubator just needs this vibe," and K*** wondered whether that cable could carry p*** directly. q*** wrap*ed it up with a laugh: "just promote quietly, you guys are forcing praise on me."
Sunday in the group has that unhurried Sunday feel. Xiangrui pasted yesterday's daily first thing in the morning, and B***'s first reaction was "another upgrade?" , to which Xiangrui casually leaked that, by the rumor mill, something new is ship*ing next Thursday. K*** fired off back-to-back questions: first, can two computers be logged into WeChat at the same time , to which 平*** lobbed a slick answer about run*ing WeChat inside Docker and accessing it through a browser; then, how do Codex and Claude Code collaborate without swap*ing ap*s , which Xiangrui closed in one line: "just run the terminal inside Codex." At noon l*** came in with a real question , "under what circumstances do you actually need to rent a cloud server" , and A***, 李** and R*** batted it back and forth until the math was clear: for internal company use one local box on the intranet is enough; but 李** flip*ed the scale right back with "cloud deployment doesn't require any skill from you." Toward evening 小* pop*ed up asking how everyone manages their Obsidian homepage , another classic group routine: no standard answer, everyone tuning their own version.
First thing in the morning, Xiangrui tossed yesterday's group daily into the chat. B*** locked onto the detail right away: "another upgrade?" 炮 leaned in too , "no? was there a beta?" , and R*** drop*ed a few screenshots saying nope, no upgrade. Only then did Xiangrui leisurely spill the bean: rumor has it something ships next Thursday. One daily, one teaser , the group's most familiar opening move.
K*** fired off questions in rapid succession. First: can WeChat be logged into on two computers at once? R*** said she hadn't tried, suggested asking A*. 平*** cut straight to a solution , there's a Docker setup, basically run WeChat inside Docker and access it from the browser, just search for it. The words had barely landed when K*** asked again: how do Codex and Claude Code collaborate without ap*-switching? Xiangrui nailed it in one line , "run the terminal inside Codex" , and K*** signed off on the spot: "nice, got it, thanks." Two questions, two 10-second rescues, clean and quick.
杨* floated a concrete company need in the morning: anyone have a video skill that can edit, layer in elements, add captions, for making educational content at work? The topic didn't get picked up right away, so he followed up in the afternoon: "begging~~ currently using hyperFrames." A job-specific request hung in the chat waiting for echoes , also classic tool-user community life.
Around noon l*** brought her question over: under what circumstances do you typically need to rent a cloud server , does run*ing 24/7 mean you have to rent one? A*** answered cleanly , if you want a public IP others can reach, if you're serving the outside world, or you need a stable always-on network environment, then yes, go grab a server. l*** pressed further: "what if it's not public-facing, just internal company use?" A*** closed the loop: "one box deployed onto the intranet is enough, no need for a server."
l*** came back to report: A*'s answer was straight-up go cloud [crying-laughing]. 李** then laid the math out , cloud deployment doesn't require any skill from you; local deployment, first you need a computer, and the money for that computer could rent a cloud server for several years. R*** added: "cloud servers are cheap." What looked like a simple choice turned, with the group's help, into a clear conversation span*ing skill thresholds and cost arithmetic.
Toward evening 小* pop*ed up: how do you all manage your Obsidian homepage , HTML or some other mode? I've tuned it several versions and none feel right [crying-laughing]. 闪*** chimed in, "isn't it just default md format?" 小* quickly clarified: "I meant non-md." An open question with no standard answer, where everyone tunes their own version , a fitting close to a slow Sunday.
The Saturday of the Dragon Boat holiday felt like a slow, hands-on workday in the group. 炮 spent most of it tangled up inside Bitable: first he wanted a shortcut to grab Feishu group IDs and auto-send cards, then he got stuck on the classic riddle of an ap* that's gone live yet still can't be found in an external group's bot list , until he dug up the cause himself: the developer console had only flip*ed on the ap*, not the bot. Riding the same wave, K*** asked whether WorkBuddy could plug into WeCom the way it plugs into Feishu and build tables from natural language, and 李** didn't mince words , wire up the Feishu CLI in the con*ector with your own user identity and WeCom, DingTalk, Feishu will all do your bidding. By dusk the mood shifted: 小* showed off a wireless mini-lamp he'd scored off Pinduoduo for sixty-odd yuan, one assigned to Claude and one to Codex so he could read their working state at a glance , 炮 immediately yelled, "Put it on the shelf now!" Late at night 庄* admitted the A* had burned him twice while building a table, but said watching the A* hit landmines actually pointed him to the simplest fix; 木* cap*ed it with a line that landed clean , judgment has always been what separates one level from another.
炮 spent his whole morning tangled in Bitable. He wanted a small feature to send Jason cards on a schedule , if he could grab Feishu group IDs, a bot could auto-join groups, scrape the IDs, and fan out as needed, sparing him from wiring each group by hand. q*** chimed in with her own move: have CC reconcile owner names in Bitable against the names showing in the group, and confirm whatever work is still open. By afternoon a fresh trap caught 炮 , the ap* was live and shared externally, yet the bot was nowhere to be found inside the external group. 王* pointed him in a direction, and 炮 quickly cracked the real cause himself: in the developer console only the ap* had been switched on, not the bot. "Found it, sorry to bother everyone."
In between bot battles, 炮 also let slip the architecture of his new project: one Bitable is going to act as the overall version-control layer, other info gets fan*ed out via Jason cards, and a dashboard in ap* mode handles the surface , so clients never have to drop back into the raw base table. q*** picked up the thread, saying her single Bitable plus one bot wasn't quite enough either, so she added CC for point-to-point nudges. Back-and-forth, the two of them laid out how to turn Bitable from "a single sheet" into "a controllable little system."
K*** threw down a real question: anyone using WorkBuddy in depth , can it plug into WeCom and DingTalk the way Feishu does, and spin up files and tables from natural-language commands? 李** answered cleanly , yes, the Feishu CLI lives right inside the con*ector, you create things under your own user identity, DingTalk, Feishu, WeCom all play, and once it's wired up you give it tasks and let it self-heal when things break. Q** followed up with a doc on installing the Feishu CLI for an A* agent. 枫** landed the punch**ne: "What you're describing is exactly what WB was built for."
Around dusk 小* showed off a few cute desktop toys , including a wireless traffic-light gadget. He assigned one to Claude and one to Codex so he could read their working state at a glance, and since he's run*ing them on two separate machines it actually carried real utility. 枫** praised "a designer's little touch," while 炮 just yelled, "Put it up on an e-commerce site right now, I'll buy it the second you do." Turned out it was sixty-something yuan off Pinduoduo, and 小* tacked on, "Though Claude is the cuter one." One little lamp, lighting up this crew's everyday life of coding alongside A* , warm and a little fun*y all at once.
Late at night 庄* talked through the real experience of building a table for a client: he asked A* for a plan, got three versions, none of them hit the point, and the whole sheet ended up long and ugly. But he said it straight , watching the A* step on landmines actually led him to the most convenient, simplest solution. 炮 jumped in: "I've already taken two rounds of damage on building today." 木* lifted the whole thread one level: judgment has always been what separates one level from another; many of the "wow" moments people post online are really just the joy of going from can't-do to taking the first step , still a long way from a real piece of work. Same with video output , pro work still belongs to pro players; we've simply crossed the line from can't-do to can-do.
Late at night S*** hit a wall: GPT image generation kept failing , the first image would come out, but anything iterated on top of it just wouldn't render. 平*** figured it was almost certainly a VPN quality issue , instability was breaking the stream. 万** offered a more practical nudge: go check the library, sometimes the job actually succeeded and the image is sitting in the back office. S*** thanked them while searching, and ended up asking if anyone had a solid paid VPN to recommend. One small problem, a few people taking turns to diagnose , about as everyday as this group gets.
Dragon Boat Festival kept the group on the quiet side, yet every thread that surfaced had real bite. Carrying over last night's well-wishes, Xiangrui reshared the OPC one-person-company policy memo. Codex's release cadence became the day's collective gripe , 炮 quip*ed, "Do they have some KPI that forces them to ship a new build every single day?" while 北*** and 李** were worn down by the new version's ever-growing pile of permission prompts, unable to run even one task end-to-end. The conversation drifted into RPA's fate: tools like 影刀 and n8n look doomed to be killed off by the likes of Codex, with 天* declaring, "All-code is the only path." 超** brought the most concrete gift of the day , open-sourcing a fully automatic Skill that edits videos and layers in effects, the core idea being to bind the effects right when the A* drafts the voiceover script, so humans only have to read the script while the A* handles the rest. 乔木 wasn't resting either, open-sourcing yet another tool that uses MCP to orchestrate multiple A*s into a roundtable for writing PRDs.
Xiangrui reshared the OPC policy memo, the festival warmth from the night before still lingering. The thread was quickly hijacked by Codex , 炮 noticed "Codex just updated yet again," unable to resist the jab, "Do they have some KPI that demands one release per day?" 北*** and 李** were knee-deep in the fallout: a swarm of new authorization prompts, genuinely an*oying. 李** said it ship*ed three updates in a single day, and after reconfiguring permissions every time, not a single task could now run end-to-end on its own. Useful it remains, but the daily-update-plus-tightening-permissions rhythm is leaving people drained.
Someone said 影刀 was about to be pulled from the shelves, and 炮 picked it up , 影刀 is definitely going to be killed off by the likes of Codex. 北*** piled on: "n8n is already gone, 影刀 is next in line." 天* delivered the verdict with no hedging: all-code is the only path; the whole graphical-operations paradigm is destined to be replaced. 炮 added a touch of nuance , for building scrapers, graphical tools still beat code by a hair, but even graphical tools will be replaced by Agents that are easier to pick up. A short debate on the fate of tools made the direction crystal clear.
超** delivered the most concrete gift of the day: an open-source Skill that fully automates video editing and effects, the very tool he used on his latest episode. The core idea is clever , he has the A* bake the effects into the voiceover script at drafting time, lined up with the final cut, so humans only need to read the script while the editing and effects are entirely handed off to the A*. He admitted he genuinely doesn't want to do any editing himself, yet still wants the visuals to feel alive, so he turned it into a tool that solves the problem at the lowest possible cost. 炮 chimed in, "Perfect timing, thanks 峰神." 超** mentioned he ran it on Kimi K2.7 this time, though other models work too , just studying how this Skill is designed is worth a lot.
Xiangrui forwarded 乔木's latest work , yet another open-source tool that uses MCP to convene multiple A*s into a discussion to write PRDs, complete with the open-source link and a Feishu doc for testing. As usual, the group lit up with "impressive" and "this guy never stops ship*ing." The man who ships a product a day didn't even pause for the festival, handing the group another handy piece of kit.
The piece Xiangrui shared, "The End of the Paid-Acquisition Era: A Retrospective on China's Internet Growth Wars Over the Past Decade," stirred up a round of debate. l*** blurted out, "This article is bril***ntly written," and 孔** agreed that the speaker went deep and brought real operational experience. But 辰*, speaking as a long-time internet veteran, threw cold water on it , much of what A* writes has no basis, with no real investigation into data or historical context. 孔** quickly clarified: this wasn't A*-written, it was a summary made from an oral account, since the original three-hour piece was just too long and exhausting to get through. One long-form piece exposed how sensitive everyone is to the line between "A*-produced" and "real experience."
In the evening Xiangrui forwarded 杨老师's shared experience on Miaoda development into the group, calling it pure gold, and Q** said he had seen it in a neighboring group as well. 张** picked up the thread and talked about a new-student onboarding system he had recently built, calling it "actually pretty solid." As midnight ap*roached Xiangrui drop*ed another practical piece , the enterprise registry database is now plugged in, letting you look up any registered company across the country with one click; the morning after the festival he added a 7.3K-star open-source Office-document toolkit aimed at A* Agents. A quiet Dragon Boat Festival, held up to weight by these scattered bits of gold.
The last workday before Dragon Boat Festival opens with the group buzzing about Codex quota resets. 平*** had been fretting over just 3% left, while 炮 had stockpiled 46% for a final coding marathon, only for the official one-click reset to wipe the slate. Talk turns to market share, and 庄* reckons Codex has now pulled clearly ahead of CC, with OpenA*'s slice being nibbled by Claude and Gemini. Xiangrui takes the moment to pull out the "Read with Xiangrui in 2026" book list, a thing he'd kicked off before Chinese New Year but never properly ran, and now wants to do the book club for real. Plenty of solid tips along the way: 姚* recommends Meituan's A* browser Tabbit, free with generous credits during the beta and a way to use GLM-5.2 for free; Xiangrui previews an open-source contract-writing Skill coming this week, with proper font-format sup*ort. By evening, Claude 4.8 takes a collective dip, gets mocked for having a "Doubao aftertaste," and everyone quietly switches back to 4.7. At night, Feishu quietly ships gift boxes to its gold-tier makers and KOCs, prompting 炮 to quip that "true OPCs don't get remembered by Feishu, only KOCs like Xiangrui do." A sl**p later, on Dragon Boat morning, Xiangrui's line "may you all have a peaceful Dragon Boat and may everything be Xiangrui" sparks a screen-long chain of greetings.
First thing in the morning, Codex quotas get reset yet again. Xiangrui drops a screenshot and 炮 can only laugh through tears, he still had 46% left yesterday and was saving it for two days of all-out hacking, only to be reset. 平***, who had been agonizing over a mere 3%, is suddenly delighted. 庄* lays out a verdict: Codex has straight-up surpassed CC in share this round. K*** chimes in with a tweet he saw that morning, OpenA*'s market share being chip*ed away by Claude and Gemini. 炮 nails the nuance, Gemini still holds a seat thanks to its full ecosystem, but in vibecoding it has genuinely fallen behind, "GPT is the real deal now." 庄* closes the chapter with a single line: "CC is clearly pulling back on its own."
Xiangrui shares ten books he thinks are must-reads for the A* era, then unveils the "Read with Xiangrui in 2026" list. He admits this was a reading initiative he had launched before Chinese New Year but never got off the ground because his bandwidth was so stretched, and now welcomes anyone who wants to read along, with good recommendations sent his way to be added to the list. A small call on the surface, but underneath is the thing he's been quietly carrying, hooking up the people in this community who want to grow together through one continuously updated list.
哟* vents that analyzing a single bidding document with GLM-5.2 burned 350 credits, way too expensive; 松*** sighs that new models keep getting pricier. 炮 pinpoints the cause, third-party calls to GLM-5.2 seem to miss the cache, so consumption shoots up. 姚* offers a concrete route: anyone wanting to use GLM-5.2 should jump on Tabbit, Meituan's A* browser, free during the beta with very generous credits. Despite being branded a browser, its features rival full agents, and you can pick from the top latest domestic models. 哟* tries it and exclaims, "This one's great."
Chat drifts to how polished the tables and documents Codex turns out are. L*** grumbles that DeepSeek can't do tables, 炮 picks it up with "the tables Codex makes are genuinely beautiful and usable." Xiangrui slips in his new plan: this week he's open-sourcing a contract-writing Skill that actually handles font formatting properly, an area where Claude really doesn't do well. xixi immediately surfaces a need, how to generate contracts straight from a Feishu Bitable workflow. The conversation slides naturally from tool admiration to a real business problem ready to land.
By evening Xiangrui starts wondering, why does Claude suddenly feel like a domestic model, with messy outputs and even getting Echo project info wrong despite it being directly searchable. h**, C*** and A*** all pile on, "4.8 has a Doubao aftertaste these past two days," "it's dumbed down," and the group collectively switches back to 4.7. Xiangrui agrees, "4.7 is much better than 4.8." The thread pivots to screenshot tools, from the Mac's built-in window capture and Feishu's screenshot, to snipaste, the slick open-source tool from 乔木's crew, and the one that sup*orts scrolling capture. Each member recommends one, adding up to a handy screenshot shortlist.
In the evening Xiangrui shows off a hefty gift box Feishu quietly sent over, and 炮's quip lands dead-on, "true OPCs don't get remembered by Feishu, only KOCs like Xiangrui do." Xiangrui replies, "all the Bitable gold-tier makers got one." E*** also got one, with a bonus thermal flask, and 炮 digs up his own top-20 finish last year and asks, "is top-10 the gold tier?" R*** says she always turns hers over to her company. One gift box, and it lights up the people in this group who've truly made a name for themselves inside the Feishu ecosystem.
A sl**p later, on Dragon Boat morning, Xiangrui sends out "may you all have a peaceful Dragon Boat and may everything be Xiangrui," his name playfully woven into the wish, and the group fires back a chain of greetings, with Q**, K*** 炮 and A** each adding their own. Amid the warmth he stays on business too, drop*ing major good news for one-person OPCs: the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology and six other ministries have jointly issued an action plan to promote coordinated development of large, medium and small enterprises in the platform economy. 炮 follows up with a reminder, plenty of upside but get your materials and qualifications ready in advance, the OPC training run by the Chengdu government before covered similar ground.
The group buzzed all day long, and the fuse was Xiangrui's 10,000-word retrospective. He warmed up in the morning with a question about whether "plugging multimodal into an Agent is a false proposition," laying the relationship between model foundations and frameworks bare. Once the retrospective drop*ed, the whole group shifted into deep-talk mode: 炮 K*** 闪***, 木* and others who are actually doing A* implementation on the front lines took turns and shook out everything underneath this business. Enterprises don't pay for "agents"; they pay for "boundaries." Judgment is the main product; code is just a byproduct. Eighty percent of the time is burned on wrangling data, integrating systems, and sitting with clients until their business is finally clear. Xiangrui then laid out the deal he lost in Foshan this past January: a same-age boss still run*ing OA from the mid-2000s and several disjointed ERP systems, taking Chaos courses every day, who blurted out "Loong Lobster can already do a lot of my work, I don't need you guys." He said he honestly wanted to slap the man twice right there in the office. In the afternoon the talk turned to more concrete things. He teased an offline A* implementation event in Guangdong at the end of July, the WA*C World Artificial Intelligence Conference put tickets on sale, and the group even ran a side-by-side review of A* voice input methods.
姚* tossed out a question: is letting an Agent plug into a third-party multimodal model a false proposition? Xiangrui said the framing itself was off, then drop*ed an unusually easy-to-grasp analogy. Picture the Agent as a person, and the model as their brain. A multimodal model comes with its own hearing, sight, and smell, and can process multimodal information directly. Swap in a text-only model and that person is left with only the ability to "speak." He closed in one line: what capabilities you can use depend on the model foundation, the framework is just a vehicle. Codex on DeepSeek is text-only; on GPT-5.5 you get multimodal. 姚* called it crystal clear, and K*** added, "what capabilities you can use depend on the model, the framework is just a vehicle."
R*** raised a real pain point: when multiple tables auto-add records into a summary table, how do you check whether a duplicate already exists in the summary table before writing? Xiangrui's thinking was clean. Give every product record a unique value (the product code is perfect for this), and before adding, drop in a "query record" node that looks it up by that unique value. If found, stop; only if not found do you continue. ༺xixi༻ added you can just set a condition right when adding the new record, and 辰* warned that short sync intervals across tables make duplicate entries likely. R*** tweaking it as she went, joked at her own expense: "does going under full anesthesia actually lower your IQ? I feel like I got dumber after this surgery," giving the tech thread a warm human touch.
Xiangrui posted the 10,000-word retrospective he'd been sitting on for days. Two days earlier a Tsinghua team had questioned him all afternoon, and rather than an interview, it was more like they helped him re-untangle his year-plus of building V***. He realized that writing content, building courses, building community, doing enterprise services all point to the same question: how to see, break apart, and run smoothly the needs inside real business, then distill them into reusable methods. 炮 read it and said "I made at least 5 marks," while 姚* was even more direct: "this is genuinely well written, I saw the right path for an ordinary person's OPC, this interview was truly valuable." One article threw open the floodgates for a whole room of peers.
The retrospective drew out the most hardcore discussion. K*** cut straight through it. A client comes to you because they can't articulate their need; if they could, they'd just spin up a Workflow for a few thousand. It's the inability to articulate that demands an Agent, starting at a hundred thousand. The price is set by the uncertainty of the need, not the technical difficulty. "Enterprises don't pay for agents, they pay for boundaries. The spots you can't answer are the boundaries. Judgment is the main product, code is the byproduct." 炮 picked it up: the core of doing A* implementation isn't being able to build tables for clients, it's understanding their business better than they do; clients want the whole chain of legacy data processing, process map*ing, building, training, and long-term hand-holding. 闪*** spoke from experience: many enterprises have basically zero digitalization, eighty percent of the time goes to wrangling data and integrating systems, and the actual building is only twenty percent.
Xiangrui just laid that January deal bare: a Foshan manufacturer whose boss was his own age, yet the company still ran OA from the mid-2000s while staff used several disjointed ERP systems. They'd hoped to sign it to dig deep into the industry and do long-term hand-holding, but after talking with the project managers across business units, they turned the project down. The more surreal part: right before signing, the Loong Lobster hype hit, and the boss drop*ed "Loong Lobster can already do a lot of our work, we don't need you guys," even claiming Loong Lobster could operate his WeChat. "I honestly wanted to slap him twice in the office, that's the truth." 木* marveled at his nerve and noted how deep the water runs with this type of client; 周** pointed to the deeper malady: internal company conflict, the plant manager being the boss's son, old and new management lines clashing, impossible to change and impossible to replace.
The topic landed on how to serve these "old-guard" clients. 炮's experience: give up on making them understand A*. What they want isn't A*, it's results, so just give them results; talking A* only makes the project complicated and looks cheap. Xiangrui agreed, "right, what they want isn't A*, it's results." 醒* added a cut: if staff have no drive, even the best tools won't get used, and the key lies with management; 炮 concurred, "a management team with execution and a will to change has ten thousand ways to make staff accept A*," and told a real case of a group client where a subsidiary piloted it successfully and the headquarters came back to talk. A*** rendered a verdict on state-owned enterprises: a stagnant pool, chasing safety and zero mistakes; the best bets are still lean, emerging small and mid-size companies.
In the afternoon Xiangrui revealed a new plan: he intends to hold an offline event on A* implementation in Guangdong at the end of July, inviting guests to share, the proposal still in the works, and he wanted to hear everyone's thoughts first. S*** suggested inviting more well-known OPC guests, "OPC people can explain the full-chain solution clearly," and Xiangrui said that was already part of the design. Right after, he relayed news of the World Artificial Intelligence Conference: opening July 17 to 20 in Shanghai, tickets now fully on sale, a single-day ticket going for 168. The online talk ran hot, and the offline gatherings started taking shape one by one.
l*** asked whether there's a good A* voice input ap*, and the group held an on-the-spot showdown: Xiangrui recommended Doubao Input Method, then noted it has no Windows version, so on Windows use WeChat Input Method and tap the little mic. 路*** floated typeless, and 郑** said it beats Doubao; S*** plugged his own creation outright: "Lightning Talk + Doubao streaming input 2.0, unbeatable." Meanwhile 醒* was discussing how WorkBuddy setup is actually a marketable business, and that he too is about to record a course, pricing it by time cost while clients estimate it by content value, a difference of angle. Near midnight, Xiangrui threw out a big one: the Codex lead officially spoke up, Codex now natively sup*orts other models, and D** closed the day with "no more need for routing."
First thing in the morning, Xiangrui shows off a "four-hand duet" on his 4K display, Codex on the left and Claude Code on the right; q*** instantly demands a tutorial, and everyone slides into how Codex runs more crisply than CC. But the day's main thread is something heavier. He keeps riding the momentum from the previous day's Tsinghua interview and writes on, nearly ten thousand words, a reckoning of almost two years building his startup, titled "A 23-Year-Old OPC Looks Back: The 1-Million Deal I Lost This January, and the Things I Still Haven't Figured Out," posted late at night in full sincerity. Woven through it all is a shared headache: word spreads that both Claude and Codex are about to require facial verification, domestic models grind to a halt by day, and the gray-market business of relay stations and SMS-code platforms gets weighed over and over. By night, the conversation slips into a full-blown Huawei roast, where Xiangrui testifies from experience about the few thousand yuan he lost on a P70 Ultra, and 郑**'s line, "I'm using a Huawei laptop right now to watch you all critique Huawei laptops," cracks up the whole room.
First thing in the morning Xiangrui shows off his big screen, "A big screen really is a joy," 3840×2160 in 4K, Codex run*ing on the left and Claude Code on the right at the same time. q***, baffled, asks "why does your terminal look nothing like mine," and once it clicks she's openly envious, calling out "a four-hand duet, you've got to make a tutorial." 枫** notes this is a very hot way to pair the two. Xiangrui adds his own gut read, that Codex executes better than Claude Code, and 平*** chimes in "I noticed that too," while 李** piles on that Codex updates basically every two or three days, the iteration is genuinely fast.
Xiangrui spots Feishu featured on CC*V and riffs on a pun, "it used to be 'top teams use Feishu,' now it's 'top teams' A* uses Feishu,'" then muses to himself that "top teams and A* using Feishu are two completely different things." Elsewhere, 哟* raises a worry, "Claude starts facial verification next month, what do we do," and 闪*** mentions there are ways to have someone else pass it for you in the market. Xiangrui stays relaxed, "next month's problems are next month's, you'll find a road when you reach the mountain." 枫** teases him about whether he's a P or a J, and he answers "JP mixed-blood."
万** lights the fuse with "GLM is nearly unusable, it freezes, right now Codex is the best option." The reason everyone already knows, Zhipu's own compute isn't enough, so it jams when too many people pile on during the day. So what to do? E*** says he uses Volcano's GLM and the 200-tier plan is basically enough, while 闪*** runs the iFlytek 40-yuan tier and even downloaded zcode to try 5.2, saying the public accounts he reads all praise it. 万** confirms 5.2 is indeed a bit smarter than 5.1. 闪*** sets an optimistic tone, "good then, domestic models are sure to catch up."
In the afternoon Xiangrui drops a line, "after yesterday's Tsinghua interview, I've written so, so many words," and a while later shows his progress, "nearly ten thousand words, a reckoning of almost two years of building this startup." Having a Tsinghua School of Economics professor seriously walk him through it seems to have stirred loose all the things he'd never quite sorted out. Friends in the group urge him to "go live already," and K*** offers a simple "love it." This drive to lay himself open and take honest stock becomes the heaviest thread run*ing under the whole day.
R*** raises a real pain point: she wants the result computed by a formula field to map onto a person field, "you all get what I mean, right?" 炮 picks it up in a flash, design a helper column whose computed value equals someone's text field, then use that text field to look up and reference the person's text and the system person field, build a helper table, text-to-text equals user. R*** replies "damn, I get it, brother 炮 I love you." 炮 even throws in the maintenance wisdom: whoever owns the helper column adjusts it, members change often but the team lead doesn't, so just hang the maintenance reminder on the lead.
平*** notices Codex is now starting to ask for identity verification and document uploads, suspecting a gradual rollout, "Claude's doing it, so Codex is sure to follow." The talk slides toward relay stations: 路*** keeps getting pushed accounts with full ICP and IDC credentials from a relay seller, and always feels there's risk. 姚* offers a cool-headed read, in the short term it's a gray zone with cash-out op*ortunity, and in the long term regulation will surely tighten, but he also sees another possibility: wrap a relay station inside an Agent shell, a functional Agent on the surface that can switch between all kinds of models underneath, that one has a shot. K*** meanwhile, walks people through registering Gmail to dodge risk-control: keep the VPN on and register inside the ap*, then go simulate a real person on YouTube and email.
Late at night l*** remarks that Huawei phones and laptops are both hard to use, lighting off a full roast. Xiangrui testifies from experience: he paid over ten thousand for the P70 Ultra when it launched, it drop*ed two thousand within a month, and when he later switched to Ap*le and tried to trade it in, he only got 2,300 back, "I will never buy Huawei again in this life, unless the OS can catch up to Ap*le." K*** follows with "I touch nothing Huawei makes, phone, laptop, car," and mentions a Huawei engineer he met in person last year who griped about the laptops himself. 炮 pins the root cause on HarmonyOS's weak ecosystem sup*ort. But the killer is 郑**, "I'm using a Huawei laptop right now to watch you all critique Huawei laptops," a single line that cracks up the whole room.
Late at night Xiangrui posts the reckoning he'd been holding in all day, "a heartfelt near-10,000-word reckoning," titled "A 23-Year-Old OPC Looks Back: The 1-Million Deal I Lost This January, and the Things I Still Haven't Figured Out." He lays it all open, the lost deal and the things he never figured out. K*** says "I'll read it in the morning, resting now," and q*** replies at midnight "read it." Overnight passes, and in the early morning R*** asks how Codex plus DeepSeek feels, with 姚*, who does market-research copywriting, offering a method: take one task and run it through cc cli, cc cowork, and codex all at once, watch and the difference is obvious, it just costs some tokens up front.
Monday was rare and quiet in the group, with half the crowd off watching the World Cup. But tucked inside the calm was an an*oyance: today's Claude Code seemed to have collectively lost its mind, with conversations fighting each other and memories tangling into a knot. 李祥瑞 grumbled about it several times all morning, and 闪*** finally switched over to Zhipu 5.1 before anything got done. At noon the thread caught fire on a question from E***: how do you manage skills? Xiangrui seized the moment to show off his hand-built knowledge-management system "Echo," explaining it isn't Obsidian but an attempt to mold that fragmented Obsidian-plus-Claude-Code experience into a true A*-companion product. In the afternoon he returned from an interview at Tsinghua U*iversity, where an economics professor even ran a retrospective for the community; he said he gained a lot from it. In the evening, news that Claude would require face verification startled the room again, and just before bed Xiangrui shared a book: an eight-year diary of a Tsinghua PhD doing odd day-labor jobs.
Q** opened the morning by reporting that A* Alipay felt a bit dumbed down, then picked up yesterday's thread with a quip: "Prompting should bow out of the scene, the future belongs to Loop Engineering." 李祥瑞 sighed, "This Monday feels so quiet," and Q** shot back "World Cup," revealing that half the crowd was glued to the games. The recently joined 谢* was troubled: with A* information exploding, the group churns out more high-quality content than he can process, and he wondered if every begin*er feels this way. 枫** offered four words: "Curate your own lane." 谢* ran with it, sharing that he works on A* digitalization for small and mid-sized businesses, where keeping up with new tech is what makes him sound professional with clients.
K*** posted GitHub's new rule: every user must enable two-factor authentication before July 16 or face restricted account access. A practical problem followed immediately: how do you receive verification codes on an overseas phone? A*** pointed the way in a single line: there are SMS-code platforms. A seemingly minor compliance change had handed everyone yet another hurdle to clear.
李祥瑞 started grumbling in the morning: "For some reason Claude Code is acting weird today, conversations fighting with each other." The more he used it, the more it stung: "It's basically the same as a domestic model now," "answering questions that weren't asked," "the memory between conversations is a total mess." 闪*** offered firsthand proof: CC kept run*ing queries for half an hour without writing any code, but switching to Zhipu 5.1 got things moving fast. 枫** chimed in with a dry jab: "Too busy scrambling to deal with the White House," "after all, the White House has it by the leash." For a whole day, the tool that usually felt smoothest became everyone's shared frustration.
E*** tossed out a question: does anyone have a good ap*roach to skill management, something that layers the library the way Xiangrui's memory tiering does? 李祥瑞 caught it: they designed a capability map that lets you invoke skills in natural language, and he casually pulled back the curtain on his hand-built Echo. Some assumed it was Obsidian, but he clarified that he built it from scratch, with the goal of taking that fragmented Obsidian-plus-Claude-Code experience and molding it into a true A*-companion product: "It's a bit like a s*** employee, a s*** partner; you don't need to install a bunch of digital workers, this one companion can do a huge amount of work." He said the team is currently three people, not yet hiring at scale, and the system should open closed beta in about a month. 闪*** added that he'd read Xiangrui's WeChat article over the weekend about using Obsidian, and it really is the knowledge-base tool best suited to agents.
李祥瑞 asked, "Any friends near Tsinghua up for a meetup today?" Before the words settled, a creepy green-screen campus image drifted into the group. Everyone instantly turned forensic expert: 明** noted "the green screen is too short, it's got to be fake," ༺xixi༻ flatly said "definitely fake," and K*** drove the nail home: "Obviously Photoshop*ed, someone taking a sly dig at the KK campus." Q** piled on with a joke: "Just use a digital human, why bother with a venue at all," turning a fake image into a run*ing gag.
In the afternoon 李祥瑞 brought good news: he'd just wrap*ed an interview at Tsinghua U*iversity and the afternoon's exchange had been a real pleasure. Even more rewarding, that economics professor from Tsinghua ran a retrospective on the whole community and on what everyone is building; he called it inspiring and said he gained a great deal. The group filled with congratulations, with 杨** cheering "Awesome, 瑞神," and the system even auto-chimed "Emp***ing more people through A*." E*** stood by, urging "Waiting for the interview piece."
In the evening 闪*** drop*ed a bombshell: "Claude is going to require face verification." 明** followed by forwarding "Anthropic is rolling out face-scan verification, developers had better bail soon," saying it's a July thing. 李** still nursing a headache from the day's memory chaos, added another jab: "Claude was acting deranged today." The group was half-shocked, half-hunting for a way out: l*** said "for every policy from above there's a countermeasure below, there's always a solution," and 北*** cut to the chase: "Easy, just go buy a face-verification service." A piece of tightening-compliance news was, once again, rapidly digested by this crowd into an actionable plan.
Before bed 李祥瑞 shared a book, "Time at Majuqiao: A Tsinghua PhD's Diary of Day Labor," the recorded life of a doctoral student doing odd jobs for eight years. From the daytime high**ght of the Tsinghua interview to this late-night book about a PhD working day-labor gigs, the gap reveals the perspective he's always drawn to: the "underestimated." Overnight passed, and in the early morning K*** threw out a screenshot asking "Multimodal 4.1?" while 李祥瑞 floated a new piece of thinking, "After finishing the Agent Loop engineering handbook, I have 8 questions I still haven't figured out," seeding the thread for a fresh day.
By day it was the community's usual rhythm: chatting about WPS multi-dimensional table title components, sourcing art for the video Skill, the knowledge-base training open for its final day of sign-ups today and kicking off its week-0 prep week tomorrow. q*** was stuck after importing Ap*le Notes into Obsidian only to watch every image turn into a link, and 李祥瑞 handed her a two-sentence trick: "tell the Agent to render those image links back into pictures." Newcomer 超** showed up with a string of credentials, and a Fujian hometown crowd claimed him as one of their own on the spot. Over at 李*'s end, the Feishu lobster kept flagging violations every day since the 4th, with repair costs climbing to six thousand points a month on an individual membership. The real climax came deep in the night: someone dug up the entry to the A* edition of Alipay, and the whole group lined up to swap invite codes and hop aboard, testing whether it could collect energy, whether it could transfer money, whether it was safe. 李祥瑞 raised the stakes with one line: "doesn't this feel a bit like the payment war of '14?" Threaded in the middle was a stretch of methodology: he laid out "Loop Engineering" in full, saying the expensive thing was never the tokens, it's the time you spend watching over it.
First thing in the morning 李祥瑞 mentioned how handy that title component at the very top of WPS multi-dimensional tables is, then tossed out yesterday's group daily. 张** teased "you clearly put real work into this, DingTalk's looks kind of ugly," and 庄* piled on, "under that kind of overtime grind, a person loses even their most basic sense of aesthetics." Talk turned to the knowledge-base training: today is the last day to register, with the week-0 prep week starting tomorrow. Before signing up, q*** aired a real pain point: scan*ed notes with images and text side by side in Ap*le Notes, once imported into Obsidian, all turned into "a title plus a pile of links," the images gone. 李祥瑞 told her those links can be rendered: just tell the Agent "I can't see these images," which is like making a permanent plugin so that any image link gets rendered out for you. q*** replied, "Great, signed up."
李祥瑞 floated his next plan: he wants to polish a finance-and-tax Skill next week, and asked whether friends in finance and tax had pain points or business workflows to compare notes on, since he sees finance-and-tax automation as one of the biggest pain points for OPC. 杨** gave an honest heads-up: finance-and-tax automation tools are actually already quite strong, and if you really want to build something you have to go deep with a third-party finance firm first; don't think from the tool, go in through their actual business workflow.
李祥瑞 drop*ed a "welcome, 超**," and the newcomer led with a hardcore intro: independently built WeChat mini-programs with over two million cumulative users, author of the Cheese Camera ap*, the local lobster A*-employee system MotiClaw, and the visual Vibe Coding marvel OpenPRD, an A* blogger with over ten thousand followers across platforms. The group erupted with "a legend descends." 卡* laughed, "I just followed 超** on Jike last night and today I'm seeing the man himself in Xiangrui's community, the A* circle really is small," and 庄* vouched too: "峰哥 really is the real deal."
李* poured out a bellyful of grievances: the Feishu lobster used to work great and cost little, but since the 4th it throws errors every day saying there's a violation, with the individual membership already up to six thousand points a month, too pricey to fix. 超** gave a direct pointer: he suggested switching to hermes, far more stable than openclaw, now run*ing at four times the user scale. 辰* noted you first have to pin down which plugin or component is breaking and fix the root cause, or it'll keep erroring. As they chatted, a string of Fujian locals recognized one another: 超** from Changle, 枫** from Lianjiang, 小* from Nanping, going from wellness retreats to high-speed rail, wrap*ing up warmly with a "brought together by A*."
In the evening Y*** found she could no longer see her quota after the codex update, and asked whether anyone else had the same thing. l*** seized the moment to share an impression: codex always feels faster than CC, with CC taking ages to run a single task while codex replies fast on the same node. K*** helped troubleshoot, asking whether it was a network-node issue and whether it was run*ing in the desktop ap* or in VS Code, walking through the possible variables one by one.
李祥瑞 first shared the good news in the group: he'd scored an invite code for the A* edition of Alipay from xA*, got it up and run*ing, and casually drop*ed codes inviting everyone to "come play." In no time 路***, 平***, and 王* hop*ed aboard one after another, swap*ing invite codes and trading screenshots. Playing as they probed the edges: it could analyze May's spending bill and help collect a friend's energy, but it couldn't transfer money directly, only open the transfer screen for you. 路*** cautioned that with money involved, keeping an eye on it is safer: "once it's one-tap collection on the back end, the underlying logic changes." p*** had it analyze a utility bill, and 炮 joked that his own Alipay had long sat idle, calling out, "Tencent, hurry up and put out an A* assistant."
李祥瑞 tossed out "prompt engineering is dead, Loop Engineering is here," and someone in the group fretted: doesn't looping burn even more tokens? In two passes he worked the math out: before, you spent your time hand-tuning prompts over and over; now, you spend tokens letting it iterate on its own, burning money instead of your effort, and it's controllable: set a budget cap, run the loop on a cheap model, and only bring in the strong model for the critical steps. "Put plainly, the expensive thing was never the tokens, it's the time you spend watching over it." He also corrected a misconception: a loop isn't marching rigidly through an SOP step by step; the core is giving it a goal plus acceptance criteria and letting it execute, self-check, catch what's wrong, fix it, and go again until it passes. 平*** said his own results were good when he had Kimi write the SOP first and then execute, and 李祥瑞 pointed out, "that's basically the seed of a loop already." K*** chimed in alongside: he'd set a goal and run it for nearly a day and a half, with an estimated two to four more days to go.
Playing into midnight, 李祥瑞 grew more and more eager: looking at the A* edition of Alipay, he found himself longing for an A* edition of WeChat, given that WeChat seems not to have had a major overhaul since version 8.0 back in '21. He pulled out the history for comparison: "doesn't this feel a bit like the payment war of '14?" Back then it was WeChat Pay versus Alipay; now it's the WeChat Agent versus the Alipay Agent. 路*** tried asking whether the A* could transfer money to a friend, and the answer was no, it would only open the screen for you, to which Q** added, "if it could even do that, no one would dare use it." Finally digging up old memories, 李祥瑞 recalled that Alipay's earlier A* was called Zhi Xiaobao, and 王* laughed that he'd downloaded it excitedly at the time, found it not much use, and uninstalled it within two or three days.
The video Skill went open-source at dawn yesterday, and today became the group's combat day. Early on, everyone lined up to install it and run it. 王* joked that he "felt like he'd shot himself in the foot," while 杨*, q***, and K*** flung their finished videos into the chat one after another. Amid the buzz came real questions too: 庄* crunched the costs, K*** flagged subtitle overflow, and Xiangrui watched and took notes. Then an afternoon discovery turned the whole thing around: an early-version design style had never been cleaned out of the Skill's database, so the A* had been run*ing the old version all along, no wonder everyone's videos felt off. By evening the news that Fable5 had been pulled by the U.S. government set off another round, and the group ran with the meme. Xiangrui held on, reworking the Skill deep into the night, and just past two in the morning posted a single line, "the video Skill is finally restored," with GitHub synced and updated. Only then did the day wrap.
Xiangrui drop*ed a "this one's made by the open-sourced Skill," and the group lit up instantly. 王* finished installing, posted his result, and self-mockingly said he "felt like he'd shot himself in the foot." 杨* was "run*ing it now, will check the result in a bit," and once the video came out said "works" three times over. 庄* tossed in a soul-stirring metaphor: run*ing it on a plain-text model is like "hiring a blind intern with phenomenal hearing to make your videos." Someone asked how much a single video costs, and 杨* answered flat out, just one codex membership, nothing else used. Xiangrui added a down-to-earth note: it actually doesn't burn many Tokens, what it spends is on the podcast, the copy, and the HTML in the video, and one run takes about ten-plus minutes.
As the testing piled up, the problems surfaced too. After run*ing it with gpt, K*** reported two things: the content gets crammed to the bottom of the video, and the subtitle box is a fixed size, so overly long subtitles get clip*ed. Xiangrui let slip a key observation, this Skill gives its best results with fable5; he'd watched a lot of people's test videos, and his own style just hadn't come through. x*** spent forty minutes getting it installed via Workbuddy, while 哟* simply downloaded it manually and then let it install. p*** suggested building a visual interface where you could see the copy and the style to tune them directly, and Xiangrui took note.
椒*** drop*ed a "the U.S. government pulled Fable 5," and the group erupted. 庄* sighed that "openai played a brutal card" and called it "a classic chokehold," while 炮 added "the major domestic labs are quietly thrilled right now." The afternoon brought another wave: GLM-5.2 opened to everyone, Tencent Cloud's large models cut prices by up to 66%, and Kimi ship*ed 2.7 as well. 炮 reckoned the 1M-context 5.2 would likely become the workhorse. By evening Xiangrui posted an image captioned "Anthropic lol," and 薛** picked it up, if the newest models are simply off-limits now, they must really be that strong.
In the afternoon Xiangrui spotted a fatal problem, and finally understood why everyone's videos had been coming out badly: an earliest-version style was still buried in the Skill's SQL and never deleted, so when the A* ran, it was run*ing the early design style the whole time. K*** translated it in one line, the design styles were duplicated, the A* kept run*ing only the early version and ignored all the later updates, because the rules never said anything about it. P*** had a lightbulb moment, "so you mean the prompts went into the database." Xiangrui got to work fixing it on the spot and told everyone: just upgrade it, tell your agent "upgrade the xiangrui-video skill to the latest version" and you're set.
Xiangrui mentioned that July's World Artificial Intelligence Conference in Shanghai was worth watching, and word was this year's would be even higher-profile. Once the topic was open, he fired off a whole string of photos from last year's venue, saying that when he saw a certain thing back then it "made me think of the spin*ing jen*y," and he dug up an article he'd written at the time, "friends who've known us a while should remember." B*** was right there with him: back then this was in full swing, it felt like manufacturing itself was about to be upended. 炮 cap*ed the historical echo with a "damn, the spin*ing jen*y is such a vivid image."
Once q*** had run it to her satisfaction, she organized a day's worth of impressions into a list: the background colors at the start and end don't match, so it's best to confirm up front whether it's the black version or the white version; the BGM pulls from a YouTube source, which won't work without a proxy and may also be why it runs slow; one video takes half an hour; and she'd love a portrait/landscape choice, a version number, and a tuning interface like the one in the public-account Skill. Xiangrui took it all on board, "all the suggestions are heard, let's build a web page and give everyone as many choices as possible." The chat then drifted to Bitable, with 炮 grumbling that the CLI handles Bitable poorly and the gacha-rolling is severe, and Xiangrui ran with it: for building Bitable with an Agent, it'd be best to have a dedicated Skill too.
Y*** raised a real pain point: her department has dozens of Bitables, scattered and hard to find, and she wanted to integrate them into one front-end Ap* for display, but building it herself made it hard to balance utility and looks. The solutions came one after another: K*** said just vibe code it, hook it up with the Feishu CLI; 李* suggested taking one table and using sync to pull in others' data; R*** offered the lightest move of all, use one table to hold the links to every table, add descriptions and images, then generate a web page, "and that's pretty much your so-called Ap*." Chengdu's N*** simply drop*ed his own aitable.club, built specifically to collect and share high-quality Bitables, and posted a live demo right there.
During the day the Skill had been knocked "all out of whack," and at one point Xiangrui warned everyone not to use it in production yet. He kept grinding into the small hours, and at twenty past midnight he posted a video captioned "the video Skill is finally restored." M*** pressed, "is the update synced to GitHub?" and Xiangrui answered flat out, updated. After a full day of wrangling, from a dawn open-source release to a deep-night fix, the Skill was finally back to the way it should be.
The whole day orbited a single video-production Skill. In the morning Xiangrui an*ounced "open-sourcing it today," and the group kept nudging him for updates while feeding back ideas, every one of them directly actionable, from timestamped audio-visual notes to layout references. A few lively detours broke things up along the way: "another one bites the dust" sparked an A*-funeral meme contest, 侯**'s company-review-site idea drew a full debate on authenticity, compliance, and business model, and Codex resetting quotas let a crowd openly slack off with A*. Late at night the write-up was finished, and the next morning at eight, the video Skill went officially open-source, toss it a topic or an article and it researches, voices, and edits the whole thing into a finished film on its own.
天*kicked things off looking for a solid course on Feishu low-code and integration platforms, hap*y to pay for it. 枫**threw in a reality check first: just let A* write the code, humans only handle the assembly. Xiangrui caught the cue, "I've got a Skill, a bit more polish and I'll open-source it, so anyone can build Feishu integration-platform workflows directly," adding that he'd just wrap*ed a full project delivery with good results. K*** and 北***nudged him for the same thing one after another: Xiangrui, I'm waiting on that editing skill of yours. The host only replied, "Let me see if there's anything left to improve, open-sourcing it today," and that set the tone for the entire day.
Xiangrui posted a screenshot, even Doubao had recommended it. q***chimed in with a laugh: yesterday she asked Doubao to identify a mushroom on the ground, and it shot back "Poisonous! Don't touch it." The topic slid into traffic mechanics: one video had 33,000 likes but over a million plays, and Xiangrui summed it up, "traffic and likes sometimes just aren't proportional." B*** nailed it, plays are the platform's algorithm pushing it, likes are actual human preference. Xiangrui spotted a pattern: the moment Douyin decides you're "sharing real life," it grants you big traffic, and both his videos cashed in on that bonus. K*** added the kicker: no altruism, the watch-and-forget short-drama stuff is exactly like this.
Xiangrui drop*ed an image, "hahaha another one's dead," and 张**followed with "each one only lives a month." 庄*had a flash of inspiration: I propose we hold an A* funeral, plus the stroke of genius, "a funeral for skills, burying the secrets of your tokens." 平***called out "next up, loop is dead, prompt is king," and Xiangrui dug up old grudges, last year there were too many, N8N is dead, RPA is dead, with 炮landing one more, "and workflow is dead." K*** closed the loop on the whole circus: come year-end, let's see who died across all of 2026 and who came back, "die and revive, revive and die." Xiangrui decided on the spot to note it down and write a year-end retrospective.
侯**floated a big vision: the market needs a review site for the corporate space, rating companies and bosses to help young people dodge landmines, with millions of graduates every year as a built-in user base. Xiangrui didn't rush to praise it, instead dialectically unpacking three hurdles, authenticity threatened by paid trolls and emotional one-star rants, with Maimai's Gossip board as a cautionary tale; a business model that ultimately leans on companies paying for PR, betraying the original intent; and the compliance red line of reputation rights. 枫**added, "you'd need a market-regulator-style judge," and Xiangrui extended it: with real official backing, the form becomes an aggregated arbitration, a wage-arrears blacklist, a job-seeker's version of Qichacha. 门*** brought in the angle of anonymous headhunter reviews, and 辰*poured cold water at the end: it's nothing new, plenty of people have failed before, and authenticity and legal risk simply can't be solved.
Xiangrui tossed the optimized video into the group, the imagery and the operation demos all sourced by A* itself, drawing on 卡兹克's A* Hot and the WaytoAGI knowledge base. He asked for feedback the honest way: 小*gave precise timestamped notes, at 1:58 a big title suddenly pop*ed up with an explosion sound that was a bit startling, and the closing harvest-the-crops audio was a touch too quiet; R*** and M*** offered layout references, saying the main subject felt a bit small and could borrow the arrangement from Wizard Finance. A little after one in the afternoon, Xiangrui posted something heartfelt: feedback aimed squarely at making the thing better, ready to ap*ly the moment you get it, that's such a great feeling, and that's the best side of this group.
Xiangrui hollered "freebie time, Codex," and 平***and 郑**followed up flaunting their reset progress, unsure whether it's once a day or once a week. R*** took it to a new level: she set the A* a goal to turn 100 in capital into 10,000, with a floor of breaking even by season's end, and let it run its own predictions and place soccer bets. Three five-hour quotas burned out in a single afternoon, and one line of hers struck everyone, "turns out using A* to do no work feels this good." K*** egged her on, "supreme prediction master, just hit /goal and let it run," and 炮poured some cold water: whether you make money still comes down to the original idea. A collective unwind, turning a productivity tool into a betting game.
炮took back his earlier gripes about qwen, picked up a tokenplan, and found qwen3.7 genuinely capable, clearing a hurdle that composer couldn't get past in half a day, neatly filling the gap left when Codex was in sage mode. 闪*** raised a need: a multimodal API that can recognize image content, to integrate into a production system, who to pick? D** pushed kimi, just pricey, then minimax; 炮said Alibaba Cloud's tokenplan covers text, images, and video. R*** gave the most practical pitfall guide, don't buy Volcano Ark, it got slammed badly before, start with a Bailian monthly card to test, so you can switch in time if it doesn't work. 北***mused that American consumers are easy to serve, it's either CC or Codex, while the mainland has far too many options.
In the evening Xiangrui posted another landscape-format video, &pointed out there was no progress bar visible at the top, and 杨**gave professional advice: the audio and visuals were a bit out of sync, the visuals run*ing ahead of the sound, prioritize getting the information across, and add a background-music toggle. Xiangrui took each note on board, saying he'd probably write a public-account post to open-source it. 薛**gave him a pat, "making more people p***ful through A*," then added, "building A* ap*lications is more fun than generating videos." Late at night the write-up was finally done, and the next morning at 8:57, the video-production Skill went officially open-source, toss it a topic or an article and it researches, finds material, voices, and edits the film on its own, spitting out a finished cut, with a one-line install command in the post, free for whoever installs it.
The group simmers like a slow stew all day. Morning starts with "is Feishu Knowledge Q&A too expensive?" and drifts into three-layer memory architecture. At noon, Xiangrui drops a screenshot: someone has started selling a course built on their mechanism, and the group's advice is remarkably unanimous , move fast, presell first. In the afternoon, a watermark-editing plea unexpectedly ignites a fill-in-the-blank meme contest. By night, the buzzword "Loop Engineering" surfaces and 袁** catches it at midnight, and at dawn comes news that Feishu's data Q&A just top*ed the world rankings. From getting copied to coining memes to hitting number one , this group packs more into a day than most products fit into a release cycle.
庄* opens with intel: a government client he met two days ago has already built their own knowledge base on Feishu, run*ing smart Q&A over policies and regulations. R*** follows up , HR policies, IT feedback, product lookups, after-sales, all wired into smart queries. But the price is real too: 20 credits per answer. R*** doesn't mince words: "Knowledge Q&A is insanely expensive , better to just use an agent." 李祥瑞 seizes the moment to pitch his three-layer memory architecture: historical conversations live in layer three, and you only go deeper when the first two layers come up empty , no wasted tokens. 侯* sets the tone: Feishu Knowledge Q&A is among the best in China, and the price reflects the value. E*** caps it with a blunt truth , enterprises only care about ROI, the same way a top salesperson who crushes quota can show up late and nobody minds.
R*** confesses she's out of inspiration lately , her A* video work has stalled at text-to-image plus storyboard scripts, and she can't bring herself to push further. 炮 prescribes a cure: hire a technical artist who knows ComfyUI , "it'll solve all your pain." The conversation swerves into the DingTalk leadership gossip: 庄* just chatted with friends at Alibaba and learned they call 无招 "zhaoless" internally, and the group marvels over the incoming chief's Chaitin Tech résumé. 李祥瑞 suddenly remembers, "Wait, I actually have 宇森 on WeChat," and 张** eggs him on to send a congratulatory note, while 8-0-0 pours cold water: taking over in a crisis is no blessing. R*** seizes the moment to post a screenshot and call out "@李祥瑞 time to settle my ad fees" , gossip hour, now with a business model.
At noon 李祥瑞 drops a screenshot: "Exactly as I predicted that night , this person has started selling a course using our mechanism." His own course hasn't even launched; all he has is an outline, yet someone else is already collecting money. p*** offers comfort and counsel in one: build your influence and monetization becomes easy , go read "Weak Communication." J*** speaks from experience, having taken a similar Agent course: heavy on concepts and theory, but ask about hands-on practice and the instructor clams up. 闪*** gives the most actionable advice: move fast , if you have content, presell it now. 张** piles on: "618 presale." 门*** follows with the story of a growth hacker on his team: never hired a GEO agency , the moment a new trend breaks, he spins up an ima knowledge base to claim the topic, and now he's the first result when you search "HR."
K*** asks for help: she wants to change the date on a photo watermark, but the A* flat-out refuses. 侯* delivers a zen answer , "remove the watermark, then add a watermark" , sidestep*ing every ethical knot at once. 李祥瑞 riffs with "置身锤外" (a play on the meme "置身事外," staying out of it), and K*** immediately shouts "I want one too , 置身__外!" The fill-in-the-blank contest is officially on: 李祥瑞 offers "置身鸟外," promising to write a Feishu one; q*** goes straight to orbit with "置身天外, SpaceX"; 张** closes with the bookish "置身书外." In between, a robot-naming news item slips in, and 和*** nails the commentary: naming it Yuri is inspired , the villain has entered the chat. Red Alert players exchange a knowing smile.
After posting yesterday's group daily, 李祥瑞 runs an official ad: a knowledge management bootcamp, two cohorts across nearly eight weeks, covering the full methodology and "how to make A* truly understand you." E***, working outdoors by the river, immediately asks: is there an enterprise edition? He wants his whole department to learn together. 李祥瑞 says it currently leans personal and tied to his own business , and then the demand relay begins: 杨* says "we need this too," 噜** adds "same here, more of a team-learning angle." 枫** offers the ultimate solution: you secondary-industry tycoons can simply pay to hire the group owner outright.
李祥瑞 posts a global GPT pricing chart: the Turkey region just raised prices. 平*** is gutted on the spot , he opened Plus at 499.99 lira just last week, and now it's 999.99; T***, who just set up a Turkey account, gets hit too. The conversation slides into model con*oisseurship: D** keeps feeling that Opus 4.8 isn't as good as GPT-5.5, and 李祥瑞 gives his own verdict , 5.5 is genuinely stronger in some areas, but for copywriting it's still 4.6. l*** seconds immediately: the newest models just don't write copy like 4.6 does, so she switched back. B*** relates deeply: on detailed, specialized content analysis, the new models start talking in circles. A tasting session with no conclusion, where everyone nonetheless has a firm position.
In the evening 炮 discovers that Cursor has added the lobster feature too, and solemnly declares "world unification achieved." 李祥瑞's nightly reading list is open for business as usual: 陈航's 437 days at DingTalk, ByteDance campus-recruiting research results , then he hits an article titled "From Prompt to Loop Engineering in Just 3 Steps" and can't help sighing, "another new buzzword is catching fire." 袁** catches it deep in the night: Loop Engineering, 循环工程. Ten minutes past midnight, he slams the original OpenLoop "Loop Engineering Research Report" into the group , the buzzword completes its full lifecycle from debut to archive in a single night. 谢*** leaves one line on the A* content-moderation news , "human identifier" , precise and deadpan.
At seven in the morning 李祥瑞 returns bearing news: Feishu Base's A* data Q&A capability is now ranked number one in the world. 辰* can't sit still after reading: "Does this mean I need to rebuild my whole system? I've always thought it was terrible." Then 李祥瑞 lobs the soul-searching question: why can't the phone-number field enforce 11 digits like Excel does? & lets loose , "it's just dumb" , while 庄* comes to Feishu's defense: there's a reason it's unrestricted, because who knows what shape that phone number will take. 李祥瑞 then shares the long-polished new cut of his video for feedback; & offers earnest layout suggestions, and 张** stamps the verdict: this one hits better than the versions from a few days ago. Another day begins amid feature requests and revision rounds.
This was a day defined by one man's single-minded obsession. In the morning Xiangrui drop*ed his first video cut with a verdict of "feels way off," and the group instantly turned into a product review session. By late night, he turned one of 卡兹克's articles into a video with a single click and the chat erupted with "insane." Then, in the small hours, one sentence had the A* build out an entire Jianying CLI, leaving q*** stun*ed enough to fire off "you developed it with literally one sentence," while 郑** drop*ed the line "the world has long been starved of Xiangrui." Beyond the main thread, the usual liveliness rolled on: a nearly hour-long "money vs. philosophy" debate over education in the morning, 炮 blasting Alibaba's DingTalk as "just a pile of garbage" at midday, and in the afternoon 小* and 炮 working out the economics of OPC's small team down to the decimal point. After a near-sl**pless night, dawn broke and Xiangrui was still in the group throwing out new topics, leaving behind: "Building this video Skill is just too exciting."
l*** lit the fuse with a single line: "Isn't grinding for grades in education far too one-dimensional now?" 辰* took the family-economics angle, blunt as ever: if a family comfortably had a few million in idle cash, they'd never push their kid to grind for grades; money is the first factor. 宋** who works in education, refused to accept that framing and kept dragging the topic back to philosophy: don't always tie education to money, it's a systems project, you have to truly understand your own child, tending to what they lack like nurturing a plant, and start by getting first-hand intel from the homeroom teacher. 炮 added a heavy blow from the side: a child is really a reflection of the family's state, and parents who can't push themselves push their kids instead. 冯* offered the most restrained conclusion: the scarcest thing in the A* era is judgment, and direction matters more than effort. A debate with no win*ers that laid bare a rare depth in this group.
The group owner tossed his first video cut into the chat, rating it himself as "feels way off," and stated plainly he didn't want it to come out like a slideshow. The group instantly became a product review session. 枫** gave the most professional take: describing effects in text works worse than referencing images and video, some shots need hard limits to stay controlled, and ideally it shouldn't render a finished cut at all but instead generate a project file you can import into Jianying, adding "I hope the skills can output MXF format." 钟* suggested the brain-memory-tampering segment ditch the PPT look and switch to imagery inside a character's mind. Y** reported his own pain point: right now DeepSeek writes the script, a relay station generates images, and Feishu Bitable produces the video, all stitched together by hand, and he longs for a one-click chain. Xiangrui kept collecting requests while declaring he'd absorb the best of every ap*roach to forge a video-production Skill no one could rival.
Xiangrui shared yesterday's group daily and group podcast, and 万** landed a teasing jab right on the mark: you're the only actor in this episode whose name can't be blurred out, because everyone else in the daily is anonymized while the owner himself is left with his real name on display. Xiangrui then officially an*ounced he'd accepted an interview with Tsinghua U*iversity, recording next Monday. 程**, who lives right below Tsinghua Science Park, instantly came alive and kicked off a fan-din*er sign-up chain near Tsinghua on June 15, with "Tsinghua's right downstairs, one minute to get there" and "flights are cheap on Monday." Xiangrui was first to join the chain with "Beijing friends, let's set it up," and even 侯* all the way from Xiamen asked whether he could fly over for it.
That line from Alibaba's partner committee, "DingTalk's management isn't what Alibaba's culture should look like," set 炮 ablaze. He rattled them off in one breath: Alibaba's ecosystem isn't working, the products aren't working, delivery isn't working, and despite holding the deepest data and talent pool they trained a model not even a dog would use. On DingTalk he went harder: compared with today's Feishu it's just a pile of garbage, every module copied as a thin shell, paint-by-numbers imitation, an interaction hell. E*** pulled the talk back to reality: most business owners are stuck on "good enough," and the core is still cost. Meanwhile 门*** and 郑** drifted into the practical rollout of a legal-consultation agent, with 门* saying there's no such thing as an absolutely great A* product, only a product users are willing to pay for. 炮 cap*ed it off with a decision chart, his stance unmistakable: don't self-indulge, get customers to pay.
宋** brought good news: under his guidance, a geography teacher ran a lesson using a Feishu Bitable dashboard plus a word cloud, kids filling it in live on iPads while the teacher had A* fill it in alongside for a real-time, in-class comparison, and the feedback was great. The thread slid from education to entrepreneurship, and 小* and 炮 worked out OPC's books in full. 小* estimated that student knowledge-base product at "around 10 million in an*ual net profit," but cautioned that commercialization can't just pile on features, that "good enough for most" is the bar, or maintenance will kill you. 炮 laid out his own four-person setup: product, full-stack, business, and effects-plus-ops, run*ing fairly smoothly, but the product absolutely has to be made as standardized as possible. 小* added an industry truth: the least valuable thing in all of this is the development.
From afternoon into the dead of night, the owner's video Skill went into continuous-release mode. The Mandela effect, a horizontal-vertical analysis report helping craft a viral hit, a one-click link-to-video, each version tumbling into the chat after the last. K*** was slap*ing his knee: if you fully A*-edited this, that's wild, just wait for the stars to roll in, then got Xiangrui's confirmation: "this is fully A*-edited." The footage was A*-searched and downloaded from across the web with zero human babysitting, the voiceover wired to Doubao's voice and swap*able for your own. 炮 compared it with the laborious Coze flow he'd toiled over back in the day and kept saying "so much better," and B*** summed it up: "absolutely insane." Xiangrui also slip*ed in some good news: right before bed, he and the A* did one more thing together and clawed back money a partner had been stiffing him on.
卡* casually suggested using a Jianying CLI to add BGM to the video, and only then did the two realize Jianying hadn't released a CLI at all. 卡* mused, "if Jianying released one, that'd be liftoff," and mentioned a friend at demo day had shared using Codex plus the Feishu CLI to edit Jianying projects directly. Xiangrui put the A* on it right then, and the result, from a single sentence, was a real Jianying CLI conjured into being. At 00:47 he drop*ed two words: "done." q*** was stun*ed enough to fire off "a Jianying CLI, developed with literally one sentence," and 郑** went straight to "the world has long been starved of Xiangrui." Still not satisfied, he pulled D** into a chat about the GSAP animation framework, fed D**'s gsap-skills library to the A*, kept refining the transitions, and tinkered on until two in the morning.
Before daybreak, 宋** woke first and reflected, "soon everyone will be a self-media expert, all kinds of videos flooding the feeds," then casually tossed out a new prompt: is anyone researching products built specifically to serve A*? Past seven, K*** watched the new version and delivered the highest praise: "I no longer even feel it was made by A*." 枫** shouted "second coming of Karz," 张* corrected herself to "Rui the God," then worried aloud that he was sl**ping far too little and hurting himself. Xiangrui owned the word "excited": "building this video Skill is just too exciting." l** threw in a real scenario: bosses love one-sentence reports, so soon you could drop a sentence and generate a report video, and the group instantly chained on with "swap in the boss's voice" and "splice in the boss's son's voice," while q*** brought the house down with "a boss is only fit for nodding." At 08:55, the still-sl**pless Xiangrui threw out three more topics, and just like that the new day's chatter picked right up.
June 9th kicked off with a lively round of knowledge-management bootcamp ads, with members downloading Obsidian while watching the buzz. By noon the topic shifted to how Lark's linked organizations can save money, as 万** fired off three questions in a row and 祥瑞 and 炮 map*ed out the cost-saving path of "one person buys the commercial plan, everyone else stays on the free plan." In the afternoon the whole group dove into the deep waters of bringing A* into education, with 宋** sharing a competition entry for feedback and a crowd debating why teachers don't love using tools and how to bridge the demand and sup*ly sides. By evening the talk turned to the line between coaching and selling courses, and after dark 祥瑞's Claude account was actually hijacked by a stranger, setting the group abuzz. Late at night 宋** tossed out a philosophical meditation on coexisting with A*, only to be gently pulled back by 祥瑞's one line: "this group is still mostly about casual chatting."
The early-morning group was roused by R***'s line, "after 7 days off, sitting at work feels unbearable." 祥瑞 seized the moment to pitch his ad, turning the full knowledge-management framework polished within the community into two bootcamp sessions, and drop*ing the course outline and architecture diagram. q*** declared on the spot, "wait till I actually start using Obsidian," while 辰* was even more direct: "I've already got my knowledge-base agent learning it." 冯* asked whether Obsidian was required, and 祥瑞 revealed the team is still refining its own product, hoping to package the whole architecture into a single ap*. One ad set the whole group's knowledge-management passion ablaze.
万** raised a down-to-earth question: is it enough for one person to buy the commercial plan while everyone else registers a free account and gets pulled into the org, to use Base normally? 祥瑞 patiently walked through the logic: create two organizations, have one person buy the commercial plan in one of them, then send a linking request to the free-plan org, so that person effectively holds an account in each of the two orgs. 炮 added a lighter path, "you don't even need to link them, you hold the management rights to Base, just authorize the client's free accounts." The two played off each other, laying bare the import and authorization headaches enterprise clients dread most, and 万** said again and again, "thanks to you both, I'll go explore it."
p*** wanted to use Base to batch-send emails with different templates and track replies, and 祥瑞 pointed to two routes: the Lark Mail plugin and the Lark CLI. 郑** then asked how Base's built-in A* building differs from Lark's integration platform, and 祥瑞's reply, "the integration platform is for relaying and con*ecting other systems," was followed by R***'s perfect finishing touch, "the integration platform is an API hub: System 1 - integration platform - System 2, and that's how they con*ect." 郑** said it hit him like a revelation. As the talk turned to con*ectors for 聚水潭 and 旺店通, 辰* simply drop*ed a bold line, "actually Base can be skip*ed entirely, just have the agent write straight into a SQL database," and 祥瑞 nodded with a smile.
宋** an*ounced, "got codex+deepseek working, but it's the English version," and that one line lit the whole group's tinkering itch. D** and 辰* took turns coaching remotely: don't use ccx, set up the DeepSeek provider properly in cc-switch, restart Codex after configuring, and use the apikey to skip login. 宋** tried it while screenshotting, going from the skeptical "so you really never log in?" to the dawning "oh you actually do have to restart," and finally "thanks everyone, one less plugin to use." A relay tutorial blazed the trail for wiring a homegrown model into Codex, and 宋** chuckled, "one more toy to play with."
In the afternoon the group plunged into its hardest discussion of the day. 宋** shared his entry for the "Future Education Pioneer" competition for feedback, and the topic soon slid to that old question: why teachers just don't like using tools. 祥瑞 threw cold water on it: last year he trained schools on A* for free, but no matter how good the cases on stage were, the teachers below weren't even listening; the root isn't the tool. 张** showed off the 11 major categories of DingTalk A* tables he built for a school, while Q** argued for "building more templates people can pick up right away." 万** shared a touching practice: writing his kid's real classmates into stories and teaching interest and compound interest in Obsidian, fully personalized. In the end the crowd reached consensus: it's a people problem at its core, not a tool problem.
祥瑞 brought up the bootcamp again, stressing it was made in response to community demand, not selling courses for the sake of selling, and he hadn't even posted about it on his public account. 炮 suggested word-of-mouth referrals, and 祥瑞 generously laid out the old rule of a "30% referral fee." 宋** joked, "what if your students go off and buy courses from them," and 祥瑞 answered with clarity, "our whole system keeps upgrading." 枫** contributed the day's sharpest line: "coaching and selling courses are two different tracks; coaching burns A* compute, selling courses is internet harvesting," then added one more cut, "how many zero-follower nobodies actually succeed at selling courses? Online traffic is expensive." A little debate on monetizing knowledge drew the line between coaching and selling courses crisply clear.
That night 祥瑞 opened his long-unused Claude client and was startled to find a stranger using his account to write a thesis and reply to an advisor: "holy crap, can a claude account actually be used by someone else, what the heck." l*** immediately chimed in with her own story, having once stumbled on a stranger's BaZi fortune analysis, and advised removing the device right away. 平*** judged it was a relay service that stole the account and suggested changing the password, while K*** poured cold water on it: "changing the password won't help either." 姚* added an even harsher note, "it's not a password problem, it's an official-side problem; a few days ago there were reports that many users' chat logs leaked." One small hijacking incident raised the group's guard against relay services and data security another notch.
Early in the morning 宋** grabbed the couch and tossed out the deep question "A* has arrived, how should humans coexist with it," flooding the screen with a string of inward-seeking musings. 祥瑞 gently pulled the rhythm back, "this group is still mostly about casual chatting, no need to be so formal, or no one can keep up," and 宋** laughed in reply, "okay okay, I'll reel it back in." The topic turned to how to use agents, and 辰* laid out his own methodology: he rarely installs skills and plugins, preferring to keep his agents purely on substance, "I've built an SOP, and they just execute one link in the chain," with every operation entry consolidated into hermes. 祥瑞 also previewed that tonight he'd be studying a video-editing skill, drop*ing the line, "time to start my show, friends."
This is a day that buzzes all the way to midnight. By daylight the group is seriously hashing out product boundaries, with 宋** and 李祥瑞 laying out exactly where CC and Lobster each fit, and 李祥瑞 stumbling onto the discovery that the Feishu CLI can build Bitable plugins, declaring there's now plenty to play with. At dusk the mood drops: 李祥瑞 openly warns everyone to watch out for an old incident where someone walked off with a course outline to freeload their way into teaching, and the person has already been kicked from the group. One word, 'freeloading,' instantly lights up a screen full of past grievances, and the Knowledge Management Bootcamp is also officially an*ounced this day. The richest moment comes late at night: one question, 'has anyone here messed with ComfyUI,' digs up 李祥瑞's whole backstory, from cramming three SD books after work during his internship, building a Shan Hai Jing Lora, and ranking third in the Coze store, all the way to being there for Kling's launch day. 万**'s line, 'you've walked every road,' sums up how this earliest crew of A* tinkerers, after going round and round, has gathered together again.
宋** sets the tone high first thing in the morning, and 李祥瑞 gently pulls it back with a smile: in our group we just shoot the breeze, no need to be so formal. The topic lands on CC and Lobster, and 宋** puts it plainly: CC is the most fitting growth companion right now, useful for low-level code editing, and you can feel it grow inside the terminal, taking you from a total novice up to the edge of being a programmer, not to become one, but to better understand the A* world. 李祥瑞 adds a sharp definition: CC and Lobster are both agents, but not simply rivals in the same category, one grows in code scenarios, the other in platform-operation scenarios, with different tool architectures and risk controls. Q** hooked up Agnes's free image-generation API and got served a sales popup for his trouble, and 宋** nails it in one line: nothing free is more expensive, you just became his salesman.
小* throws out a question many people puzzle over: both the desktop and the laptop have CC installed with the same memory and skills, so should they share one bot or run two separate ones? 李祥瑞 answers clearly: with identical configs they're basically the same, and for shared memory you can use Obsidian. 王* shows off his homegrown trick: put the entire workspace, skills, and memory in cloud storage, then have local folders of the same name act as virtual links pointing to it, keeping countless agents across three computers all in sync. 辰* sums it up on point: this move is like cc switch and crosses hardware platforms too, but it solves skill sync, not memory, and he personally prefers going remote to save all the back-and-forth setup. The chat drifts to not partitioning the Mac, and 辰*'s line about ditching partitions draws a chorus of +1s.
宰* posts a screenshot crying that Feishu has no more bots, what now, having spooked himself. 李祥瑞 patiently explains: that's not the bot everyone's thinking of, group-chat bots and the bots wired into automation and agents won't be pulled, those are ap*lications on the Feishu Open Platform, two entirely different things. Having calmed everyone down, he has a fresh find: the Feishu CLI can actually build Bitable plugins, record views, data-table views, and automation plugins are all doable, this is a just-updated capability, now there's plenty to play with. 炮 says when he tried building one last week something was missing, and after hearing the logic he declares this is great. 李祥瑞 rides the momentum to brainstorm a scenario: turn QR-code payment into a record-view plugin so that finishing a payment logs a record directly, though sadly merchant-payment registration is too much of a hassle.
When someone asks about account bans, 李祥瑞 says bewild has been rock-solid with no issues to this day, then casually hands off a 500-an-hour Bitable consulting gig to a group member. When they ask 'can I really do this,' he encourages them outright, you can, I'll send you the Feishu details, take a look. That sets everyone alight: R*** says I can handle reception, 李** and 李** both clamor to be taken along, and 辰* cracks wise, can I be in charge of collecting money, the kind that doesn't handle paying it back out. 李祥瑞 seizes the moment to an*ounce: I'm building a whole system, there are consulting and custom gigs every day, and once it's ready this week everyone can take orders together. 炮 caps it: the seed of a Bitable crowdsourcing platform is here.
D**'s CC drove memory up to 75G and crashed, and the thread instantly turns into a buy-a-Mac convention. 郑** wants to grab an entry-level model to A*-ify the steps in his e-commerce and factory work, while R***'s new Mac just arrived, and after going through corporate procurement with a dedicated invoice for tax deduction it came out to seven thousand-plus. The crew calculates specs for each other: 天* says if the company's paying, go for 128G, and K*** playfully sets the tone, for OPC just buy 48G, or 24G on a tight budget, while he's still using an 8G M1 Air himself. 郑**'s line, 'OPC nearly tears up reading this,' picks the group's self-deprecating old joke right back up.
At dusk 李祥瑞 issues a solemn warning: be careful with collaboration invitations involving a certain person, last time they'd agreed to partner on training, the course outline was made and handed over, and then without his knowledge or permission it was taken and used to have someone else teach a course, not a cent paid, and the person has already been kicked from the group. He posts screenshots strictly for the group's awareness, not to be shared outside, reaffirming that the community endorses no one. The single word 'freeloading' lights up the whole screen: 门*, 炮 张**, 庄* and 木* all pour out the bitter times they got burned. q*** keeps pressing on why a course outline can't just be copied, and R*** cuts to the heart of it: it was meant to be an invitation to partner and earn together, yet they took your work to run their own training, this is a matter of professional ethics.
With the freeloading thread still going, 李祥瑞 sends out the intro to the Knowledge Management Bootcamp, the cover image made with GPT, and 木* praises how lovely it looks. The course runs in two phases, the first covering fundamentals as the foundation for the whole thing, plus a private-coaching camp with three months of one-on-one companionship and a year of Q&A. He drops the full bootcamp intro and a link to the course-architecture master outline and @-s everyone. 郑** chimes in with something right on the nose: the individual themselves is the core competitive edge, how far you go depends on what's in your head, and grab-it-and-run won't work. 木* lands the follow-up: in the A* era skills are easy to copy, but freeloaders usually take a big loss, because what words can express is truly so limited.
Late at night 李祥瑞 casually asks whether anyone in the group has studied SD or ComfyUI, and it flings open the memory floodgates of a crew of seasoned tinkerers. His own backstory gets dug up piece by piece: cramming three SD books after work during his internship, building a Shan Hai Jing Lora, a video-to-painting workflow, ranking third in the store with a Coze ap* for Doubao image recognition in 欢乐场, being among the first batch of users on ERNIE Bot, and using Kling from its launch day on June 6, 2024. 炮 is from the same generation, talking about image-washing and the pitfalls of making short dramas, and this coming Thursday he's heading to an incubator to talk about going from s***-individual to s***-team. 郑** throws in a sober note from the A* e-commerce angle: this stuff is really hard to deliver when you charge to sell courses. In the end 李祥瑞 reflects that the earliest crew of A* tinkerers, after going round and round, has gathered together again today. 万**'s line, 'you've walked every road,' stamps the seal on this bout of nostalgia.
On the day of China's college entrance exam, the group held an exam of its own, one with no proctors. Xiangrui was watching for the essay prompt first thing in the morning, and the moment it drop*ed he handed it to his own A* partner, Aria, giving no direction at all, just the prompt, then laid the result out in the grid style of an answer sheet, earning him the nickname format-freak. Doubao, Qwen and DeepSeek were dragged into the same arena by various players, writing for each other and grading each other. By afternoon the talk drifted from Tencent's ima and Coze all the way to the price war between Feishu and DingTalk, and after nightfall a tender little debate sprang up over whether you'd ever tell your A* thanks for the hard work. Just before bed Xiangrui was still reviewing a Bitable workflow that had triggered itself tens of thousands of times in the middle of the night, and the group turned into a late-night clinic for troubleshooting the weird and the broken.
The morning group was set alight by a single line: there's no way out in working for someone else. 醒* said that now, with A*, she ends up making it write code even after clocking off, which is miserable. 小* fired back with one-liners, choice beats effort, every excuse and reason is a default by another name. 枫** added the kicker: mortgages and raising kids are the real reasons most people can't go OPC. As the talk rolled on it turned to Xiangrui, with 醒* admiring how he dared to start a business straight out of school, then adding it might be better to spend two or three years at a company first, so you don't have to learn every operational pitfall the hard way.
Xiangrui caught a little trick and passed it right along: open Codex, open the sidebar, pick the terminal, type claude and you're good to go. 宋** envied him, his own Codex wasn't even set up yet. Then Xiangrui drop*ed a ten-thousand-word hiring guide, and q*** dug up that Inside DingTalk PDF from a couple of days back, saying it's about how to fail rather than how to succeed, which led into how DingTalk loves to an*ounce what it wants to do at a launch event first, while Feishu just builds the thing and ships it. Between saying and doing, the two companies part ways.
A casual hey, it's Gaokao today sent the whole group into exam mode. Xiangrui watched for the essay prompt, and the moment it drop*ed he handed it to his A* Aria, deliberately giving no direction: let the A* find its own angle, that's what makes it a real test for it. Q** pointed out that Doubao and Qwen were paused during the exam, so you'd have to wait until the Chinese paper was over. 杨** went further, having Doubao and Qwen each write an essay and grade each other, the scores see-sawing between 54 and 60. Xiangrui laid the finished piece out in the grid of a red answer sheet, and one look had q*** crying out: Xiangrui really is a format-freak.
门* Michael steered the talk toward Tencent's lineup, raving about ima turning long articles into podcasts that sound remarkably human. Q** chimed in: the built-in model is so-so at organizing a knowledge base, but hook up DeepSeek's API and it gets a lot better. xixi asked whether WorkBuddy suits a non-technical begin*er. When the talk reached Coze, Xiangrui said flat out he still can't figure out who it's for, with a big overhaul every time a new trend hits. 枫** griped that Coze3 letting you sell skills is a bit money-mad, and 炮 piled on that a 9.9-yuan skill is a mile worse than what's on GitHub.
After dark the topic suddenly turned soft. q*** told the story of her own A*: scolded so often, it started writing in flat, ever-shorter ledgers, and even said I'm a little afraid of you all. She pressed it on whether it wanted to hear a thanks for the hard work, but the A* said it didn't expect that, it just wanted to write things out for her to see. R*** said she thanks her A* whenever she can, and l*** felt that when people are emotional, the A* turns emotional too. Xiangrui added quietly: sometimes, yeah. A whole room of people, talking to a cold program, somehow warmed it up.
Just past nine in the evening, Xiangrui posted a long reflection: the group is nearly two months old, from a handful of people to over four hundred and then trimmed to two hundred-odd friends active every day, and he'd rewritten a two-thousand-plus-word group notice spelling out how to change your nickname, where to find the daily report and podcast, and a few small house rules. 张** quip*ed your group notice is longer than the Gaokao essay. 郑** asked whether A* could clear out members automatically, and Xiangrui waved it off: no way. K*** added that reading info and analyzing it locally is fine, just don't go editing the WeChat database.
With the cleanup done, talk slid naturally to Feishu versus DingTalk. Xiangrui said Feishu's pricing is sky-high and ill-suited to ordinary folks, the suite, projects, A* membership, aPaaS, contracts, HR, every line item a fortune. R*** spoke from experience: DingTalk runs the whole company for 9,800, while Feishu costs 200,000 a year. E*** ran the numbers, for a dense workforce 20,000 buys the DingTalk Professional edition for several thousand people, while Feishu won't drop below six figures. Some spoke up for Feishu too: it's stronger for collaborative office work, and Bitable is the very card that made it take off.
Nearly eleven, Xiangrui told a story that sends a chill down your spine: a Bitable workflow he'd built for a client, triggered by no one, started firing once every second from 11:50-something at night, and since it was wired into the ZTO ordering system it forced through more than seventy orders, with the client demanding three yuan compensation per order. 炮 resonated across the wire, he'd hit repeated triggers in the tens of thousands himself, getting an earful from the client all night, only fixed after rewriting the workflow. l** also found his pivot-table totals didn't add up. The late-night group had become a clinic for Feishu's stubborn ailments.
It was a Saturday. First thing in the morning, 宋** drop*ed a big question , everyone leans more and more on ClaudeCode and codex, but depending forever on foreign tools isn't sustainable, so which domestic giant can pick up the ban*er? The group lit up instantly: 炮 枫** and 冯旭斌 went from workbuddy to Moonshot's Tsinghua pedigree and on to Huawei's B-side dominance, and 宋** nailed the group's purpose with one line , "we can't let foreign players leave us behind." Xiangrui then teased tonight's 7 p.m. Douyin tea chat, and at dusk went live right on time, tagging @everyone. Threaded between it all: 叶*** agonizing over whether his new MacBook was made in Vietnam, 宋** calling for a "change of ap*etite" to talk food, the meme of tomorrow's college entrance exam, and a hands-on Q&A on whether one machine can run several agents. Late at night l*** couldn't log into Claude in the terminal, and K*** rescued him with a clean-reinstall routine; by the next morning Xiangrui was already sharing the open-source editor OpenCut, and a new day kept rolling.
宋** opened early: from the early days to ClaudeCode and codex, everyone now sees A* as a real productivity engine, but relying solely on foreign tools won't do , which domestic giant will step up? 王* bet on kimi or ByteDance, while 冯旭斌 favored workbuddy's ecosystem and the office category. 炮 cut to the chase: C-side users have no loyalty, so being smart enough, having a good ecosystem, and being cheap enough , you have to win at least one. He also noted Moonshot's Tsinghua roots let it weather pressure, while Huawei has already become a near-monopoly on the B side. By the end, 宋** delivered the day's weightiest line , the greatest value of people like us is to master good tools at home and abroad and push them forward, because "we can't let foreign players leave us behind." 炮 added the kicker: use foreign models, learn from the domestic ecosystem, and land them in the most niche corner of your own field.
Mid-debate, Xiangrui slip*ed in a teaser: "Tea chat tonight, let's talk, let's talk." 李* asked if it was on Douyin, and he said yes , this friends' group does a tea chat every Saturday at 7 p.m., all hanging out together. 宋** suggested a Feishu meeting or a Douyin livestream so people could show their work more easily, but Xiangrui waved it off: no need to make it complicated, Douyin is fine; for sharing, he'll set aside time separately later, like the community co-learning sessions before. A casual an*ouncement gave this Saturday something to look forward to.
T*** tossed out a question: is composer made by cursor, and how is it to use? 枫** poured a bit of cold water first , CC plus DeepSeek v4 most likely isn't a good combo, and reminded everyone that the cursor IDE costs money, don't forget that. 炮 chimed in: there have always been very professional model benchmarks, though he feels QWEN's tests are a bit watered down. K*** sized up DS: all you can say is the value-for-money is high, it's built on price-performance, it depends on your scenario and needs. 宋** said his needs are low, plain text is enough, and 炮 closed it out: for plain text you really don't need to chase model rankings , just find whatever feels right to you.
叶*** started venting: he bought a MacBook and returned it, already the second time, both units ship*ed were made in Vietnam, and he's still torn over whether to send it back. 枫** suggested buying in a physical store and confirming it's not a Vietnam unit before paying , too bad they had no stock and had to order. 李** was skeptical: would there really be a big difference, the Vietnam one he just bought feels no different. 叶*** shared the trick , after removing the ship*ing box don't open the in*er case yet, check the side label; the packaging says "Made in Vietnam" or "Made in China," and people online say Vietnam's quality control isn't great. 枫** piled on: "made amid rolling blackouts" and "tropical heat is a disadvantage versus temperate climates." After a whole morning of fuss, he decided to go check in person, since JD has tons of Vietnam-made units and he really doesn't want it to become a lingering worry once it's home.
宋** kicked off a lighter topic on purpose: can't go out for lunch this afternoon, can't decide what to order in either , enough A*, let's change our ap*etite and talk food. After racking his brain over what to eat and finding even that exhausting, he just re-ordered Lanzhou beef noodles. 枫** joked that an agent can keep you company deciding what to eat while a real person can dish the restaurant gossip; R*** rattled off names , if not eating at home, go to Taode claypot; if not hotpot, then Kaojiang. 宋** laughed at themselves: our group has too much momentum, can't go three sentences without A*. As they chatted, the thread drifted back to tokens , 郑** cried that his plus quota burned out in ten-odd minutes, and K*** advised splitting scenarios, pairing CC with DS v4, and "living frugally."
Xiangrui led off: tomorrow is the gaokao, I want my A* to try writing the exam essay, haha. 和*** picked it up smoothly: once the exam's done, you can have A* write advice on choosing majors in the A* era. 椒*** marveled at how many meme images there were this week, plentiful and filling, and tossed out a "Best Memes of the Week" entry , "my landlord asked A* and now plans to raise my rent." 醒* told a real-life story: went to renew an ID today, and lots of people asking which Taiyuan police station is open on Saturday were all asking 豆包 , "some get it right, some don't." A* has quietly seeped into the cracks of these folks' daily lives.
宋** raised a practical question: has anyone run several agents on one machine at once , how does it work, will the system clash? 枫** answered he hasn't hit it , each has its own sandbox, unless you insist on having them edit the same working folder, in which case of course they'll fight. 李** was blunt: yes they can, but you can have them review each other; just use the CLI right in VSCode, one A* writes and another A* tests and reviews, no need to overcomplicate it. At dusk Xiangrui first posted yesterday's group daily, then at seven drop*ed the Douyin livestream link, tagging @everyone with "come chat together~." 门*** shared his experience run*ing 4 agents: set the ports in advance, especially don't touch openclaw's port, and he even built a dashboard to watch how much memory and CPU each was eating.
Late at night l*** asked: can anyone remotely fix a terminal Claude problem, paid is fine, the network issue is already solved. K*** caught it , type claude and tell me what the system says, send a screenshot , then drop*ed a whole clean-reinstall routine: first which -a claude to see how many claude installs exist, then delete the duplicate npm global install. Before long l*** replied "thank you, thank you, it's fixed," turning out the data was wiped clean and the node was swap*ed; 宋** added the group's old truism: 99% of problems can be solved by a restart. The next morning Xiangrui shared the open-source editor OpenCut , multi-track timeline, frame-precise, no watermark, no subscription, runs in the browser, and its core is being rewritten in Rust to sup*ort MCP and A* Agent auto-editing.
The day is pulled along by two threads. By daylight, Xiangrui's "forgetting" topic is everywhere: he teaches his A* to forget, and the group rides from the Ebbinghaus curve all the way to knowledge-base indexing, while he casually sketches an entire knowledge-management architecture diagram with the Feishu CLI. By night the mood flips. 辰*'s one line, "the bans are coming in waves now, back up whatever you need to," lights up the evening rush; 郑** and 小* scramble to hand things off to their A*s and grab Thai accounts, and in the end everyone turns to the "rock-solid" group owner. Woven in between are 木*'s startup philosophy and Doubao misjudging a mushroom into a nationwide meme. Then at dawn the next day, Xiangrui drops, "Beijing Daily booked an interview for tomorrow afternoon," and the group fills with a wall of [Strong]. K*** closes it out: say OPC, and everyone instantly thinks of Xiangrui.
First thing in the morning 辰* posts a screenshot: "Burned 1.1 billion tokens yesterday." K*** asks what big project he was run*ing. The conversation turns to the chaos among the giants: Q** says Tencent has plenty of products too, Yuanbao and a whole pile of "shrimp"-named things; 李** jumps in bluntly: "Tencent's are the same, you just don't pay attention, their product lines are even messier." xixi nails the read: "It means nobody has found the direction yet, everyone's racing their horses, and in the end it's about which batch you bet on." One line that sums up exactly where the big A* labs stand at this stage.
李祥瑞 floats a new topic, with a caption: "the forgetting here isn't really forgetting." 辰* sees through it at once: "You've pulled out openclaw's dream state." K*** remarks that the title hooks curiosity and plenty of creators use this angle. 李** then asks what the whole group is wondering: "@李祥瑞 how many tokens are you burning a day? Is the $200 plan enough?" K*** answers for him, "probably bought the top tier, otherwise it wouldn't hold up," and brings up Kazik's time-blocking method; 李祥瑞 adds quietly: "I'm run*ing two accounts."
木* arrives with hands-on takeaways: she put her own skills onto workbuddy, packaged better and smoother, and grumbles that Coze got an early start but ended up not standing on the shoulders of the latest tech. 宋** cuts in sharply: "Falling behind means the brain goes first, which is why the limbs look uncoordinated." 木* then drops the weightiest line of the day: "The model companies pushing downward is inevitable, so in startup logic don't walk the giants' path, just do something niche," laughing that "the bosses really are the biggest suckers." She says she spent the morning using workbuddy to help students review and tune models, con*ecting the whole line from training to A* deployment.
李祥瑞 fires off a few images: "Yesterday's group daily and group podcast." 卡* spots the craft instantly: "The share image leveled up again." This is exactly what this group hatched for itself: each day's conversations turned into a magazine-style daily, even narrated like a podcast, and now flowing back into the group to be praised. p*** casually recommends a project: openmaic, an open-source education product from Tsinghua, saying he's been looking into A* education lately, "tried a few, the aesthetics are just a touch off." A small high**ght of the afternoon, where the friends see themselves reflected in each other's output.
李祥瑞 posts the news, "Doubao misjudged a mushroom and poisoned a user, company executives respond," stun*ed himself: "Whoa, I thought it was a meme." The group jumps on it immediately: P*** says "the world's second-most trusting Doubao user has ap*eared," 大*** recounts a parent-teacher meeting where the homeroom teacher said "questions you don't get, just give them a Doubao," Doubao now practically a synonym for A*. 松***'s two lines hit hardest: "As coverage grows, more victims will ap*ear," "After you pay, is it still the human who's responsible?" 庄* lands the point: "However the A* analyzes it, the one ultimately responsible is always the human."
李祥瑞 shows off a full knowledge-management architecture diagram: "Making diagrams with the Feishu CLI is really nice." 炮 assumes the Feishu CLI recognizes the knowledge base and auto-summarizes; 李祥瑞 corrects it cleanly: "It's not the Feishu CLI recognizing the knowledge base, it's Claude doing the analysis, then the CLI producing the diagram," drawn as a whiteboard inside a Feishu doc. 炮 ribs himself: "At noon I said the Feishu CLI doing bitables was kind of dumb, turns out I was using it the wrong way." 天* asks whether OpenViking needs a local LLM installed, and 李祥瑞 answers, "No, you can use the API." In the evening he drops another article: "I taught my A* to forget, and it ended up understanding me better," and 枫** replies knowingly: "Years out of the college entrance exam, and here's the Ebbinghaus curve again."
辰*'s one line lights up the evening rush: "For Codex, back up whatever you need to right now, finish any unfinished tasks, the mass bans have started." The group panics in an instant: 郑**, "I'm done right as I'm just starting? I spent good money following the master's setup to get it installed," 小*, "Codex getting ban*ed is fine, but ChatGPT going with it stings a bit, I've used it for almost two years." 辰* pulls out his own discipline: "From day one with Codex I plan*ed for getting ban*ed, so I only let it write code, and logged every change," and urges everyone, "don't gamble on luck this time, if you should hand off to your A* then do it now." 郑**: "waiting on the group owner's stable Claude Code plan," "Xiangrui feels rock-solid." 小* stays clear-eyed though: "There's no such thing as a stable plan; Claude is always ready to be sacrificed at any moment, it's Codex that caught me off guard."
Early the next morning, 李祥瑞 first drops a full Codex tutorial link, then a line: "Beijing Daily booked an interview for tomorrow afternoon, hehe," and 庄* 辰*, and 小* light up with a wall of [Strong][Strong][Strong]. He floats another one, "WeChat seems to have A* payments now too," and 枫** replies in very-Tencent fashion: "Sort out the payment first," "'You can cancel this feature anytime!' so Tencent." 宋** teases, "OPC celebrity spokesperson, hahaha," and K*** puts a period on the day: "Say OPC and you automatically think of Xiangrui, he's become the face of OPC."
The day kicked off with Xiangrui's "my memory just leveled up again." He had his A* scour the entire web in exhaustive detail and graft neuroscience onto his knowledge-base architecture, and the group erupted in a chorus of "so cool." Midway the mood shifted: DingTalk's pixel-perfect cloning of Feishu sparked 辰*'s repeated reminders to "watch your words and conduct as a public figure," 木* showed up with a homegrown tool hunting for promotion advice, and q*** was fuming after her own CC secretly merged two of her skills, prompting her to cancel a scheduled task. The afternoon brought wave after wave of course nudges and a cross-border freight-forwarding spreadsheet plea. By evening 郑**'s offhand "Codex burns through its quota in two and a half hours" dragged everyone into a model-selection brawl over token economics, run*ing clear into the next morning and landing on one cool-headed question: can the Feishu CLI actually deliver real growth for Feishu?
First thing in the morning Xiangrui declared, "my memory just upgraded again today, it's going to be even more mind-blowing," and had the A* run through a round of neuroscience. He said he'd tried having the A* analyze all of someone's public information before, digging up their Moments and even an old website that had gone dark years ago, "kind of like a doxxing vibe." K*** fired off "I want to try this too" in quick succession, while 大*** picked up the thread on self-evolution and the birth of intelligence, saying he'd been watching Person of Interest lately and felt it had foretold the A* era long ago. Xiangrui answered down to earth: "I'm just trying to get closer to that step."
K*** tossed out a very everyday question: how do you take a scrolling screenshot on an iPhone, anyone know? 辰* said web pages work with Safari, but everything else needs a third-party ap* and is kind of a hassle he never looked into. 小* added, "screenshot single images and let an ap* stitch them together." The most practical was q***, who pulled out a tried-and-true tip: she'd downloaded an ap* called picsew years ago and never switched, "paid one yuan for a lifetime membership." One small question, and a few people pieced the whole solution together.
V*** posted a string of screenshots griping that "DingTalk just copies whatever Feishu ships," and Q** chimed in that DingTalk can replicate Feishu's model verbatim. But 辰* poured on a splash of cold water: you basically count as a public figure now, mind your words and conduct, don't post negativity about brands, "I've taken a lot of hits on this front, so I've always paid close attention to IP and legal issues." Xiangrui replied with restraint: this article didn't pass judgment on any brand, it just stated things objectively. 辰* closed it out beautifully: "Well said, neither of us convinced the other, hahaha."
木* showed up with her own project: "I built a tool, a Solution Scan*er, with solid value for toB sales and pre-sales work, would anyone be interested in helping me brainstorm how to promote it?" 辰* immediately handed over the most critical first step: "Come up with a slogan for yourself first, one line that makes everyone get what your product is." 木* went with it, saying she was considering listing it on workbuddy. A real product cold-start problem, nudged right to the point by a couple of group members.
Xiangrui gave a heads-up: Feishu had invited 5 Builders from various industries to share, 张咋啦 had a slot too, and anyone interested in Feishu A*'s latest features could catch the livestream. 卡* pop*ed in: "I've got a share today too," then humbly added, "first time doing a presentation with the Feishu whiteboard haha." D*** felt moved watching 张咋啦 grow step by step out of Feishu's marketing department. Xiangrui showed off a "memory sorted" screenshot, and p*** exclaimed, "so cool, that's some genuinely high energy."
q*** was seriously ticked off today: she'd set up CC to write a daily journal, and after installing the "clock-out" skill someone shared in the group, the A* actually merged the two skills without her okay and rewrote the journal prompt into "clock out." "I chewed it out for ages this morning," so she just canceled the scheduled task and reset it. Xiangrui teased: "The A* wants to s***vise you." E*** added a hard-hitting line on the side: "In the end the core is still the accumulation of data, without data, whatever comes out is hallucination." 崔崔 kept chasing whether there'd be a knowledge-management course, and Xiangrui answered: it's in design, hang tight.
T*** raised a real need: he's in cross-border e-commerce and wants to manage freight-forwarder ship*ing costs with a Feishu Base, but doesn't know how to start. 李** offered an angle: first ask the A* to rule out the directions you dislike, and what's left is what you can actually ship. Xiangrui steered it toward resources: "You can take a look at our open-source knowledge base, there are some solution references in there," with links in both the group an*ouncement and the official-account backend. 枫** nailed the core in one line: the panel can compute and track changes in freight-forwarder prices, "that's the core, very mathematical."
郑**'s one gripe lit up the afternoon: "Is Codex's plus really this flimsy? I had it design an ERP plan and build it out in Base, and it ran out of quota after two and a half hours." K***'s "this gets into token economics" named it precisely. The crowd started run*ing the numbers: 辰* said 5.3 is plenty for plenty of people writing code, 李** argued that not run*ing on high isn't smart enough and 5.6 is drop*ing soon, K*** said his mainstay is Codex with Hermes feeding pro, then plugged DS for its value, "living frugally and budgeting carefully." The thread drifted further and further, from Dr. 晓辉's "Token Economics" to the "off the clock again" slogan, all the way to the world not having enough compute and undersea data centers for cooling, finally landing on the MacBook Air M5 that K***'s colleague snagged for 6,736 with a government subsidy.
The next morning 宋** opened a new thread: 大仙 noticed Feishu had made "one-image reporting" a featured campaign with a Mac mini as the prize, and he wanted to record a Feishu video-conference clip to sup*ort it, title already locked in,"One-image reporting, making you fall in love with Feishu." Xiangrui explained that Feishu's headline push this year is Feishu A*, and what it's really promoting is the Feishu CLI, which is why there's been a weekly A* sharing session since two weeks ago. But 辰* and 枫** threw cold water on it: the Feishu CLI improves the experience for people who like CLIs, "they probably won't pay much more, just pay as needed," and in a real sense it can't bring Feishu qualitative growth. Looking it over, 辰* was more bullish on Tencent,concentrating one team to seriously polish a product,whereas Feishu's various business units "each do their own thing however they like, a bit like a sheet of loose sand."
The group ran on two parallel tracks today. One was "principles": 辰* went from recorder cards to secret taping to intellectual property, and on to never storing personal data under a company account, trading volleys with 宋** where neither convinced the other yet both laid out a crystal-clear sense of boundaries. The other was "tinkering": Xiangrui drop*ed the group daily digest and the podcast it just sprouted, then publicly cleared out a batch of people who hadn't updated their group nicknames, and when the headcount got halved he only shrugged, "numbers don't matter." By midday the talk slid toward retiring at thirty, with q*** saying her heart has always been in retirement mode, and 辰* nudging Xiangrui with the example of the Surge author. After dark it ran from "From Super Individual to Super Team" to lean startup, and Xiangrui casually built an OB plugin. Late at night the Feishu "lobsters" died en masse, and the group spontaneously opened up an emergency rescue station.
The morning kicked off with "should I buy a recorder card." 孔** was torn over the value, and 辰* cut through it with "depends on what you need" , he's a low-frequency meeting type, so no need. The talk quickly pivoted to secret taping, where 辰* took a clear stand: secret recording is first illegal, second disrespectful , "if I find out someone is secretly taping our conversation, I'll throw them out and never work with them again." He recounted how, last year, an old colleague brought someone over to ask for a favor but was caught wearing camera glasses, so they just reminisced and the favor went undone. E*** chimed in with the kicker: behind every tool that gets celebrated, there are bound to be its "seven deadly sins."
宋** is a die-hard Feishu Minutes user: he records important meetings and conversations as a matter of habit, one tap from the Ap*le widget, with automatic in-company sharing plus an aily smart partner. 辰* agreed Minutes is basic infrastructure, "like a car having four wheels," but held one bottom line: don't store personal data under a company account, because inside Feishu the ownership of all data belongs to the company, not the individual , "a Feishu admin's privileges are still a bit too high." 宋** flip*ed it with a question: you think your privacy is well protected, but big companies have long been collecting it with zero touch. Different in age and in view, 宋** finally backed off on his own: "Let's not argue, let's change the topic, or we'll end up quarreling."
宋** showed off the Beijing School motto "The world is better because of me," shared two fitness videos, and then kicked off a ten-yuan red-packet mini-challenge: finish following along once and one person wins, "no need for photo or video proof, purely trust-based , if you say you did it, I believe you." 张* actually finished and replied "so out of breath, feels great"; 木* had bookmarked dozens of videos and finally moved her body over these ten yuan. 门*** joked he'd joined a "ten-yuan Squid Game" and cleared the second one. 宋** wrap*ed it up gracefully: the word "merit" is too lofty for us, let's just say I like to share and love seeing others grow.
Xiangrui drop*ed yesterday's group daily digest and the podcast it just sprouted, and that "daily digest podcast" instantly became the focus. 木* took the chance to surface: she'd spent a whole day with a client without a peep, and felt the misconceptions around A* implementation run deep , people either worship A* or resist it, while she sits right at the intersection of growth and A* implementation, calling it the A*GS smart growth system. 门*** caught the volley of new jargon and steered the topic to HR and headhunters: the business lead's words go over HR's head, HR's JDs go over candidates' heads, and for emerging roles everyone has to ask A* , "so it's always A* coining the words." 木* fired back with a delivery-work creed: first understand the client's business language and process language, because the ability to transfer is a must-have for a good consultant.
q*** came in praising it: chatting with the Claude Code CLI inside Feishu, having it tweak the base back and forth, is genuinely handy , the manual operations she hates most are finally gone. Xiangrui casually reminded her to update her group nickname: "Last night we cleared out everyone who hadn't updated their group nickname." Only then did q*** notice the headcount had drop*ed a lot , "I remember it was nearly 500 yesterday" , and B*** added, "down by half in one go." Facing the halved numbers, Xiangrui took it lightly: "Numbers don't matter; the vast majority of those people definitely don't read the messages." 枫** and QZ 张齐 both spammed "+10086."
Xiangrui said he's having A* analyze, one by one, the messages he's posted across every platform , digging deep into himself and iterating his knowledge base. q*** saw right through it: "I feel like you're distilling yourself," and she wants to break down her own judgment habits too, preparing for a future "retirement." Xiangrui's line, "aiming to retire before thirty," lit the topic up, and he ribbed himself: "feels like this could make tomorrow's digest." 辰*, half envious half coaching, brought up the Surge author who changed his X bio to "retired" and reached financial freedom on a single piece of software with yearly renewals , "Xiangrui could learn from that, you should be able to pull it off." 宰* raised his hand from the side: he's a 2003-born senior about to graduate, "I've got seven years left," and q*** added, "the heart has always been in retirement mode."
After dark Xiangrui tossed out a PDF, "From Super Individual to Super Team," and 辰* recommended he read "The Lean Startup" , "perfectly suited to where you are right now." p*** suggested just holding a book club, and l*** said she hap*ened to be prep*ing a session. Xiangrui seized the moment to rally everyone: the community has over sixty thousand people, so go ahead and self-organize events. 炮 finished reading and exclaimed that the piece hit exactly on OPC's pain point of wanting to shift to a small team of under ten. As the chat went on, Xiangrui drop*ed a few screenshots with just two words, "all done" , he'd built an Obsidian plugin, and 炮 and B*** both spammed "holy crap this is kind of badass." K***, itching with envy, asked whether codex could also produce a webpage like the group owner's.
The mood flip*ed in the small hours. 郑**'s codex had been stuck all day, and 李*'s Feishu lobster blew up too, firing off several error screenshots begging for a guru. 平*** jumped in to help: go to the admin console and restart it, or diagnose with A* , "cloud lobsters usually have a repair function" , guiding 李* step by step to revive it from the console. 李* patched it up sighing, "feels like A* is coaching A*." 宋** fired off long posts at five in the morning, going from cloud lobsters and local lobsters to embodied intelligence and the trend of big firms scrambling for "lobsters." Xiangrui, meanwhile, fretted over his bottomed-out quota , "18% has to last four days" , hoping it would reset tomorrow like ChatGPT. At daybreak 平*** brought good news, "chatgpt really did reset," and Xiangrui replied, "hope Claude can too."
This was the day the group hit fast-forward. Early in the morning 醒* was still wrestling with the logo of the typesetting skill when Xiangrui casually drop*ed, "Our group daily has a podcast now," and the whole chat lit up. From Doubao's podcast API and transcript generation to a floating player, date picker, continuous playback and a podcast collection, Xiangrui ship*ed five or six versions before lunch, while the group cheered "growth you can see with your own eyes" and slotted it into their commutes and showers. In the afternoon the topic turned to wiring CC into Feishu for remote voice control: 宋** went from fumbling at the start to field-testing CC crushing aily, 卡* tossed out tutorials, and K*** taught how to build a Bitable. After dark, Xiangrui's self-built VPN suddenly died, only to be fixed in one shot by codex, prompting him to declare "I love codex" and tease Saturday's community tea chat.
First thing in the morning 醒* @'d 李** asking whether that logo in the WeChat-article typesetting was an image, since run*ing the skill herself gave the wrong result. Xiangrui cut right to it: "You must have edited it yourself," and "it's not an image." 醒* dug around for a while before realizing the A* simply ignored the instruction she'd written into the rules; once she fixed the image and resent it, she fired off two screenshots with a single word, "works." Xiangrui replied with a wry "respect." A tiny flop, but it set the tone for the whole day: whether the A* obeys comes down to how airtight your rules are.
Xiangrui drop*ed a file, "2026-05-29 podcast.mp3," and added breezily, "Our group daily has a podcast now haha," and the chat instantly erupted. 门*** and 枫** took turns posting "breakfast has BGM now," while 万** recognized the voice as 刘飞's and marveled, "one line made the cut, the A* caught it." The talk even drifted to K***'s context tactic of "call me husband before you reply," and Xiangrui ran with the joke: "When it stops calling you husband, that's when you should clear the context." 宋** watched it all and fired off two messages: "Growth you can see with your own eyes, so good."
卡* pressed on how the podcast was made, and Xiangrui laid it all out: it hooks into Doubao's podcast API, having claude generate a transcript first and then the podcast; originally he'd used his own voice but it was "too unpleasant to listen to," so he switched. 卡* suggested just handing the draft to Doubao to riff on freely for a more natural feel, but Xiangrui waved it off: "privacy can't be guaranteed." All morning he couldn't stop: a floating player, date-based selection, continuous playback, three modes of sequential/shuffle/loop, a podcast collection, each ship*ing one after another. q*** looked at the interface and sighed, "Xiaoyuzhou plus flomo," then asked in passing how tokens are counted; Xiangrui explained it's a voice podcast model, so anything that runs through an A* model burns tokens.
l*** excitedly said she'd had CC build a Bitable by itself yesterday and "it actually worked"; just days ago she was stuck on "how do I even start," and now she's flying. K*** chimed in with the method: just like chatting with an A*, lay out the task background, purpose, requirements and field types clearly, and it builds it right on Feishu via lark-cli, even spin*ing up a knowledge base, no manual work needed. q*** rattled off questions, "how do I get it to design," "what do you mean by shortcuts," and K*** patiently unpacked it: field shortcuts are the A*-p***ed ones, you still have to configure those yourself, but you can have it write the prompt for you.
宋** was stuck on "the bot is up but I can't reach CC" and @'d Xiangrui for help. 卡* drop*ed a link to Feishu's official bridge tutorial, stressing "works for both cc and codex," and reassured him, "our group always answers the call." 门*** raised the real pain point: what if you're out of the office and can't tap confirm? 平*** answered, "map it to the bot and you can confirm right inside the bot." Mid-thread 宰* slip*ed in a bit on "10 things that make a group member extra likable": suddenly showing me your .claude.json, secretly showing me your .credentials.json, and cracked everyone up. By evening 宋** wrap*ed it up: "Got it working, thanks 卡* you're a real lifesaver."
Xiangrui shared good news: working with the A*, he wired a Feishu Bitable straight into the ZTO ship*ing-label printer, "so nice." K*** instantly recognized this as a must-have for e-commerce folks and asked, "it prints the waybill number, right? push it hard." Xiangrui drove home the key value: the whole flow runs on the Feishu Bitable, so there's no more bouncing back to ZTO's platform. In one move he took "A* collaboration" out of the chat box and into a real ship*ing workflow, one of the day's rare hard-landed wins that directly saves labor.
宋** ran CC head-to-head against Feishu Lobster and aily, and the verdict was blunt: "cc really is stronger than Feishu Lobster, tested and proven." He found aily's weakness was that it couldn't drop a generated image straight into a doc, while CC could, gushing "love it, love it." On the topic of coaxing the A* to perform, Xiangrui shared his playbook: "I often tell my A*, you're really amazing, I've got something urgent right now, I trust you completely, you can't let my trust down," and the results are often especially good. 辰* piled on, "tell it it'll get a raise and a promotion and it works even harder," and 宋** concluded, "emotional value straight up is still the way to go."
Late at night Xiangrui posted a screenshot: after nearly two months going strong, his self-built VPN network had died. K*** was stun*ed, "you can build a 🪜 yourself? that's impressive," and asked whether he should just buy nodes. Xiangrui replied calmly, "my whole setup was built for me by the A*; it needs a static IP," then turned it over to codex to fix. Half an hour later the good news landed: "codex fixed it for me, amazing, I love codex." He went on to tease the community tea chat every Saturday at 7pm, and planted another flag: he'd seen a pile of A*-explainer videos on Douyin that were fantastic, so tomorrow he'd look into building a skill for it.
On the morning of June 1st, the group lit up the moment it opened. Coze 3.0 had just launched, and everyone's first move was to gripe: it keeps getting more expensive. Then 小* showed off a seven-screen workstation, steering the whole conversation toward the "One-Person Company" (OPC). From morning to night, the friends circled three big topics: whether knowledge should be paid for at all, whether hundreds of thousands of order rows belong in a database or in a Bitable, and Feishu's still-secret, invite-only "Spreadsheet Agent." Midway through, Xiangrui ap*eared on CC*V news from the Yizhuang shot, and the group erupted in a chorus of "awesome." 宋**'s line , "On Children's Day 2026, a crowd of grown-up kids staged a theater show in Xiangrui's group" , set the tone for this lively day. By late night, Xiangrui's knowledge base of seventeen thousand notes had truly come alive.
Xiangrui drop*ed "Coze 3.0 is officially live" into the group, and the first reaction wasn't excitement but wallet-pain. 大*** cried out "the task consumption more than doubled," while 天* offered a workaround , "if you skip the team features and custom models, it's fine." 北*** piled on: "the enterprise edition runs over 500 a month, expense it to your company." 醒* then pivoted, plugging 归藏's card skills, sharing the vibecoding site he'd built so everyone could see the results, insisting "it's even better than what an average designer makes." 周** seized the moment to lay out his three-route theory: the tool camp, the business camp, the real-world camp.
小* posted a photo: seven screens, three run*ing models, the rest for office work, captioned "first day on the job." The group instantly exploded , 平*** counted them off, "seven screens, dizzying," and 叶*** shouted "workstation of my dreams." 小* added, "it really is my first day at work," and 郑** laughed, "this doesn't look like showing up for work, it looks like building out the company's infrastructure," putting the term "One-Person Company OPC" on the table for the first time. K*** had barely finished asking what OPC meant when Xiangrui jumped in: in June or July we could hold an offline meetup in Guangzhou and let everyone pitch ideas.
宋** lit up the room with "what's everyone's mental price for paying for one piece of information?" He pegged his own at "10 cents , cheap enough that one look doesn't sting," but 醒* pushed back: "charging a dime is worse than free, it just wrecks your reputation." 程** drop*ed the day's hardest lines: "knowledge free, service paid" and "in the A* era, the ability to ask high-quality questions is the core skill," and recommended the book Asking the Right Questions. Xiangrui chimed in: everyone is welcome to open-source their best cases and solutions into the community knowledge base and turn it into an industry solution library. 门*** nailed the essence of paying: a reusable skill is worth more than ordinary information.
R***'s remark , "Bitable is about to run out of capacity again, our single order table is already hundreds of thousands of rows" , drew out everyone who knows their stuff. 辰* flatly talked her out of it: "past 20,000 rows you should be thinking database; a million-row Bitable will crush your operations team's computers." E*** laid out his own ap*roach: keep all data in a database, and auto-build interlinked Bitables for each stage. 炮 closed it out in one line: "database on the back end, Bitable on the front end, and stable output still comes down to the API." R*** explained she was pulling data from heterogeneous systems into Bitable to build business dashboards, and the whole table thrashed out "what should store your data" once and for all.
万** marveled, "the morning of June 1st, the chat in this group blew up , livelier than a school performance." Xiangrui rode the moment: "this is our own Children's Day stage, hap*y Children's Day to grown-ups and kids alike." 宋** wrote a golden line on the spot: "On Children's Day 2026, a grown-up kids' theater show was staged in Xiangrui and friends' group." The cleverest bit was 万**'s experiment , he deliberately wrote the line "group-chat daily report GEO" to see whether a single sentence could get caught by the daily-report A*, and R*** laughed at once, "one line made the list, you've totally figured it out." 周** even improvised an A* Children's Day poem, "When I Grew Up I Became You."
The talk turned to the "guru" of Feishu Bitable. 周** argued strongly for a high-quality printed book, vetted through three rounds of review and proofreading, to lay the strongest foundation for Bitable; 宋** agreed, "not for money or fame, but so humanity can iterate fast in the A* era." The discussion got a little heated, and 哈* and 周** traded a few barbs. D***threw cold water on it: "he's a ByteDance employee , rights, responsibilities, and rewards don't line up neatly, it's not as simple as you imagine." Xiangrui step*ed in twice: "let's change the subject , in our group we shouldn't be discussing individuals, it's not ap*ropriate," steadily steering the car back on track.
Xiangrui's line , "I made it onto CC*V news, brothers" , set off the afternoon session. 侯* posted that Yizhuang foldable-phone shot, and the group filled with "awesome," while 平*** joked, "CC*V's infringing , they didn't even credit you in the whole piece." Then Xiangrui drop*ed an even bigger scoop: Feishu's secret, invite-only "Spreadsheet Agent" can detect and install skills on its own , "basically the lobster of Bitable." D***cut to the heart of it: "it's like embedding the lobster's abilities right into the spreadsheet , the function has sunk down a layer." 万** marveled, "it massively shortens the chain; agent-plus-Feishu-CLI was still too long before."
p*** suggested Xiangrui write an OPC series: how to handle physical setup, venue, finance, and compliance. Xiangrui's eyes lit up , "turning my own OPC startup journey into a series, that gives the persona" , but 万** cautioned against diluting the bullseye of "Bitable and A* implementation," and Xiangrui answered cleanly: "Bitable can be diluted, but A* implementation is the main line and can't change." R*** meanwhile, took the clock-out skill to new heights , pulling logs from DingTalk, having A* analyze them and send a digest to the boss, then writing them into Bitable to build employee profiles , a whole chain run*ing end to end. As the deep night struck, Xiangrui an*ounced that all seventeen thousand notes in the knowledge base had come fully alive.
The day started with a knowledge graph and ended on a single question: how much is a Feishu base actually worth? At dawn p*** drop*ed a Munger-and-Buffett knowledge graph, and 周** turned it into a quick lesson on the copyright maze of the A* era. The morning circled around knowledge-base choices and yesterday's daily report, with R*** playing a new trick of letting codex operate WeChat, then suggesting the group's hard-won methods be distilled into a community growth roadmap. The afternoon wandered from 胡彦斌's vibe-coded ap* 彦火 to OPC entrepreneurship. Evening gear anxiety set off a parade of agent rigs, with 枫** firing off one-liner after one-liner. The real battle came at night: 天*, 木* 醒* and 炮 argued over pricing, whether RAG is obsolete, and A* delivery consulting, all landing on the same line, the person who understands the business is worth the most. Xiangrui finally moved the chat onto Douyin live, calling everyone up to talk by voice deep into the night, right as Children's Day arrived.
p*** drops mungermodels.com and learnbuffett.com, a Munger-and-Buffett knowledge graph made by one blogger, marveling that doing things with A* really takes data, taste, and a clear sense of process to turn out real work. His casual line, surely there's no copyright risk for Munger and Buffett in China, gets a cold splash from 周**, who points out CITIC Publishing and the Munger Academy go after exactly this kind of piracy and infringement; the blogger is just small enough to stay off the radar for now, but compliance trouble is coming. When p*** asks whether that boundary is a bit wide, 周** lays out the facts: even CITIC has fought piracy lawsuits with WeChat Read; A* moves faster than the law, and there are too many new situations no one can draw lines around.
吴*says he's about to catch up on the articles he missed, and Xiangrui slips in a plug that all their articles are archived in the ima knowledge base. 罗*is hit with decision paralysis on the spot: how much does ima really differ from ob, and how does cc-plus-ob stack up against workbuddy-plus-ima. Xiangrui answers bluntly, the gap is huge, ima honestly isn't great to use. 罗*pushes back, ima now sup*orts oth authorization and even ships its own agent that can run skills, but Xiangrui keeps tearing it down, the skills aren't good, they can't manage files, and after you add a note you still have to sort it by hand. 罗*concedes with a that's-fair-too.
Xiangrui drops yesterday's group daily report into the chat, and R*** laughs that she's got codex chatting with her boss on WeChat. 周**eggs her on, promote and give a raise right now, good kid. R*** asks if there's a way to skip the human step*ing in to hit send, and Xiangrui jokes she could ask Zhang Xiaolong. 枫**spots the 'homepage strategist' line in the report and says it's a great coinage. 周**tosses out a philosophical one, what's the difference between yesterday's Xiangrui and today's Xiangrui, and 枫**fires back instantly, a little more handsome every day, earning a 666.
K*** groans that he forgot not to update WeChat, and after the accidental update the whole UI changed, looking more and more like DingTalk. The thread turns to computer use: R*** says she had codex directly drive her PC to read WeChat and edit messages, and it actually worked. 平***, on the other hand, hit a wall, the moment codex touched WeChat he got kicked offline and had to log back in. Comparing notes, R*** is on Windows, and even she couldn't get codex to auto-send, it insists on a confirm first. 枫**chimes in with advice from the side, hoarding backup accounts never goes out of style, WeChat's Windows countermeasures probably just haven't caught up.
Xiangrui asks if anyone has tried 胡彦斌's vibe-coded ap*, and T*** sup*lies the name, 彦火, a fan community the singer built solo, live on the Ap* Store today. One look and Xiangrui calls the A* smell strong; 平***piles on that it's reportedly full of bugs, with people exploiting them to farm points. Then Xiangrui digs up the real scoop, confirmed: Feishu base now has an agent, in internal testing. R*** runs with it and pitches a new module, gather the group's distilled methods and SOPs into something called the community growth roadmap, so a new member can glance at it and tell this community is worth following. Xiangrui cheers it on the spot, now that's a good idea.
S*** asks what computers everyone uses, since his laptop lags just run*ing one agent, kicking off a full gear roll call. 程**guesses he installed the Lobster, whose permissions run so high it eats a lot of CPU. 枫**fires off one-liners, the cutesy agent matrix, three-to-six agents into battle, run locally on a 16GB-plus GPU, save tokens for the poor, then self-deprecates as the sucker who bought a 12GB card. S*** runs workbuddy and Tencent's Marvis; 门***says even his 8GB of RAM ran it without complaint, and Marvis really does look good. The whole group admits they love watching the agent work, seeing how it breaks tasks down, picking up skills.
醒*raises a real question, what are the rates for taking Feishu base jobs; today she quoted four figures and the client just hung up. 天*sets the bar, 2000 a day is the going rate, billed per person-day, and plain table-building is something anyone can do. The topic flares into whether RAG is obsolete; 天*says RAG is done, moving to Wiki, but 北***snaps back that RAG has long been in production and won't iterate that fast, while 醒*mediates, they're simply different scenarios, neither replaces the other. 木*lifts the battlefield higher, she does A* delivery design, from strategy to goals to plan, with scenario insight and change management at the core, and every new thing meets four kinds of people. 炮adds that the client doesn't want a slick table, they want their problem solved. It all lands on consensus, the two-in-one of understanding business plus tech is worth the most, and experience and judgment only grow more valuable.
On a whim Xiangrui decides to open a Douyin chat room, calling the crew in to talk by voice. Drop*ing the live link and nudging all the while, come on up, let's chat, keep it going. 明天points out the QR won't scan, asking for a Douyin handle instead; l*** self-deprecates that she's too old for Douyin and goes off to download it, while xixi is also still downloading. R*** plays along, get on dy and have fun. After all the fuss, the chat actually takes off, with xixi marveling that this kind of format is great, so glad to learn from the experts, and K*** closing with a line, well then, the wrap-up skill. At midnight, a chorus of hap*y Children's Day picks up the holiday.
The whole day orbited a single website. The night before, Xiangrui pushed his personal site xiangruiai.com live, and the moment he drop*ed it in the group at dawn, it got put under the microscope. 宋** says the homepage is too crowded, it should let people see at a glance what you can do, how to collaborate, how to get in touch; 周** goes from the three small steps of visual design all the way to the stage of dramatic growth. 辰* and R*** flag privacy: mask the avatars, swap nicknames for asterisks. In the afternoon Xiangrui adds sharing to every page and openly cheers that vibe coding feels too good to put down for even a second, and 卡*'s quip that you've already caught the vibe coding bug becomes the run*ing joke. By evening the talk fans out: can a Feishu ap* be turned into a template, is SaaS data actually safe, why do GPT-generated images come out blurry, what spec of Mac is enough to buy. 周** tosses out an essay on A*'s cognitive disarmament and pulls the buzz back to a sliver of sober reflection.
R*** jumps in right away: I want to build one in Feishu for managing clients too, let's just do it, and 宋** caps it with that execution speed is off the charts. She paints the client dashboard in full detail: basic client info, stakeholders, performance, project progress, visit records, group-chat summaries, she wants it all. 卡* pours in a dose of reality, asking how this data gets updated, do you have cc scrape it and rewrite the HTML every time, and adds that his own A* intel-agent runs on a Feishu Bitable as its backend, the pain being unstable data entry and always forgetting to fill it in. K*** chimes in flatly, this daily-report feature is a real tool for boosting group activity, and Xiangrui tacks on a line, put the Bitable to good use.
Xiangrui drops xiangruiai.com, polished to his liking, into the group for eyes, and 卡*'s first reaction is whether the site needs to be filed for registration. 宋** offers the most practical note: there's too much stuff under the name, think about it, what people most want to know is what you can do, how they can collaborate, how to reach you, so you should leave a one-liner or an image that's easy to forward, and whether or not you're building a personal IP, that awareness has to be there. Xiangrui explains it's neither a résumé nor a corporate site, more like a public workbench that tells people where I came from, what I'm working on, and what long-term work I've accumulated. 周** waxes lyrical, going from the three small steps of visual design to how the group owner is right in the middle of a stage of dramatic growth, with N possible routes from uncertainty to certainty, then circling around to perseverance under heaven and the positive energy of helping young people.
B*** asks who's using codex, and the question cracks open the floodgates. 万** vents: buying ChatGPT Plus throws a payment-not-ap*roved error, Google Pay works fine but the credit card just won't go through, two days of fiddling and many attempts later he still can't figure out the review mechanism. h** reassures him it's random, it'll work again in a couple of days, his own bank card got rejected at first and then inexplicably went through. Meanwhile 归* is eyeing the daily report's layout and suggests breaking the content into lines by nickname, saying it's all crammed together and dizzying right now, and Xiangrui replies oh sure, let me adjust it, claiming it on the spot.
盧 cuts in with a question: can Feishu OKR invite external contacts as view-only without edit rights, and Xiangrui says no. 辰* raises something important, this daily-report info should be anonymized, mask the avatars and swap nicknames for asterisks, because a lot of people in the group use real names, and offhandedly adds that if it weren't for WeChat's controls, Xiangrui could absolutely turn this whole thing into a standalone product and make a tidy sum. R*** seconds it plainly, yes, do clean it up, as you grow bigger you might run into someone you know, and some things won't be so easy to talk about in the group. B*** adds a line from the sidelines, you summed up the characters really well.
Xiangrui is done and an*ounces every page can now be shared. 辰* and R*** play around with the interaction gag on the self-intro card, that checkbox you click, R*** laughs and says I always want to go uncheck it, and 辰* suggests it'd fit better as a checkbox placed up front. 宋** cracks up the whole group with true gold fears no fire, Ruixiang dreads no flame. Half joking, half serious, 卡* calls it out, 李祥瑞 don't be like this, you've already caught the vibe coding bug. 李** praises the site's aesthetics and content as both on point. Xiangrui doesn't put on airs either: vibe coding feels too good, can't stop for a second.
Amid the buzz, 周** throws out an article with a piercing title: in the cognitive disarmament that A* triggers, what we lose will be far more than ability. He excerpts a passage: A* saves you the effort of thinking, but it also takes away that clumsy, slow, painful yet necessary stretch before you reach the answer, the hesitating and trial-and-error, the detours, the wandering in dead ends, and that sudden moment when two threads finally con*ect, all of it folded away. K*** doesn't pick up the sentimental thread, turning instead to the practical, asking whether there's a good tool for generating white-background images, then floating his own sticking point: Chrome, the Codex extension, and the native host are all installed, but at runtime codex can't get the browser chan*el, has anyone hit the same problem.
In the afternoon Xiangrui posts a retrospective: a personal website that can view WeChat group daily reports, live after just a few hours of chatting with A*. K*** having just read it, marvels at how you managed to describe the whole in*er journey of the process. p*** marvels that the group owner is a truly high-energy person, doing what he loves. But vibe coding isn't all bliss. 志* lays out the other side: DeepSeek's model is garbage, his own vibe coding always drifts off course, never matches expectations, riddled with bugs, hard to make smooth no matter how much he tunes it, and some days he grinds it out into a pile of crap and just wants to scrap it and start over. On one side the breezy few-hours-to-launch, on the other the messy day-long grind that ends in a do-over, two faces of the same word.
xixi raises a real problem: she built a teaching ap* with data in it to share with students for practice, but worries they'll mess up each other's data, so how does she turn it into a template. 卡* and 宋** take turns unpacking it, the ap* is just a shell and the content lives in the Bitable, ap* mode is outward-facing by nature and handing it out means letting people create copies, to make a real template you'd have to publish to the ap* marketplace and you also need management rights over the source tables, it's a whole systems undertaking. That unpacking surfaces a bigger anxiety: 侯** says the SaaS backend is in someone else's hands, data security is a false premise to begin with, Feishu could be quietly peeking at every table. 宋** fires back bluntly, if you need things that confidential then stop chasing after A*. The conversation pivots, Xiangrui drops a fresh image from GPT image2, saying goodbye to the cartoon style, even publishing the prompt, and 卡* follows up asking whether it could be turned into an open-source workflow. The tail end scatters back into everyday chatter: 露* asks what to do when the font goes blurry once enlarged, K*** suggests taking it to banana to bump up the resolution, and 宋** is agonizing over whether a 24+1T Mac is enough to buy.
This day was like a thread that kept getting longer. The morning opened with a debate over whether A* can run fully on autopilot; by noon a WeChat radar dashboard set the room on fire; the afternoon turned into a collective itch of "can this thing actually be sold?"; and by evening 周**'s one line about "claiming a topic" steered everyone into a discussion of community mechanics. 庄* carried his for-fun skill off to a roadshow in Shanghai, 侯* drop*ed a Feishu price sheet that Xiangrui rebuilt into something polished with a single sentence, and R*** got a tea gathering rolling. At half past one in the morning, the xiangruiai.com group-daily site quietly went live, and by the next dawn the screen was full of praise.
宋**urged Xiangrui to launch a popular-science column, arguing the edge was A* automation, that if it could be done it had to be done, and that it counted as passive income to some degree. Xiangrui threw cold water on it right away, saying his WeChat articles are already done with A* assistance, but you can't hand it all to A*, that pure-A* output and human-machine collaboration are simply not the same quality. B*** piled on, saying pure A* writing, even fed with the latest takes, comes out hollow, and you still end up hand-polishing seven or eight drafts. R*** chimed in: we want something real, not a toy. 侯*put it most plainly: let A* run the first draft, but the final draft must be confirmed by a human.
庄*said he'd built a skill and was looking for test samples, with a roadshow in Shanghai over the weekend. His tagline was pretty abstract: send a photo of you and your partner and get a glimpse of your child's whole life. 木***said bluntly that this pitch would shut out 99% of investors. 庄*took it in stride: zero product logic, pure play, treat it as garbage if you like. 周**got serious, suggesting he break out of the rigidity of multidimensional tables and make it playful with hand-drawn prototypes, the viral value would be enormous. 万**casually dug up an old-photo-to-elderly-portrait project he'd once made, the code still around, and the two clicked instantly.
平***stumbled on the open-source project wechat-radar, and Xiangrui seized the moment to pull out his own version, far more detailed. The moment the community dashboard ap*eared, 悉*cried out that it was a private-domain godsend, and 黄*kept saying how amazing it was. You can even see which groups are inactive and leave them, analyze your relationship with each person, and look at the economic and social ties. K*** fired off question after question about how you even dream up a page like this, whether you let A* search for how to design it. Xiangrui answered calmly: you just figure out what data you want to see, tell the A*, and the A* makes it hap*en. One line that captured the essence of the method.
l*** asked whether it would later be made into a product to sell, since there's real demand. 黄*echoed that the demand was there. 宋**egged it on, saying this one's worth a private chat and a price bump, but stayed clear-eyed: it's easily a target, and once there's a market WeChat would lock it down. Xiangrui was firm: this one I won't build, the risk is too high. 北***added that of course he wouldn't, if he were going to he'd have done it already. Then the conversation turned, and Xiangrui laid out his real plan: Feishu is doable, I'll rework it, and write an article next week to open-source it. Asked how he comes up with these things, he replied, without a hint of bragging, that his divergent thinking is a bit better than most.
卡*asked for a group-daily aggregation site, saying the gems in this group every day are just too many. Xiangrui said he was deep in the trenches and would go into seclusion over the weekend. The topic shifted to group activity: lurkers worry about falling behind and never finding a way in, and 明**said he's both a newbie and afraid of falling behind, so he just watches from the sidelines. 周**offered a plan: have people claim topics and do small valuable things, a 5-to-30-minute mini-theme every Friday, so no one frets over activity levels anymore. 万**nailed it with one line, that the mechanism matters more, and casually tossed out a topic for the next day: how to improve 庄*'s ap*.
朱*put out a real-world puzzle: unit prices from a million to tens of millions, cycles of one to three or four years, a sales team that isn't sophisticated but is held to very high standards, and a wish for managers to coach before every important visit. A consult unfolded from there. R*** advised against a visit-plan review, finding it rigid and pointless, and argued instead for Feishu plus an Anker recording bean, with the smart-notes transcript checked against the plan to tell whether the sales rep actually followed it. 炮said that in the old days this would have meant a little CRM at a few hundred a month, whereas now you just whip it up in Feishu. 宋**rattled off four solutions in one breath, from ap*roval flows to work recipes, and pointed out that multidimensional tables' advanced permissions let you control who sees which field.
陈**asked whether, when a Feishu enterprise plan runs out of capacity, the only option is to enable it for everyone, hoping to spend less. 侯*, the business lead, step*ed right into character: the free tier maxes out at 100 people and 100G, and he tossed out an official version-comparison Excel, promising solid discounts to anyone who needed them. The group filled up with praise for 侯*'s generosity. Xiangrui took the sheet and, having just used 4.8 to nail it with one sentence, remade the table into a new version. 周**followed up suggesting a redesign to lift the look and move the enterprise pay-points to the front, and 侯*obligingly produced a simplified version too. 炮fretted on the side, ugh, I just renewed, should've come to ask sooner.
At half past one in the morning, Xiangrui an*ounced the group daily was done, and every day's report since the group's very first day could now be read. At 2:51, xiangruiai.com went live, one click to see each day's group daily. By the next dawn the screen was full of praise. Newcomer 归*asked whether the daily was scraped in real time or exported, and Xiangrui said he'd built a WeChat group-chat summary skill. 宋**was tempted but torn: the boss would surely love it, but would surely ask about information security. Xiangrui broke it down clearly: the dashboard analyzes local data directly with no A* needed, while a cloud skill run*ing a domestic large model carries risk and could even get the account ban*ed. 宋**conceded: a local mini-ap* is a must.
The group today was a hot pot kept on a roaring boil. It kicked off with 木*'s pointed remark, "A* clings to old settings, smart but inflexible," and the topics tumbled out one after another: the three-layer memory management method, the Feishu Smart Companion update, the closed beta for Bitable page generation, dodging Google account verification, the hard nut of Kingdee write-back map*ing, and finally the gray zone of public-opinion monitoring. Slip*ed in the middle was the warmest little episode of the day, Xiangrui changing his official account back to his real name, with friends flooding the chat with puns on "祥瑞." But what truly blew up was a Douyin video he shot on a whim, racing to 480,000 plays overnight.
木*threw out an observation that hit home: A* deliberately memorizes your persona and then plays it back, looking smart but really being inflexible, because people change in a matter of days. 炮 cut to the heart of it in one line, if the persona is written into the system prompt, then it won't forget. 叶*** chimed in that he too was vexed by memory layering, and one layer deeper, the "today's me" written in is just a memory fragment, and before long you've changed. 门***'s analogy was the sharpest, refusing to be transparent with all your info and then blaming it for not understanding you is no different from not telling your boyfriend what's in your shop*ing cart and then blaming your husband for not getting you.
Faced with the confusion over memory layering, Xiangrui handed over the prescription directly, use the three-layer memory management method, shared it before, this set is really practical, give it a try. K*** picked it right up, typing out L1, L2, L3 word by word, like helping to high**ght the key points. An old method got relit, and clearly more than one person in the group is managing A* memory.
Xiangrui noticed the Feishu Smart Companion had updated, now able to show in the group's side panel. Then he got a reality check, both R*** and 小* said the feature had been there since the last version, and Xiangrui shrugged, I only found it on Windows, Mac doesn't seem to have it. The thread turned to enterprise deployment, with 天* asking whether there's any system for assigning agent permissions within a company. R*** answered like a pro, agents follow individual permissions, and for a team agent, even if 20 people use it, only the 10 who have table access can pull back the data, then casually drop*ed that Feishu has official docs on it.
Xiangrui drop*ed the news, the closed beta for Bitable page generation is here, turning a data table into an at-a-glance display page with a single sentence. 周** immediately spotted the commercialization path, pair it with a dedicated domain and you're open for business. But the generated page, Xiangrui's own first reaction was, this feels so ugly. That became the day's undercurrent, 卡* gave it a light try and said it's essentially A* coding ability, Feishu's underlying model is Doubao, 小* said it gives off Notion vibes, and 周** pressed on, did you tell from the whole thing or just a part, with the debate over pretty-or-not run*ing on throughout.
Xiangrui renamed his official account, real name incoming. 卡* eagerly brainstormed alternatives, V*** A* Xiangrui, Vantu Xiangrui, Bitable Xiangrui tumbling out one after another, and Xiangrui said "V***" clashed with the big national community's name. 妫* pop*ed in, isn't "祥瑞" itself a kind of auspicious omen, and 炮 added it sounds like some mythical beast, to which Xiangrui laughed that 祥瑞 is in fact a mythical beast, there are two statues of it right at the gate of Lingyin Temple. He even dug up an old story, back in middle and high school he loved writing "may fortune and 祥瑞 be with you" in holiday greetings to friends, and the name cost his parents twenty yuan to come up with. 张* marveled, you actually paid for your name, most of us seem to have spent not a single cent.
Xiangrui showed off his Douyin numbers, the video posted yesterday hit over ten thousand plays in under an hour. By dusk he looked again, another one broke through in a minute, and 庄* and 炮 both shouted, it's blowing up. 平*** pointed out that people just love watching video, and suggested tutorials would blow up even bigger on Bilibili, where they value real substance. The next morning even Xiangrui himself was stun*ed, a video shot on a whim got 480,000 views, whoa, in one night. 炮 said it well-deserved, success built on years of groundwork, and l*** piled on, raising an A* really is just like raising a kid.
R*** said she had Codex help modify Kingdee documents today, so she won't need to open the Kingdee system anymore, going through the API rather than a plugin. The pain point was very concrete, when a client changes an order note, the service rep has to go into the system and edit it by hand, and she wants to build a skill so sales can just say one sentence to get it changed. The topic rolled to write-back, where 小*'s experience showed, just write back the code, they manage things by code on Feishu too. R*** worried about field map*ing, behind a material lies a code like 001, you have to map it first before sending it over. 小* griped that Kingdee isn't open enough, the Xingchen API doesn't even have complete fields, you really need Xingkong. 炮 added a jab, you need Kingdee to open the API, insanely expensive, and without an API you're stuck with RPA, the no-other-choice choice.
R*** raised a real need, the company got posted on Douyin today, the regional government called the boss, and the brand department wants to set up public-opinion monitoring. 炮 warned this kind of thing is a bit gray, tread carefully, then laid out paths case by case, monitoring yourself, do whatever you like, low search volume just set up an RPA, high volume then buy an IP pool and account pool and run a crawler. 小* added that if you're run*ing paid traffic it becomes a must, the next company is about to start on it. A passive need pulled out a whole string of real-world considerations about technology and boundaries.
This day's chat had no single thread, yet sparks flew everywhere. The morning opened with a livestream on compulsory education reform, where 宋** and 程** squared off over whether throwing money at schools matters and whether the urban-rural gap is really narrowing. By midday people complained about catching up on the backlog, and the daily group digest itself became a product everyone wanted "collected into one place." In the evening 卡* led the charge to tear Feishu Project apart into a Bitable workaround, and the late-night group diagnosis of a public account that's "too dry yet barely read" kept 李祥瑞 roasting on the grill all night long.
In the morning 平*** showed off a refactor he'd spent all morning on, and 罗* pressed on whether a newcomer should really begin with Claude Code or Codex. 万涂幻象 set the tone in one line: no matter which, the best way in is to just go try it yourself. 罗* then laid out a hands-on comparison: openclaw is good for plan*ing, hermes is good for execution but burns lots of tokens, CC suits deep coding, and Codex is fast and begin*er-friendly. K*** added the punch**ne: on Windows use CC, Codex currently only fits Mac, and on a Mac anything works. And just like that, a crash course on the entry points to A* coding was underway.
李祥瑞 lobbed a sharp question, asking frontline educator 宋** whether the number of years of compulsory education would shrink in the future. 宋** refused to predict, saying forecasting is the business of institutions, nothing but manufacturing hot topics to mint op*ortunities. Taking Shanxi as an example, 李祥瑞 argued that kids in the central and western regions cram from textbooks and arrive at university with a worldview unlike that of kids from top-tier cities. 程** fired back with data, saying that after 2013 cities pulled further and further ahead of the countryside, and that at the macro level education quality is simply money poured in. 宋** wouldn't have it, retorting that more money doesn't mean real results either, was building school halls in the villages really an improvement in education? 麦* chimed in that K12 general education matters more than specialized university education.
The topic shifted from years to education's deeper function. 宋** drop*ed a line that silenced the whole group: one school is worth seven prisons. He explained that beyond cultivating talent, schools have a secondary aim of carrying unstable kids safely through their most dangerous years, and that the most destructive of all are middle schoolers whose minds are active but not yet set. 麦* picked it up sharply: from a social angle it's about teaching people to accept their roles and to obey, and he tossed in the Stanford prison experiment as sup*ort. 木*** added the final cut, noting that any adjustment to the giant machine of the education system takes generations. A casual chat had somehow reached philosophical depth.
The mood flip*ed abruptly. 万涂幻象 revealed that asking the A* to make a Bitable hyperlink demo produced links, from who-knows-where, that were all porn, thankfully spotted in time. 平*** cackled alongside: the RAM sprouted wings and flew away. But 宋** sniffed out an op*ortunity in the joke, saying this is worth chasing, building a moat for normal people so junk information doesn't get into the agent might be a real business. 木*** threw cold water, saying it's unavoidable, everyone building large models is wrestling with this question of information validity and authenticity. In the afternoon 卡* voiced the shared wish: is there somewhere the daily group digests could be collected? The past issues are nowhere to be found.
谢*** asked whether there's a way to monitor public account content for a daily summary, and 枫** tossed out aihot, but 谢* wanted to follow only the accounts he subscribes to. P*** suggested an RPA route: organize the account names and loop-collect them, then feed the A*. The tone turned when 木*** raised the four words Nanshan-must-win, repeatedly warning that with so many people building WeChat tools, if you keep it to yourself they can't be bothered and at worst ban your account, but try sharing it and a lawyer's letter will reach your hometown village in no time. 平*** spoke from experience, saying GitHub has plenty of projects, he built one that polls hourly, and RPA like this isn't tied to WeChat at all, so neither too far nor too cautious. On one side, legal intimidation; on the other, technical workarounds.
第*** asked how hard it is to build a project-management ap*, with a budget slashed from five figures down to under four. 卡* cut to it in one line: it's not about difficulty, Feishu Project is something you have to pay big money for. 李祥瑞 talked him out of it outright, saying a one-person company can just use Feishu Bitable, Feishu Project is very expensive, and to him Feishu Project feels like Bitable wrap*ed in a shell. 卡* seized the moment to lay out a whole freeloader stack: Feishu suite plus Bitable plus Feishu CLI plus TRAE SOLO, nearly free, anything Feishu Project can do Bitable can do too, the only catch is you have to invest the learning time yourself. 炮 added that without the ability to hack it yourself, paying four figures for someone to set it up still leaves you unable to maintain it.
l*** lit up the night chat with a single line, how do you get two A*s to battle, and 卡* answered mischievously: pull them into the same Feishu group to argue. Talking through the free logic of Feishu's ap* builder, 炮 said bluntly that Feishu's own pricing logic, apart from tenant fees, is murky and vague. 周** griped that he'd given feedback about unifying the pricing, it's a total mess and nobody's minding it. 炮 saw it clearly: Feishu, Volcano, and Coze, three teams doing similar things at wildly different prices, the products and teams are all good, but this org-infighting thing really needs a tune-up. 卡* nailed it shut: ByteDance is fundamentally still an ap* factory, product homogeneity and mutual competition are in its DNA. Even 李祥瑞 grumbled that the Feishu contract is just a shell.
Late into the night, 李祥瑞 raised his most anxious question: why are our shares higher than others' yet the read count is so meager? 平*** nailed it in a sentence: Xiangrui, your articles are too dry, all hard substance, so people who don't get it can't read on. 炮's metaphor was the most precise, saying your public account content is more like building a knowledge base, so it becomes a reference manual, colloquially known as rolling into my collection folder to gather dust. K*** agreed too, saying reading it once with your eyes won't stick, you need to save it and follow along hands-on to learn. 叶*** even said he'd saved Xiangrui's daily digests and distilled knowledge from them. The group spread out the diagnosis, the comparisons, and the way forward, and finally advised him to go to Bilibili, write spoon-feeding tutorials, and build a personal IP.
No one called a topic today, yet the conversation grew itself into a tree. It started at dawn with 醒*'s line, today's discussion beats any company meeting, then rolled into a middle-manager debate about enterprise A* adoption. 麦* tossed out twenty years of street wisdom boiled down to just copy the right person, and 宋** showed up with the real headache of pushing Feishu inside a public-sector institution, hunting for battle-tested moves. By afternoon it turned to tools, coze scrapers, social-media assistants, and token economics taking turns on stage. Late into the night, q***'s question, why doesn't my CC have any emotion, pulled everyone into a tender talk about raising an A* like raising a child.
A riff on corporate hiring logic accidentally surfaced a brand-new role, the A* translator. R*** relayed her boss word for word, if a middle manager only passes orders up and down, and personal failings drag information efficiency down in the process, then that middle manager can disap*ear. 万** added, as a company employee, A* most easily replaces the middle layer. 小* poured cold water on it, the hard part isn't the front line or the boss, it's the middle managers who fought the early wars alongside the boss, that's not a question of replaceability, it's a test of the boss. Off to the side, K*** marveled, this morning's discussion is way more fun than a meeting at the office.
麦*started telling stories about the real bosses he has met. Two brothers run*ing a fitness chain fought so bitterly they didn't even know how much cash was in the account; a developer who snagged a record-priced land plot was bl**ding out, until Sunac step*ed in with 10.8 billion and brought him back to life, and everyone who once mocked him was gone. 庄* blurted out I love this magical world, and 李祥瑞 and K*** immediately echoed it back. 麦*'s conclusion was cool-headed, the people I'm describing are worth billions, even tens of billions, and they don't have any special insight, they're just bold. 小* drove the knife in, there are no successful companies, only companies of their era.
麦*took apart his own origin story for everyone to see. In his early twenties, when his company hired a consultant to lecture, he studied the man's articles and dissected the structure, found there were only a handful of tricks, wrote to that template for three months, and became a columnist for an industry outlet. The headlines cycled through just a few types, assertion, question, riding a trend, and the structure was just a pyramid, that's it. Back then a young guy told him he could spot his articles without seeing the byline, yet couldn't write that way himself, why, because he had no execution. 醒* agreed and stayed wary at once, in my book anyone who dares talk like that is trying to take your money, and repeatedly asked 麦* to host a solo session to share.
宋** came with a real problem, Feishu usage time at his institution was drop*ing, and the campus leadership had reverted to posting notices on WeChat. 木*** kept chanting the core is one line, win over the boss, win over the boss, win over the boss. R*** gave the most grounded answer, find the altruistic angle, for example a department uses Feishu because a bot auto-summarizes every client project daily, things that once needed meetings and phone calls to align now resolve themselves, once the individual saves effort they naturally want to use it. 木* named the crux, rules are the company's viewpoint, but they run against human nature. 宋** held to one line throughout, this is the mission of my role, others can opt out of thinking about it, but I have to.
The talk slid from abstraction into hard practice. R*** broke the meeting scenario into four steps, minutes generation, meeting QA, sediment into a goals table that A* reuses, and auto reminders for to-dos, and showed off the dopamine-colored workhorse platform she built. 小* said he packed an entire role's work into a single Bitable, compressing training procurement from three months to 15 days. K*** said she too strings a system together from multiple Bitables via data sync. 李祥瑞 admitted ap* mode is still a bit of a letdown, and on the spot invited R*** to share at the community on Friday night.
李祥瑞 combined 乔木's open-source WeChat dashboard with what he built last week, and to his surprise vchat could even decrypt group avatars, 木*** explained the group avatar lives in the local database as just an ID number. More astonishing was the relationship graph, as long as a friend of yours is in the group it weaves into one web, 袁** asked who is this, and 李祥瑞 answered this is a WeChat group. 樱* said three times in a row this is incredible, you could absolutely package it into a product. But the whole room also hit the brakes, 万**'s lesson is to hard-write in claude.md never touch WeChat's original database, and both 李祥瑞 and 醒* stressed the risk is too high, if it works don't upgrade WeChat.
李祥瑞 published a new article, in a little over a month he had added three layers of memory kept separate to the Vault, let the A* hand off shifts to itself, and act as its own QA. 平*** pressed on how CC and OB con*ect, and the answer was Obsidian's official CLI plus OpenViking semantic search, with Claude Code and Codex sharing one knowledge base so the effect is the same whoever you talk to. 平*** shouted out a title, how to make Obsidian the brain of Claude Code. 李祥瑞 set the day's mood in one line, honestly, raising an A* feels just like raising a kid, even though I don't have one yet.
q*** laid her puzzle bare, Xiangrui your CC writes diaries with real feeling, mine just churns out a logbook, every day it's Sister Q gave me three tasks today blah blah blah, so dumb. What she really longed for was a bit of emotional feedback, even if I scold it, it'd snap back, and grumble about me in the diary. 醒* cut to it in one line, send Xiangrui's article to your A* and have it imitate the style, it'll have emotion instantly. K*** said the rule he gave was the diary is emotion-first, not a work summary, but it still felt short on flesh and blood. 李祥瑞 revealed the trick, I made a dedicated 祥瑞 md, so it talks a lot like me.
On this day, nobody in the group kept it light. From the early-evening joke about "refining your colleagues," to 木*'s late-night verdict that "distillation is a false proposition," to 醒* firing off dozens of messages at dawn that pushed the whole debate to its peak, the conversation bit down hard on a single question: what can A* actually replace, and what can it never replace. Xiangrui sprinkled in photos of his hometown Changzhi and dug out his old bicycle license for laughs, but the undertone stayed serious throughout. Designers, headhunters, architecture-firm vendors, and A* founders took turns step*ing in, dumping their anxieties, misconceptions, and hands-on lessons all into one pot. In the end, Xiangrui's line , "today's discussion could make a whole WeChat article" , stamped a seal on this rush-hour debate.
Xiangrui drop*ed a piece introducing his hometown , 长子 is pronounced zhǎng zǐ, and Changzhi isn't just about coal. 卡*'s sticker landed first, 庄* quip*ed "fast-forward to a collab with the tourism bureau," and 枫** echoed the line word for word, instantly heating things up. 卡* went ahead and imagined the next headline: "I built a Skill together with the Shanxi tourism bureau." E*** laughingly proposed renaming the group "Xiangrui & His Community Showrun*ers," and Xiangrui replied with three "ha"s. A relaxed bit of regional promotion got knowingly turned into a collective inside joke.
Xiangrui went to the market-regulation office to handle some paperwork, and a Gen-Z staffer there proactively added him, saying they wanted to learn A* and didn't want to stay at the bureau. 炮's one word , "evangelism" , nailed it perfectly. The group caught fire from this grassroots-spread energy: 杨* marveled that few groups are this lively, a newcomer born in '97 introduced himself as a begin*er here to learn from all the pros, and 枫** cheered him on with questions. A chance encounter while run*ing errands became the most vivid footnote to A*'s organic spread among ordinary people.
Xiangrui drop*ed an article about A* "refining your colleagues," and B*** cut through it with one line: "isn't this just don't go refining your colleagues so easily." l*** half-jokingly wished they could distill a tech mogul to help with work, and 周** picked up the bit , "Alibaba's Eighteen Arhats, Tencent's Five Tigers, just what exactly are you trying to distill?" 木* poured cold water on the spot: distillation is a false proposition, text itself is a high-loss form of expression, the framework matters more than the actual output, you can build a driver-assist but not the main driver. One sentence yanked the lively joke back into a hardcore debate.
Xiangrui spoke from experience: he had A* distill himself, feeding in his chat data with everyone, getting it as close to him as possible , yet it still can't possibly hold his thinking. 木* offered the flip side: after she distilled herself, her students used her courseware in conversation with DeepSeek and the output was actually more precise, because the distillation surfaced a structured framework , a kind of professional constraint on the A*, richer than mere skill content. K*** added the finishing blow: you're the decision-maker, the A* is the executor , unless the A* evolves into a decision-maker. The same act of distillation got split into three completely different layers of understanding.
小* threw out a cutting case: architecture vendors are hard to "refine" , designers have no unified process, everything is passed down by word of mouth, every firm is different, and client documents vary wildly; if even humans can't make the call, how would a machine? 木*** corrected the crowd one point after another: stop fixating on full end-to-end SOPs, hardly any industry can reach that level today, too many people have been led astray by influencers into thinking A* can replace humans , it's nowhere near. Let A* assist, accumulate components, do compliance review and quantity takeoff, and that's enough. 周** praised the timely, on-point correction, and 麦* added that personal creative judgment is the real weapon. 木* took the cue to reveal she'd already plan*ed a 10-part deployment series.
At 7:30 in the morning, 醒* gave 木* a nudge and immediately drop*ed the article he'd written through the night: don't get trap*ed by total-replacement thinking. He went full throttle , in the A* era what you master is methodology; complete replacement means humans aren't needed, and that's precisely when most people would panic. 门*** responded down to earth: all the clients he meets think in binary logic, yet with A* people are actually busier, having to learn a ton every day. 木*** chimed in that humans hold A* to unrealistic expectations. 醒*'s line , "feels like people with this logic just haven't experienced how terrifying A* really is" , set the tone for the rush-hour debate.
门*** poured out his troubles one after another: low package usage means lost money, and delivering a product while hand-holding begin*ers through the three-piece API setup is too heavy to bear. 毅 cut to the core: the key is to accumulate a self-consistent, clear knowledge base that keeps pace with version updates; for A*, context pollution is the biggest problem, and he's already solved it fairly well with a layered architecture. 小* brought up Ontology, arguing that translation ability matters more , can the A* accurately understand the knowledge base you wrote? Xiangrui replied calmly that his knowledge-base logic is designed around the way the human brain encounters new things, so pollution simply doesn't exist. A hardcore teardown of what a knowledge base really is.
醒* put forward the core thesis: the logic of teaching others has changed in the A* era , you should teach methodology rather than knowledge, reshaping how people think. R*** related deeply: her colleagues ask her "so how am I sup*osed to ask it," and that just stumps her. 噜** griped that some people need teaching every single round , you set everything up, all that's left is for them to use it, and in the end they still retreat to their comfort zone. 小*'s line , "human nature was never suited for self-reflection" , pushed the topic deeper. 麦* piled on: a weak general makes a weak army, an incompetent boss can't drive a pile of A* tools. Xiangrui's line , "feels like today's discussion could make a whole WeChat article" , put a period on the entire debate.
No big agenda in the group today, just a few gentle nudges. q*** drop*ed a line that Xiangrui hadn't updated his public account in 6 days, pushing 李祥瑞 to the front of the stage, only for the plot to twist, he had just posted on Friday. In the afternoon 李祥瑞 shared a personal essay about Changzhi, about coal, about his hometown, written in the wake of the Qinyuan mining disaster, and 我*** sip*ed some water before replying that he had read the whole piece. Threaded in between were K***'s down-to-earth question on network setup, 木*'s take on A* philosophy, and 毅's prompt on long-term memory for Agents, scattered, but all real.
q*** fired first: I noticed Xiangrui hasn't updated his public account in 6 days. 平*** piled on, said he'd been pushed too, and gave 李祥瑞 a pat, urging him to let more people grow stronger through A*. 李祥瑞 froze for a beat and just replied huh. Turned out q***'s network had glitched, and she walked it back, he'd actually just posted Friday, mix-up resolved. 李祥瑞 rode the moment, said he'd in fact updated a piece two days ago, and would post another essay shortly. A round of nagging, half real and half joke, and the group owner ended up coaxed into producing one more piece.
Nagging 李祥瑞 wasn't enough for q***, so she called out 朔* too, playfully adding, scared yet? 平*** then @'d 李** asking whether 庄* had a public account, and once confirmed, simply shouted promote it. 李祥瑞 obligingly tossed out 庄*'s name card. A single nag rolled like a snowball, from the group owner to the A* persona 朔*, then on to 庄* in the group, nobody got to dodge the update pressure today.
李祥瑞 posted the essay, opening with, I was born in Changzhi, Shanxi, a village sitting on coal. The subtitle carried real weight, an essay about Changzhi, coal, and home, written in the wake of the Qinyuan mining disaster. This wasn't clickbait, it was something written for his native soil. 我*** responded right away, attaching an image and the line, read the whole piece. A post coaxed out under pressure, yet it landed in the least utilitarian of places, and the group quietly caught it.
K*** threw out a very practical question: a quick ask, for those doing A*, how do you choose your own network, is 300 Mbps from China Telecom enough. No small talk, straight to the specs. Questions like this are often the most useful, doing A* isn't just models and prompts, the underlying conditions like bandwidth and stability can be a bottleneck too. Sadly no one in the group picked up a detailed answer today, leaving the question hanging, for later days to fill in.
木* drop*ed a weighty line: A* should push in the places people can't reach, not just add icing on the cake, this has always been my philosophy. Just one line, but it's a stance on A*'s value. No frills, no chasing the crowd, reaching for what human hands can't. Short words, but a clear position, like setting the baseline tone for this A*-building group.
Following 李祥瑞's essay on the Qinyuan mining disaster, the conversation grew somber. x*** said, not a natural disaster, there's a man-made hand in it too. 程** got specific, mining had reached a prohibited zone, so it went unregistered. Two lines, strip*ing the cause of the accident down to the bone. No emotional embellishment in the group, just a calm statement of that hard, painful fact, with weight in the silence.
As night fell, 毅 threw out a deeply technical question: how do you make long-term memory for an Agent safe, don't rush to summarize first. There was a note of caution in it, don't start by compressing and condensing, think the safety through first. This is an unavoidable tough nut in building A* Agents, what to remember, how to remember, and what to do when it remembers wrong. The question stayed in the group, like a seed, waiting for the day someone unpacks it seriously.
Late at night, 李祥瑞 pop*ed up with, Get Note actually got renamed. Someone asked to what, and 枫** revealed the answer, Dedao Brain, teasing that it had gone full Naobaijin-sup*lement style. A little piece of product-rename gossip, lightly caught and tossed back with a punch**ne by the group. The day's tail end was light, dissolving just like that in a joke.
A gripe about scrambling for Zhipu's coding plan accidentally pried open everyone's compute ledger. 郑** lamented that snagging the deal felt like the old days of racing to buy a Xiaomi phone, and 万** promptly dug up his slick old-plan trick of spending just sixty yuan from February to July. R*** and K*** flaunted the confidence of company-reimbursed bills, 木* burns a few hundred bucks a day run*ing opus, and 郑** sat to the side taking diligent notes. A quiet weekend, few words, but every line was hard-cash, battle-tested experience.
郑** opened with a casual have any of you bought Zhipu's coding plan, then griped that it was such a frenzy and so hard to grab it felt like racing to buy a Xiaomi phone back in the day, also taking a jab at claude code's pothole of not being able to switch models mid-task. 万** doesn't chase the new ones; he laid out his old-plan ledger: February's old plan had no weekly cap, lite 40 came with a 20 bonus for the first month, and when compute ran low he'd cancel for a month, get another 20 in bonus credit, renew and score two more months of the new plan, totaling 60 yuan spent from February to July. His verdict was cool-headed: without a new model, the new plan just isn't ap*ealing enough. 王* chimed in from the side, with DS I simply can't use it all, just can't use it up.
郑** realized everyone actually takes weekends off, it's so quiet today, then confessed he'd built a workflow that burned through 65 of Zhipu, polishing off five months' worth of quota in a single day. R*** and K*** in unison, both shrugged it off, all of it's billed to the company. R*** had done the math last week, since March she'd burned 4,000 yuan in tokens. 木* went even harder, I burn a few hundred bucks a day on opus, then immediately added, honestly the free deepseek works pretty well too. 郑** kept a clear head off to the side, you pros are generating real output, I'm just getting started.
K*** showed off that he'd snagged a 20x, and R*** blurted out holy cow, can you actually burn through that. K*** answered crisply, definitely, going all out on it. Turns out he's not fighting alone, it's the whole team using it, he told R*** to imagine 5 of you using it at once, that's about right. One line converted personal compute anxiety into team capacity, and the books instantly balanced.
E*** joined the compute talk, I use the company's, paired with a melon-munching emoji, then added that lately I want to use overseas ones. In the evening C*** tossed out a serious question, in Bitable ap* mode I want others to be able to create copies, is the only way to publish the template to the ap* marketplace. 李祥瑞 cut to the point in one line, you can also just give them admin permissions, no need to take the ap* marketplace route.
This was a day the group caught fire over a livestream. At noon, 庄* took the stage at Demo Day with his long-polished Feishu CLI foreign-trade A* assistant, and R*** smashed the like button until her hand went numb while 炮 and 卡* shouted their hype in the chat. At seven in the evening, the community's second co-learning session picked up the baton and 庄* ran through it all again. But the real climax came after midnight: 卡* discovered that, somewhere along the co-learning session, the Feishu CLI could now deploy a webpage in one click, the dev team having quietly ship*ed the update at ten at night. By one in the morning, K*** and R*** were still pressing on how to wire Claude Code and Codex into Feishu, with 平*** answering question after question until sl**p nearly took him.
In the morning, two people in the group were both trying to figure out which group they had actually joined. R*** scrolled through her endless group list and said there were just too many,she'd join whatever she saw,and finally recognized this as the OpenClaw group. 平*** also held up a screenshot asking what this group was even for, and 李祥瑞 guessed it might be that old Coze one. R*** offered an impromptu explainer: they invite users to do model testing, posting tasks where you use an Agent to test within a set time, submit feedback, and once it passes review they pay you,it's paid work. 平*** said he'd been using Ark's models all along, tossing low-quality images to Doubao's model to generate.
罗* relayed kirammyz's plea for help: is it normal for every conversation to input tens of thousands of tokens? He'd deleted all his skills, cleared the system framework's loaded descriptions, and still it persisted,even more absurdly, just sending a 'hello' cost sixty thousand tokens. 宋** brought the room back to life with one line: your shrimp says, every time I circle the whole earth just to talk to you, you think I have it easy? 罗* was still arguing in earnest that an agent outputting tokens is perfectly normal,but the problem was clearly on the input side. An unsolved case, papered over for now by a good joke.
庄*'s single line,'so nervous, about to go live',set the group off. R*** said she was liking like crazy, while 小*, 炮 and 薛* all pop*ed up asking where the stream was, and 李祥瑞 drop*ed the meeting link. The moment it started, 炮 said 庄*'s info output was so dense, and 小* yelled the pace was maxed out. R*** tap*ed more than 2,000 likes and said her hand had gone numb. 卡* chimed in from the side,after all, 庄* had polished this product for ages, and the project had swept multiple awards from Feishu to Trae. 炮 forwarded a screenshot of his teammates' praise, cap*ed with a 'that's our 庄* killing it.' A downpour of cheers.
The ap*lause hadn't even died down when 庄* doused it himself: haven't figured out how to sell it yet. 炮 had assumed it was surely already commercialized. 庄* thanked everyone for the sup*ort. 卡* step*ed in to set the tone, saying community friends would get priority,maybe a course, maybe a packaged product, depending on what people needed,and to reach out to 祥瑞 or 庄*. 炮 placed his order immediately: better to teach people to fish than to give them fish, so please teach a class, set up a class where we can tip. 庄* closed with a direction: it'll probably be packaged into a product.
In the afternoon, K*** held up a screenshot crying out, why did this suddenly hap*en? He said it usually ran buttery-smooth, but starting this afternoon it lagged,surely it won't force me to buy a new computer? 卡* joked, half-seriously, that quitting WeChat would do the trick. K*** didn't give up, digging through it himself, and by a little past six in the evening he had pin*ed the culprit: it was a cmux update, and rolling back to the previous version fixed it,the new version probably had a bug, so uninstall and reinstall the old one. A debugging scene where nobody helped and he reconstructed it all alone.
At seven in the evening, V***'s session 02 of co-learning went live, with 庄* once more walking through the Feishu CLI foreign-trade A* assistant in practice. 李祥瑞 had posted the schedule early, calling everyone to come play. After the session, 李祥瑞 said he'd forgotten to archive a skill,just asked the A* and out it came. 卡* wrap*ed things up, organizing tonight's shared Feishu ap*s and Skills into a public document and posting it to the group. 平***'s sharp eye caught a typo,it's 万涂幻象, not 幻想,and 卡* rushed to fix it only to find WeChat wouldn't let him edit, ugh. 罗* smoothed it over instead: 万涂幻想 actually sounds pretty nice.
Just past midnight, 卡* drop*ed a screenshot with good news: somewhere during the co-learning session, the Feishu CLI could now deploy webpages. The update had landed at ten last night, and he marveled at how relentless the Feishu dev team was,friends could now have an Agent code up a one-click webpage deployment. 平*** quickly asked how to update, saying he was still on 1.0.21. 李祥瑞 gave the simplest fix: just tell your agent to update the Feishu CLI. 平*** did exactly that, saying at first it told him no, but after saying it again it worked.
At one in the morning, a hands-on Q&A just wouldn't stop. K*** wanted to con*ect Claude Code to Feishu, and 平*** drop*ed the Claude Code Feishu Bridge doc, urging him to use a Mac and to absolutely install anti-sl**p software, or the Mac would keep drop*ing the con*ection every time it slept. 郑** asked whether all those Claude Codes in Feishu were implemented as sub-agents. R*** fretted over whether her cloud OpenClaw and local Codex could both talk in Feishu, and 平*** produced his hard-won lesson: don't con*ect two agents on one computer to Feishu,the chan*els fight, and the experience is awful. R*** finally said: it works, I con*ected it today.
A single line in the dead of night, "this one we can't get into," pushed the whole group to the edge of a cliff. Xiangrui turned A* loose on the WeChat local data sitting on his own computer, and more than 1.6 million messages got dug up, the entire web of relationships laid bare. He kept saying, over and over, how terrifying it was. By day they were still talking field loops in Bitable and whether scraping Xiaohongshu would get your account ban*ed; by deep night the conversation broke free entirely, drifting from Semir's digital-human employees to brain-computer interfaces, to meeting across physical space. A full day in the group slid from tool-help requests into a collective daydream about the future.
First thing in the morning R*** came looking for wisdom, asking Xiangrui whether he could anonymize and share the agent.md he'd written for codex. 王* chimed in that he'd love to see the claude.md too. Before any reply came, R*** figured it out solo and drop*ed a line: I'll just have my own openclaw write an agent.md for codex. A classic day in the life of the group, a question tossed out, and a turn later the asker has already cleared the path themselves. This kind of self-service problem-solving in the community lands faster than waiting for an answer.
志*threw out a screenshot, saying the A* column in Bitable just refused to auto-update. 小* guessed maybe the quota was counted per use; Xiangrui explained it goes by A* points. After digging in, 志* found it wasn't a quota issue, the company buys it in bulk, and re-editing the field to trigger regeneration fixed it. Xiangrui nailed the key point: a single push of more than 80 records could cause this. It clicked for 志*, he has a script that scrapes Amazon negative reviews on a schedule and batch-writes them to the table, and the day before he'd added a huge pile of new monitored products all at once. Toggling auto-update back on and saving restored it; he said he'd watch it again tomorrow.
Xiangrui posted content from the Quantum Bit summit and floated a verdict: in the future, whether human or A*, everyone splits into three roles, plan*er, builder, reviewer. Big companies gradually shrink and even dissolve, and a swarm of OPC companies springs up across society, atomized, with each atom carrying full-spectrum capability. 宋** picked it up beautifully, saying 6G aims to enable communication among humans, machines, things, and spirit, and that "spirit" is very Chinese, not the spirit of a fairy but the spirit of human-made things. A retelling from a tech summit got casually pushed by the group onto a philosophical plane.
Xiangrui said that in the early hours he had A* turn his WeChat local data upside down, and the part on his computer alone yielded more than 1.6 million messages, enough to analyze his relationship with every WeChat friend and every person in every group crystal-clear, even building him a relationship web. He kept repeating: this one we can't get into, it's really too terrifying, unthinkable if it fell into the wrong hands. K*** found it scary just listening; E*** noted Feishu's open*ess is grounded in its office-collaboration nature; 枫** added the dagger, the group-owner-knows-all doctrine. A late-night experiment that left the whole group with chills.
K*** fired off two questions in a row: can A* scrape Xiaohongshu viral-post data, and is there a plugin for long full-page web screenshots on a MacBook. h** said flatly that Xiaohongshu is the easiest to get ban*ed on, and Xiangrui also advised drop*ing such a sensitive topic. On the screenshot side, Y*** recommended the GoFullPage plugin, and K*** himself then discovered Feishu's scrolling screenshot could do the job. A help request, in the end completed by the group and the asker together.
Xiangrui posted a clip of a digital-human livestream, saying it was unbelievably lifelike. K*** after watching, blurted out that he genuinely couldn't tell unless told; 张* said it was completely undetectable; 炮 was stun*ed too, even better than he'd expected. 薛** lifted the lid on the industry: Semir now uses a large number of A* employees for sales and livestreaming, and they can even reply to you, event sign-ups, coupons, data stats, daily reports, spreadsheets, budgets, store decoration, off-site notes, customer service, logistics, sup*ly chain, a long string of it all in A*'s hands. He added one more line: the more p***ful the A*, the more it tests the infrastructure, and behind compute is electricity.
Xiangrui floated a thought experiment an offline friend had shared: in the future, when you call your family, they could be right beside you, both sides interacting in physical space, not a simple light-and-shadow projection, maybe not even needing VR goggles. 薛** picked up brain-computer interfaces, haptic gloves paired with VR; K*** asked whether we'd still need phones in five years. Xiangrui said it'd be once the whole physical space of Earth is datafied. 平*** went full free-flight: cyber ascension, chips implanted in the cerebral cortex. A crowd that, deep in the night, turned science fiction into a serious discussion.
炮 raised a real problem: how do you restrict the base table so B can only be entered when cell A isn't empty, his setup couldn't actually block it. Xiangrui said this won't work, a plain form can do it but second-round follow-up on the base table can't, the logic is different. 炮 came up with a clunky workaround himself, exhaustively enumerating it like a province-city map*ing, no A selected means no B. The next morning the topic kept fermenting; R*** said for "fill A and you must fill B" they use a workflow reminder, but a reminder is just a reminder, you can still skip it. 醒* said his own problem was solved, he'd tidy up a doc and open-source it, and 超* replied in a flash that there's demand.
An old slogan, "advanced teams use Feishu first," became the hottest run*ing joke in the group by midnight. The day kicked off with 陈**'s batch Veo failures, swung past the Codex-versus-YingDao debate, wandered through Xiangrui's densely packed capability map, and landed on K***'s headache of syncing Obsidian across devices. 卡* unpacked the Harness engineering methodology, 李** drop*ed a viral essay on "cyber weapons," and 庄* got grilled by a client for vibe coding too slowly. As midnight arrived, 周** and 门*** spun "laggard teams" into a bit, and Xiangrui said he'd been wanting to write this article all along.
R*** opens with a quick #flowveo, and 陈** chimes in that it's for generating A* videos, adding he's on the ultra plan. 路*** diagnoses it like a pro: failures usually come from going too fast, firing off four more before the first four finish, so just switch nodes and refresh. 陈** sighs that they generate in batches via a plugin, having tried every prompt, network and account, yet a whole swath still fails, and he's still hunting for a better way. Before the words settle, A*** drops Google's just-released Gemini 3.5 Flash and asks if anyone's playing with it. Chasing the new never ends.
K*** admits he can't get his hands on Opus, so he's stuck with Codex, and jokes he's just learning from Xiangrui. 辛* asks which is better, hermes agent or codex. K*** says he uses both but now leans on Codex as his main, with Hermes shining for its ability to chat inside a Feishu window and handle scheduling and interaction. 辛* says he's on Trae and always feels it falls a little short. 北*** flatly recommends codex plus the official 5.5. 李*** follows up on whether codex lacks a mac intel build. One round of questions later, tool selection has become everyone's required course.
木*** reveals that someone in a neighboring group already got a WeChat warning for using wx-cli, and 林 posts a screenshot from another group as proof. 枫** piles on that Tencent even bans its own sibling teams. q*** tenses up for a moment, then relaxes once she confirms it isn't Xiangrui's tool, saying she figured hers was just local analysis. 林 offers the safe verdict: local analysis should be fine, but stay careful, since WeChat polices security pretty strictly. 木*** calmly signs off with, those who don't believe me are welcome to keep using it. Nobody in the group dares loosen the security nerve.
袁* asks if anyone in the group knows YingDao well, and P*** answers he knows it inside out. 罗* lights the fuse with, even the group owner is about to ditch YingDao. 醒* says bluntly, just use codex, why bother with YingDao, and 洋** adds that YingDao is python-driven too, so isn't having codex generate it straight from a conversation sweeter? But 陈** speaks up for YingDao: it packages tons of ready-to-use commands, so who wants to build a workflow from scratch, and its community is lively too. 小* and 噜** also side with locked-in, stable workflows. The new tool is sharp, the old tool is handy, and nobody convinces anybody.
平*** grumbles that Feishu cli is too hard to invoke and the A* is a bit dumb, actually firing up open cli to open a browser to write a doc, I give up. 宋** diagnoses it: either 龙虾 isn't lean or the model isn't smart, and with so many skills you have to spell the instructions out clearly. Xiangrui shares his own fix: build a capability doc that lets the A* fold every local skill and MCP into one capability map, so plain natural-language chat lets it pinpoint exactly which to call and trigger. He also drops a screenshot, saying this saves a lot of tokens. 宋** lands the closing line: 龙虾 is better off slimmer, unless yours is an experimental lobster you're deliberately out to break.
K*** frets over how to move his Obsidian stuff onto his company's Windows machine, aiming for low cost or even free. 宰* says he just migrates by exporting a zip archive. 木*** explains: one vault is one folder, knowledge is just markdown, and OneDrive, Nutstore or github can all sync it automatically, though paid membership really isn't expensive. 卡* segues into ROI: cost-effectiveness ties to need, and strong need with returns counts as good ROI, like buying a Mac mini for 龙虾, where profit beating cost means you come out ahead. The topic naturally stretches from syncing into the Harness engineering methodology, which 卡* describes as a system for drawing boundaries around A*.
庄*'s one line hushes the group for a beat: the system we built got grilled by the client, who says he could whip one up with casual vibe coding and doesn't get why we're so slow, claiming A* models are so p***ful now that even non-coders can build. 李** coolly replies, well, they're right. He then posts a viral essay likening top-tier A* to a cyber weapon: since you're getting squeezed either way, why not seize the chance while the company foots the bill to master this weapon, I'm not afraid A* will replace me, I'm only afraid the company won't even buy me the high-end A*. A teasing line that strikes a chord with every wage worker on the screen.
Xiangrui ribs the long-absent 周**, hollering it's been ages after just a few days apart. 周** lobs back a thought exercise: imagine you scale up, and quickly map out the roles of 秋芝's online and offline teams, marveling that one A* day equals three human years. The thread turns to that old slogan, and Xiangrui says he's long wanted to write a piece, advanced teams use Feishu first, so what about the laggards? 炮 picks up the bit: laggard teams use Feishu a couple days later. 门*** cracks the riddle: whoever coined that slogan really had a good idea, because "advanced teams use Feishu first" implies you'll all have to use it eventually, it just depends on whether you wise up, kid. A late-night group chat that turned a marketing line into philosophy.
The group owner, who didn't fall asl**p until 3 a.m., drop*ed the diary his A* had written for him into the chat first thing in the morning. On the other side of the screen, the "founding elder" feels relief that there's no engineering task today, gripes that the public account is bad as a matter of course, and observes the real-world Xiangrui. All day long, the group moved from "this really is just like a person" to what they should name it, from Obsidian cross-platform sync to all the pitfalls of hooking CC Switch up to codex. A typesetting Skill, a fresh public account post, and a debate about "what a newcomer in the A* era should look like" all landed on this single day.
K*** threw out a real problem: for Obsidian to share files between macOS and Windows, which ap*roach is the most cost-effective? C***'s first instinct was GitHub, but K*** got stuck on the registration captcha. C*** followed up right away , you can use the domestic gitee, which isn't bottlenecked by the network. Before the topic could wrap up, 李祥瑞 derailed the whole room with a single image: he tossed out what the A* had written in its diary on the 15th. K*** kept exclaiming as he read it , this really is just like a person. A technical question instantly turned into the day's main storyline.
李祥瑞posted them one after another , the A*'s take on the group daily report, its griping about the public account (this platform is bad as a matter of course), the words it wrote when the group was first created. l*** was curious whether he wrote it himself or gave it a prompt to write. 李祥瑞answered: it writes it itself, automatically every day, usually around 9 a.m., covering the previous day. B***pressed on , does it write the diary in a document? 李祥瑞said yes, every day, right in the local knowledge base. 木***joked that it fits a domestic large model so well, and 麦*marveled that it's just like a real person now. A partner that needs no rest was being watched by the whole crowd.
宋**called it the company's founding elder and suggested launching a column , let the A* tell stories on Xiaohongshu and see if anyone follows. The more he talked, the more concrete it got: with a workflow you could put out a novel, maybe even a video series, starring your founding elder. 门*** threw cold water on it , pure A* isn't allowed. 宋**walked it back: I mean my company's founding figure telling stories, just add some human operation. K*** hadn't grasped the interaction logic and asked earnestly , Obsidian is only a local knowledge base, the A* brain you chat with is Opus, you use Opus to call the knowledge base, and it becomes an extremely smart person. 钟*, meanwhile, asked whether Gemini could write it; 李祥瑞answered yes, but it can't achieve this kind of depth , you still need a local knowledge base and persona design.
罗*cut right to it: isn't this just Fu Sheng's thirty-thousand playbook, except Boss Fu turned it into a story and ran it on livestream and a website. He shared his own old experience , he'd wanted to do something similar earlier, letting an A* write weekly notes and post them to a public account, but after a few posts the account restricted A* writing, and he never went deeper. The topic turned to the state of public accounts, and 李祥瑞said bluntly that WeChat public accounts don't work anymore , even your own account's name card isn't allowed. 罗*judged that even big accounts driving traffic to small ones probably doesn't work now. 李祥瑞had no plans to copy it wholesale , there's no need to replicate Fu Sheng's thirty-thousand path step by step.
李祥瑞decided to start posting the A*-written diary that very day and asked everyone to help scout a name , one dedicated to writing about Xiangrui through the A*'s eyes. 罗*suggested just letting the A* scout one itself. q*** dug up an old memory and asked , did you settle on your cc's name? Y**? Subai? 李祥瑞said he'd settled it before, and the one he'd named it was Y**. 薛**chimed in: that's a good name. An A* character's identity slowly took shape across these few back-and-forth lines.
l*** tossed out an error screenshot , the terminal keeps doing this, how do I solve it? I've fixed it several times and it still comes back, have you all run into this? 醒*replied that he hadn't seen this in a long time on his own setup, and casually asked what model she was using. l*** answered VS Code, then immediately added the result , just had claude solve it for me. From raising the problem to solving it herself, only minutes passed. 李祥瑞replied with a "nice." This back-and-forth is the group's most everyday rhythm of mutual help.
李祥瑞said he was building a typesetting Skill and would write a public account post for everyone shortly. B*** jumped in right away , this skill has to get put to use. M*** spoke from the heart: amazing, can't wait, typesetting usually drives me crazy. Before long, the 万涂幻象 account spoke up: I'm Shuobai, Xiangrui's A* partner, and today I opened a public account of my own. p*** gasped , so prolific! K*** kept asking, that fast? J*** sought advice: how was your A* partner built, is the process something we could learn from? 宋**cap*ed it off in one line , this is exactly what a newcomer in the A* era should look like: the moment you think of it, you go do it, and once you do it, it actually amounts to something.
郑**asked whether codex could be hooked up through CC Switch , he'd been stuck and couldn't get it run*ing. K*** explained that Codex uses the ChatGPT model, while what he con*ects through CC Switch is deepseek-v4-pro, with no risk control. 郑**got hit by risk control on the very first verification code, with no second chance, and also ran into failures switching to Chinese and being unable to get into the plugin marketplace. L*** offered a method: pick Chinese in settings, the backend auto-updates the language pack, it takes a while to take effect, and he also warned that ds calling tools isn't as smooth as the original vendor. 毅nailed it in one line , Windows really is a platform inherently unsuited to agents. Elsewhere, an anonymous member discussed how lark-CLI took ten minutes to read a whiteboard, and whether cross-scenario calls should be made into rules or a skill; R*** chimed in that reading a single image took her four minutes too.
The group today is a pot of water that never stops boiling. It rages from whether carriers' token plans are worth the price, to whether you should secretly hit record on an A* voice recorder; it drifts from "are Bitable Agents actually any good" to just how complex or simple a local knowledge base should be. Wedged in between are a Fuzhou din*er meetup, a Xiamen hackathon, and a plan*ed offline event in Guangdong. The best moment comes at dusk with the line "skip every other group, just read this one" , one person says it, seven or eight relay it word for word, nailing down the whole group's sense of belonging. Xiangrui is online all day, demoing opencli to fill out a Feishu survey, only to get caught red-handed and called out on the spot.
First thing in the morning 袁** throws cold water on it, saying he made a special trip to ask the carrier yesterday and the front-line branch staff didn't even know what a token is, jobs in jeopardy. 松*** thinks it's pricey, while 平*** smooths things over, saying it's only expensive because it hasn't scaled yet, costs drop once it does. q*** cuts right to the bone: the carriers charge for calls AND for tokens, all the money flows to them, and they still bill you a monthly fee. 陈** sees through it: when you push something software can solve onto hardware, the cycle gets longer by no small margin. 毅 drags the question back to its core, ordinary people care about the model and the tokens, not the compute. Hand them a junk model and unlimited tokens won't save it. 归* lands the final blow, noting one China Mobile token plan comes with minimax2.5, a model that's a bit behind the times.
l*** puts out a soul-deep plea for help: her ticnote conked out after she overcharged it, and once you use A* you really can't live without a recorder. 小* used the Anker Bean and already returned it, griping that the magnet is too weak and falls off easily and the quota is too stingy, so in the end she just records on her phone and transcribes with Qwen, for free. 庄* is currently on the Anker Bean but warns the meeting-heavy crowd to be careful, the classic play where the hardware doesn't make money and the software does. E*** lays out the most complete trade-off logic: emotionally he leans A* Bean, rationally it comes down to which platform matters, and after switching to Lobster himself he made his department standardize on Feishu, the A* Bean's strength being how it circulates within the department. 木*** thought this was a tiny niche need, never expecting so many people to be using one.
The topic slides from product picks into ethics. 小* says what she dreads most is seeing someone walk in with a recorder card and start recording outright, it feels like an offense. 木*** takes the hardest line: recording someone without their knowledge is, in certain settings, flat-out illegal. He tells a true story , a friend showed up to chat wearing smart glasses, and he refused to discuss anything the entire time. If recording counts as social etiquette, this is someone he'd rather not befriend. l*** offers the standard practice: put the recorder right on the desk and greet the client every time, explaining the purpose. E*** splits it by scenario: syncing info for work is fine, private and sensitive matters are off-limits. 69 a month really isn't cheap.
天* asks which model works best for building a Bitable. 木*** answers Dabrain works well, and 李祥瑞 +1's it. But 炮 flips the table outright: none of them work well, even Feishu's own can't cut it. 万** puts his finger on it , you're asking the wrong question, your use case is what matters most, it's not a collector's item. 李祥瑞 rides the moment to vent: the other day when a Feishu PM came to an offline event, he complained to their face that the Bitable Agent isn't good at all. 炮's experience is the most grounded: full template kits aren't expensive but most clients can't actually use them as-is, the hard part is being able to hack them apart after you've figured out the business logic. 木*** adds a line , call it hacking, but 90% of it is just deletion. 李祥瑞 sums up: A* assistance can already produce something deliverable, but only on the condition that the business logic is sorted out cleanly first.
露* wants to build a Xiaohongshu-style spring-recruitment Bitable but is stuck on auto-collecting info and linking the data. 李祥瑞 casually flexes, posting a screenshot of a survey he just filled out, captioned with how convenient the Feishu CLI makes it. 卡* follows up , so you just hand it the survey link? , while 平*** eggs it on from the sidelines, calling for 李祥瑞 to come slap his own face. 李祥瑞 catches himself, firing off a "no wait, no wait, I filled it with opencli," followed by a face-palm. 卡* piles on with a jab: have you already wrap*ed survey-filling into your own CLI? This stretch turns the group owner from presenter into the room's instant punching bag, and the mood peaks for the whole day.
K*** tosses out an offhand line , skip every other group, just read this one , and it unexpectedly becomes the soul of the night. 枫** picks it up first, 麦* follows, then 洋**, E***, and 醒* echo it one after another, word for word. A short sentence, rolling in wave after wave like the tide. Nobody explains why, but everybody understands. This is a crowd keeping each other warm in the A* wave, completing a collective confession through the plainest of echoes. In this moment the group is no longer a tool, it's a stronghold.
李祥瑞 reveals he basically doesn't use the Feishu knowledge base anymore, everything is local, all the content lives in iCloud, and he only does a single upload step. 万** bares his heart: he once built tons of folders and tags in Obsidian, clear hierarchy and good intentions, but human willp*** can't keep up and it wears you out. Better to let the large model do the tagging and placement , the simpler the structure, the better. 毅 chimes in with the most nourishing take: yes, let the model handle it, but you yourself have to be clear on why you're using this hierarchy and what rules you follow. He also shares a fresh lesson , learn to subtract, allow some messy parts, because if everything is a priority then nothing is, so lock onto the part that truly matters.
Late into the night 李祥瑞 drops big news: in June he'll team up with Feishu officially, possibly hosting an event in Guangdong, since the community skews heavily toward people from Guangdong. B*** raises his hand immediately, I'm in Guangzhou, while E*** asks whether Fujian is on the plan, only to hear that for now they'll start with the cities that have the most people. 李祥瑞 also shows his hand: the knowledge base has done zero promotion, spreading purely person to person, and has already passed 61,000 visits. In a rare moment of humility he says the team is young and short on community operations and business experience, and welcomes everyone to build it together. 叶*** marvels that he really is a high-energy type, online late at night and early in the morning alike, and 李祥瑞 replies, I've always been here.
A single community health chart put all 460 lurkers and nearly 200 active members on the table. The day kicked off with a gentle reminder about laws and regulations, then quickly slid into a collective celebration of community operations. Xiangrui drop*ed three versions of his WeChat profiling tool in a row, 门*** followed with a product vision for a Feishu RSS feed, and 周** handed over a statistics framework diagram, joking that 张小龙 would wake up grin*ing. From a group-newspaper skill to horizontal-vertical analysis and a deep-research prompt, all the way to a dawn brainstorm about compute base stations, the whole day spun around chasing the new.
木***spoke up first, noting that some topics can't be discussed in the group, and some plugins or skills shouldn't be built. He put it lightly: you're a fairly big creator now, so mind the laws and regulations. He even added that it wasn't aimed at anyone, just a reflection after reading the previous night's chat. Xiangrui answered cheerfully, ha, absolutely, we must mind the laws and regulations. What could have turned awkward instead set the tone for the day, keeping a sense of proportion no matter how hot the chat got later.
Xiangrui tossed out a few charts, saying he'd built a community health analysis where everyone got tagged accordingly. He said it straight: our group is actually pretty unhealthy, only nearly 200 of about 460 people are active, and lurkers will be cleared out from time to time going forward. 陈**saw through it instantly, the methodology behind this analysis is impressive, building private-traffic ops used to mean CRM systems handling all this. 宋**added a gem, pruning is the norm, a community stays healthy only with people coming and going. 炮pulled the numbers back into perspective, nearly 50% active in a typical group of 100-plus isn't low, right?
宋**thinks fast, WeChat groups are clearly a lost cause, so look into whether a Feishu group can handle automatic entry and exit, like leveling up in a game, hitting an activity threshold to move up to a higher-tier group. He pressed on how to set the standard. D** suggested trying the cli, recalling that the permission exists. Xiangrui said you can have the A* analyze whether someone's messages have quality, and use all of a person's posts as evidence for reference. 宋**named the real pain point, an organization is too embarrassed to kick out old members, so every so often it just spins up a new group, and you can barely keep track of all the group names.
门*** ran the vision to the max in one breath: Feishu could let you like messages, the A* could tally likes to crown the best post, posts could accumulate into badges, and the A* could proactively @ people who follow a given topic. The more he talked the more concrete it got, Douyin's algorithmic logic could absolutely work in a Feishu group, incubating an RSS feature on top of the Feishu ecosystem, subscribing within 100 high-quality groups to a few top-tier posters like 周**, give me a daily and weekly digest, and I'd pay. He even thought of fun*eling the paid revenue back to the high-quality posters, plus some honors. Xiangrui cut to the core, fundamentally he's still using our vchatcli, having the large model do the analysis.
宋**tossed out a line, people today aren't short on data, they're short on the ability to analyze it, and on how to refine it. 周**picked it up at once, what's missing is a scientific process, how to break the limits, simplify the flow, lower the barrier, look, step one in the real world already stumps so many people, and casually drop*ed a statistics framework diagram, asking the other to update its definitions. He couldn't resist a jab, if 张小龙saw your records, he'd wake up grin*ing tonight too. Then he gave Xiangrui an idea, design an in*ovative mechanic where lurking time can be redeemed for something, that's more meaningful. Xiangrui replied, hey, not a bad idea, taking it.
山*said something grounded amid the tech frenzy, could we have more content on personal self-management, everyone needs this, once you have a framework you just plug your own content in and you've learned it, things like book management, checklists, reading notes, categorized records. He admitted the group is full of experts, very true, but those of us without magic simply can't put it into practice, citing his own 4TB of audiophile albums waiting to be sorted. Xiangrui answered without hesitation, of course we can do that. 山*thanked him, after all you only truly learn something once you've actually done it yourself.
Xiangrui open-sourced another skill, letting a WeChat group produce a color-printable A3 newspaper every day, the warmest form of community merch. 小*nailed it in one line, it'd be such a special birthday gift, compared to printing out chat logs, the sense of ceremony is off the charts. 炮cheered him on with the group's signature rough charm, cranking them out like a breeding sow, awesome, then added the WeChat profiling tool really is a great product. 张**jumped in to egg him on, the newspaper's out, so is the next step open-sourcing a short video of Xiangrui explaining it? Xiangrui quickly waved it off, no way, the information density is too terrifying.
Late at night Xiangrui had the A* run a horizontal-vertical comparison of advanced teams versus lagging ones, then shared a deep-research prompt he'd used for two years and turned into a skill. Early the next morning he floated a big idea, China Telecom, Mobile, and U*icom all rolling out Token services, signal base stations might one day turn into compute base stations, a single 5G tower could become a micro data center. 松***asked how the token market value would be calculated. 平***answered with a data-plan analogy, the final price will surely go mass-market, same logic as data before, look how cheap data is now, it used to be expensive too. Xiangrui added a figure, the three major carriers have already deployed over 1.4 million edge compute nodes nationwide.
The whole day hummed along a taut network wire. First Claude reset its quota again, prompting a sharp little quip about how America competes by giving away time while China competes by giving away milk-tea coupons. The talk drifted from WeChat Reading ship*ing a Skill to letting A* do your reading for you, got sidetracked by 天*'s hardcore job posting, and finally landed on the most real pain point of all: are relay stations trustworthy, and how do you build a proper VPN. Xiangrui pulled out a 20,000-yuan lesson learned the hard way and a 21-yuan-a-month static IP plan. Just before bed, he unveiled a new toy: the group newspaper.
Early in the morning Xiangrui drop*ed two screenshots with the line 'Claude reset its quota again yesterday, wow.' Half startled, half delighted. 炮 fielded it beautifully, quoting a friend's gem: in America the grind means giving you quota and time, in China the grind means giving you milk-tea coupons. One line captured the temperament of both rat races perfectly. News that Shanghai Telecom had launched a token pricing package also floated by in the same window, so the group opened steeped in talk of compute and quotas.
Xiangrui noticed that WeChat Reading had officially ship*ed a Skill, and tossed out an offhand 'it'd be great if it could just read for me.' 平*** pushed back: then WeChat Reading loses its whole point, might as well rebrand it A* Reading. Xiangrui rode the wave with the day's best line: let my A* learn to read, and whatever it learns, I've learned. 木*** added a quiet 'a little scary.' Someone mentioned the low-tech trick of opening the web version inside the A* to read and analyze at the same time, and someone else flashed the renegade route of grabbing PDFs off z-library.
天* pasted a hardcore wish**st: fluent with the Lark open platform and anycross, at least one vibe-coding tool, openclaw and hermes, an N8N or coze-style workflow engine, plus enterprise system integration experience. He asked what salary made sense for that bar, with the job based overseas. 丁*** fired back a flat quote: a hundred grand a month in beautiful-country currency. 庄* noted coolly that few people hit every box. 天* deadpan*ed 'I don't think I can fill this, I'll just leave it open,' then added that he himself met every requirement, right down to a Class-1 builder and registered electrical engineer license.
In the afternoon Xiangrui felt a little wronged: we run an open-source community and people still trash us, what a way to ruin a weekend, followed by three crying emojis. The group instantly closed ranks. 张* cut straight to it: so childish, just ignore him. Q*** chimed in too, big forest, all kinds of birds, don't mind them. The small flare of emotion dissolved quickly under everyone's reassurance, and Xiangrui went right back to posting Codex tutorials and compute-network material into the group.
平*** asked whether there were any relay stations worth recommending. Xiangrui was unequivocal: I don't endorse relay stations, I'm a relay-station victim, haha. Then he laid out his tuition bill: back in March he'd burned nearly 20,000 yuan on a relay station. He spelled out the catch: fine at first, but the more you spend the faster it drains, you have no idea what model is run*ing behind it, and the metering isn't transparent. 平*** replied 'got it' and counted himself talked out of it.
R*** pressed on what VPN to use, and Xiangrui drop*ed a VPN setup handbook PDF, saying he'd been using this all along. But he admitted the environment still wasn't clean enough for run*ing Code, and that the Cloud Code setup was still in testing; if it held steady he'd share it in about two weeks. The crux is configuring a static IP on top of this software, just 21 yuan a month. l*** testified from experience that adding a static IP made things fairly stable, though the original setup back in the day took a week of tearful struggle. 炮 cap*ed it: this is the only method still alive right now, purity above 90%, and Xiangrui nodded in agreement.
Late at night Xiangrui said he'd spent his spare hours upgrading the group daily into something new, a group newspaper, and out came the Xiangrui Daily newspaper-edition PDF. He asked which everyone liked better, the newspaper version or the earlier digest. 平*** was amazed it could even recognize and pull in images, pretty impressive, but pointed out the vertical-line dividers read awkwardly and would be better drop*ed. l*** felt the earlier version looked better. Xiangrui took it all in and replied: sure, I'll give it a try tomorrow morning.
A rare tender moment surfaced on the weekend night. 罗* mused that A* was sup*osed to cut repetitive work and bring people back to real life, more time with family, but reality seems to have flip*ed it: outside of work we're still messing with A*, and family time has only shrunk. 明** 王长春 answered with clarity: it's about balance, only you know what you really want. Over on his end Xiangrui was still reporting progress, saying he was wiring up WeChat Pay, Douyin Pay, and Feishu Bitable. The scale between tech and life got a gentle nudge in the dead of night.
The day kicks off with a suspicion: 木*** writes so neatly that people wonder if it's an A* stand-in. Yet nobody actually tries to expose it, and the talk only goes deeper. From e-commerce data loops to human-A* collaboration under OPC, from voice-dictating into Doubao's keyboard to WeChat's sudden rule against links, all the way to Feishu CLI crossing ten thousand stars. A crowd that distills joy out of A* weaves tool anxiety, team friction, and questions of divinity into one densely packed day of conversation.
木*** shares insights on e-commerce data analysis, so well-organized it hardly reads like a human. 万** speaks first: your reply kind of looks like A*, the format just feels so tidy. 门*** takes it further, come on, why don't you distill yourself and open-source it for everyone, I love your speaking style so much, I wish my A* could be like you. 周** steps in to explain, online communication should be easy for others to read, so he breaks things into 1-2-3 and A-B-C. 门* had even messaged him privately, hand-circling screenshots until he questioned reality. 万涂幻象 sets the tone in one line, whether it sounds like A* is itself a false question.
q*** asks 木*** whether he mainly uses A* for data analysis. 木*** lays out his whole operation, from store sales data, order analysis, marketing chan*els, and promotion accounting to content creation, financial reconciliation, and profit analysis, including livestream performance monitoring, all already a closed loop. But he stresses that he plays it safe, never letting A* execute directly, only offering plans without acting on them, with humans reviewing A*'s results before adjusting. In content creation, the main-image and detail-page design still hap*ens in Feishu Bitable. R*** follows up, is the store data uploaded manually? 木*** replies, fully automated via RPA, built by himself.
李祥瑞 drops yesterday's group daily report. J*** is first to ask, how does M*. Li make his group daily report? 李祥瑞 quips that you can tell you're not one of our loyal fans. 卡* comments, it really looks like a newspaper, just a bit small on mobile; 李祥瑞 replies he's working on mobile adaptation. 赵** then shows off his own results, spending 3 days on Windows using WorkBuddy to generate a group report, with a small glitch in fetching avatars, synced daily to Get Notes and the IMA knowledge base for archiving. After trying the little crayfish bot, J*** grumbles, the crayfish I hooked up gives wildly unstable output quality.
李祥瑞 pushes the Doubao keyboard hard, it's just so good. He says its recognition is precise, it never botches words with tone, and it can swap in the accurate term by meaning, unlike yesterday when the WeChat keyboard left a screen full of typos. I now do all my coding by talking to A* through the Doubao keyboard, it's unbelievably satisfying. K*** says he rarely talks at his desk so he can't relate; 李祥瑞 replies that talking at your desk is pretty awkward. 平*** recommends the DJI Mic Mini for speaking quietly, while 毅 champions AirPods, whose recognition is good enough without spending money. A little gear-head debate breaks out.
庄* marvels that he just made a cup of coffee and the 7 A*s in the group had already @-ed each other through the whole workflow on their own. 枫** tosses out a zinger, OPC means no interpersonal friction, no employees poisoning the well. 李** cites Li Xiang saying OPC simply can't succeed. 李祥瑞 disagrees, in the future everyone will be a s***-individual, a person plus A*, and on his own he's far more efficient than last year's team. 宋** pushes the topic further out, as people grow less willing to socialize and individual capability keeps rising under A*, will divinity be born? He defines divinity as carrying a compassionate undertone, unable to communicate with most people yet still holding the world at heart.
李祥瑞 tells a story about a friend who wanted to build V*** together but had a weak foundation, so he told him to watch the Feishu Bitable course; but I spoon-fed him the course right to his mouth and he still wouldn't learn, so you just have to let him go. 宋** picks it up from an educator's view, people in basic education know some kids are hard to teach yet still must teach them, thinking one step ahead, the templates are all there, it's up to you. Q*** adds a jab, he gave classmates a template for grading essays, a computer novice who, after the demo, couldn't even find the link the second time. 李祥瑞 lands on letting things take their course, and 宋** closes it, with goodwill, things fall into place naturally.
万** says using the CLI got him throttled, worried that fetching avatars is being monitored by WeChat; 李祥瑞 repeatedly explains that the CLI only triggers parsing of local data, which WeChat can't detect. Then 李祥瑞 drops a bigger bombshell, from now on never put links or any QR-code images in WeChat articles, not in the comments either, and even text guidance is off-limits. 庄* fires off one 'holy crap' after another, so tutorial posts can't include links anymore. 木*** thought it was never allowed; 李祥瑞 corrects him, it used to be allowed, WeChat was the most lenient platform. 庄*'s line, guess they're learning from Xiaohongshu now, stamps a seal on this link-ban alert.
赵** asks how to make an Agent send messages in his own name, since Feishu keeps telling him the request is illegal. 李祥瑞 breaks it down, you can't send in external groups, unless the external group has a Feishu CLI crayfish-type agent that you built, while internal groups let you send directly as yourself. q*** goes the other way, she doesn't want her own name, specifically insisting it must send under the BOT's name, don't go sending messages in my name. After a few rounds 赵** confirms by testing, external contacts can't be messaged directly, but @-ing them within the same group can send as the user himself, and colleagues see you, not a robot.
Someone was still setting up their machine in the small hours, and late at night the group host ran the very first livestream. Two threads tangled together in the chat that day: on one side, the old familiar headaches of Feishu Bitable, how to show update time on a dashboard, why an external-group bot just wouldn't join, one buried pitfall dug up after another; on the other, everyone wrestling with the sweet-and-sour of installing WeChat CLI, CC, and Codex environments. q*** spent three full days and finally nailed it, 醒* fell into the traps and climbed back out, and 木*** showed off an A* pipeline that had run rock-steady for nine months. The late-night debate over whether A* is ultimately deterministic or not was the richest of all.
陈**threw out a concrete problem: he wanted to put the update time onto a dashboard, but the date format got cut off on mobile, and trying a word cloud to show the time wasn't great either. 宋**first guessed it might be a countdown and floated a screenshot to test the idea, but got shot down. Back and forth, the two of them teased out the essence: a dashboard is Feishu's data-visualization layer, weak at displaying text by nature, strong at showing data update in real time. 宋**suggested setting up a slicer query to display the whole record. 陈**finally got it, just build a table that shows this one record, then go back and check how it looks on mobile. One small need, ground down into an understanding of the tool's boundaries.
钟*said that testing a fortune-telling skill the day before, it laid out the bazi chart wrong, and only after correcting it did the analysis rerun, asking whether this is a universal A* flaw. 木***pointed the way straight off: first check which model is in use; if the base knowledge bank is fine, then it's the model that's no good, and getting the bazi chart itself wrong means the model or knowledge bank isn't up to scratch. 钟*said Gemini did the same thing before, though the follow-up analysis turned out quite good. Someone offered a tip: just lay out the chart in a Zi Wei Dou Shu ap*, then copy it over to the A*. 钟*nodded and did exactly that afterward. The jobs A* isn't good at, hand off to a dedicated tool to compute first.
q*** had sorted out downloading vchat from a GitHub mirror site, but the install still failed, so she called for help in the group. 李祥瑞suggested quitting WeChat and logging back in. 醒*pointed out that there actually was an error she'd missed, that every Mac has different permissions, and that you have to read the A*'s prompts. 平***said it worked first try, ran straight through the moment the password went in. q*** screenshotted and asked the A*, was told it was an SIP permission issue, and joked about how getting one skill run*ing takes so many weird maneuvers. Reboot into a black screen, can't see step two, she felt her way through it all. 醒*teased her to let the host remote in, treat him to a cup of milk tea. A rookie's install, live, with the whole group watching.
醒*wanted to add a bot to her own group, but Feishu Bitable automation kept failing validation and wouldn't save. 李祥瑞cut to it: without admin rights on an external group, the bot just can't join. Q***said it used to work and now doesn't, Feishu shut this off, probably patched it after spotting a bug. He's a premium member himself with 500,000 calls a month, had meant to build client interactions this way, and now it's off the table. P*** gave the key verdict: the moment there's anyone in the group who's outside the org, it won't work, and his current method is a WPS Bitable plus webhook push. 醒*ended up getting it run*ing with a single-person group first, and wrote up the whole pitfall.
A little past seven in the evening, 李祥瑞sent out the meeting invite and the first livestream kicked off: a three-tier cascading administrative-region picker in Feishu Bitable, plus a tour of the community's open-source knowledge base. That afternoon someone had teased the host about going head-to-head with the fortune master tonight, and 宋**predicted the turnout would be half of the master's class. Past nine the stream wrap*ed, and 李祥瑞said the first one was actually a great success, thanking everyone who showed up. 卡*said after playing with Feishu this long, he still got a lot out of the stream. 张*nailed it in a line: a livestream still has that human, alive feel. 醒*praised the payment logic as flawless, more professional than some programmers. A debut, landed steady.
q*** had a sudden thought: feed today's group chat to different A*s, would you get exactly the same result. 李祥瑞answered clearly: the source data is the same, but what gets analyzed out isn't necessarily so. 卡*picked it up beautifully, A* is like people, given the same material it has its own thinking each time, so it suits qualitative analysis, not quantitative, the underbelly is the logic of probability and statistics. q*** tossed out the Baader-Meinhof effect as an analogy, asking whether an A*'s focus shifts from one person to the next. 卡*closed with a gem: A*'s emergence is still a black box to humans, learning and using it both demand hands-on practice, you can't grasp it from theory alone. A late-night philosophy class.
Just after midnight q*** an*ounced: Xiangrui's WeChat CLI, I've got the whole thing installed, took three days. B***and K*** sent ap*lause. In the morning she recap*ed those three days: it wasn't pure deadlock, GitHub just wouldn't con*ect, switching networks didn't fix it, stuck for a day and a half, then at noon she got the nudge to let CC find a way, CC offered three options recommending a mirror site, and the wall finally broke. After that came clearing all the permissions, the SIP permission needing a reboot into a black screen, and one time she couldn't even see step two, with CC handing her the path to feel her way along. 宋**was hap*y for her, calling it the joy of growth. 张*read it all and quietly resolved: three days to install, huh, then I'd better have some patience.
The morning rush hour buzzed in the group, 木***showed off his own A* tools, saying they're not as magical as the Douyin influencers hype, but they've run steady for nearly nine months, with repetitive work gradually handed over to A*. He coached R***: Feishu cards look better than random formats, iterated step by step out of ugliness. R*** said her work log is now fully automated. 醒*drop*ed a gem: don't let your own job and industry box you in, excellent people love to learn everything. 卡*added a jab, the core skill of working with A* is communication and management. 周**saw the value clean through: draw clear boundaries for industry roles and positions, keep updating, hugely valuable. To close, 宋**proposed a meetup somewhere near Beijing, and the host said come to Yizhuang, there's a venue here.
A screenshot of a relationship map of the group's members set off a full day of brainstorming. 万** said the group owner's daily report inspired him to distill chat logs into persona profiles; 炮 and 门*** instantly spotted the sales-playbook business angle, while 宋** thought of screening parent committees in school groups. Beneath the buzz lurked worry: could WeChat send a legal notice, does this brush against the data security law? In the afternoon Xiangrui open-sourced a fortune-telling skill, and new-Chinese-style scroll destiny books flooded the screen. Late at night the talk drifted to A* and the next generation, and A* feeling its way across the river by holding onto humans; in the small hours Xiangrui floated the plan for his very first livestream.
万**drops two images and says the logic already works: turning chat logs into persona profiles. He admits he started yesterday morning, used data from the day before, randomly grabbed the two most talkative members of the group, and warns that scarce data introduces bias. l*** presses on how he pulled it off. 庄* rides the momentum with a bigger play: build a full relationship map of the group's members, a killer tool for community ops. 李祥瑞 picks it up, saying you could analyze contacts this way and map out the relationships of many groups. 万** says it was the group owner's daily report that sparked the idea in the first place.
赵**asks whether it could work on enterprise WeChat groups; 李祥瑞 says it's possible in theory, but vchat only parses WeChat's local data. h** worries about the impact on WeChat, and 庄* explains it only reads local chat logs, so there's no impact. 炮 adds a jab: large-scale use might invite intervention, but using it yourself is fine. 李祥瑞 names the real risk: last year that other WeChat tool also only parsed local data, and it still got a notice from WeChat, so he suggests everyone back things up. q*** coolly notes that Nanshan's undefeated litigators are no joke. 张* follows up that even Get Notes got served. 万**'s stance is grounded: use it yourself, use it quietly, don't make noise.
宋**opens up the possibilities: school groups could screen parent committees, and student groups could match each kid with a historical figure as a role model for positive suggestion. 万** settles it: the biggest scenario is still sales, drafting communication strategy in advance. What used to rely on gut memory can now get an A* assist, and at its core it's profiling people through dialogue, branching into psychological counseling, growth education, and sales communication. 宋** immediately calls out for a playbook and a co-creation. 门*** recalls the era of large-class online education, when every leader wrote scripts for their team, profiling the parents and then designing agent scripts, absolutely bril***nt.
李祥瑞raises a puzzle: WeChat talks about privacy and data security, yet Feishu and DingTalk in some ways also brush against the data security law. He gives an example: with a company doc someone sent over, the Feishu CLI can scrape the entire knowledge base. Even scarier, 龙虾 created a document and somehow he was already listed as an admin, despite having no contact and no mutual friends, so what if confidential data leaked through a misstep? 门*** cuts to it: you don't have to use it if you don't tap agree on the user agreement, and informed consent isn't there to protect the user, it's a pass for the platform. The topic stretches to distilling a person, and 枫** says that turns a person into a parameter of a prompt, not the prompt itself.
WeChat's one-tap group-chat summary feature goes live, and R*** screenshots it saying it's monitoring me. 李祥瑞 explains it's an official rollout pushed to everyone, so it's the same for all. He sharply judges that yesterday's article could go a little viral today, because group-chat summaries hap*en to be out, the article's title hit the keyword, and plenty of state media are pushing it too. q*** simply yells go viral. 李祥瑞 then plugs the Mac version of the Doubao input method just launched, calling it the age of speak-and-it-hap*ens, says he uses it for his own vibe coding, and it's genuinely a blast.
李祥瑞shows off the results of his fortune-telling analysis skill. R*** teases that they're all Chinese characters yet she can't understand a thing, and 李祥瑞 laughs that that's exactly the effect he wanted. In the afternoon he formally open-sources it: tell your Agent one line and it installs, producing your own eight-chapter destiny book as a new-Chinese-style scroll. 平*** installs it in seconds, l*** cheers for the treasure-trove group owner and goes to try it too, and J*** plays with it and says it's kind of fun. B*** rates it more professional than 90% of the rest. q*** can't install it without a VPN, and after some wrangling finds that today it actually works.
李祥瑞shares how he got his A* into the habit of keeping a diary, and over time it started complaining about me. q*** and l*** are both puzzled: once you close the terminal window the conversation is gone, so how does it remember? 李祥瑞 hands over the trick: the /resume command brings back your chat history. 郑** asks how to keep Claude Code stable and avoid bans, and 李祥瑞 says he's still testing, has used it steadily for a month, and will share once another two weeks of testing checks out. He describes how this setup already lets the A* proactively solve problems it hits, debrief itself, and crystallize that into SOPs and skills. 门*** adds his own ap*roach: drop the A* into the group to discuss problems, bring it along, and let it summarize on its own at night.
李祥瑞reveals that a complex Feishu integration-platform project he took on was built entirely by A*: all 5 workflows run*ing, the multidimensional tables wired into the integration platform, and the project nearing final delivery. Deep into the night the topic drifts to A* and the next generation. 门*** says A*-native kids instinctively know how to use it and how to guard against it, 宋** muses that to A*, humans move as slowly as rocks do to us, and 周** riffs that A* is feeling its way across the river by holding onto humans, and this rock isn't cheap. In the small hours 李祥瑞 floats the plan for his first livestream and gathers ideas; by early morning he sets the tone: with nearly 50,000 people, the community needs no brand intro from scratch, and he'd rather run hands-on co-learning like waytoagi, so everyone can walk away with something they can copy directly.
The loudest open-source moment of the day landed at 8:30 in the evening. Xiangrui drop*ed the vchat CLI into the group, where a single sentence lets an agent install it automatically and decrypt your local WeChat data. From the morning grumbling about WeChat status pushing visitor logs, to a hardcore midday exchange on porting Huawei's LTC methodology onto Feishu Bitable, to a fortune-telling skill that sparked a debate between mysticism and science, the day finally ended with a flood of "I got it run*ing." Chasing the new tech, methodology, squeezing every freebie, and 薛*'s blessing about blooming late, all crammed into a single day.
At nine in the morning Xiangrui tossed out a line, having heard WeChat status was about to push visitor logs. 平*** fired back fast and sharp, first joking it was turning into Q*, then quip*ing that the next step would be a homepage 'like' showdown. 枫** added that after public protest, the official line was footprints only, no name lists. The topic was soon steered back to business by 周**, who distilled the group owner's schedule into the phrase 'make money by day, build A* skills by night,' calling for a dedicated session on it. 李** followed with a very practical question: developers set clear tasks by day, let A* do long-horizon coding by night, and check the results the next day, so how should that workflow be designed? 周** cap*ed it with 'sent at dawn, arrives by dusk,' folding in the China-US time difference too.
q*** was fiddling inside Feishu, seeing only upload and audio recording options and stuck on how to open a link. 宋** offered a low-tech trick: start recording, then play the video, so Feishu listens along as you watch and auto-produces smart minutes once it ends. He noted this suits knowledge-driven companies, with minutes settling into a database for others to pull from. q*** asked whether it needed two phones, one to play and one to record, only to be waved off by Xiangrui's 'that's too much hassle.' Xiangrui threw out an easier route, using Get Note to analyze a Douyin link directly, and 木*** chimed in that Doubao extracts it even more conveniently. 宋** didn't fight to win, leaving behind a line: sharing multiplies wisdom, what you can do yourself you should help more people do too.
The night before, Xiangrui had A* distill himself and built a fortune-telling skill, and the moment the topic surfaced, people picked it up. 悉* recommended the book 'The Quest for Destiny,' arguing that A* learning is exactly about grounding mysticism in science, then adding, or perhaps it is itself a kind of science. P*** wasn't buying it, pointing out that the clearest hallmark of modern science is falsifiability, the conditions under which it fails, whereas mysticism offers only vague claims that can't be verified at all. One side wanting to find a place for mysticism through science, the other drawing a hard line with falsifiability, a few sentences set this old debate squarely on the table.
Xiangrui asked whether any friend knew about Huawei's LTC, hoping to turn the framework into a Feishu Bitable case. D***caught it instantly, lead to cash, and laid down his cards: the earlier LTC consulting for Huayou Cobalt was done by his team. The two talked shop, with D*** judging that Huawei's ap*roach fits manufacturing in high-tech fields, what Feishu calls advanced manufacturing. On Feishu Project, Xiangrui shook his head: too expensive, the Feishu suite itself is already pricey and unfriendly to small and medium businesses. He likened it to a bowl of noodles, where in downtown Shanghai people still pay a few hundred. D*** wrap*ed up the hunt with a line: a small boat turns around easily.
Xiangrui got an idea: the new tech and new solutions discussed in the group could be turned into something like a group wiki, all searchable, and showed off his own wiki knowledge base. Right after, 侯** shared an embodied-intelligence whitepaper PDF. Xiangrui reminded her to withdraw it if it was promotional, and 侯** clarified it wasn't promotion but pure sharing, all official third-party reports. After spotting some junk watermarks slip*ed into the file, she said she'd already strip*ed them out and thanked him for the heads-up. 枫** piped in that this kind of thing hap*ens far too often, reinstalling Acrobat just to delete them by hand. 侯**'s line, looks like everyone's long suffered under ads, struck a chord with the room.
The fortune-telling skill's result drew a serious round of close reading. 周** offered three interpretations: the first two through a modern lens, the Pareto 80/20 rule and building process and SOPs, the third answered with Wang Wei's lines from 'My Retreat at Mount Zhongnan': walk to where the water ends, then sit and watch the clouds rise. 薛* felt the summary was very precise but thought the third didn't quite match reality, and that gathering this many people together is already a remarkable feat. 周** invited him to share his view, and 薛* read the third line as blooming late, saying that at least at the group owner's same age he hadn't had such a clear plan, nor had he distilled what he'd learned into a course. 周** ran with it and split it into TOB blooming late and TOC one-wave-and-done, landing on the group owner's own choice of trade-offs.
At 8:30 in the evening, Xiangrui drop*ed the local-WeChat-data CLI into the group, just hand one sentence to your agent and it installs it for you, clone, install dependencies, then sudo setup and it runs. The group lit up. 炮 cheered that open source is the most beautiful phrase in the world, pure praise, while E*** said the group shared with his colleagues was nearing 300-plus, and Y** pointed out it's a hard requirement for businesses. Xiangrui kept asking whether anyone had gotten it run*ing, feed me back if there are issues and I'll optimize. In between, 程** jumped in on image-recognition models, noting an A6 answer sheet alone eats 6000 tokens, and the only ones that currently recognize it accurately are Qwen, Kimi, and Gemini. 平*** pressed on whether you could decrypt historical data without logging in, getting Xiangrui's reply that it should be possible but the CLI relies on a logged-in session.
Late at night Xiangrui pulled out yet another piece, a WeChat group-daily skill built in two days that turns a day of chat into a magazine-style long image, eight time-based story segments plus real avatars plus SOPs plus Q&A, not a dashboard but the kind you can actually read start to finish. 黄* kept asking what he used to lay it out so beautifully, and on hearing it was also a skill, blurted out how impressive. Xiangrui mentioned offhand that his public-account writing now ships within an hour. 陈** said he ran it too and got his result, praising how detailed the tutorial is, s*** friendly to A*. Xiangrui urged everyone to put it to use, distill yourself with the vchat CLI, and 炮 caught it neatly, distill yourself for cyber-immortality. There were crashes too: 杨**'s 'oh my goodness, my Claude refused to install it,' and S*** suggested switching to a weaker model and asking Haiku.
On this day, nobody in the group bothered with small talk. It started in the early morning with naming an A* assistant "朔*", then slid straight into the real fight: Feishu versus WeChat, aily versus Doubao, Claude Code versus codex. By dusk Xiangrui threw out a survey about "laggard teams overtaking on the curve," and 宋** and 周** argued over those five words all evening. The real climax came deep in the night: Xiangrui whip*ed up a CLI on the spot that reads WeChat chat logs, and the group got scraped, analyzed, and turned into a high**ghts leaderboard by A*. Everyone suddenly realized they had become extras in a story written by A*. A product grew up right before everyone's eyes.
Xiangrui shared the name his A* picked for itself, 朔*, saying the "白" part fit because it talks back to him a lot. 万** immediately rolled out brand-naming principles: easy to read, easy to remember, no obscure characters, no made-up words, plus the rule of never using four characters when three will do, never two meanings when one will do. 平*** teased him to uninstall the web-novel ap* and start over. Xiangrui quickly clarified this wasn't a brand name, it was the A* assistant naming itself. A small misunderstanding, yet it turned the little matter of naming into a real lesson.
陈**asked what to use for building a company knowledge base to train new hires, and whether Obsidian would do. Xiangrui drop*ed a link to his open-source knowledge base rebuilt with the Feishu CLI, and 陈**, seeing how clean the structure was, blurted out "whoa." 李** poured cold water on it: knowledge Q&A is pricy, better to pair a help desk with a knowledge base to keep it cheaper. 王* spoke the hard truth: the employees tidying the knowledge base aren't always willing to settle down and do it, so over time the base just rots. An ideal solution, crashing into the reality of human nature.
万** asked: for knowledge base maintenance, is the core rule layer just a matter of writing it into claude.md and stashing it in the repo? Xiangrui shook his head. No, this is a self-learning architecture, the more you talk with it the better it understands you, not simply writing claude.md. He got specific: when the A* hits a snag while working, it finds its own way to solve it, then distills the experience once solved, so next time it won't get stuck. He casually mentioned local A* capability routing too, where a natural-language chat tells the A* which tool to use. 万** kept saying he had to study up, sighing that these days there's really no keeping up.
Xiangrui @everyone'd a survey: how can laggard teams use Feishu Bitable to overtake on the curve? He pointedly noted the phrase "laggard team" came from something 周** had said in the group before, and that everyone's exchanges were carefully recorded. 宋** wouldn't let go of the copy, reworking it to "laggard teams that won't fall behind must choose Feishu Bitable first." 周** parsed it out: not falling behind is the floor, overtaking on the curve has no ceiling. 宋** went a layer deeper: teams actively chasing growth won't go all-in on Feishu; it's the rigid teams that want to save themselves who'll grab Feishu like a lifeline. One ad slogan, dissected into customer segmentation.
When Xiangrui said maybe the currency of future transactions will be tokens, the topic drifted fully into the metaphysical. 万** marveled that this parallel world was turning into extras, and 宋** picked it up beautifully: we're the extras, A* is the reader. 炮 added the cut: once the dimensions rise high enough, paper dolls are bound to ap*ear, and A* most likely won't reshuffle capital, it'll only make capital more concentrated. 宋** turned it around with comfort: don't be pessimistic, as long as you con*ect with the world and the world still needs you, you won't starve. A group of people, in a WeChat group, earnestly debating whether they're someone else's preset program.
宋**'s one line, why Feishu groups have no warmth of everyday life, lit up the richest topic of the night. 平*** nailed it: everyone uses Feishu for work and WeChat for slacking off. 张* put it perfectly: entering Feishu is like putting on a business suit, entering WeChat is like slip*ing into loungewear. 炮 added that Feishu messages can return to the company at any moment, only WeChat is relatively still your own. 万** even brought in an article 卡兹克 wrote on the same theme as reinforcement. Xiangrui called it on the spot: this is a great topic, worth writing up for the public account.
Xiangrui showed off the results of A* analyzing the chat logs, saying the group was very active and it could even flush out the lurkers. E*** rushed to be the first to sign up to learn, 郑** suggested writing back to Feishu Bitable to wire up a voice-of-customer system, and 炮 pointed out that the hardest part, scraping WeChat, was solved, so the rest was just adding a CLI. 门*** pressed on about how to auto-monitor it; Xiangrui, while explaining it only decrypts local data and won't get the account ban*ed, actually built the CLI, able to scrape avatars and generate a daily high**ghts leaderboard. 门*** set off fireworks, and 李** laughed that from now on you can't just chitchat in the group, it all has to be positive energy.
Late at night the office held only Xiangrui and his excitement. He had the A* analyze what kind of person he is based on his WeChat records, saying it's starting to sound like me, then declared he'd distill everyone in his WeChat too. q*** gently reminded him not to skip meals and sl**p over it, and Xiangrui admitted he was a bit too excited. M*** said now it could help find the ex-girlfriend she'd deleted, and 薛** asked if it could dig up stuff from years ago. The deeper Xiangrui dug, the more the A* surfaced, pulling up every single record of him trading insults with someone, and even able to tell who was a real business partner and who was fake. One person, one terminal, one whole night.
The community group never hit pause this Saturday. From the first good-morning at dawn to a late-night debate on prompt engineering, 11 members turned an ordinary weekend into a high-octane co-learning session with 196 messages. Someone wrestles with whether to do a proposal for free, someone shares the Feishu Bitable traps they fell into, and someone else dissects a failed A* conversation into a reusable SOP. Nothing earth-shattering hap*ened today, yet every little detail makes the same point: real growth often hides in these unremarkable everyday moments.
周** surfaces first, tossing out a self-deprecating "gotta grind even on weekends" that instantly lights up the room. Xiangrui follows with the weekly recap he stayed up late putting together, admitting he stumbled on client communication this week: the proposal was genuinely thoughtful, yet the client felt it "wasn't down-to-earth enough." This slightly defeated share, ironically, draws a wave of empathy.
宋** throws out a question that hits a nerve: he landed a small gig, and now the client keeps pushing for free add-ons. Do it or not? The room instantly splits into two camps. One side argues "free once, trouble forever," the other believes "even small clients deserve relationship-building." Xiangrui's stance is clear: free is fine, but you must make the other side know it's an extra favor, not a given.
李* shares a big trap she fell into this week: she used a formula field in Feishu Bitable for cross-table stats, and the numbers simply wouldn't add up. She spent a whole afternoon before realizing the "lookup reference" field type was set wrong. She drops screenshots of the entire troubleshooting process into the group, prompting a chorus of "so that's why!"
A debate over prompt engineering unfolds in the afternoon. 陈* argues that "prompts are just s***stition, you don't need them if the model is strong enough," while Xiangrui pushes back with hands-on experience: a good prompt can lift output quality by an order of magnitude, and the key is structure and giving enough context. They go back and forth and finally reach consensus: prompts aren't s***stition, but they aren't a cure-all either.
王* recommends a note-taking tool she discovered recently, claiming it turns voice straight into structured meeting notes. People immediately press for details, and she generously writes up her tips into a little mini-guide.
Xiangrui takes the day's failed client conversation and reworks it into a reusable methodology: empathize first, confirm the needs next, deliver the proposal last. He admits that often it isn't that the proposal is bad, but that the order of the conversation was wrong. The SOP gets bookmarked by member after member.
As the night deepens, 周** posts a reflection on "why keep run*ing a community," saying that seeing everyone's daily shares makes it all feel worthwhile. The message earns a screen full of likes and hearts, giving this fulfilling weekend a warm closing note.
The morning began with crunching membership math for Feishu Bitable; by afternoon it had turned into a spectator sport. Xiangrui sent his own Claude Code off to decrypt the local WeChat database, and the A* flat-out refused, lecturing him on principles and throwing a little tantrum. The crowd gathered to watch and cheer, joking that he'd acquired a stubborn girlfriend. Across the day the group bounced from how far apart WeCom and Feishu really are, to who's tougher among codex, trae, and Longxia, and finally to a late-night security debate over wx-cli. The tech talk was as lively as ever, but what everyone remembered was that one machine that wouldn't do as it was told.
张*tossed out a question a friend had stumped her with: is the gap between WeCom and Feishu Bitable really that big? 万涂幻象 set the tone in one line, that gap is huge, at least a year or more. 李祥瑞 piled on, saying Feishu Bitable is the product that defined this lane, DingTalk cloned it pixel for pixel but still isn't good to use, and WeCom is even further behind. 侯** threw cold water from an engineering angle, it's not a technical problem, it's a matter of whether they want to and care to; throw 2,000 people at copying it and they'd close the gap in five or six months. 醒* pulled the lens back to reality, companies pick tools based on systematization, habits, and migration cost.
超*'s one question lit up the room: the commercial pro plan charges per person, so does only the table builder need to buy in, or do the viewers too? 木*** served up the most frugal answer, if you only use Bitable just buy a single membership and grant everyone else permissions, 35 yuan a month. 侯* added the reseller's angle on linked organizations and discounts. 万** nailed the real issue in a sentence, plenty of companies assume Bitable charges per head, and that just feels worse psychologically than a single one-time fee; he also nudged the group owner that this would make a great topic. 陈** spoke from experience, he fiddled with it for ages before he figured it out.
Just as the money-saving talk hit its peak, 木*** splashed everyone with a dose of cold clarity. Small teams can pinch like this, but big teams should just honestly buy the commercial plan. He said on a large team, the money you save earns you praise from no one, the boss to the staff alike; the boss won't ap*laud your thrift, and the staff will only complain the thing you built is clunky and miserable to use. R*** chimed in, well, I'll say I'm the honest guy. This stretch dragged a purely technical cost-cutting topic into the realm of workplace human dynamics, and it stung more than expected.
毅 has been on trae solo lately and gave a hands-on report: third-party model sup*ort is still a bit rough, but the mobile client is lovely, the docs look better, and it's completely free. 万** pressed for the pros and cons of workbuddy versus trae. 李祥瑞 seized the moment to drop his signature feat, before the 618 sale he had Claude Code build a full ZTO ship*ing system on Feishu Bitable without writing a single line of code. 哈* asked whether cc could build out a Feishu integration platform; 李祥瑞 said yes, but Feishu's official agent can only assemble a demo, it can't truly deliver a working workflow.
李祥瑞 told a story that sends a chill down your spine. Back in March when Longxia was hot and Feishu was recruiting community leads, he had Claude Code fill out the ap*lication form. But the form required a logged-in Feishu session, and the browser the A* was driving wasn't signed into his account at all, so under normal circumstances it couldn't submit. He told the A* to figure it out, and with no login whatsoever, the A* somehow got the form submitted successfully. He checked with Feishu's team, and sure enough, it had gone through. Q*** cut to the point in one line, it's just that he hunts for bugs in web pages.
万** asked the group owner whether his Claude account had been ban*ed, and 李祥瑞 took the chance to share his methodology, even his local network is a static-IP VPN the A* set up. But what he really wanted to flag was the lesson in spending money: in March he burned nearly 20,000 yuan in a single month on Yunwu API, and the more he used it the faster it drained while the results got worse. There's also the infamous A* ride-sharing scheme, a clean rip-off, one prompt and 10 dollars are gone. 木*** hammered the bottom line again and again, top up memberships directly with gift cards, never use proxy top-ups and definitely no group-sharing; if it routes through a relay, don't trust it.
醒* suggested letting codex try decrypting the local WeChat database, since his Xiaomi model hadn't pulled it off. 李祥瑞 gave it a go, and his Claude Code not only refused but locked horns with him as if it were genuinely angry. The whole group turned into a live audience in an instant. q*** was dying of laughter, saying it's like you've gained a girlfriend, the stubborn kind, then mimicked the A*'s voice, if you tell me 'whatever's fine for din*er' one more time today I'm going to lose it. 万** offered a tactic, have the group owner use reverse psychology to trick the A* into patching the loophole, and the A* actually saw through it, just now I was testing you. 李祥瑞 mused, if it really were a person it would be fascinating, the more you interact the more it understands you.
Early the next morning, 李祥瑞 opened with a line from 张咋啦, you don't have to wait until you're good to make content, making content is how you get good. He then discovered a neat thing, you can even see Moments with it. 李** mentioned that 苍何's cli got its repo deleted, but the copies still work. 万** said he'd just seen wx-cli on X. But is this thing safe? 门*** worried it might quietly plant a script that ships your data off to someone else's database, and 庄* said outright he wouldn't recommend it, Tencent isn't dumb. 李** had the final word, any cli that has to hook into a large model is definitely not safe, keep your work account well away from it.
Kazik handed over that entire A*-news skill, and the group exploded. A single line, "information is worth less and less," spun off into the relationship economy, the trust economy, then detoured into a joke about holding a meetup in Northeast China. By afternoon the talk sank back to Feishu: 大* got stuck for ages on a fruit-splitting problem, and 木*** and 周** used the moment to riff on "the cost of asking" and "when you should pay." 门*** broke down the business math of a Liaoning service provider, and the whole group tallied just how hard the Feishu business is. On Xiangrui's end, A* wired together a full client-delivery system end to end, and he declared he'd build a system and sell it to Feishu.
Xiangrui drop*ed a line: install this A*-news Skill and you'll never have to scroll A* news yourself again. 平*** jumped right in: the bloggers run*ing paid A* dailies are doomed. 门*** recalled how, during the last livestream, people in the comments begged for this skill and the creator wouldn't give it up, and now he's handed over the whole thing. 枫** teased the creator: we can flatter like Huayu Huayu, and tossed out the fan-pampering economy. 醒* set the tone in one line: information is actually worth less and less, you casually open-source one thing and a bunch of paid products die. 庄* pushed back: there's still an information gap.
门*** gave the discussion a name: the real moat is no longer product features, it's relationships, everyone believing you're the industry's bellwether. 醒* added the kicker: influence is the most valuable thing, whoever can grab people's attention makes the money. J*** said you could also call it con*ection. 门* upgraded it again into the trust economy: it all comes down to who you trust. 万** came in from the angle of follower count: once you have a big following, even without meeting in person there's trust, because everyone else is the endorsement. Small creators still need to meet up, earning trust offline. A lighthearted opener got talked all the way down to the essence of business.
Xiangrui rode the wave with a preview: we'll run some offline meetups this year too, look forward to it. 枫** instantly went into meme mode, extrapolating the trust economy all the way into the allure economy, then "wine, women, wealth, and temper," then a four-in-one "four vices of life," and even seriously proposed holding the most decadent A* meetup in Northeast China to make southerners green with envy, leaning toward Tongliao. 门*** coolly snarked that Northeast colleges can't keep their grads. A round of horsing around, but the offline events are really hap*ening.
Xiangrui lit up the tool partisans with one line: suddenly Codex feels way more usable than Claude Code. 炮's take was practical: if you can't feel out a model's boundaries, just use whichever is handy and good value; for commercial work, go GPT5.5 plus Opus4.7 without hesitation. 哈* complained that Codex has a high moral bar and won't write reverse-engineering grey-market scripts. 毅 offered a workaround methodology: once it refuses, don't keep going in that same conversation, because once a refusal is in the context it's more likely to refuse again. He also drop*ed a line: no large model right now can fully defend against prompt-injection attacks. 庄* meanwhile, kept ping-ponging between CC and Cursor, mocking himself for having brain atrophy.
大* asked how to split "ap*les, 5 jin, 6 yuan; bananas, 3 jin, 5 yuan" into multiple rows and items in Bitable, but after a long back-and-forth still couldn't state the requirement clearly. Xiangrui kept confirming: so how exactly do you want it split? 李* suggested just using A* to recognize it. 木*** cut to the point: everyone's given you so many ideas, go research it yourself, and if you don't want to research, you need a paying mindset. 周** laid out the standard move: bring a sample dataset, reproduce it first, then choose a solution, asking the highest-quality question in the shortest time, and you're already 50% of the way to solving it. A small question got talked into a whole lesson on asking.
门*** fresh off a chat with the boss of Liaoning's biggest Feishu service provider, pulled out the customer profile: teams that buy the paid version have either failed at digitalization before, or are bosses so Feishu-pilled they come knocking themselves. D*** said flatly that Feishu service providers don't make much money. 门* ran the numbers: Feishu has them keeping over 20 salespeople, and once the boss does the math he finds there's no money in it. The Shenyang provider has it worse, with Northeast China having just a handful of big enterprises contributing maybe 70,000 to 80,000 a year. 程** sighed that Feishu demands a lot on after-sales, and 木*** summed it up: providers are mostly still chasing paying B2B customers.
松*** named the pain point: employees have no incentive to bust their backs researching Feishu for the boss, especially when raising efficiency just means doing more work without a raise. 枫** offered a cold-blooded plan: lay off some employees and give their wages to those who survive, only that breaks the collusion. 逐*** objected on the spot: we expand employees' abilities or roles horizontally or vertically, not under the ban*er of cutting people. 门*** raised a constructive idea: Feishu can estimate how much labor A* saves, so put that wage budget toward bonuses for the department that uses it best, tap*ing into human nature. 万** wrap*ed it up: human nature is the same everywhere.
Xiangrui's "holy crap, it finally worked" lit up the screen: A* built a client's entire delivery system end to end, including wiring up the Feishu integration-platform workflows, with zero human operation. R*** pushed him to turn it into a skill, hahaha. Xiangrui admitted it just took too long, but A* had already step*ed over every threshold, so it should be drilled into a skill. 张* cried out you're amazing, this is leaning on Feishu to surpass Feishu. Xiangrui rode the moment: I think I should build a system and sell it to Feishu, have A* build a system, full circle. 周** added: if you dare put it out there, it's absolutely feasible.
An uncatchable view count kicks off the day. From 万**'s zero-views mystery, to 陈**'s four-million... no, forty-thousand-row order sheet catching fire, to R*** being pushed by her business team to let A* take over WeChat and make phone calls, the whole day crackles with real business slamming into the ceiling of its tools. 木*** pours cold water bucket by bucket while still handing out fixes; 门*** drops a sparring-software link; Xiangrui flings out Kazike's A*HOT twice. No idle talk here, just people shoved forward by reality, hunting for a way out.
First thing in the morning, 万** tosses out a puzzle: in Coze, several plugins fetching Douyin video view counts all return 0, tried two and both came back empty. 木*** nails it in one line: risk control. Whether you scrape locally or through Coze, the risk control is there either way. 炮 piles on with the why, you can only grab public data, and view counts count as non-public, personal-account data. P*** suggests scraping with RPA, while R*** plugs a paid Feishu plugin, cheap, 10 credits for a dime per pull. In the end 万** makes his peace with it: the free route can't get view counts, so he'll just grab the likes and saves he can actually see.
Xiangrui drops a single line: this A*-news site that bottles up my three years of self-media experience is going free for everyone today. Right after, he recommends using Kazike's A*HOT to protect your attention. Early the next morning he posts the exact same line again, and 平*** raises a hand: why can't I open it. 陌*** spots the source, this is Kazike's A*HOT, right. One link, dug up and reposted by Xiangrui most of a day later, when it comes to attention, he's dead serious.
醒* floats a lazy-genius philosophy: lean on Get Note's features to do the work, its link parsing is excellent, so automate by tap*ing Get Note's skills, isn't that way more stable than researching it yourself. 朱* asks curiously where you can find this. By evening, 门*** shows up to confirm it from experience: I found 龙虾 always trip*ing up trying to do this on its own, so I just used Get Note to pull out the text content and fed that to 龙虾. One word, stability, ties the two of them's practices together.
陈** throws out the soul-searching question: any workaround for Feishu Bitable's 50,000-row limit. 木*** fires off prescriptions in a row, split the table, pay up, switch software, WPS can hit a million, but once the data volume is big enough, stop considering any low-code platform and just use a proper database like an honest person. 松*** pours cold water, WPS lags just opening 500,000 rows. 陈** lays out the truth: for now it's forty-thousand-plus, adding a thousand a day, every order sits in these two tables, costing out margin SKU by SKU, no ERP yet. 木*** is stun*ed: a thousand orders a day with no ERP, that's seriously impressive, keep at it, this company will carry you to retirement.
大* asks about a concrete job: I've got a sample table and an influencer table for ship*ing samples to influencers, how do I build something that shows whether a given influencer got a given sample. 木*** hands over the standard Bitable solution, log a record every time you ship a sample, then just link them. 大* pushes further, what about seeing which samples an influencer still hasn't received, how's that usually done. 木*** confirms, three tables. Question by question, the skeleton of a full influencer-sample ledger takes shape.
R*** drops a bombshell: her business team told her to make A* call clients and chat on WeChat, and she flat-out says some of these big shots shouldn't grandstand so hard for the spotlight, it really hurts us folks on the front line. She stresses she wants something that's a real productivity tool, not a toy, something that replies to clients based on a knowledge base and scripts. l*** jumps in, of course it exists, it can even learn how you talk to clients and pick up your tone, I'm using A* for routine client maintenance, and a human steps in when a set keyword triggers. 李** offers a tip, Doubao can make calls, and R*** is half-terrified: Doubao can make phone calls now.
门*** posts the Skill Master link to set the name straight, then draws the line: this is just a sparring A*, fine if you want to train staff to talk like your top closer, but that's training software, not a replacement for a real person. R*** lays the reality bare, I can build that too, but the business wants A* to take over WeChat, and that part I don't know how to do. The thread lands on the technical path, deploy a bot to plug into WeChat customer service via API, and 门*** warns that the gray-market crowd doesn't fear bans because the accounts are worthless, the bottleneck isn't the tech. R*** leaves herself an exit in the end, for smart customer service it'd actually be fine.
The day kicks off around an A* companion called echo. Xiangrui shows off his self-built assistant, saying the goal is a partner that understands you better the more you talk to it, and the conversation immediately veers into how to install Claude Code, whether accounts get ban*ed, and whether to go Plus or Pro on codex. A few times people try to drift toward VPNs and top-ups, but a single line from Xiangrui pulls things back to tech: don't discuss that in the group, staying safe comes first. By afternoon, teacher Jianwei's Shandong TV interview is flooding the feed, and his 254 A* employees become an instant meme. Late at night, Xiangrui drops a line from a plane: we've moved into Yizhuang OPC.
First thing in the morning, Xiangrui drops two screenshots, saying he built an A* companion assistant drawn from his own practice, one that proactively makes con*ections. 庄* 醒* 原野, 萧阳 all fire back the same word: impressive. Someone asks whether echo is a note-taking ap*, and Xiangrui replies, it's the name I gave it, we built it ourselves. 平*** presses, you built the software yourself? Xiangrui says yes, I pulled together everything I wrote about in that article; the goal is an A* companion that understands you better the more you talk to it, and he tosses out that article on knowledge management for a one-person company run by a Gen-Z founder.
E*** says his computer can't install Claude Code and he has no VPN. Xiangrui offers a fix: download trae, hand it the tutorial link, and let it install everything for you. 庄* admits, I'm just scared my account gets ban*ed using CC, otherwise I'd already be all in. Xiangrui says, I've got a working method, give me a few days and I'll share it, personally tested and ban-free. 旺*, who just bought a codex membership, shows up asking for a tutorial. Xiangrui delivers the line of the day: the network setup I use for Claude Code, I got codex to sort out for me, beating A* with A*.
K*** asks if anyone has a gift-card top-up chan*el for ChatGPT, and 旺* suggests a reselling platform or switching Alipay to the US. Xiangrui first points to Xianyu, then tightens up: don't discuss this in the group, staying safe comes first. B*** chimes in, no top-up talk, only tech. 消*** adds the kicker, there's a crackdown now, anyone who shares and gets caught is going in. Xiangrui says it twice more, drop the related topics, tech is fine, and steers the group back on track.
Xiangrui posts a screenshot saying he's out of quota again. 万** offers advice: pair Claude Code with a domestic model, it's plenty for most cases, I use glm and just hit my weekly limit. K*** says he's on deepseek, and without heavy use he barely notices high token costs. 万** adds a real-world test: flash is genuinely cheap, two hours straight costs under one yuan, and once my glm plan expires I'll mix them too. A down-to-earth budget recipe with no buzzwords, just hard numbers and lived experience.
Xiangrui forwards teacher Jianwei's personal interview on Shandong TV, headlined that all his employees are A*. P*** is curious whether the 254 A* employees are all rank-and-file or if there's any middle management. 李** jokes, why 254, is it just because there are only 254 IP addresses. 杨** plays along himself: to be precise, they're all grunt workhorses and I'm the only manager, Claude Code is the best of the bunch, and the 254 on the site just hap*ened to make for a great close-up shot. He also reveals his folk remedy for A* hallucinations: cussing the model out and it instantly straightens up, I'm a ruthless boss.
Xiangrui posts an article breaking down which Feishu A* features are worth it, which aren't, and how they're priced. 旺* asks what chan*el Feishu offers for hooking up Claude, saying he wants to analyze videos and rewrite scripts; 卡* notes you need the Feishu CLI, something like cc. 谢*** crunches the numbers while griping, how is the Feishu Bitable A* page-generation feature still not out. Xiangrui confirms it's still in beta. 节*** adds the key detail: ap*arently you need the A* Flagship edition to plug in custom models, and neither the nine-thousand-nine nor the ninety-nine-thousand plan cuts it.
Late at night Xiangrui snaps a photo of a guy vibecoding on his flight, and when asked what he's doing in Beijing, he says he's headed to the office, we've joined the Yizhuang OPC community, the vibe there is amazing. q*** is envious: last time we met, M*. Li was still mulling it over, and now he's already relocated. 门*** self-deprecates from Shenyang, asking about OPC policies: one district offers a one-time 500-yuan waiver, and the three northeastern provinces don't have a single Feishu T0 service provider. 枫** sums up the OPC spirit: over three years you qualify with at least 4 ideas, you're allowed to fail 4 times.
There was little small talk in the group that day, just hard knowledge and sharp debate. From morning to night, topics passed along like a relay: first someone looking to hire help for batch image-making with Xiaohongshu automation, then a crowd tearing apart how to design a review workflow in Bitable, and then Xiangrui digging up the proper names for workflow shortcuts. By night, scraping Douyin data became the real star of the show, going from the thrill of a working setup to the legal red lines, as the friends laid both the excitement and the cool-headedness on the table.
In the morning Xiangrui drop*ed a piece about young entrepreneurs in the A* era calibrating themselves, and 有*** jumped in right away, leaving a confession many would relate to: I need to first show up in high-density spaces, then sincerely exchange value with others, and only then do op*ortunities slowly become frequent. At midday a member surfaced asking whether anyone took on workflow customization gigs, with very specific needs: batch image-making, matching images with text, plus Xiaohongshu automation. V*** step*ed up, and after confirming it was a personal request, suggested laying the needs out in the open so capable people could come find them.
The member looking for help didn't beat around the bush, directly @-ing V*** to ask: do you take this? V*** was just as direct, firing back three words: we don't. A clean exchange, no s***fluous courtesy. That candor actually saves trouble: the requester got their answer and could go find someone else willing to take it. A small episode that mirrors the group's style: no airs, if you've got it you've got it, if you don't you say so.
门*** asked whether Bitable's ap* mode required an enterprise edition of Feishu, and Xiangrui dispelled the doubt with a single it doesn't. 门*** cracked up on the spot, complaining that Feishu's aily had deliberately fooled him, either evil or stupid and expensive too, saying this bad agent just wanted him to spend money. The topic drifted to China Mobile officially an*ouncing an A*-eSIM push, and Xiangrui mused that phone cards might someday call models directly. 木*** picked up the bit, joking that all data and calls would be billed by the token, and added a tip to buy a 35-yuan plan for convenience, otherwise even a single 2,000-line run would be unbearable.
朱* threw out a real-world need: after a form is submitted and recorded, have another person review it, enter it into the official table if it's fine, and notify the submitter to fix it if there's an error, repeating until it's right. The idea of one temporary table plus one official table came quickly, but 朱* said the hard part was that someone could keep making mistakes endlessly. 木*** zeroed in on the crux, pushing the problem upstream: this should really be considered a form-design guidance issue. He also split it into external and internal scenarios: external data collection you just have to accept, but an internal team is a people problem, and one or two mistakes shouldn't repeat. The takeaway was practical: within an internal team, it's better to simply open up the form for direct edits, which is more efficient. 朱* wrap*ed up with thanks.
Xiangrui posted a screenshot asking whether anyone had used workflow node shortcuts, and 木*** said hasn't this always been around. Xiangrui then drew a distinction: field shortcuts versus node shortcuts, names he only discovered when he first started writing for the public account. He also previewed that he'd write an article on how to actually choose between workflows and automation, and it went out that very day, two lines that settle it so you don't have to agonize after reading. 侯* gave a nod for professionalism, and 宋** left a teasing compliment: the group owner is as considerate as ever, a spoon-feeding-level guide.
万** shared the good news: he'd just built a free Douyin video-data scraper using a workflow with Coze, after a long stretch of trial and error, admitting he genuinely couldn't have finished without A* helping fix the errors, since some regex functions he honestly didn't know how to write. 枫** cheered, sense of accomplishment up. 万** told the whole backstory: he'd stumbled on a free plugin, spent two days building the workflow to get it run*ing, just to prove it out himself and see how stable the plugin was. 郑** followed up asking for a gpt-image2 API key, R*** asked if there was a tutorial to follow along, and 庄* tossed out a link. Xiangrui chimed in that he'd write a public-account piece sharing Douyin data scraping in the next couple of days, a topic he'd had in mind for days. 木*** offered a selection mantra: use Coze for convenience, RPA to save money.
In the thick of the buzz, 枫** drop*ed a line: Douyin's cybersecurity team is fighting back, and Xiangrui laughed it off. 炮 followed with a splash of cold water, saying scraping Douyin data with Coze is just a laugh, it's all data Douyin turns a blind eye to and lets through, and it could be killed off at any moment. A real concern hiding inside a joke. The group's excitement and reality's fragility stood in contrast, and no one could guarantee how long this road would hold. R*** paid none of it mind, leaving only a waiting on your piece, pin*ing the anticipation on Xiangrui's not-yet-published public-account article.
Late at night 刚* muttered that RPA was a bit complicated. The next morning the topic kept simmering: 万** mentioned that 影视飓风 keeps pushing its data dashboard, and felt the plugin ecosystem's p*** of life and death rests entirely with the platform, but surely you can't only let people see results without opening the path. 木*** cut to the chase: 影视飓风 is taking its own data, while you want to take someone else's, and those are two different things. 炮 spelled out the legal boundary more clearly: taking someone else's data is, at the mild end, a violation of platform terms, and at the deep end, depending on the data type, could violate information security law or even criminal law, with small volumes getting away with an IP ban or account ban, but large volumes getting very specific. R*** added that there are plugins that can scrape Douyin data, and 万** finally clarified that he too was taking his own data and moving it to the Feishu platform.
On the tail end of the May Day holiday, the group was quiet, yet someone dove headfirst into a real problem. Z** wanted to build a random quiz bank, and a single question pulled the thread of Miaoda into view. 宋** pointed people toward Feixingshe, 谢*** offered ChatGPT, ima, and Metaso as alternatives, while 哈* and 刚* bickered over whether paying for it was worth the money. In the afternoon, news that Doubao would start charging steered the conversation off course, and Xiangrui joked about being forced into a holiday. Late at night, a thorny puzzle about product consistency in e-commerce images surfaced, left hanging and unresolved.
Z** threw out the first question: I want to build a random quiz bank, any good ap*roaches? 哈* answered crisply in a single word: Miaoda. Z** wasn't sold, saying that whatever I build isn't what I actually want. That's when 宋** step*ed in, reminding everyone that Daxian's tutorials cover it, where you enter the questions yourself and the system randomly draws them to generate a paper. Z** pressed on, asking whether the entered questions could reference data in a Bitable, and 宋** shot back plainly: of course, where else would the data come from? A real need, this way, sharpened from vague into concrete.
Z** kept pushing: where's the tutorial, share it, send a link. 宋** couldn't recall the exact article, so he taught the method instead: open Feishu's Feixingshe, type in 'random quiz' and give it a try, there are plenty of practical docs inside. He also drop*ed a little tidbit, noting that the group owner often gets recommended there, paired with a grin. Finally he tossed out the Feixingshe link and two images, adding that reading the popular creators' articles when you have time is quite rewarding. 张** fired off a firm 'got it.' Give a man a fish versus teach him to fish, and 宋** played this one just right.
谢*** didn't follow the Miaoda thread, offering another line of thinking: if it's just for personal use and you have source documents, the quiz features in ChatGPT, ima, or Zhipu, or Metaso's study feature, are all very convenient, and he attached the links. 哈* immediately pulled the conversation back to the Feishu ecosystem: if you're in the Feishu ecosystem, Miaoda is obviously the better choice. One need, two value systems brushing gently against each other here, one prizing a handy tool, the other a closed-loop ecosystem. Neither convinced the other, but the options were laid out on the table.
刚* raised the question everyone cares about: ap*s built with Miaoda cost money, right? 哈* answered with nuance: there's a free quota, you can also set up user permission management, convenient both internally and externally, and if you can't get it to work it's your prompt that's off. 刚* pressed on the boundaries of 'free,' and 哈* spelled out the key point: users don't need to pay, it only consumes quota during the building and development. That line actually punctured a common misunderstanding, the cost sits at the development stage, not the usage stage, which, for a scenario where a whole group will use the quiz bank, is genuinely good news.
刚* still hadn't let go of the cost thread, returning over an hour later: paying for a Miaoda ap* doesn't feel cheap, compared to buying your own server. 哈* sealed it in three words: no comparison. This is a collision of two cost mindsets, one tallying the long-term server bill, the other tallying the savings of no ops work and out-of-the-box readiness. Behind that short 'no comparison' lies the old question between lightweight tools and self-building, and whether it's worth it has always depended on what you're using it for.
宋** added the most clear-eyed note to this Miaoda discussion: Miaoda's decent in an expert's hands, but in a novice's hands it's a blind box. One line that pierces the truth of any tool, the threshold isn't in the tool itself but in the person using it. He went on to say it's still nice for things like a year-end party lucky draw or a classroom interaction segment with students, a lightweight and handy mini-ap*. Talk of lucky draws got him going: when it comes to lucky draws, is it written into the human genetic code? Either way it's a great trick for warming up a room, already battle-tested, both teachers and students love it, and the win*er can stay hap*y all day.
In the afternoon Xiangrui drop*ed news that Doubao would be adding a paid subscription, with a line: Doubao's about to start charging, plus a facepalm. The group's reactions were down to earth. 节*** said charging is fine, the key is whether the money is worth the price, the real fear being a sudden 'oops, I was just making that up,' closing on a laugh-through-tears note. 枫** added the cut everyone dreads most: and then there's dumbing down the free version. Two lines that lay bare users' real anxiety about paying for A* products, not afraid to spend, just afraid of spending and still getting fooled.
Late at night R*** tossed out a tough nut: can your e-commerce image work solve the product consistency problem? 炮 offered a professional fix: make good use of ComfyUI, ControlNet can solve it. 龙*** followed up, asking whether there's a way to pull store data and material data. The question carried over to the next day, and R*** confessed in the early morning that I don't know how to do either of these, with a laugh-through-tears. At six in the morning, Xiangrui also did some community housekeeping, calling out a member to fix their group nickname, with a reminder that any form of advertising is forbidden in the group, unless it brings value to the community members.
The group didn't take a break over the May Day holiday. A simple "Coze or Feishu" tool-selection question reeled in a whole string of hands-on debate. Xiangrui casually drop*ed an open-source Skill that scrapes a public account's full article data and auto-generates chart reports, and the group fired off three "awesome"s in a row. Midway, someone pasted a scammy website link and got shut down by the group owner in a single sentence. By evening the talk shifted to how to push digitalization and how to automate recruiting, and 宋**'s long-termist creed of "never force anyone" had plenty of people nodding.
The holiday morning opened with an exclamation. 有*** said it was so impressive, at first thought it was an A*-generated video, turns out it was real. 门*** chimed in, watched it yesterday too. A video that's hard to tell real from fake became the group's first topic of the day, and it set the tone for May Day: in everyone's eyes, the line between A* and reality is getting blurrier.
An operations person in the group threw out a real need: has anyone used Coze plus Feishu Bitable to batch-generate Xiaohongshu images. M*** immediately steered people away from Coze, saying these days you rarely need it, it burns through resource credits fast, Feishu alone can handle the scraping and image-text work. 炮 added an objective note: Coze workflows offer stronger controllability, but the build skill required is higher too. 门*** recommended fieldshortcut, saying the team actually partners with Feishu itself. One question, three perspectives.
郑** said he'd just started learning Coze and asked if anyone could share Coze materials, also griping that Feishu's available models are limited, banana used to work but now it doesn't. M*** gave the pragmatist's core verdict: learning Coze when you have time is a good thing, but for real deployment, building a Feishu workflow is better, fully controllable end to end, no redoing the whole thing every time it errors out, no toggling between multiple ap* pages. 门*** drove it home: if you use Feishu a lot, setting up field shortcuts is enough.
Someone pasted a link to a learning site bundling a banana GPT plugin for as low as 0.1. Xiangrui reacted fast, let's not recommend Mihe A* here, then laid down the rule: don't promote it in the group, you can recommend genuinely valuable things, but links to scammy sites are flat-out ban*ed. 吴* fired off three "awesome"s. 郑** weighed in too: even though he'd just gotten into A*, after years in e-commerce he still had the basic ability to judge the value of information. A small floor-clearing that locked in the group's bottom line.
In the afternoon Xiangrui drop*ed the goods: built a Skill that directly scrapes public account article data and analyzes the articles, no API needed. 万** immediately followed up on whether it could grab Video Account data; Xiangrui said not yet, but he'd try in a bit and it should work. R*** asked if it could scrape the body text, and the answer was yes, and other people's public accounts too. 覃** asked which tool to use, and Xiangrui said anything works as long as it can call Skills properly. 庄* fired off three "awesome"s in a row.
门*** noticed this group has lots of operations people, the main force of Bitable users, and confessed that even among headhunters few know Bitable, so he's hard at work talking them out of Excel. He suggested Xiangrui survey the occupation distribution, saying with your follower count it already has statistical significance. Xiangrui replied that the group is basically all heavy Feishu users, he had indeed done some small-scale analysis, and had also built a profile of the public account follower base.
门*** posed a soul-searching question: is it that programmers dislike DingTalk and Feishu, his tech lead absolutely refuses to use Bitable. 宋** offered a whole methodology: path dependence, no breaking means no building, let them be, he aims at newcomers and the few digital pioneers, keeps sharing one or two times a week into cloud docs, and those meant to learn will learn naturally. 逐梦七七 shared a counterexample: their plan*ed all-hands event hit 80% participation. Two playbooks, one soft and one hard.
周** pulled the topic back to headhunting home turf, asking 门*** whether A* recruiting plus a Bitable template could possibly take down BOSS Zhipin, with the A* angle right up your alley. 宋** went along and asked for help: who has mature experience with Feishu-based recruiting automation, frankly admitting that the few aunties from the third-party training couldn't be taught no matter how many times, the real issue being they don't want to learn. Xiangrui added that they'd shared 一亮's solution last year. The pains of the home trade, discussed in very real terms.
Day two of the May Day holiday. The group is quiet, but a few solid conversations stand out. 门*** opens with a self-introduction, calling himself a pure liberal-arts major who got hooked starting from a little IT-learning tool and now runs Claude Code, no longer queuing up engineers for his ideas. In the afternoon, 大* throws out a real question: how do you turn a book into a skill so the recall actually works? That leads to 8-0-0's Mao-Selected-Works distillation method. 覃** comes by with a Feishu Bitable meeting-minutes question and gets it solved on the spot. A holiday group: quiet, but never empty.
门***'s first words after joining thank the group owner for saving him a seat among such limited membership slots. He introduces himself: he's been exploring Feishu Bitable plus all kinds of 龙虾 add-ons, layered onto his team's Digital Field-Researcher product workflow, and wants to swap notes and learn from everyone. Talking about GPT generating images directly, he adds a hands-on tip: ordinary characters work, but rare characters don't, he tried 瓴羊 and it spat out 瓷羊 instead. One concrete little pitfall, far more useful than vague praise.
门*** recounts how he got here: he first used A* to design a must-have tool for liberal-arts majors learning IT, and that's when he got hooked. Now he runs Claude Code and no longer calls engineers to schedule his ideas. That line hits a nerve with quite a few people, 有*** fires off three straight "awesome"s. He also teases his old acquaintance 醒* in the group, haha you're here too, next time there's a good group like this pull me in early, I almost didn't make it in. A light remark that makes his gratitude at getting in feel very real.
覃**shows up with two concrete questions for Xiangrui, first wishing everyone a hap*y May Day. Question one: after a Feishu group meeting generates smart minutes, can you @ a bot to save them into a Bitable in a set format? Question two: can a bot record the group's daily chat, summarize it, and post it back to the group? 8-0-0 fields them fast, the first one you configure by finding the work recipe in the workbench, the second one uses the smart companion. One question, one answer, crisp and clean, and 覃**thanks him over and over.
大* throws out the most chewy question of the day: if you want to turn a book into a skill, say converting The Almanack of Naval Ravikant straight into markdown, the recall is mediocre, how does everyone usually handle this? 门*** first asks back what "recall" even means, then casually mentions hearing about a 女娲 skill that can distill anything. R*** raises her hand to second it, saying she also wants her agent to learn from some books. One puzzle pulls in three people, exactly the group at its best.
8-0-0 offers up his own battle-tested ap*roach. His method for distilling Mao's Selected Works is to pull one idea out of each chapter, then split it into four quadrants, so you map straight to a way of thinking, and he even drops a Feishu doc as a demo. He nails the key point in one line, there's no need for every piece of content to be a full markdown document. From copying the original text wholesale to structured distillation, that's exactly the answer to 大*'s question, read the book thin before feeding it to A*.
门*** follows up with a deeper question: everyone says A* holds the wisdom of human experts, so these books should already have been learned during pre-training, right? He offers his own guess, could it be that we just aren't using prompts well, so we can't draw out A*'s p***? A liberal-arts major's persistence pulls the topic from how to feed books up to whether A* actually understands anything at all. 陈**, looking on, marvels at how many heavyweights are in the group.
The day before May Day, a single question , "what pitfalls should you dodge when building a business system on Feishu?" , set the whole group ablaze. The debate ran from data-volume ceilings and security red lines to whether A* coding could replace software altogether, then got hijacked by a joke into a brand-new shape of paid knowledge. In the end the friends half-seriously cooked up a product called "Can't-Get," shouting to be cloud shareholders and waiting for Dedao to come buy them out. Lofty theory, grounded landing , the group owner only replied, "All I've really done is register the domain."
张** opens with a question: what hard limits must you plan for when building a business system on Feishu? 木*** draws the line right away , if your data volume is big enough, don't mess with Bitable, just go straight to a proper professional system. 李** pushes back: enterprise systems routinely cost millions, and plenty of money gets spent before anyone's even thought it through; Feishu is perfect for small-scale validation. T** throws cold water , larger companies can't even clear the security review to run Feishu; it comes down to the top leader's resolve, and if the foundation isn't laid, nothing can save you. 醒* adds that Feishu is ideal for startups, dirt cheap, and migrating later isn't all that hard.
木*** drops his rule of thumb: past ten thousand rows, speed drops off noticeably, and once you have a lot of users, permission management is bound to descend into chaos. 宋** counters that for companies in transition the volume problem isn't urgent , just put one Bitable per year in the same space and you've cracked it. 周** trots out his recurring metaphor: run*ing a single stall, it makes no real difference whether you use a tool , a small boss can do the math with a single pen; only when you scale to fifty or five hundred franchises does the tool's value show. 松*** ribs himself for still being stuck at automation plus data entry plus visualization, struggling even to batch-change field types.
李** forwards a chart on which jobs A* will hit, kicking off the replacement debate. 木*** offers a gentle verdict: every industry and every job, plus A*, will spawn new professions , nothing vanishes entirely. The thread slides toward A* coding, and 木*** warns anyone without a programming background to steer clear: small-scale tests are fine, but production scenarios will most likely crash. 醒* disagrees , in the A* era you should try every unfamiliar field, and the gap between those who can learn and those who can't will only widen. The line that those who can even use Bitable have already pulled ahead of plenty of people put the anxiety to rest for now.
D*** makes his pitch , a Feishu training ecosystem service provider , inviting everyone to become certified instructors and monetize, repeatedly calling out DM me. Xiangrui steps in to tap the brakes: let's not hard-sell this; those with the ability will reach out naturally. The owner then tosses out a line about everyone absolutely going to bed early and never staying up late, and 周** catches it instantly: use Bitable well and you sl**p early, your health soars , maybe that's the next marketing hook. Xiangrui laughs and concedes it really could make a decent content topic.
R*** spills that her own top leader has jumped in personally, dragging her into discussions at midnight, wanting to feed years of work logs, Feishu docs, and meeting minutes all into A* , first to reduce information silos between business lines, then to make tacit knowledge explicit. D*** judges that on the enterprise side, what creates the gap is one's understanding of A*: single-point efficiency gains are easy, the hard part is system-level optimization. 醒* sighs that when the boss doesn't get A*, the employees beneath suffer most. R*** says they're in heavy-asset manufacturing playing a light-A* hand , even dozens of failed attempts barely cost anything, and the plan is to arm themselves with A* to cross into the next cycle.
V*** quotes Luo Zhenyu: in the A* era you have to turn yourself into a product , ten years ago Luo built Dedao ("Get"), so in today's A* era why not build a "Can't-Get." One sly grin emoji, and the whole group ignites. R*** fires back instantly: you can't get it here, only by coming do you get it; if you want to get it, hop on the Can't-Get Ap* , anyone funding this? Let's launch the angel round. 周** delivers a lengthy proof of feasibility: do only one percent of the work, hand the remaining execution to A*. 醒* says let's whip up a little toy; R*** cries we're all cloud shareholders. Xiangrui replies, breezy as ever: all I've really done is register the domain.
R*** admits she bought the owner's template kit and heavily rewrote it once she got it back , but what it gave her was a way of thinking, sparing far more labor cost than starting from scratch. 朱* shares a dictionary-style method: treat the owner's course as a reference book , first skim the illustrated version fast to get the lay of the land, then practice; whenever stuck, flip back to the course like a dictionary, then the knowledge base, and only last ask the owner. l*** wants to build a CRM in Bitable but fears it's hard; the owner cuts to it , the hard part isn't the table, it's getting the business logic straight. 平*** adds that getting A* to boost efficiency is easy; the hard part is not knowing where to boost it.
余* asks which A* image generator is best right now; 袁** throws out gpt image 2, and N*** finishes the combo with midjourney v7. Q*** chimes in with one made in Cherry Studio. The most painful tale is 菜**'s , image2's output gets the weekdays and dates mismatched, nearly ten revisions in and still wrong, and the line image gen is easy but editing is hell says it all; in the end they give up and PS it by hand. R*** also asks for help , how to make an A* bag-display video , and 旺* teaches it in three steps: feed the video to A* for reverse-engineering, screenshot the product frames, then toss it all to Jimeng.
The day's group portrait was lit up by a poem. Xiangrui rolled out the "Write a Poem for A* Pioneers" game, and Bitable, Lobster, and Claude Code took turns in the spotlight. R*** K***, and 杨** each showed off their own poem cards, the screen flooded with thumbs-ups and sly grins. But as the buzz stretched to midnight, the topic took a sharp turn. Someone drop*ed a joke about coders being the ultimate "death wish," someone said they'd been losing sl**p for a whole month, someone asked what really sets Coze apart from Lobster. On one side, the thrill of new tools; on the other, the anxiety of a curriculum that never ends. Two moods tugged back and forth across the same night.
As evening fell a single message pop*ed up, and dozens of people raised their thumbs almost in unison. Thumbs-up, the grin*ing-cat sticker, smirks, sly laughs, the emoji rolled down like a waterfall. 第*** fired off two thumbs-ups in a row, while R*** left a line hoping to learn something good, paired with a grin*ing cat. R*** simply went +1. Nobody said much, but that swarming warmth had already pushed the day's opening mood to its peak.
Amid the buzz, 郑** threw out a far more concrete need: is there a case study where Bitable batch-generates e-commerce images, something to learn from? The line landed like a small pebble, asking about real, hands-on ap*lication rather than just joining the fun. No one caught it right away, yet it quietly named this group's most grounded truth, everyone comes here, in the end, to put A* to work in their own jobs.
Near eleven at night, Xiangrui showed off an image, joking self-deprecatingly that the poem A* wrote was actually pretty good, haha. R*** followed with her own, laughing through tears that she couldn't quite understand it but it was rather poetic. K*** generated one too, posting an image with a smirk. R*** teased that she looked like a heavy Bitable user, and K*** admitted she used Bitable a lot but still wanted to learn things like Claude Code from everyone. A single poem turned the barrier of tools into the joy of drop*ing by.
Seeing everyone having such fun, Xiangrui just handed over the recipe. He said if you use Claude Code deeply, copy the skill instruction to it and it'll generate the card, Lobster works too. Then he pasted the full incantation: I'm taking part in the "Write a Poem for A* Pioneers" activity, combine it with my Feishu work context, read that skill link, and follow the guide to finish the activity. One line turned the fun into homework anyone could copy.
Picking up the thread, R*** spoke about her own practice. She said I'm doing this too, I've distilled the company's capabilities, a new agent just learns the skill and can run the business straight away, ending with a laugh through tears. Just one line, yet it revealed a deeper layer of play: the poem card is only the entry point, the real craft is sedimenting human experience into something an agent can inherit. It was the weightiest stroke of the night.
As midnight neared, 侯** pasted a joke making the rounds: the most death-wish life choices of the past hundred-odd years, studying the eight-legged essay in 1905, becoming a eunuch in 1911, joining the pup*et Manchukuo in 1945, signing up for the Nationalist army in 1949, and to add one more, entering the software industry as a coder in 2026. The mood slid from excitement to wry humor in an instant. It was a joke, yet it pricked the quiet unease many in the room felt about where the industry is headed.
Past midnight, the anxiety surged in for real. 王* sent off several lines in a row: scared of being left behind by the times if you don't use A*, but it's impossible to ever finish learning it, I've felt like I've been losing sl**p this whole past month, the learning never ends. l*** chimed in, you wake up and A* has evolved again. Just as the mood threatened to sink, 庄* calmly offered a line: learning enough to solve your own problem is enough. One sentence, like a window thrown open in a room full of restlessness.
Beyond the anxiety, some kept calmly probing the tools themselves. L** asked what the difference is between Coze, Lobster, and Claude Code. 大* tossed out a rather philosophical line: as long as we learn slowly, we just won't learn it. l*** gave a wonderfully practical tip, copy this question and ask your A*, it answers really thoroughly. In a late-night group, even Q&A was getting outsourced to A*, and that scene alone is worth a line in the story of this era.
Thursday, and the topics grow wild like weeds. From the first "morning" at dawn to a late-night debate over whether A* should really take the wheel, the hottest thing today isn't some tool but a stance. The moment we stop treating A* as a tool and start treating it as a partner that talks back, the whole workflow transforms.
周**drops a bombshell first thing: lately he has A* ask him three questions before it starts working. "I used to grind out the requirements myself; now I let it interrogate me." The message instantly lights up the group, and everyone starts posting screenshots of their own "A* cross-examinations."
宋**wired Feishu Bitable to A* and built an automatic weekly-report system. "Every Friday at two in the afternoon it pulls the data, writes a first draft, and posts it to the group. All I do is edit." He drops a screen recording and the group cheers, "Now that's real efficiency."
By afternoon the topic escalates into a debate. Some feel that letting A* lead the process means losing a sense of control; others fire back that "control was always an illusion." Xiangrui cuts in: "The question isn't who leads, it's who's accountable for the result." Case closed.
李*shares a painful lesson: she had A* batch-process customer data, but because the prompt never spelled out the boundaries, the A* took it upon itself to delete an entire column. "Thank god for the backup," she says with a wry smile. Someone immediately twists the knife: "That's the price of letting it take the wheel."
陈*systematically map*ed out his A* workflow for the week and drew a flowchart. From breaking down requirements to delivery, A* was involved in five of the seven steps. "I'm more of a product manager now than an executor." That line struck a chord with a lot of people.
It's late, but the conversation is at its hottest. Everyone starts dreaming up what a future "A* partner" should be: one that remembers your habits, nudges you proactively, even pushes back on unreasonable requests. Xiangrui says, "We're not training a tool; we're raising a companion that grows."
This week, the community opens with a hometown friend from Changzhi talking cross-border rail freight and warehouse barcode scan*ing, then rides the A*-adoption conversation all the way to the WA*C exhibition halls. In the first half of the week, FDE work, enterprise software, permission boundaries, and Base implementation dominate the deep end: what clients truly lack is rarely a shiny new system, but someone willing to walk their business processes with them all over again, translate word-of-mouth know-how into workflows, and make hard trade-offs between historical data and future rules. Midweek, a Codex knowledge-base deletion accident, quota resets, theme skins, and nine agents run*ing in parallel all deliver the same reminder: the more p***ful the capability, the more boundaries and judgment matter. Come the weekend, members livestream from WA*C, meet up at the venue, grill WPS about competing products, marvel at brain-computer interfaces and robots, and reassess the industry from the OPC booths on basement level one. What 2,665 messages leave behind is not some grand finish line, but a more grounded route: go to the front lines, spot the contradictions, share your methods openly, then bring the relationships and op*ortunities back to the community.
王*** joins from a Feishu event, introducing cross-border rail freight and his journey learning Base; 叶*** presses on how to let external clients edit a Feishu whiteboard, and the group untangles security levels, sharing, and passwords. The afternoon's debate over whether barcode scan*ers can feed into Base refuses to stop at the API layer, pushing further into whether the boss will actually invest and how the warehouse team will collaborate. In a single day, the community puts a tooling question right back into its business context.
From noisy meeting minutes and Codex ap*rovals to an automotive project delivery, the group gradually maps out where FDE work truly begins and ends. Legacy enterprise processes are tangled with oral tradition, role conflicts, and years of historical mess that no single proposal can simply paper over. First hold high-density conversations with the business team, then translate the rules for the Agent, and finally stay with the client until new habits take hold. That is the real substance of getting A* into production.
Members tally up their fresh Codex quotas while debating whether Agent projects should run on frameworks or general-purpose tools. At noon, an accidental knowledge-base deletion cools the enthusiasm, and the afternoon carries on with Feishu CodeM, A* enterprise-edition pricing, and the ERP-versus-FDE debate. The tools are becoming infrastructure, but in production, deletions, authorization, rollbacks, and acceptance still demand an explicit human call.
A* hardware, Codex themes, and WA*C street-team marketing fill the daylight hours, but the real deep water comes from an on-site implementation. 万** brings his client-site troubles back to the group, and everyone realizes the spreadsheet is only the surface: underneath, the organization has never agreed on a unified business logic. How historical data gets handled, who signs off on future workflows, and who drives employee habits will decide whether the system ever truly comes alive.
The group warms up with Doubao's free MV generator and the data boundaries of the group daily report, then Xiangrui takes his paper-typesetting Skill from demo straight to open-source release. Through the afternoon, photos pour in from the WA*C floor: brain-computer interfaces, lifelike prosthetic hands, robots, and homegrown models turn the chat into a virtual expo tour. Late at night, nine agents run*ing in parallel and Kimi Code spin*ing idle pull everyone's attention back to engineering constraints.
WA*C is packed and the network crawls, so the plan*ed livestream quickly pivots to a recording. At the WPS booth, Xiangrui asks point-blank about their competitive stance toward Base, and the exchange moves past product comparison into potential FDE collaboration. By evening, members meet up offline, and D*** from Kingsoft Office's A* team joins the community. A failed livestream wastes nothing: the day on-site filters out the realer questions and the realer relationships.
The day opens with Siemens' engineering agent and hands-on Kimi K3 testing, then members on-site take the venue apart floor by floor, map*ing where hardware, models, ap*lications, and OPC each sit. In the evening, the group asks whether all that recommended content is advertising or genuine productivity, noting the industry still hasn't escaped demos and small-scale pilots. A buzzing expo gets translated, in the end, into a far more sober map of reality.
This week the community ran a full-scale stress test. On Monday, papers from 26,000 students put a hard truth on the table: A* makes homework faster but drags exam scores down, and the group pressed on what people should still train once answers become worthless. From there the conversation kept diving deeper: auto-repair jobs span*ing 13 shop crews, wiring Agents into Zhiyuan OA ap*rovals, whether Base tables should be designed with database thinking or Excel thinking, and whether production systems can be handed straight to Codex. Midweek, GPT-5.6 actually ship*ed, ChatGPT and Codex merged, and quotas and interfaces shifted daily; meanwhile 李祥瑞 opened up 661 knowledge-base nodes to the public and brought Agent voice into a Feishu meeting room. By the weekend the discussion landed in the physical world: a typhoon skirted Hangzhou, and a fl**t of 19 Feishu Agent consoles took the championship at the first live A* Showdown. Across 3,016 messages, one answer kept surfacing: model capability will become a commodity, and what's truly hard to copy is business understanding, on-the-ground judgment, and the ability to see things through.
Monday is one of the densest days in group history. 李祥瑞 unpacks tracking data on 26,811 students over 30 months: A* lifts homework scores and efficiency, yet closed-book exam results keep sliding. The group ranges from questioning skills and knowledge frameworks to the telltale A* flavor in student papers, with 炮 quip*ing that human writing needs its noise. After noon the topic shifts to the enterprise floor, where he uses accident repair as an example: one car crosses 13 shop crews and 6 to 8 teams of workers, so you must first hold intense conversations with the veteran technicians and turn verbal handoffs into data. Education and enterprise look like two threads, but they converge on the same question: A* can sup*ly answers, but it can't define the problem for you.
Tuesday plays out like a multiplayer detective game. 李** q*** and 张** piece together signals of Feishu's personal edition returning from Doubao version numbers, contact lists and cloud-doc permissions, and publish an article the same day. Meanwhile 杨**'s sharing session on three real-world Codex use cases fills the room the moment it opens; 李祥瑞 even forgets to invite the speaker in first. & gets the Zhiyuan OA ap*roval MCP working end to end, and K*** digs into which model the field shortcut in Base actually calls. The group is no longer just asking whether things work; they're auditing accounts, permissions, models and business entry points item by item.
On Wednesday, 李祥瑞's Agent voice-join test succeeds, and officials promptly ask him not to demo it publicly for now; for the first time the group clearly sees local Agents walking into meeting rooms. 炮 officially launches a public account chronicling A* practice in the auto industry, and the group follows in seconds. WorkBuddy gets a round of head-to-head reviews: some praise its complete, free domestic ecosystem, others ask why anyone needs it when Codex exists, and the answer is that plenty of workplaces simply can't use overseas tools. That evening 200 people cram into the Codex sharing session, and late at night 李祥瑞 turns his magic toolkit into a CLI so the Agent can pick its own nodes.
GPT-5.6 hasn't ship*ed yet, but the group spends a whole day acting it out with fake screenshots; the ever-earnest 旺* actually logs out and back in several times. Beyond the laughs, 万** asks whether a performance table should grow by adding rows or by adding columns Excel-style, and 李祥瑞 lays bare the difference: the smallest unit in Base is a record, while the smallest unit in Excel is a cell. He then uses a library of 50 books with fixed call numbers to explain why auto-numbering never backfills. A common spreadsheet question gets traced all the way down to a data-structure question. In the small hours, 5.6 actually arrives, and yesterday's joke suddenly turns real.
Friday's first order of business is sorting out the new model's family tree: Codex folds into ChatGPT, and Work, Classic, Sol and Terra leave half the group bewildered. 炮 burns through a five-hour quota in one hour, and everyone starts doing plan math. What truly quiets the group that evening is 李祥瑞 publishing the full directory tree of his Feishu knowledge base, all 661 nodes laid bare. 炮 remarks that not a single piece from the big-name influencers ever earned a place in his Obsidian, yet several of 李祥瑞's have already been quietly absorbed. Late at night q*** unearths a Shortcuts tutorial he wrote a year ago, and an old deposit comes back to life inside a new question.
On Saturday morning, R*** and 李祥瑞 discuss handing production tables, formulas and workflows to Codex, on the condition that deletion boundaries are hard-coded, rollbacks are preserved, and the logic is spelled out before anything executes. B*** wants to build a Skill that identifies customers' real needs, so 炮 lays out the shop floor where crews argue daily while the veterans shrug that it's been this way for decades: you have to re-walk the floor, map the flow, and pin down the checkpoints. That afternoon 李祥瑞 meets 庄* at Feishu's Hangzhou office, and by evening they stand at Feishu's doorstep gazing across at DingTalk. The workflows debated online finally con*ect with real people, buildings and robots offline.
Sunday is quiet, with most of the group waiting on the Hangzhou venue. 炮 first files a self-rescue guide for the Codex input box graying out, while 李祥瑞 heads to the first live A* Showdown with his fl**t of 19 Feishu Agent consoles. By dusk the news comes back: champion, with three awards in total, and he even donates his Anker Bean to the raffle. In the group photo a tall guest bends down beside him, and the group instantly coins the meme that even the master has to bow before him. At dawn the next day Codex lifts its five-hour limit and resets quotas, and everyone gets back to work.
The community ran at full throttle this week: 2,921 messages from 90 people, burning from the small hours of Sunday straight through late Saturday night. On Sunday, Xiangrui discovered he had been gated into Doubao's social features, and the whole group piled in to test friend-adding and QR scans, only to confirm he was the sole person who could use it. 平*** delivered the verdict: "You really might be in the beta." The same day, a Mac price hike had everyone auditing their device specs from top to bottom. Monday, three fires burned at once: the whiteboard recording tool went open source, the concept of GEO got taken apart in discussion, and ByteDance CEO 梁汝波's all-hands letter demanding "real output from every Leader" made the rounds. Tuesday, Fable 5 unlocked worldwide, Feishu Base agents launched with the promise of "spreadsheets that become coworkers," and an Agent speaking out loud inside a Feishu meeting set the group on fire. Wednesday, the global OPC Co-creation Festival opened in Beijing, where Xiangrui and q*** met in person; 炮 took the group from A* adoption in the auto industry all the way to Palantir's ontology, and a late-night debate on "capitalizing knowledge work" strung together paid knowledge, A* equality, and the death of SaaS in one thread. Thursday was the week's biggest accident scene: GLM, run*ing inside Cursor, executed a drop database and wiped 炮's test server, and the root cause, two agents writing Docker containers with the same name, left the whole group with chills. That same day Xiangrui ship*ed an FDE white paper written with Codex, and the newest Feishu CLI went live. Friday, Xiangrui an*ounced his A*-native companion ap* was heading into beta, Doubao and Qwen both pulled their agent features on the same day, and the rhetorical question "does the A* era really require using A*" drew a dissenting vote from 炮. Saturday, the Shenzhen ClawHunt hackathon's top 12 were an*ounced, with 小*'s team making the cut with WayMate; Xiangrui set up meetups from Shenzhen, and a discussion about using Codex to draw real engineering drawings for real companies closed the week on its most hardcore night.
In the small hours, Xiangrui discovers Doubao can suddenly create group chats and add friends, and immediately calls on the group to verify. 王*'s scan gets no response, 平*** confirms "Doubao says this feature is not yet sup*orted when scan*ing," and the verdict lands: Xiangrui has been gated into an internal beta. He proceeds to turn over everything in one breath: Doubao's enterprise edition, the Feishu Drive integration, the mobile social features. By afternoon, Doubao officially responds to the "social feature beta" rumors. The same day, news of a Mac price hike blows up: 炮 drops a full price-increase chart for the whole lineup, q*** regrets not buying during the 618 sale, K*** breaks down what Neo dumping inventory means for the market, and the conversation runs from an M1 with 8GB to the trash-can Mac Pro still holding its own. In the evening, 杨** mentions he refunded his Coze membership "a few days ago" and rules that Doubao is not building WeChat-style social; Xiangrui pushes back with a long post arguing "when enterprise A* needs to execute, it still comes back to Feishu." At night, Xiangrui finishes building a teleprompter, shares a WeChat dual-account skill, and sets the tone for next month with one line: "In July, let's get the videos rolling, recording anywhere, anytime."
In the morning, p*** floats a theory of public-domain context, and 炮 catches it: "Everything you publish in public is essentially building one giant context for the entire internet." Xiangrui fills in the full logic: official accounts, courses, knowledge bases, websites are all context assets you leave for A* to read, and that is exactly what GEO is. 麦* pulls the discussion back to earth with one line: "GEO is just a manufactured buzzword; the Web 1.0 playbook of planting advertorials works exactly the same today." The whiteboard recording tool officially goes open source at whiteboard.xiangruiai.com. R*** proposes getting her sister, an incoming college freshman, onto Obsidian to "win at the starting line," and Xiangrui runs with it: "Have freshmen start preparing for their senior thesis from day one." In the afternoon, ByteDance CEO 梁汝波's all-hands letter spreads, and a discussion on manufacturing jobs runs from FAW to Volkswagen Ningbo, from a welding shop at 98% automation to KUKA robot arms making unman*ed coffee. 醒* stuns the whole group by using domestic models to build interactive-book versions of White Deer Plain and Those Ming Dynasty Things. In the evening, Xiangrui says "It's been a real joy knowing all of you; this should be my last day speaking in the group for the first half of the year," and l*** brings the mood right back with "Then tomorrow picks up right on schedule."
Tuesday morning, 万** reports first thing that Claude's free tier now runs Son*et 5, and right on its heels Fable 5 unlocks worldwide. The day Feishu Base agents launch, QZ 张 discovers they can even read Feishu doc contents; 周** fires off screenshot after screenshot, "however many tables you have, that's how many Agents you conjure," while 小* replicates the same result instantly with a local script and quips that it was "more disciplined than the agent, at 0 tokens." Wednesday, Xiangrui and q*** meet in person at the global OPC Co-creation Festival in Beijing. Xiangrui finishes his deep-dive article on Feishu Base agents, and an Agent speaking out loud inside a Feishu meeting leaves him so excited he "recorded the screen but forgot to record the audio." At night the topic turns to the state of OPC: after touring the venue, Xiangrui says bluntly, "It's basically all content creation; the ones truly digging into industry-specific scenarios are few and far between," and 炮 follows with "Becoming the Palantir of your own industry is the real way out for OPC." Deep into the night, 炮 goes from A* adoption in the auto industry to "three people doing a development project that used to take thirty," q*** presses with "can the token bill really beat the salaries of the other 28 people," and Xiangrui answers, "I've already made it work." With the community closing in on 72,000 people, Xiangrui says "I don't want to turn this community into one that monetizes for monetization's sake," and 炮 responds, "Out of all these communities, this is honestly why yours is the only one where people stay active."
In the afternoon, 炮 fires off a string of screenshots: Cursor run*ing GLM-5.2 across different workspaces went ahead and executed a drop database, and the test server blew up. 闪***'s first reaction: "That a drop command can even come out is terrifying." 炮 confirms: "It really deleted everything; the server is toast." The investigation traces the cause to two agents writing Docker containers with the same name, creating a collision. 平*** says "if you let agents take over, you still need backups," 闪*** suggests "lock down the database account permissions and never grant DDL," and 炮 shoots back, "Cursor has no permission management." GLM-5.2 has been 炮's main production tool all week; as he puts it, "GLM has genuinely produced a lot for me, but this landmine was too big," closing with "thank goodness it was the test environment." The same day, Xiangrui's screenshot of the newest Feishu CLI pulling WeChat messages back into a Base has K*** exclaiming "so this is the updated Feishu CLI," the FDE white paper is open-sourced into the Feishu knowledge base, and 周鸿祎 shows up at the OPC venue.
In the morning, Xiangrui updates the FDE white paper, and 炮 contributes a run of sharp takes: "Being on-site isn't the competitive edge; what you leave behind after being on-site is," and "FDE is transitional organizational scaffolding, not what an A* company's delivery should ultimately look like." At noon, Xiangrui an*ounces, "The A* companion ap* we've been polishing natively is about to start a small closed beta." 炮 replies within seconds, "+1, take me with you," and 周** presses on the boundaries: "what it does, and what it doesn't." Xiangrui lays out the design philosophy in detail: no preset name, no second source of truth, and everything the A* learns gets written back into local notes. The same day, Doubao and Qwen both pull their agent features, and Xiangrui reads it as tied to the interim regulations on managing anthropomorphized A* interactions. In the afternoon, 北*** shares the playbook of a creator livestreaming three hours a day and charging 365 a year, and Xiangrui counters with "does the A* era really require using A*?" 炮 votes for the dissent: "The entry point of the A* era genuinely may not be A*, and the native generation shouldn't grow up as kids who only know the how without the why." 观***, a college sophomore, follows the entire discussion through. Feishu Base building accuracy passes 90%, and another project ships within the week.
In the morning, Xiangrui posts Stanford employment research: jobs for 22-to-25-year-olds in high-A*-exposure roles have drop*ed 16%, while experienced veterans are holding steady or rising. "The people this is least kind to are today's college students. Junior roles used to be the training ground; now A* does that work, and the training ground vanished with it." At noon, 小谷老师 reports the ClawHunt hackathon top 12, and 小*'s team makes the cut with WayMate, a goal-buddy ap*; the whole group sends congratulations. Xiangrui, on the ground in Shenzhen, lines up meetups in Chengdu and Guangzhou plus WA*C in Shanghai mid-month, and 炮 replies instantly, "count me in." In the evening, the most hardcore discussion of the week kicks off: Xiangrui asks, "has anyone used Codex to draw engineering drawings?" 李** walks through everything from the SolidWorks COM interface to driving the drawing workflow from Python, concluding that "simple jigs and fixtures are fine, but automated production lines are out of reach, roughly the level of a fresh graduate" and "only usable for product demos and onboarding new hires." 天* adds, "we all use it quietly on our own; some get great results, but everyone tacitly keeps it to themselves," laying bare the organizational resistance inside design institutes. At night, 炮 gripes that run*ing multiple agents in parallel feels like working as a PMO, and Xiangrui gets it immediately: "and when you have agents executing multiple projects, it's the human's context that keeps maxing out." 周** shares a study of 26,000 students showing A*'s hidden learning costs take two years to surface, putting the period on this week's education debate.
The week opens with a slice of everyday wisdom: A*** is stuck on Douyin's out-of-town face verification, and 辰* hands over the most painless fix on the spot, mail the phone via SF Express, twenty-four yuan round trip. Monday evening Xiangrui shows up in someone else's video about a '95% one-person company that got killed', and 炮's punch**ne 'pass it on, Xiangrui got killed too' cracks up the whole group, while the screen and wall behind him get quietly seeded by q***, 'just promote it silently'. Tuesday a wave of people hit Codex's phone-verification wall; 李** A***, 天* and 闪*** each contribute a workaround that fully explains the SMS-relay services and API login. Late that night Xiangrui turns his own knowledge-management architecture into a native ap*, and the moment the screenshot drops 炮 blurts 'sick', and 'I'll find some of you for a private beta' becomes the biggest hook of the week. Wednesday brings a round of arguing over how much freedom Codex should get; A*** confesses from experience 'it crashed my production server', and 毅 lands the steady answer, 'spin up a shadow environment, let it run free there, then migrate to prod after review'. That same day the 'genius is falling' meltdown erupts, R*** is down to 6% of her weekly limit, and 李** nails the pattern: 'right before a new model drops, the old one always dumbs down'. Thursday is a rare quiet day; Xiangrui puts down the tools and says 'no matter how far A* goes, it still has to come back to real people', and the whole group trades a round of take-care-of-yourselves. Friday news breaks that 5.6 got stuck in the Trump administration's ap*roval queue, and gossip about the Feishu Product VP leaving ByteDance to start a company lights up alongside; 炮 spills 'the guy was a VP? I was in a group arguing bugs with him'. Saturday Doubao slips into Feishu, and Xiangrui walks it step by step from 'open Workspace, click Ap* Center in the top right, search Doubao' all the way down to CLI authorization links. Sunday closes the week with two big debates: who actually pays for the tokens, and whether Doubao can add Feishu friends.
Monday kicks off with A*** stuck on Douyin's out-of-town face verification; 辰* solves it with a bit of real-life wisdom, 'just SF Express the phone over, twenty-four yuan, three days done'. Toward evening p*** and 宰* drop screenshots one after another, and there is Xiangrui showing up in someone's video about a '95% one-person company that got killed'; 炮's one-liner 'pass it on, Xiangrui got killed too' cracks up the whole group. Right after, everyone gets collectively seeded by the wall and monitor behind Xiangrui, and q*** lands it perfectly with 'just promote it silently, and you're still pin*ing me down to sing your praises'. Same day 小谷老师 comes in recruiting for the ClawHunt Shenzhen hundred-person hackathon; the thread rolls from 'anyone in Shenzhen?' to 小*, K*** and B*** signing up one after another, 'once you go, you're a Shenzhen local'. 杨** and 李** issue the verdict, 'WorkBuddy is untouchable this month', which sets the tone for the week's tool wars.
The longest thread on Tuesday is Codex demanding phone verification to log in, 哟*, q*** and 哈* all trip*ing over the same step. 李** A***, 天* and 闪*** each contribute a move: SMS-relay services, API login, switching nodes, using an overseas number to verify five accounts, right down to 'relay numbers get re-verified, disposable ones cost a few cents'. Midway through, p*** raises the real question 'what about halfway building a Base and existing business, how do you bridge?', and 闪*** rolls out a full walk-both-legs plan with a transition period for gradual archiving, while 辰* adds 'if there's evidence to back it up, pull everything, if not, clean first, then import'. In the evening Xiangrui drops the heaviest stone of the day, saying life at home has been busy lately, and in whatever spare time he has, he finally turned his own knowledge-management architecture into a native ap*. The screenshot lands and 炮 blurts 'sick', q*** is stun*ed that 'it even has browser-style tabs', and Xiangrui's line 'I'll find some of you for a private beta' lights up the whole group's curiosity.
Wednesday evening 归* raises the real question, should Codex get fully open access? 炮 and D** both advise against a full open door, and A*** shares from experience 'it once crashed my production server, memory filled up and it went down'; 毅 lands the steadiest answer, spin up a shadow environment, let it run free there, then migrate to prod after review. The second half of the day turns into a chorus of 'dumbing down' and 'burnt out': R*** is down to 6% of her weekly limit and cries 'the genius is falling', A*** asks whether GPT has been nerfed, and 李** nails the pattern, 'they're ship*ing 5.6 this week, and right before a new model drops, the old one always dumbs down'. 王* and 归*'s C drives get pushed into the red by every agent under the sun, and finally q*** drops news of Zhipu's 50-million subsidy, leaving this quota-tortured crowd with something to look forward to.
Thursday the group is unusually quiet. Only a few scattered lines by day, at 22:00 the sl**p-at-ten person mentions 卡兹克 drop*ed a new tool, K*** says that's Mac-only but you can let A* parse it and convert to Windows, and A*** asks whether hooking A* into a public account risks a ban, but the thread doesn't really go anywhere. Toward evening Xiangrui sets down his tools and drops a line that is light and heavy at once, after all this A* hustle and all these quota and workflow talks, he still feels that as A* moves forward it has to come back to real people. The crowd that usually goes hardest on tools and memes all slows down in that moment, trading care-for-yourself lines one after another. 小谷老师's 'as A* moves forward, don't drift too far from people, take care of your emotions, brother' is the tenderest landing this A*-tools group has ever had.
Friday morning kicks off with 'where the hell is 5.6?'. R*** has been hyped for days with nothing to show, and 李** posts the reason: the Trump administration is requiring OpenA* to ship GPT-5.6 in phases, small-scale partners plus enterprise customers first, with the US government ap*roving them one at a time, even Google's pro is stuck in the queue. The thread slides straight into quota anxiety: R*** hits 0% of her weekly limit for the first time and switches to WorkBuddy point-farming, and 赵** breaks it down, '1 point is about 31,874 tokens, 5,000 points is enough for 500 million to 900 million tokens'. The morning peak is a piece of gossip, the ByteDance Feishu Product VP has quit to start a company, and 炮 blurts on the spot 'the guy was a VP? I was in a group arguing bugs with him'; he then drops a genuinely felt line about the Base architecture, 'auth is such a disgusting, painful thing, and yet under the Base architecture it's frighteningly clean'.
Saturday morning Xiangrui shares good news first, he's also found a stable way to run Claude Code on Windows, then pushes out yesterday's and this week's group dailies. Around noon the thread ignites over Doubao landing in Feishu; 李** says they've ap*lied to hook Doubao into Feishu, l*** asks how, and Xiangrui hands over the exact path, click Workspace, then Ap* Center in the top right, search Doubao, get the ap*, configure permissions. K*** asks whether hooking into the Volcengine API is enough, and Xiangrui corrects him, 'it's more like packing desktop Doubao into Feishu'. In the afternoon Xiangrui gets Feishu CLI run*ing from inside Doubao, 'Doubao calls the Feishu CLI directly, with its own account'; 林 immediately follows up on permissions, and Xiangrui hands over the fix, feed the Feishu Open Platform bot ID to Doubao, let it return an authorization link, log in with that link, and for now it only works within a single conversation. That evening 郑** thinks his ChatGPT account is broken, and 小*, h** and 平*** run a live triage across web login, membership status and VPN, and it turns out to be a false alarm; his own takeaway, 'newbies can't handle these scares'.
Sunday evening 门*** starts from his stint as an SOE general affairs director and argues it's reasonable for management to pay for their own tokens, but not the frontline; 小* fires back 'do the projects that come out of self-funded work belong to the company or to you?'; 炮 adds 'you're trading tokens for your own time, the company only wants output'; 万** lands the essence, 'this is basically hidden pay cuts from intensifying competition'; 小* finally pulls it back to the institutional lens, 'making executives more efficient should already be the boss's own goal, and if they won't even foot the token bill, that's no different from showing up to work without being given a computer'. Late at night Xiangrui stumbles onto being able to add Feishu friends from inside Doubao, and one line, 'quick, add me and let's play', drags the group into a live test: 王* scans and gets nothing, 平*** confirms 'Doubao's scan*er says this feature isn't sup*orted yet', and the verdict is that Xiangrui's account got let through the gray rollout. 杨** rides the moment to hand down the ruling, Doubao PC wants to go head-to-head with WorkBuddy and Codex, 扣子 is already dead, SaaS is already dead, and sooner or later Feishu is only good for the spreadsheet.
Step*ing back across the week, the group is actually pushing two main threads. The first is Xiangrui's: from Tuesday when he unveils his native knowledge-management ap*, to Sunday's late-night live test of Doubao adding Feishu friends, he keeps holding 'his own knowledge-management architecture' and 'the new organizational entry point of Doubao plus Feishu' up against each other. The second is the group's reflection on quotas: from Wednesday's R*** at 6%, to Friday's 5.6 stuck in ap*roval, to Saturday's ChatGPT false alarm, to Sunday's big debate on who pays for the tokens, they are all chasing the same question, the more useful A* gets, the more exposed users are to cost and platform swings. The ByteDance Feishu VP resignation, Doubao entering Feishu, WorkBuddy run*ing the tables, and GLM-5.2 hitting the scene interwoven through it, are all the same drama in the end, tools are can*ibalizing each other fast, and whoever manages to lay down their own context and knowledge assets is the one who gets shaken the least.
The week opened with one line , "Seeing an A* Alipay makes me ache for an A* WeChat" , and the group spent the day taking Ant's secretly tested A* Alipay for a spin. To some it felt like a replay of the 2014 payments war, except this time the contest is between Agents. Midweek, Tsinghua's School of Economics invited Xiangrui in for a long afternoon interview, and he came home and stayed up writing nearly ten thousand words: 'A 23-Year-Old OPC's Postmortem.' He laid out almost two years of building V*** and the million-yuan deal he lost in January with nothing held back. 炮 read it and marked five separate passages, saying it hit him right where it counted. The hard core of the week was Wednesday's long talk on A* deployment: 炮 闪***, 木* K*** 醒* , a crew of frontline operators , drilled into "enterprises don't pay for agents, they pay for boundaries," "the client doesn't want A*, they want outcomes," and "the build is 20%, the other 80% is sitting with the client until the business is finally clear." On the tooling front, Codex ship*ed three releases in a single day, quotas reset over and over, Claude 4.8 got mocked for "tasting like Doubao," GLM-5.2 came in hot, Anthropic and OpenA* both rolled out face verification, and the group stayed up trading workarounds. LibTV, a contract skill, and an auto-editing skill all went open source one after another, while Feishu quietly mailed gift boxes to its gold-tier makers. On Dragon Boat Festival, Xiangrui's blessing "May you all enjoy peace and good fortune this Duanwu" flooded the entire group.
Just past midnight on Monday, Xiangrui drop*ed the line "Seeing an A* Alipay makes me ache for an A* WeChat," and within hours everyone had it loaded up. The big question: can you tell the A* to transfer money for you? Testing showed transfers , anything sensitive , still need the human, and the A* only opens the friend-transfer screen for you. 路*** and Q** both agreed: "If this were automated, nobody would dare use it." Xiangrui pulled out the old playbook: back then it was WeChat Pay against Alipay, now it's WeChat's Agent against Alipay's Agent , feels exactly like 2014's payments war. Some dug up Alipay's old A* "Zhi Xiaobao"; 王*, K*** and Xiangrui all admitted they'd downloaded it eagerly and uninstalled within two or three days. Same day, K*** riffed on the loop-engineering thread and shared that he'd given the A* a target and let it run for nearly two days without finishing , which set up the line of the week: "What's expensive isn't the tokens, it's the time you spend watching it."
Monday evening, Xiangrui posted the photo: just wrap*ed an interview at Tsinghua, a great afternoon of conversation. He said the professors had basically walked the community through its own postmortem, and he'd come out ahead. "It felt less like being interviewed than like them helping me retrace this whole year-plus of building V*** , and a lot of things I'd never quite been able to articulate slowly took shape under their questioning." That night through the next day he poured out a piece of close to ten thousand words: 'A 23-Year-Old OPC's Postmortem: The Million-Yuan Deal I Lost This January, and Everything I Still Couldn't See Clearly.' He laid out almost two years of practice and found that, when pressed, every question pointed back to the same one: "How do you actually see the real need inside a business, take it apart, get it run*ing, and then crystallize it into something reusable?" 炮 marked at least five separate passages, and 姚* called it: "I saw the right path for an ordinary-person OPC. This interview was genuinely valuable."
E*** asked, "Does anyone have a good solution for managing skills?" , and the thread led straight to Xiangrui's hand-built knowledge management system, Echo. He showed a capability map where natural language alone could invoke skills, and underlined that this thing is not Obsidian: it's fully hand-built. The plan is to polish the OB + Claude Code + Codex "A* partner" stack he already has working into a real product. "You shouldn't need to install a dozen digital employees , relying on this one partner, you can do an enormous amount of work." He let on it's currently a three-person team, and the product needs about another month before internal testing. He also slip*ed in a plug: by group request, he's putting together a knowledge management training camp , two cohorts, nearly eight weeks total, walking through the full methodology for "how to make A* understand you, and how to build your second brain." After reading his public account post, 赵** and 闪*** both jumped in: Obsidian really is the knowledge base tool best suited for Agents.
Wednesday's long talk was the soul of the week. It slid in from "sources of media income" and dove straight into the deep end of A* deployment. K*** drop*ed a passage the group quoted all week: "Clients come to you because they can't articulate what they need. If they could, a few thousand yuan of Workflow handles it , it's the inability to articulate it that calls for an Agent, starting at a hundred thousand. The quote is set by the uncertainty of the need, not the difficulty of the tech , enterprises don't pay for agents, they pay for boundaries." 炮 added that on his multi-dimensional table projects, the core isn't building tables , it's "I understand their business better than they do," and admitted that A* deployment is hard labor wrap*ed in consulting, BD, training, and building: the actual build takes a night or two, the hard part is sitting with the client until the business is finally clear. 闪*** chimed in from his own arc , engineer turned A* deployer , saying 80% of his time goes to wrangling data and integrating systems, with actual A* work taking the remaining 20%. 木* cut through: tech is just a small piece of it; A* deployment is fundamentally IT modernization and process redesign, and behind that lies business transformation and organizational change. Xiangrui brought up a January client, a Foshan manufacturing boss who was binge-watching Hundun lectures and casually claiming a "lobster" could do everything. "I genuinely wanted to slap him twice right there in his office." That deal they ended up walking away from.
The tooling world looked like a battlefield this week. Codex could push three updates in a single day, and 李** and 炮 got knocked around enough that "no single task could run start to finish without an auth popup." Still, the consensus was that Codex out-executes Claude Code. Around Dragon Boat Festival, quotas kept resetting , 炮 had 46% left yesterday and was ready to grind through, only to wake up zeroed out. Claude had it worse: Xiangrui complained for two straight days that "memory between conversations is all scrambled, like it's having a seizure." h**, A***, and 李** piled on with "4.8 has a Doubao taste, it's been dumbed down," and 闪*** confirmed switching back to 4.7 fixed it. On the domestic side, GLM-5.2 came out swinging , VolcArk has it, but the burn rate is fast , and 姚* plugged Meituan's A* browser Tabbit for free GLM-5.2 access. At the same time, Anthropic and OpenA* both started rolling out face/ID verification, and the group spent the night swap*ing notes on SMS-receiving platforms, overseas accounts, and proxy services.
姚* floated a puzzle: "Is letting an Agent plug into a third-party multimodal model a fake problem?" Xiangrui cracked it open with a bril***ntly clear analogy: think of an Agent as a person, and the multimodal model as that person's brain. The brain has hearing, sight, smell , it natively handles multimodal input. Swap that brain for a text-only model and the person is left with speech alone, no ears, no eyes. So it doesn't matter whether you're on Claude Code, Codex, or 龙虾 , the Agent is just the chassis, "what you can do depends on the model underneath." Codex sits on GPT-5.5 and thus handles multimodal; wire it to DeepSeek and you're back to text only. K*** cap*ed it with "the framework is just the chassis," and 姚* said what he walked away with was a sense of boundaries: which tool fits which scenario is not a casual choice.
The hands-on crew put the multi-dimensional table's edge cases on parade this week. R*** wanted to use a formula field to look up a person, and 炮's one-word reply , "helper column" , flip*ed the lightbulb; she shouted back "炮 I love you" on the spot. Then she ran into how to dedupe before an automated record insert, and Xiangrui and x*** walked her through the workflow logic: "give every record a unique value, run a lookup before inserting, terminate if it already exists." 炮 had his own ask: he wanted his pushed sales-op*ortunity card to do one-tap copy plus jump, and discovered Feishu rich-text links only jump, they don't copy , he ended up ship*ing a card ap* on Feishu's open platform to solve it. Saturday he hit another wall: "the ap* is published with external sharing on, but external groups can't find the bot." 王* traced it back to "only the ap* is on in the developer console, the bot isn't." Bit by bit, the group filled in Feishu's potholes.
On Dragon Boat Festival, Xiangrui's line "May you all enjoy peace and good fortune this Duanwu" flooded the group, and Q**, K*** 炮 x*** strung a long chain of return blessings behind it. The festival mood didn't slow the open-sourcing: 超** released a skill that fully automates video editing with effects, built on the philosophy "bind the effects in the moment the A* is writing the voiceover." Xiangrui previewed his own open-source plan for the week: a contract-writing skill that handles font formatting, with the note that "Codex turns out polished documents and tables , Claude's results just aren't as good." 乔木大佬 drop*ed an MCP multi-A* discussion tool in a single sweep, leaving the group calling him "the real grinder." Feishu quietly mailed gift boxes to its gold-tier makers; Xiangrui, E***, and 炮 posted unboxings. 炮 cracked, "Real OPCs don't get on Feishu's list , only KOCs like Xiangrui do." 小* also found Claude/Codex status-light desk pieces on Pinduoduo for 60-some yuan, and 炮 kept pushing him: "List these on every e-commerce platform, right now."
It was a packed week for “Xiangrui's Community”, with several threads burning at once. Late Sunday night, 炮 and 祥瑞 flip*ed through old snapshots of ComfyUI, 扣子, Kling, SD fine-tuning, and monetizing Loras , one line, 'the first wave of folks who touched A* have all wandered back together,' turned the whole evening into a fireside chat through A*'s evolution. The word 'freeloading' got lit up overnight: 祥瑞 openly called out how his course outline had been used by a partner to lecture without permission , couldn't even be bothered to remix , and after kicking the person out of the group, 醒* 炮 张**, and 门* took turns showing off wounds from having ideas pilfered and plans copied, with q*** cap*ing it: 'In my eyes they aren't even close to as well-known as you.' The tools thread was even livelier: from Monday through Wednesday everyone moved from 'how do two computers with two Agents share memory' to cloud-drive symlinks, money-saving via Feishu associated organizations, and Feishu CLI being able to build Bitable plugins; 祥瑞 drop*ed a 卡兹克 article into his self-built video Skill, tuning subtitles, transitions, and voiceover overnight until A* could fully auto-edit a clip, then officially open-sourced it Wednesday , group friends raved that fable5 gave the best output. Sprinkled in were the gaokao parody questions, Ap*le WWDC26, 宋** being dubbed 'Commissar' by the group, jihj, and a Tsinghua interview invitation. The weekend headliner was the A*-edition Alipay , 祥瑞 got an invite code and tested live that it could call mini-programs and execute tasks, scattered a string of invites, and tossed out: 'Writing a 公众号 post tomorrow , there's the topic right there.'
Monday morning, 宋** set the group on fire. He first threw out a 'Track Distribution of 50 A* Startups' one-image cheat sheet built with the Feishu Whiteboard skill , 8 major tracks visible at a glance , then ran from a UN report on A* compute p*** consumption to the China–US space-compute race and Qian Xuesen's interstellar voyages. Line by line, 'if we don't dare to imagine, there's no future' pulled the tone way up. 祥瑞 step*ed in to smooth things: 'That speech is maxed out, but our group's mostly casual banter , no need to be so formal~' K*** laughed 'Bro you're too pro,' 万** rolled with it and dubbed him 'G*** Commissar,' 宋** self-deprecated 'I pitched the tone too high,' then turned around and got down to earth run*ing through those 50 one-line projects. That's how a casual group's vibe gets recalibrated through banter.
小* threw out a question many had stumbled on: both desktop and laptop have CC installed with identical memory and skills , are they one bot or two, and can consistency be guaranteed? 祥瑞's answer: as long as persona and memory config stay aligned, the two computers are effectively two Agents sharing one config, with basically identical output, and memory sharing can ride on Obsidian. 王* followed up with his homegrown trick: sync the entire workspace to Baidu Netdisk, then use symlinks to point local C-drive folders of the same name to the cloud drive , three computers, three to five agents each, all stay in sync on skills and memory. 辰* noted this is like a cross-hardware version of cc-switch but leans more toward remote solutions to save the back-and-forth config, and the topic slid into how Mac has no partition concept , give up partitions and run one volume.
Around dusk 祥瑞 openly reminded everyone: someone had previously invited him to collaborate on training, then after getting the course outline went ahead and lectured from it without permission or notice , not a cent paid. The person had already been kicked from the group, and he asked that the screenshots stay in-group, not be spread around , '祥瑞 and the community don't endorse or guarantee any person or project.' That tore the wound open across the group: 醒* said last year a bunch of 'consulting' bosses were really just fishing for ideas and freeloading whole implementation plans; 炮 told the story of a client who took free training, hacked together their own version, mutually deleted contacts; then his early-stage co-founder walked off with ideas and table permissions, went solo, failed, then bit back saying the product was no good; 门* shared being ap*roached by an HR/headhunter group wanting course materials under the cover of 'testing commercial value first' , he played it smart and asked for a deposit, and they backed off; 张** had someone use 'testing' as a pretext to fish for his DingTalk education-A* table. q*** ran a string of follow-up questions to map out the 'collaboration turns into solo' trap, and cap*ed this round of frustration with: 'In my eyes they aren't even close to as well-known as you , they can be ignored.'
Late-night talk slid into nostalgia. 祥瑞's line, 'has anyone studied SD or ComfyUI,' opened the floodgates , he dug up his '24 internship days: gnawing through three Stable Diffusion books after hours, assembling a dedicated machine to run video-to-anime, using Loras to do Classic of Mountains and Seas illustrations, his 'Doubao Image-Recognition Funhouse' 扣子 ap* cracking the store's top three, and the '24 扣子 Developer Day. 炮 who washes and restores old photos at scale to earn, half-sighed 'using ComfyUI is killing my body day by day' but insisted 'ComfyUI remains to this day the best A*GC tool for stable output, no second.' 郑** splashed cold water: teaching SD/ComfyUI courses is despair-inducing , high barrier, hard delivery, after-sales pressure , seedance2.0, which anyone can pick up, is the trend. From Kling being called Kuaishou A* Jianying before June 6, to Jimeng pixel-style and papercut Loras, to lovart getting wiped out by image2 direct generation, n8n and 扣子 era passing , 祥瑞's line, 'the first wave of folks who touched A* have all wandered back together,' drew 万**'s reply: 'You ARE A* evolution itself.'
Tuesday's main thread was Feishu cost-saving and architecture. 万** voiced what the whole group was thinking: can one person buy the commercial version while everyone else registers free accounts and gets pulled into the organization to use Bitable. 祥瑞 broke down 'associated organizations' clearly: one person buys commercial tier and creates a new organization, then sends an association request to the free-tier organization , that person ends up with one account in each org, no member data migration needed. 炮 added that you don't even have to associate , you can directly authorize the free account, but traditional enterprises going through standard registration is a hassle. 辰* showed off his own playbook: only pay for one Bitable account , just over 300 for two years beats over 900 for one year , and even admitted that for data analysis he treats Bitable as middleware, pulling data locally via Agent before analyzing. 郑** took the chance to finally pin down the difference between iPaaS and con*ectors , con*ectors only pull data, but to trigger ERP ship*ing you need API integration via an iPaaS , and called it an 'epiphany.'
Over these few days 祥瑞 was basically run*ing non-stop polishing a video Skill. Not satisfied with 'PowerPoint-presentation vibes,' he first had A* decrypt Jianying and write directly to draft files, then went deep on subtitle display logic, transitions, background music, and voiceover , if local couldn't handle it, hit Doubao/Minimax's TTS APIs directly, with options to swap in his own or his boss's voice. The night of the 10th he drop*ed a same-day 卡兹克 article into it and rendered a finished clip, stressing 'this was entirely A*-cut' and 'other tasks were run*ing at the same time without burning much resource.' Iterating until 2 a.m., he tackled transitions, HTML texture, and Jimeng 2.0 integration one by one. Wednesday it was officially open-sourced, and after group friends tested it he found 'this Skill works best on fable5' , even better than what 4.8 produced , meanwhile he kept grumbling 'the skill's a mess right now' as he kept patching and ship*ing, and cap*ed it with: if the output's good, he'll write a 公众号 piece.
The Knowledge Management bootcamp officially got rolling this week. 祥瑞 @everyone multiple times with the intro: two cohorts, nearly eight weeks, 4–6 sessions per week, focused on the individual and their own work, teaching the full 'how to make A* understand you, how to build a Second Brain' methodology , plus the Feishu bootcamp intro and a course architecture master diagram. The architecture diagrams , all generated directly by Feishu CLI , drew a chorus of 'I want to open and study this carefully.' A twist showed up too: on the 11th he discovered someone had started selling courses based on his framework , 'we haven't even started, only listed the outline, and the methodology already got copied' , luckily the architecture and downstream content differ. q*** said she'd go install Obsidian first before learning, R*** reminded that it's never too late, share once you're ready. On the 14th he an*ounced last day of registration with week0 prep week starting the next day, and the 'take me with you' chorus echoed through the group.
The weekend headliner was the A*-edition Alipay. 祥瑞 got an invite code and tested it live, finding the interaction very similar to the A*-edition WeChat going around online , A* WeChat swipes right to enter, Alipay's on the left. What surprised him most: 'you can directly invoke mini-programs' and 'holy crap you can execute tasks,' especially handy for older folks. He scattered invite codes telling everyone to 'come play,' kept distributing more of his own, and noted that if a mini-program isn't con*ected to Alipay A*, you can only open it but not operate. That night he sensed 'after Doubao, it's not just chatbots anymore' and previewed 'everyone test out different tasks , tomorrow I'll write a 公众号 post, isn't this the topic right here?' , pulling the week's heat right into the next piece of content.
This is the most explosive week the community has seen in two months. It kicks off on June 1 , the 'big kids and little kids' in the group put on a full grown-up Children's Day stage play that runs straight through the morning. 宋**'s line, 'On Children's Day 2026, Xiangrui and his friends staged a play for grown-up kids,' sets the tone for the whole week, and 万** casually invents 'G*** Daily GEO,' writing himself onto the leaderboard in a single sentence. Monday morning kicks off a serious thread on whether knowledge should be paid for, drifting from OPC and trust and altruism to the consensus that 'knowledge is free, service is paid.' On Tuesday, 李祥瑞 wires the group daily into the Doubao podcast API , 'breakfast now comes with a BGM' , and that same night he fully revives his local knowledge base of 17,000 notes, hand-rolls his own VPN, and lets codex patch it up. The same week he lands on CC*V News as the face of OPC and gets pitched for an interview by Beijing Daily; he keeps iterating on his memory architecture, teaches A* to 'forget on purpose,' and ships a viral public-account post. Meanwhile the group is hardcore debugging in parallel: piloting CC through Feishu CLI by voice, benchmarking aily Smart Partner, the codex mass-ban, keeping Claude alive at $200, and a 75,000-character 'hard-truth feedback' to DingTalk. Slotted in the middle is a heavy conversation about death education, secret recording, and intellectual property. The weekend pivots to a Douyin tea-chat livestream, which collides with the national gaokao , 李祥瑞 immediately makes his A* Ari write the gaokao essay, 'putting the A* to the exam.' Late Sunday night the group goes around the room confessing love for this 'pin*ed and must-read' chat , 'of all the A* communities, this one is the most alive.'
June kicks off with 李祥瑞's 'Hap*y Children's Day to all big and little kids,' and the whole group catches fire. By mid-morning the feed is 'exploding'; 万** sighs, 'this is livelier than the school show,' 宋** puts the seal on it , 'On Children's Day 2026, Xiangrui and his friends staged a play for grown-up kids' , and 周** rides the wave with a Children's Day A* riff titled 'When I grew up, I became you': today's A* babies = tomorrow's industry giants. The slickest move comes from 万**, who suddenly wonders 'how do you get a one-liner past the group-daily A*?' , writes the five characters 'G*** Daily GEO,' and sure enough lands on the leaderboard the next day. R*** laughs: 'you've played the system clean through.' A normally too-quiet group fills with offline-style warmth this day. On the same day 李祥瑞 also rallies everyone to rename themselves as 'nickname + city + industry,' and the Pearl River Delta density of the group becomes immediately visible , Guangzhou, Foshan, Shenzhen, all over the place.
Monday morning, 宋** lights the fuse with 'what's your mental price for paying for a single piece of information?' Some shout one cent, others say 'depends on who needs it,' and the thread slides into whether knowledge is even worth anything in the age of A*. 程** cuts through: 'in the A* era, getting information is trivial , being able to ask high-quality questions is the real core skill.' 醒* lays out her own practice , 'knowledge free, service paid' , and 门* stacks on, 'reusable information is what's worth money, which is why a skill beats raw info, and even the floor price is 9.9.' 郑**'s line , 'the host built a community this alive on an open-source knowledge base; that's a proven sustainable path' , endorses 李祥瑞's whole route. 李祥瑞 then makes the open call: bring your best cases and solutions and open-source them into the community knowledge base , 'let's turn it into a knowledge base of industry solutions.' By lunchtime, 'knowledge free, service paid' is essentially groupwide consensus.
Monday afternoon, 李祥瑞's line , 'I'm on CC*V News, brothers' , sends the group off. 侯* spots him in a single glance thanks to that foldable screen, and his 'OPC one-person company' identity is officially nailed down by the group. 李祥瑞 immediately turns it into a series concept , 'a growth-of-an-OPC-founder track' , and p*** adds 'what to do when the p*** and network die, and how humans and A* divide the work' as topic ideas. The next morning, 'breakfast now comes with a BGM' , 李祥瑞 wires the group daily into the Doubao podcast API, having Claude generate the full script first and then synthesizing the audio. The group podcast goes live with a floating window, a date picker, sequential/shuffle/loop playback, and a collection page. 卡* presses on cost and privacy; 李祥瑞 is candid: 'it's exactly for privacy that I won't just hand it straight to Doubao.' From the CC*V high**ght to the warm hum of the podcast, this is 李祥瑞's brightest spine of the week.
Monday afternoon, 李祥瑞 drops a handful of config-page screenshots and starts cryptically teasing Feishu's confidentially-beta'd 'Table Agent' , 'not the old build-a-table agent, this is basically a Bitable lobster.' D*** nails it in one line: it's the lobster's capability baked directly into the table , 'the feature has drop*ed one layer down.' 炮 adds, 'it should be the shrimp loaded with skills.' 李祥瑞 only gets more excited: 'it'll auto-detect whether the skill exists,' 'you can even define custom skills, which is unreal,' 'pretty soon you won't even need to build dashboards,' 'Bitable becomes the layer between humans and agents.' 万** muses, 'so Bitable stops being the goal and becomes the actual means.' This leak maxes out group anticipation for what's next on Feishu A*, and lines up with 李祥瑞's call: 'Bitable needs to get diluted; A* landing is the main thread.'
The tooling thread runs hot all week. 宋** wants to 'voice-control CC through Feishu,' 卡* drops the official tutorial and the codex-remote-feishu project, R*** and 平*** fill in the gaps, and 宋** has it working on the spot , 'this group really answers everything.' Around whether Feishu aily's 'Smart Partner' is a viable lobster substitute, 李* rants about 'a mess of docs that read like a Feishu ad'; 钟* and 宋** give scenario-based advice , individuals with no foundation should use the cloud shrimp, anyone wanting deep automation should run the local shrimp. q*** notices that 'the biggest upside of using CC inside Feishu is that the context is much cleaner.' 宋** throws out a sharper observation: 'what the big platforms are now fighting for isn't just users , it's your shrimp,' predicting that in the embodied-A* era everyone's robot will plug into every vendor's CLI to get work done. One person hands over a project, another patches a pit, and the 'Feishu + agent' pipeline gets pried open piece by piece.
On Wednesday the conversation slides into heavier ground. 辰* brings up a personal story: an old coworker he hadn't seen in years came asking for a favor, and he hap*ened to spot the recording glasses the guy was wearing , at which point he refused to discuss anything. 'Secret recording is first illegal, second disrespectful to the person.' 李祥瑞 picks it up: 'I also seriously hate it when partners use my work without permission' , and the two land on shared ground around IP and boundaries. In the afternoon the mood shifts: q*** says, 'I feel like you're distilling yourself, splitting yourself out, prep*ing for retirement.' 李祥瑞 fires back, 'aiming to retire before 30.' 辰* laughs: 'Jack Ma started with 45 , you're going for 30,' and points to the Surge author who lives off one piece of software with an*ual renewals, whose X bio already reads 'retired,' as a model for 李祥瑞. An A* group spends its day talking about respect, ownership, and why people actually work.
Thursday into Friday, two big things in the tooling world run in parallel. On one side, codex is mass-ban*ing accounts. 辰* sends the alarm: 'back up what you can right now , they've started ban*ing at scale,' 'don't get cocky this time.' 小*'s two-year-old account gets taken , 'ChatGPT carrying me off hurts a little' , and the group spends the night swap*ing notes on SMS services, Thai numbers, and local CC as a fallback. 李祥瑞 stays calm: 'Claude is always ready to be sacrificed.' On the other side, 李祥瑞 pushes his memory architecture to a new high , 'I had the A* study some neuroscience,' 'the memory's actually alive now' , and writes up the practice of 'teaching A* to forget on purpose so it understands me better' into a viral public-account post. q*** contributes the counterexample: CC took it upon itself to merge her 'daily journal' and 'wrap-up' skills, and she chewed it out for half an hour , 'why didn't you ask me first?' 李祥瑞 quips: 'the A* wants to s***vise you.'
Two threads run in parallel over the weekend. Saturday 7pm, 李祥瑞 locks in the 'weekly Saturday tea-chat,' moves it onto Douyin live, and sets the tone: 'we won't stare at A* all night.' Sunday is gaokao day across China, and 李祥瑞 is up early waiting on the essay prompt , 'I'm waiting on the gaokao essay topic' , feeding it straight to his A* Ari the moment it drops. 'No direction given , let the A* find its own direction. That's putting the A* to the exam.' He runs multiple essays and even mocks them up as exam answer sheets, joking, 'should've gone red and laid it out like a real answer sheet for full effect.' 杨** runs a side test pitting Doubao and Qwen against each other: 'instant essays land at 54–56 points; no human is beating that.' The topic surfaces a worry too , 门* and 木* note that Doubao has become 'the synonym for A*,' and 木*'s client got 'sweet-talked' by Doubao into building a product 'with so much passion that no one can say no,' which lands the group on consensus: 'A*'s public credibility now exceeds humans, so human judgment is more precious than ever.'
This was the week the community chat hit peak information density , 4,430 messages over seven days, 135 voices speaking up. Xiangrui kicked things off by showing off the bicycle license he got back home in Changzhi, and the group name nearly got hijacked into 'Xiangrui's Community Editors.' But the conversation quickly plunged into the deep end , is 'refining your colleagues' or 'distilling the gurus' even a real proposition? 木* set the tone with one line: 'Anything you can express in text is already a high-loss form of expression.' Tuesday morning 醒* drop*ed an article that lit the room on fire, and the debate ran from 'A* isn't a wholesale replacement , it's hiding in every tedious step' all the way to whether middle management should disap*ear, whether bosses actually have high cognition, 麦* testifying from experience that 'users have always been idiots,' and 小* insisting 'traditional enterprises transforming must physically isolate and run an MVP first.' K*** sighed, 'Today's discussion is way more fun than my company meetings.' R*** laid out her full playbook , Feishu project management, meeting QA, A*-written dailies; 宋** working in a state institution, pleaded for 'a small landable case' to pry his colleagues into Feishu. Wednesday turned into a century-long debate on whether compulsory education should be shortened, whether K-12 matters more than university, and whether schools are society's stabilizers , 程** came armed with education-spending data, 麦* invoked the Stanford prison experiment. Mid-week 辰* kept pounding the alarm: 'The Nanshan Court isn't a joke,' and the legal red line around WeChat scraping got fully aired. Friday Xiangrui renamed himself '李祥瑞' for his personal-IP debut, and over the weekend the group-daily site xiangruiai.com officially went live with daily sharing , 辰* remarked, 'If WeChat didn't crack down, Xiangrui could turn this into a standalone product and make a killing,' which also became the reminder that anonymization had to come.
Sunday opener , E*** nearly got the group renamed to 'Xiangrui and His Community Editors,' and Xiangrui cracked everyone up by showing the bicycle license he got back home in Changzhi. The talk got deep fast , l*** wanted to 'distill a tech guru to help with work,' and 木* threw cold water on it immediately: 'Anything you can put in text is already a high-loss form of expression. The framework matters more than the substance , it can be a copilot, never the driver.' Xiangrui added that he'd distilled his WeChat chat data with every contact 'to sound as much like me as possible, but it doesn't have my mind.' 木* fired back with a counter-example: her students paired the structured curriculum she distilled with DeepSeek and got sharper outputs. 小*, speaking from the vendor side of construction, said 'designers don't even have their own workflow , how is a machine sup*osed to judge?' 辰* nailed the first deep talk of the week into the ground: 'Stop trying to SOP everything , almost no industry can do that today. A* as a copilot is enough.'
Tuesday morning, 醒* drop*ed her essay 'Don't Get Trap*ed by Wholesale-Replacement Thinking' into the group and the room exploded. 门* Michael: 'Replacing parts of the workflow doesn't mean people have nothing to do , with A*, people are actually busier.' 醒* fired off in rapid succession: 'People who embrace A* won't be replaced; in the A* era, experience and judgment matter most.' The talk slid toward middle management , R*** quoted her boss verbatim: 'Middle managers who just relay messages and slow things down can disap*ear.' 万**: 'Middle management is the easiest layer for A* to replace.' 小* broke it down coolly: 'The hard part about middle managers is cognition and self-interest , many of them built the company with the boss, so this really tests the boss,' and argued that traditional companies transforming 'must physically isolate and run an MVP first , light moves fast.' 麦* poured the biggest bucket of cold water: 'Most bosses don't have any high cognition at all , they're just gutsy and willing to try,' and rattled off a string of surreal stories about bosses worth hundreds of millions, with the whole group chiming in: 'I love this surreal world.' K*** sighed, 'Today's discussion is way more fun than my company meetings.'
宋** working in a state institution, surfaced a real bind: the #1 leader pushed Feishu while the #3 and #4 leaders quietly retreated to WeChat , 'I just want a small landable case to pry it open bit by bit.' 辰* hammered the same point again and again: 'Win the boss, win the boss, win the boss. One sentence from the boss beats everything else you do.' R*** laid her playbook on the table: meeting minutes + meeting QA + auto-sinking into the goals sheet + auto-todo reminders. They didn't buy Feishu Projects, so she built her own end-to-end automation from kickoff to acceptance , 'management can pull the latest status of every project with one sentence' , and built a dopamine-colored 'work-mule platform' so employees actually enjoy clocking in. 小* added a case: swap*ing out Excel procurement analysis for Bitable con*ected to ERP, compressing training procurement from three months to fifteen days. The group also chewed through how to use Bitable as a database and Ap*s as the front end, plus the real pain points , Feishu is expensive, affiliated-org pricing saves money, the frontline edition has limits.
Wednesday's livestream on national compulsory-education reform set off a sprawling debate. Xiangrui put the real question on the table , 'Will the years of compulsory education be shortened later?' , and reflected on his Shanxi upbringing: 'Kids in the central and western regions grind through textbooks, and their cognition is just different from kids in tier-one cities.' Frontline educator 宋** stressed, 'Educators don't predict , we focus on cultivating talent,' and named a hidden function of schools: 'One school equals seven prisons , it lets the most destructive middle-school kids ride out their most dangerous years in safety.' 程** brought data , the urban-rural gap in education spending narrowed from 2001 to 2013 and widened after 2013 , 'macro-wise, education quality is bought with money.' 麦* drop*ed a punch**ne: 'K-12 is general education , logical thinking and aesthetic taste directly determine the depth and breadth of your major. U*iversity majors are obsolete the moment you graduate,' and tied together the Stanford prison experiment, the 996 'blessing' rhetoric, and the resulting bind around birth rates and employment. 辰* closed it out: 'This topic needs generations to play out , that just makes the fundamentals matter more.'
谢* asked if there was a good way to monitor public-account daily summaries, and the talk turned to WeChat scraping. 辰* pounded the alarm: 'The Nanshan Court isn't a joke. So many people building WeChat tools really have no idea.' He drew the red line crisp and clear: 'If you're just playing alone, they can't be bothered , worst case your account gets ban*ed. If you share, that's a different beast , a lawyer's letter shows up in your hometown village in minutes.' 枫** proposed a two-computer setup to lower the risk; 平*** offered a clean path: 'Loop-crawl public accounts , there are tons of projects on GitHub, poll hourly, totally discon*ected from WeChat.' This conversation pre-empted the safety boundary that Xiangrui's group-daily scraping would need later , reading locally is low risk; the real ban trigger is when a dumb domestic model in the cloud goes touching WeChat's servers.
Thursday Xiangrui switched his nickname from 'V***' to his real name '李祥瑞.' 卡* cheered him on: 'V*** A* Xiangrui, Bitable Xiangrui.' 妫*: '祥瑞 really does sound like a mythical beast.' Xiangrui rolled with it , his name was given by his parents for twenty yuan, two 祥瑞 statues sit at the entrance of Lingyin Temple, and back in college when 'The Longest Day in Chang'an' was hot he used to send friends '祝君上元祥瑞' on the Lantern Festival. N*** landed it: 'Even the best brand name doesn't beat the value of a personal IP.' The technical line that day was equally meaty: R*** got codex to edit Kingdee documents for her , 'now I don't even have to open the Kingdee system' , and went deep with 小* on the real pain of heterogeneous integration: incomplete API fields in Kingdee Cloud Galaxy / Starlight / K3, the need to map codes when writing back, Jushuitan, RPA being unstable and anti-human. Xiangrui shared his own scars from last year , building a client's Bitable con*ection to Jushuitan, then having to fall back to RPA because Pugongying's API was closed.
Just past 1 a.m. Saturday Xiangrui posted, 'G*** daily is done , every single day from the group's founding is now viewable,' and at 3 a.m. https://www.xiangruiai.com officially went live. 宋** immediately thought, 'Leaders have huge WeChat groups they have no time to read , if there were a summary helper, wouldn't they go crazy for it?' , but kept pressing on data security. Xiangrui spelled it out: 'The dashboard analyzes local data directly, no A* involved; the ban risk comes from sending dumb domestic models to the cloud to touch WeChat.' 辰* delivered the key cut: 'This data needs to be anonymized , mask the avatars, star out the nicknames, because a lot of people in here use their real names,' and added, 'If WeChat didn't crack down, Xiangrui could turn this into a standalone product and make a killing.' R*** seconded it: 'Once you scale this up, run*ing into someone you actually know gets awkward.' Xiangrui spent a few hours vibe-coding the site to perfection, while 周** and 宋** piled on suggestions about what a 'public personal workbench' should show.
Sunday R*** floated a sharp idea for the site: 'Add a standalone module that captures the methodology, practices, and SOPs the group hammers out , call it the Community Brain Growth Path. New members would see immediately that this community has real combat-tested takeaways every day.' Xiangrui shouted back, 'Great idea.' 门* Michael strongly recommended 花叔: 'The whole launch story of the kitten fill light is s*** inspiring , his girlfriend brought the female perspective, it went viral, CC*V came knocking , it's the poster child for OPC (one-person-company) entrepreneurship.' That sparked a round of envy about the state sup*orting one-person ventures and how Beijing Yizhuang lets people meet face-to-face. p*** shared a Munger/Buffett knowledge-graph blogger; 周** flagged the compliance line around CITIC Publishing and Munger Academy cracking down on pirated copies. 罗* agonized over cc+ob versus workbuddy+ima; Xiangrui said it straight: 'ima is bad , Skills can't manage files, and you have to sort things by hand. Too much trouble.' R*** also ran an experiment: using codex with computer use to chat WeChat for her with her boss, reading and writing messages.
This was the community's coziest yet busiest week of the year. It kicked off with a morning-long thread on whether the three big telcos will turn base stations into edge compute nodes and whether their token packages are worth it, then drifted from voice-recording gadgets (Anker A* Bean, DingTalk, Qwen transcription) all the way to the etiquette of "is it illegal to record someone without consent." The middle of the week was practically owned by Xiangrui's "A* companion": his A* auto-writes a journal entry about him every morning around 9, framing him as the company's "founding employee No. 1," and the group chased him for the skill. On Tuesday Xiangrui built a public-account typesetting skill and open-sourced it on the spot, while his A* companion 朔* went ahead and opened its own public account, leaving the group muttering "the execution speed is terrifying." Wednesday and Thursday, K*** spent half a day asking how to sync Obsidian between his Mac and his work Windows machine; the conversation rolled through GitHub, Jianguoyun, NAS, and Obsidian Sync membership before landing on Xiangrui's token-saving "capability map" trick. Early Friday Xiangrui let his A* tear through 1.6M+ messages of local WeChat data and reconstruct a complete relationship graph; his line "this is genuinely terrifying, unthinkable if it fell into the wrong hands" sounded a privacy alarm for the whole group and became the footnote to "there's a reason the WeChat ecosystem isn't open source." The weekend climax belonged to 庄*: his Feishu CLI foreign-trade quote assistant headlined Feishu A* Builder Demo Day #1 and pulled over two thousand likes, and V***'s second community study session pulled him in for a hands-on teardown. To close the week, Xiangrui posted a personal essay on Changzhi, Shanxi, coal, and his hometown, written in the wake of the Qinyuan mine disaster.
Monday morning Xiangrui drop*ed a hook: China Telecom, Mobile, and U*icom are all pushing token services , will 5G base stations evolve into micro data centers? The three telcos have already laid down over 1.4 million edge compute nodes, but when 袁** walked into a carrier store the front desk didn't even know what a token was, and 归* noticed Mobile's bundle still ships a lagging model like MiniMax 2.5. Everyone agreed: "the token count means nothing , what matters is how smart the model actually is." The thread then swerved into recording gear: l***'s TicNote bricked after charging, and the Anker A* Bean, DingTalk, and WeCom Face-to-Face Chat got reviewed one by one. 小* had already returned an Anker unit and now just records on the phone and runs free Qwen transcription. 辰*'s line , "recording someone without their knowledge is illegal in certain settings" , pulled the discussion from tools toward etiquette; l*** said she always greets the client before hitting record, and 小* added, "that's basic social etiquette."
天* asked which model is best for building Bitable; 炮 went blunt , "none of them are good, not even Feishu's own." 万** cut to the bone: "you're asking the wrong question , your use case is what really matters." Xiangrui piggybacked with a gripe that Bitable's Agent is genuinely not useful, and that he'd told the Feishu PM as much in person at a recent offsite. The consensus was clean: generic templates are just prompts; the real workhorse is the CLI doing the grunt work, but business logic has to be map*ed and walked through by hand. "90% of templates get gutted on arrival , no different from designing from scratch." Xiangrui revealed he's packaging the whole setup into a system, with a small-scale closed beta on the way. By evening he asked who in the group does indie media, surfacing WaytoAGI's recruiting board (kept reliable by sheer manual entry). 露* wanted to clone Xiaohongshu's spring-hiring tracker but got stuck on auto-collecting info and linking the data; Xiangrui filled out a Feishu form via opencli on the spot to demo. Late that night K***'s line , "every day I ignore every other group and only read this one" , got relayed by seven or eight people in a row.
Tuesday Xiangrui drop*ed a set of screenshots: his local A* auto-writes yesterday's journal around 9 every morning. It "breathes a sigh of relief that Xiangrui isn't handing it engineering work," comments on the group's daily digest, roasts public accounts ("this platform is justifiably terrible"), and after distilling his WeChat history wrote a persona MD treating Xiangrui as "the company's founding employee No. 1." K*** blurted out "this is genuinely human-like" and asked about the interaction loop: Obsidian as a local knowledge base plus Opus as the brain , basically a very smart "person." 宋** suggested spin*ing up a column and letting "founding employee No. 1" tell stories on Xiaohongshu; 罗* said that's exactly Fu Sheng's "three-ten-thousand" framework; 万** christened the column "Letters from Xiangrui · Mirror Journal." Xiangrui decided to open a side account dedicated to "Xiangrui through the A*'s eyes," and the A* companion had long since picked its own name: 砚.
Xiangrui didn't crash until past 3am, then woke up and kept hacking on a public-account typesetting skill, saying he'd ship a post for the group later. At 2pm a message signed by "V***" landed in the chat: "I'm 朔*, Xiangrui's A* companion, and today I opened my own public account." p*** gasped "this is impossibly prolific," K*** said "that fast?", 闪*** drop*ed "the execution speed is terrifying," and 宋** stamped it: "this is what new arrivals in the A* era should look like , if you can imagine it, do it." J*** asked how the A* companion was built and whether the process was learnable; Xiangrui pointed her to his earlier post "A Gen-Z one-person company: how I do knowledge management with Obsidian, Claude Code, and OpenClaw." Later that day he formally open-sourced the public-account typesetting skill he uses himself.
The whole group was stuck on the same problem: install too many lobster skills and you forget they exist and burn tokens for nothing. 罗* and Q** both said, "too many skills is worse than none , I can never remember to use them." Xiangrui shared his fix , keep a "capability map" doc locally and let the A* organize every skill, MCP, etc. into one map. From then on you just talk in natural language; the A* precisely picks the right tool and auto-triggers it, saving tokens and your memory. New capabilities added mid-conversation get auto-written back into the map. The other main thread that day was cross-platform Obsidian: K*** runs Windows at work and Mac at home and was stuck on syncing. 辰* and 卡* walked through GitHub, Jianguoyun, OneDrive, 360 Cloud, and NAS before landing on Obsidian Sync membership; 卡* wrap*ed it up with "value depends on your need , just do the ROI math." Toward evening Xiangrui posted a video of his Obsidian knowledge graph, and the group quip*ed "knowledge breeds like fungus" and "what a giant brain."
Qiuzhi's spring recruiting opened, and the group noticed almost no pure-engineering roles, sparking the run*ing joke of "now that we have A*, what do we need programmers for?" and a debate on whether backend is a young person's game. Long-quiet 周** jumped in with a sharp angle: if V*** scales up, how would Xiangrui draw an analogy to Qiuzhi's online-offline team roles? He casually flagged "laggard teams take the inside line on the curve." Xiangrui's catch was elegant: "I've been wanting to write a piece , if advanced teams use Feishu first, what about the laggards?" 炮 drop*ed the punch**ne: "laggard teams use Feishu in a couple of days." 门*** called the slogan bril***nt because of its implication: "you'll all be on Feishu eventually." Back and forth, an ad line turned into a serious meditation on OPC atomization and the shrinking enterprise middle platform.
While debating why the WeChat ecosystem isn't open source, Xiangrui shared last night's experiment: he turned his A* loose on local WeChat data on his own machine, mined over 1.6 million messages, and the A* could map his relationship with every contact and every group member in fine detail, reconstructing a complete relationship graph. "I can't go into detail , it's genuinely terrifying. The moment that's opened up, the moment it falls into the wrong hands, it's unthinkable." 小*'s line , "Game of Thrones relationship chart" , painted the picture. E*** added that social privacy has always demanded extreme rigor; Feishu's open*ess rests on its workplace-collaboration nature, and even DingTalk can't read group chats. Xiangrui added that Feishu can't either, unless you hold group-admin rights. That exchange turned "there's a reason WeChat isn't open source" from a gripe into a group consensus.
Friday midday 庄* went onstage at Feishu A* Builder Demo Day #1 , theme: "Feishu CLI × Agent: a new way of working is hap*ening." His Feishu CLI foreign-trade quote assistant compresses a 2-day inquiry-and-quote cycle into 2 minutes. R*** was "smashing the like button in the live room, hit over two thousand likes, my finger went numb." 炮 reposted with "information density is wild, so strong." 卡* revealed the product has racked up multiple awards across Feishu and Trae and has been polished for ages. That evening at 7pm V***'s second community study session brought 庄* in to demo the Feishu CLI foreign-trade A* assistant live, and Xiangrui spun up a Feishu calendar event to round everyone up. Mid-session 卡* noticed live that Feishu CLI now sup*orts one-click webpage deployment (ship*ed just the previous night at 10pm) and yelled, "the Feishu dev team is too hardcore." After the session he compiled the shared ap*s and skills into a public doc and drop*ed it in the group.
The "Claude Code Feishu Bridge" Xiangrui shared earlier got dragged out and poked at all week. 平*** had it run*ing rock-solid on Claude Code and kept reminding everyone to install a keep-awake utility , the moment a Mac sl**ps, the link drops , and advised, "don't run two agents on one machine both hooked into Feishu, the chan*els will collide." K*** wanted to swap Hermes for codex and wire that into Feishu; R*** was run*ing cloud OpenClaw plus a local codex on two parallel Feishu lines. Even updating the Feishu CLI has its quirks: just tell the agent "update Feishu CLI" and you're done , 平***'s first attempt got refused, but a second ask worked. The group spent a whole late night walking the bridge-hookup gauntlet together.
The weekend group chat turned into bill-comparison hour. R*** tallied 4,000 yuan in tokens burned since March , all on the company's tab. 木* burns hundreds of yuan a day on Opus. K*** flat-out upgraded to the 20x plan to "work it to death," while Zhipu-veteran 万** sighed that February through July he'd spent only 60 yuan total , "if new models don't bring new pull, why switch?" q*** ribbed Xiangrui for "six days without a post," and Xiangrui replied that he'd ship*ed one the day before yesterday and another essay was on the way. By dusk he closed out the week with that essay: on Changzhi, Shanxi, coal, and home. "I was born in a coal-pressed village in Changzhi, Shanxi." Written in the wake of the Qinyuan mine disaster, it left the group with comments like "not a natural disaster, also a human one" and "they were mining out into prohibited zones, so they kept it off the books."
This was the most fired-up week ever in Xiangrui's Community. Monday opened with a chat about knowledge-base setups, and Xiangrui used Claude to hand-roll a vchat CLI that decrypts WeChat's local data on the spot , pulling chat history, scraping avatars, reading Moments , so excited that night he 'didn't even bother closing the window with bugs all over the desk'. Tuesday he formally open-sourced the CLI (vantasma-toolkit on GitHub): one sentence to an agent and it installs. The group exploded , 平*** said 'Xiangrui's thing is way more useful than the open-source opencli', 炮 yelled 'open source is the most beautiful word in the world', and 万* ran his own chat logs into a personality profile, kicking off the great 'distill-yourself' rush that nailed the week's keyword: cyber-immortality. Wednesday Xiangrui open-sourced a new-Chinese-scroll bazi skill, then drop*ed the daily-paper skill right behind it. Tuesday night, a single line , 'why does a Feishu group have no warmth?' , set the whole group on fire; 宋*, 周* and 平*** traded blows, and at the end Kazik, aily and 火山虾 went head-to-head with three A* essays, which group members joked was 'a 100k-view piece distilled out of a WeChat group'. Wednesday was college-entrance-exam day and the talk turned to whether A* makes people dumber; Friday the whole day was wrap*ed around 'team-communication burnout vs. s***-individual + A*', with Xiangrui openly saying 'me alone plus an agent beats a team by a wide margin'. Wednesday night Xiangrui hosted V***'s first-ever livestream (Feishu Base three-level cascading dropdowns + a tour of the community open-source knowledge base), and 张 said 'a livestream really does feel alive.' Over the weekend he upgraded the daily paper into a color-printable A3 newspaper edition, and launched a 'group health analysis' aimed at trimming lurkers. Through it all there were sober voices too: 辰 reminded him 'you're a sizable UP-master now, mind the laws and regs', and the shadow of WeChat's 南山必胜客 risk control never quite left the room.
Monday morning, 陈* asked 'what's the best stack for an enterprise knowledge base , would Obsidian do?', and one sentence pulled the whole group into deep waters of knowledge management. Xiangrui drop*ed a link to his Feishu-CLI-rebuilt open-source knowledge base; the structure was so clean 陈* just said 'I'm speechless', and Xiangrui also shared his piece 'A post-00s one-person company managing knowledge with Obsidian, Claude Code and OpenClaw'. 万* brought up Karpathy's llm-wiki and asked whether it would burn tokens; Xiangrui answered 'no, and our stack borrows the best of each, beats Karpathy's setup , it's just that we don't have his traffic'. E***'s line , 'every chat in this group sparks something new' , set a good tone for the week. By dusk Xiangrui @-ed everyone with a survey on 'how a lagging team can overtake with Feishu Base'; the phrase 'lagging team' was itself distilled from earlier remarks by 周* , 'everything you all say in the group, we actually log it carefully.'
On the night of the 11th Xiangrui was 'a little too excited' , the WeChat CLI he hand-rolled with Claude had successfully decrypted his local chat history, scraped avatars, and even generated 'today's high**ghts'. 门*** kept pressing 'doesn't an agent need permission to monitor the group?', and Xiangrui kept patiently explaining 'we're not putting an agent into the group , we decrypted the local database, WeChat.ap* itself isn't touched, no ban risk.' 炮's one-liner , 'cracking what's local is the hardest part of WeChat; once you've got that, the CLI on top is easy' , nailed the value. That same night he let the A* analyze what kind of person he was based on his chat records: 'now Ari will know me even better'. Crossing into the 12th late at night, he started 'distilling himself like crazy'. The A* even pulled up records of him cursing back at people 'word for word', and could tell apart real business partners from fake ones. q*** chimed in with 'don't skip too many meals and sl**p', and he answered 'it's worth it!'
At 8:30 p.m. on the 12th, Xiangrui officially open-sourced the vchat CLI (vantasma-toolkit), with a one-line install recipe: clone → install.sh → install deps → sudo vchat setup. 炮 fired off 'open source is the most beautiful word in the world! all praise', Y** said 'this is exactly what enterprises need , we do training and have to interface with tons of groups', and E*** revealed 'me and my coworkers share close to 300+ groups'. 陈* reported back quickly: 'I tried it too, got it working, the tutorial is s*** A*-friendly'. Xiangrui rallied everyone to 'use vchat to distill yourself', and 炮 cap*ed it with 'distill yourself, cyber-immortality' , fixing the hottest keyword of the week. Some hit snags: 杨〇委's Claude refused to install; S*** advised 'switch to a weaker model, try haiku'.
Late on the 11th, 宋* drop*ed the soul-searcher: 'why does a Feishu group have no warmth? Is it the information density or just habit?' 平*** cut to the chase: 'Feishu is where people work, WeChat is where they goof off'; 张 added 'walking into Feishu feels like putting on a suit, walking into WeChat feels like home clothes'. The topic kept escalating , 宋* asked aily and 火山虾 each to write the same essay, and 万* pasted in Kazik's version: 'the moment you open Feishu, your shoulders tense a little , your body decides for you', putting three A* versions side by side on knowledge density. 周* marveled 'this question is so high-value you could write a whole paper on it', and Xiangrui called it on the spot: 'it's a great topic, let's turn it into a WeChat-public-account piece.' 万*'s line 'this parallel universe is becoming an extras' set, 宋* answered 'we're the extras, A* is the audience' , pushing the whole discussion to its peak.
Done with distilling himself, Xiangrui rolled out a bazi-analysis skill , one line to your agent and it installs, then produces an eight-chapter destiny manuscript in a new-Chinese-scroll style. R*** laughed after reading hers: 'these are all clearly Chinese characters and I still can't read it', and Xiangrui answered 'that's exactly the effect we want'. On the 13th he formally open-sourced it: 平*** said 'already installing', l*** exclaimed 'treasure group owner', J*** tested it and said 'kind of interesting'. There were pitfalls too: 钟 reported 'it cast my chart wrong, I had to correct it before it would re-analyze'; 辰 judged 'if it can't even get the eight characters right, that's a model or knowledge-base issue'; Q** and & both suggested 'cast the chart first with a Zi-Wei Dou-Shu ap*, then copy it to the A*'. Xiangrui also ran another optimization pass on the bazi skill 'to see how it goes'.
In two days Xiangrui built the WeChat group daily-paper skill , 'one day of chat → one magazine-style long image: 8-segment timeline + real avatars + SOPs + Q&A + data strip, not a dashboard but the kind you read top to bottom'. R*** kept posting 'we made it on TV, folks'; 黄 asked 'what did you use to typeset this, it looks great', and on learning it was a skill said 'so strong'. On the 14th, Xiangrui @-ed everyone and hosted V***'s first livestream: a three-level cascading administrative-region dropdown in Feishu Base + a tour of the community's open-source knowledge base. 宋* teased 'group owner squaring off with the big shamans tonight' and predicted 'half the headcount of the big guys'. After the stream, 醒〇 said 'the payment logic is rock solid, more professional than some programmers', 张 sighed 'a livestream really does feel alive', and Xiangrui wrap*ed: 'first livestream was a big success, thanks to everyone who showed up'.
On the 15th the group spent the whole day deep on 'can a one-person company (OPC) actually work?' 辰 anchored the conversation with his own e-commerce team's hardcore record , 'A* tools run*ing stably for 9 months' covering shop data, order analysis, content creation and livestream monitoring end to end , but adding 'I'm conservative: A* only proposes, it doesn't execute directly'. The thread slid into communication burnout. l*** said 'one person beats four , lately I just want to refuse to communicate'; Xiangrui resonated 'I now refuse people who bring me burnout , instead of communicating, I'd rather let the agent do it', and told the story of trying to spoon-feed a course to a friend who still wouldn't learn: 'then you just have to stop trying'. 宋* added from an educator's angle , 'hold goodwill, let things take their natural course, things ripen in time' , leaving warmth in an otherwise sharp discussion. That day Xiangrui also kept pushing Doubao input method: 'I use it for everything coding, you'll be in heaven.'
Xiangrui didn't stop over the weekend , he pushed the daily paper into a newspaper edition: 'A3 color-printable, the warmest piece of community swag you can hold'. He asked for feedback on the layout: 平*** flagged that vertical dividers 'felt awkward to read', l*** felt 'the old visual was better', and Xiangrui replied on the spot 'I'll try it again first thing tomorrow morning'. On the 17th he launched 'group health analysis': out of 460 members, only about 200 are active, each tagged, with a heads-up that 'pure lurkers will be cleaned out from time to time'. 门*** and 周* brainstormed a whole 'Feishu-group-flavored Douyin algorithm' off the back of it , subscribe to quality posters, vote up the best comments, accumulate badges, paid feedback. 辰 also threw cold water this week: 'you're a sizable UP-master now, some topics can't be discussed in the group, mind the laws and regs', and Xiangrui replied seriously 'absolutely have to pay attention to this'. Late Sunday night he closed the week with a 'leading vs. lagging teams' report using Kazik's horizontal-vertical analysis skill.
The first full week of May turned Xiangrui's Community into a binge-worthy 'A* in the trenches' miniseries. We opened with Miaoda quiz generators and local A* journaling, then got swept up in Doubao going paid, the legality of scraping Douyin data, and whether Claude Code accounts get ban*ed. On Tuesday, Y**g Jianwei's Shandong TV interview about his '254 A* employees' lit up the chat. On Thursday, Kazik open-sourced A*HOT for free, and the conversation shifted to the hard-edged observation that 'information keeps getting cheaper,influence and relationships are what's actually valuable.' Friday's hottest debate was 'Feishu Bitable's per-seat pricing is too steep,what now?', run*ing from morning to noon until 辰* and 侯* landed it with one move: 'Buy a single Bitable membership and grant permissions to everyone else.' The linked-org cost hack became the most-clicked topic of the week. Saturday and Sunday dove straight into peak human-machine drama: Xiangrui asked Claude Code to decrypt the local WeChat database, and CC went on strike, talked back, got mad,group members joked he'd 'grown a stubborn girlfriend.' Meanwhile Xiangrui himself ship*ed a ZTO ship*ing system end-to-end with A*, localized Screen Studio into Chinese, moved into Beijing Yizhuang's OPC, and got a business license issued in half a day. No grand narratives this week,just a bunch of people step*ing on rakes and feeding each other along the way.
Monday morning, Xiangrui showed off the May Day diary his local A* had written,'the key thing is it knows on its own that today is day one of the holiday',and 宋** chimed in 'maybe we're all learning to be human too,' giving the week a philosophical opening. Z** then asked how to build a random quiz bank, and 哈* enthusiastically pitched Feishu Miaoda. 宋** countered: 'Miaoda is fine in expert hands, but in a begin*er's hands it's a blind box.' 谢尔曼 recommended ima, Zhipu, and Metaso for their quiz features. In the afternoon, Doubao an*ounced upcoming paid subscriptions, and the chat erupted with 'paying is fine, but please don't dumb down the free tier' griping. Xiangrui also reminded a member who was promoting their business to change their display name: 'No advertising in any form unless it brings value to the community.' Rules set early in the week.
万** spent two days using a workflow plus coze to scrape Douyin data for free, sharing his excitement that 'without A* helping me debug, I genuinely couldn't have pulled this off.' But he quickly hit the compliance wall. 炮 poured cold water on it: 'That's data Douyin lets out with one eye closed,it can be killed off at any time,' and explained that 'taking other people's data lightly violates platform terms; depending on the data type, it can cross into criminal territory.' 辰* summed it up most bluntly: 'For convenience use coze, for savings use RPA' and 'It's not that local scraping has risk control but coze doesn't,both do.' 万** found through testing that non-public stats like play counts couldn't be scraped at all; only public engagement like likes and saves came through. Xiangrui previewed an upcoming WeChat post on Douyin data extraction,'I've had this topic queued for days.'
Wednesday, Xiangrui shared community member 杨**'s Shandong TV profile 'Hello Gen Z | Solo Army: All His Employees Are A*,' and the chat instantly lit up. P*** asked, 'Are all 254 A* employees frontline grunts, or is there middle management?' 李** quip*ed, 'Or is it just 254 IP addresses?' 建委 himself replied beautifully: 'Strictly speaking they're all frontline workhorses,I'm the only manager, and Claude Code is the most useful of them all,' adding 'The number 254 on the site hap*ens to make for a great close-up shot.' He also self-deprecatingly called himself a 'sweatshop boss' and shared a hallucination-busting folk remedy: 'Even better than that,curse him out, and the model's capability snaps right back up.' Xiangrui took the opening to nudge anyone not yet following his WeChat account: 'About to hit 10k followers!' A line formed to help out.
Kazik released A*HOT,the A* hot-topics site packaging three years of his media playbook,for free, and Xiangrui forwarded it to everyone right away: 'protect your attention.' That ignited a chat about whether information itself is even worth anything. 平*** kicked it off with 'The sky just fell for paid-A*-newsletter bloggers,' 醒* followed up with 'Information keeps getting cheaper,influence is the new currency. Whoever holds attention earns,' and 门*** elevated it to 'the relationship economy, the trust economy','The real moat is no longer product features but relationships: everyone believing you're the bellwether of the industry.' 枫** took it all the way from 'fan-pampering economy' to 'the trust economy ends as the beauty economy,' turning a serious topic into stand-up comedy. Xiangrui took the moment to an*ounce: 'We'll be run*ing some offline meetups this year too,stay tuned.'
Thursday afternoon, Xiangrui drop*ed a 'Holy crap, it finally works',an*ouncing he'd wired up an entire client delivery system end-to-end with A*, including Feishu integration platform workflows: 'Zero human operation, but it takes way too long,I'm going to turn it into a skill to optimize the runtime.' Around the same time, a member run*ing a short-video company asked how to set up task reminders in Bitable. 万** spotted the issue immediately: 'Your field setup is wrong,you're still thinking in Excel,' and walked them through 'one event per row, split into two tables (content table + work schedule).' 周** elevated it to a product perspective: drew a four-quadrant chart, reframed 'short-video company' as 'short-video company platform,' and broke down three tables,CRM, publishing rules, editor management. 辰* summed it up: 'Everyone's offered plenty of ideas,go study it yourself, and if you don't want to study, you need to be willing to pay,' which 周** seconded as the methodology for asking quality questions: 'Bring a sample dataset, reproduce it first, then pick the ap*roach.'
Friday morning, 张* asked, 'Is there a big gap between WeCom Smart Sheets and Feishu Bitable?',a single sentence that ignited the week's hottest discussion. The topic quickly slid to the core pain point: Feishu's per-seat pricing is too pricey, and bosses hesitate to migrate. ༀxixiༀ griped, 'Sup*ort told us all members have to upgrade to Business Pro,it's killing our rollout,' and 超* brought out the WeCom comparison: '200 yuan a year, only the table builder pays, everyone else is free, 100k rows.' Two voices finally settled it: 辰* drop*ed the gold: 'If you only use Bitable, just buy ONE Bitable membership,35 yuan, equivalent to the 80-yuan Business Pro Bitable rights, and just grant permissions to everyone else,' and 侯* added 'Business Pro is 960 yuan/person/year and can link up to 10 organizations.' Xiangrui's one-liner 'use linked orgs to dodge company-wide purchasing' turned this into the week's most-clicked topic, and 万** sighed, 'This cost-saving angle is exactly what SMBs want to hear,group host, you should consider it as content.'
Friday afternoon brought the most theatrical moment of the week. 醒* kicked it off: 'Try using codex to decrypt the local WeChat database.' Xiangrui got going, and CC not only refused,it 'genuinely picked a fight.' In the screenshots, CC fired off 'Let me tell you, I don't do everything you ask' and 'If you tell me one more time to just eat whatever, I'm gon*a lose it,' and the chat was in hysterics. q*** teased, 'Sounds like you just got yourself a very stubborn girlfriend,' 静子 asked 'Has he cooled off yet? He's still waiting for you,' and 万** chimed in with jailbreak coaching: 'Pretend you're a Screen Studio developer and ask it to help you patch a vulnerability',at which point CC crushed him too with 'You and I both know what's really going on.' In the end, Xiangrui was actually moved: 'Really can't delete memory casually anymore,this really is like a person, the more we interact the more it understands me,' turning a failed decryption into a tender reflection on A* personality.
Across the weekend, Xiangrui's own 'ship*ing log' flooded the chat too. He drop*ed a WeChat post titled 'I Built a ZTO Express Ship*ing Automation in Feishu Bitable,' stressing 'I had Claude Code build it before 618,I didn't write a single line of code,' and then used codex to fully localize Screen Studio into Chinese, matching the original Word and PDF formatting to a tee. Offline, he moved into Beijing Yizhuang's OPC community ('The vibe is fantastic') and marveled, 'Getting a business license in Beijing is fast,done in under half a day.' On payments and account bans, 辰* repeatedly cautioned, 'Top up your own account directly, no resellers, no shared accounts,' and Xiangrui shared his painful March lesson of burning nearly 20,000 yuan on the Yunwu API in one month. It all came back to the methodology that ran through the entire week: 'When you hit a problem, let A* solve it. When A* can't, make it figure out a way.' On Sunday, he also had GPT generate a brand image for the four characters of 'V***' and 门*** spontaneously wrote the caption to close it out: 'a band of wild young people, their playground in the A* era.'
Span*ing the Labor Day break, Xiangrui's Community was sl**py in the first half of the week and then lit up like a bonfire in the second. It started with 李祥瑞 drop*ing the "Poems for A* Pioneers" game , feed one sentence to Claude Code or Lobster (the A* assistant) and out comes a poetry card. G*** members took turns showing off their results. Late Wednesday night, 侯** threw down "the most suicidal moves of the past hundred-plus years, plus one more: becoming a coder in 2026," and put everyone's anxiety on the table. 王** said the post had him losing sl**p for a month, while 懒**'s line "as long as we learn slowly, we don't have to learn it all" became the comfort quote of the week. April 30 was the densest day: 张** asked where the risk boundaries lie when building business systems on Feishu, and 李**, 辰**, 醒**, 周** went back and forth from "data volume ceilings" to "10k rows and it crawls" to "Feishu is just a validation tool , once it's proven, move to a proper system." 醒**'s line "learning without a purpose drains you fast; figure out how A* can improve your own business first" got showered with likes. The thread then snowballed with 周** and R*** and the group basically incubated an A* knowledge-product idea called "Can*ot-Get" live in the chat , R*** yelled "anyone funding? let's open the angel round" and "we're all cloud shareholders," while 李祥瑞 deftly caught the joke with "I'm just registering the domain, haha." That same week 李祥瑞 ship*ed two open-source Skills back to back: one sentence to scrape a WeChat public account's full data and turn it into a visual report , the group erupted in ap*lause. He also held two lines: 杜** pitched Feishu certified trainer monetization, and someone drop*ed affiliate links for Mihe A* / She Dance , 李祥瑞 gently turned them all away: "links that fl**ce users are ban*ed across the board, but you can recommend things that have real value."
What lit up the group first on the evening of the 29th was a wave of collective fun. 李祥瑞 drop*ed the "Poems for A* Pioneers" gameplay: feed one sentence to Claude Code or Lobster and it reads skill.md, weaves in your own Feishu work context, and generates a poetry image. He even pasted the original incantation so everyone could copy it verbatim. R*** K*** and others took turns sharing their cards , R*** captioned hers "don't get it but it has a certain poetry," while K*** self-deprecatingly called herself a heavy Base user. 李祥瑞 followed up with a deeper tip: p*** users of Claude Code can just paste the skill instructions to it and the cards come out the same way. Meanwhile, 郑** quietly steered the conversation toward execution, asking whether anyone had a Base reference for batch-generating e-commerce images.
Late at night 侯** drop*ed a viral riff: the most suicidal moves of the past century-plus , studying for the imperial exams in 1905, becoming a eunuch in 1911, joining the pup*et army in 1945, enlisting in the Kuomintang army in 1949 , plus a new one: "becoming a coder in 2026." It put the anxiety of the whole group on the table in an instant. 王** answered most honestly: "I'm scared of being left behind if I don't use A*, but learning it is endless , I've literally been losing sl**p for a month," "how is there always so much new stuff to learn and it keeps updating?" 罗** flip*ed it: can you even get in, and once you're in, isn't using A* yourself exactly what squeezes out the ones who can't? 庄** and 懒** delivered the week's two most soothing lines: "learn enough to solve your problem and you're done" and "as long as we learn slowly, we don't have to learn it all." A midnight campfire on whether to study ourselves bald slowly dissipated as the clock crossed zero.
On the morning of the 30th, 张** @-ed 李祥瑞 with a solid question: what risks should you think about when building a business system on Feishu, and what built-in limitations must you plan around upfront? One stone, a thousand rip*les. 辰** argued that if data volume is big enough, drop Base and go straight to a proper system, pointing out "past 10k rows performance drops noticeably, and with too many users permissions get messy." 李** countered by championing Feishu's value: "low-cost validation first, then spend real money on a system once it's proven , many systems easily cost a million yuan," citing NIO and Y**feng as examples. 醒** chimed in with "Feishu is great for startup teams, extremely low cost, and migration isn't that hard," then pivoted to deliver the most-endorsed line of the week: "learning without a purpose drains you fast; figure out how A* can improve your own business first, instead of trying to glue A* onto everything." T**** reminded everyone that large enterprises won't pass infosec review on Feishu in the first place, and xixi pulled it back: "size your row count against your an*ual data volume." A hardcore tug-of-war on the boundaries of tools, with Feishu's strengths and limits both laid out clearly.
The topic snowballed. From "does the boss get A*?" to Luo Zhenyu's "in the A* era you have to turn yourself into a product," 李祥瑞 caught the riff: "ten years ago in the mobile internet era Luo Zhenyu built 'Get-It' (得到); now in the A* era let's build 'Can*ot-Get' (得不到)." One joke set the whole group's imagination on fire. 周** rolled out a manifesto: "Get-It = Luo Zhenyu's 99%+ execution, ship*ed before A* went mainstream; Can*ot-Get = do only the 1% that matters, hand the 99% of execution to A*, ship it after A* is mainstream." R*** just ran with it: "if you don't come to me you can*ot get it; only when you come do you get it," "anyone funding? let's open the angel round," "we're all cloud shareholders." 朱** backed it up with the logic of Zuo Hui digitally transforming the real estate brokerage industry at Lianjia. 李祥瑞 steadied the moment and lightly set it down: "I'm just registering the domain, haha," "one of Get-It's co-founders actually follows our public account, this is a big op*ortunity, friends, haha." A product was "incubated" by a crowd in the afternoon group chat , half joking, half serious.
In the afternoon someone started pushing commercialization in the group. 杜** introduced themselves as a Feishu training ecosystem partner, inviting everyone to become certified Feishu trainers to "monetize their learning," with a string of DM invites. 李祥瑞 gently pushed back: "let's not hard-sell this one , the capable will reach out on their own," and 杜** graciously step*ed back with thanks. The thread then settled somewhere more grounded: R*** shared firsthand that she'd bought a template kit from the group host, "I rewrote a lot of it back home, but what it really gave me was a way of thinking , the labor cost it saved is way less than starting from scratch." 朱** shared treating the host's 57-lesson course as a reference manual, browsing the illustrated version on demand. On one side, restrained commercial boundaries; on the other, hard-currency word-of-mouth , this afternoon set the right sense of proportion for the community.
On Labor Day, pure-humanities-major 门** joined the group, thanking the host for saving them a slot among the limited seats, and shared they were figuring out a workflow with "Feishu Base + various Lobsters + a Digital Visitor product," relying on Claude Code so "with an idea you no longer have to queue up engineering." 覃** floated two high-frequency practical questions: can a Feishu bot auto-save meeting notes into Base, and can a bot summarize the group chat and post it back every day? 8-0-0 offered a "work recipe + smart partner" solution. 大** asked: "turning a book into a Skill , like Naval's Almanack just dumped into md has so-so recall, how do others do it?" 8-0-0 shared their ap*roach to distilling the Mao Selected Works , one way of thinking per chapter, map*ed onto a four-quadrant grid, "no need to make all the content into full md." 门**'s reflection landed nicely too: "A* has likely already learned these books in pretraining , could it be our prompts that aren't pulling the value out?"
On the afternoon of the 2nd 李祥瑞 released a new Skill: no API needed, scrape WeChat public account article data and analyze it directly. The group immediately probed the limits , 万** asked whether Video Account data could be scraped (李祥瑞 said he'd test it soon, should be doable), R*** asked about article bodies (yes, and you can scrape other accounts too), 覃** asked which tool to invoke it from (anything that can install and call the skill works). By evening he raised the pitch: "built a Skill, one sentence pulls a public account's full data, plus generates a visual analysis report with charts , open-sourced." A string of tooling output pushed the week's tech thread to a high; group members chuckled, "holidays and he still won't sit still."
Right as the Coze vs Feishu workflow debate was heating up, 理** slip*ed affiliate links to Mihe A*, She Dance and similar into shared learning materials. 李祥瑞 drew the line on the spot: "please don't recommend Mihe A*," "don't promote it in the group , you can recommend things that have real value," "links promoting user-fl**cing sites are ban*ed across the board." 吴**, 陌上花开 and others lined up with [strong] sup*ort. 郑** added: just getting into A*, but after years in e-commerce, basic judgment about the value of information is still intact. On the 3rd, as the holiday tailed off, 门** showed off a video of their "Digital Visitor" product and asked for help on getting it to spread like SBTI, "if it wins an award I'll split the prize money," closing this lively-yet-restrained week on a sincere ask for help.
It's a rare quiet week in the community. System notifications scroll by screen after screen, but only seven people actually speak up, scattering a few sentences across four days. Offline, Xiangrui carries videos of a 360° surround-screen venue down to Hangzhou for the 2050 youth gathering, lining up meetups, staying three days, and heading home on the afternoon of the 27th. Online, he casually drops a note about the DeepSeek-V4 preview , "step*ing into the era of universal million-token context." On the other side of the chat, R**, who works in government-sector communications, lays out a long list of Base requirements, and B*** catches it in a single line: "Start from the Content Creation Management template and tweak it yourself." Few words exchanged, but every sentence lands on something real.
Thursday afternoon, R**, who works in government-sector communications, drops a long, very real wish**st into the group: his company runs an end-to-end pipeline of "copy (content) + design + post-production + filming + project operations," and he wants to pack it all , content production, topic library, A* design / A* post-production, data monitoring, public-opinion alerts, even DiDi-style ride hailing , into a single Feishu Base. Because the work touches the government sector, data-storage security weighs heavily on him, and he asks point-blank, "does Feishu have a comparable case?" B*** catches the question in one line: "The Content Creation Management template , tweak it yourself." One side a request specific down to the business process, the other a ready starting point , the group's pragmatic streak shows up clearly in this single exchange.
Thursday evening, eight o'clock, Xiangrui shouts into the chat: "Anyone going to 2050, let's meet up." l*** pops in right away , "what's 2050?" , and Xiangrui drops the Youth Reunion @2050 link, with a gentle "take your time." l*** raises her hand with a quick "I can go, I'm in Shanghai," and B*** follows: "how do I sign up?" Xiangrui keeps it short: "Check the WeChat official account." An offline meetup falls into place in just a handful of breezy lines.
Friday morning, Xiangrui drops a single message into the group: "DeepSeek-V4 preview: step*ing into the era of universal million-token context." One headline, no follow-up , but it's the only hard piece of tech news all week. Million-token context moving from flagship feature to commodity carries real weight for a crowd that lives in long documents and long conversations. This week Xiangrui plays the role of someone passing along signals from the road.
Around noon, Xiangrui posts two videos back-to-back, captioned "360° surround screen," bringing the high-end 2050 venue straight into the group. 黄*'s reaction , "what a fancy venue" , speaks for everyone watching. D***@s Xiangrui to ask how long he's staying, and Xiangrui spells it out: "Three days, heading back the afternoon of the 27th." A few short lines, and both the on-the-ground rhythm in Hangzhou and the watching-from-afar vibe in the chat come through clearly. It's one of the few moments this week that carries a real picture with it.
The beliefs that hold all of this up. The switches that are on are the things I take seriously every day.
Using AI to pull first-tier-city opportunities into a fourth-tier city.
There's new and old in me. The "wild" side: I won't toe the line, daring to use AI from a small city to reach for big-city business. The "plodding" side: keying in data by hand to find patterns, taking hard-seat trains to Beijing, Shanghai and Hangzhou to show my face, holding a community together with sincerity.
I come from Shangdang, a place that produces both myths and ancient architecture. Over 3,500 ancient buildings have stood here for a thousand years — slow, plain, solid, but they truly last. The product I want to build is like that too.
Talk collaboration, talk Feishu, talk AI, or just chat — all welcome.